Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method

BACKGROUND In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup. STUDY DESIGN AND...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2019-10, Vol.59 (10), p.3264-3274
Hauptverfasser: Krog, Grethe Risum, Rieneck, Klaus, Clausen, Frederik Banch, Steffensen, Rudi, Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3274
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3264
container_title Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)
container_volume 59
creator Krog, Grethe Risum
Rieneck, Klaus
Clausen, Frederik Banch
Steffensen, Rudi
Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld
description BACKGROUND In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We developed 35 competitive allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes. RESULTS We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen‐negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction. CONCLUSION We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping‐only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost‐efficient than previous technologies.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/trf.15474
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273753806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2273753806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-ef878c994b129cc7cb5fd2a46cdc1200e75c6af1a725a90e7bda136f7d9838513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun4c_AMS8KKHupmk2bTedPELFgRZvYY0SbuVbrMmrbL_3qxVD4JzGYb34WF4EToGcgFxxp0vL4CnIt1CI-BMJDTP-TYaEZJCAsDoHtoP4ZUQQnMCu2iPQQocCB-hl-vGOYMr7_oVrmzruvWqbivsSlx8Jca1zodL_K6a2qiudu0mU3hRV4tmjZXWvVedxVHQ1a3FS9stnDlEO6Vqgj363gfo-fZmPr1PZo93D9OrWaIZZ2liy0xkOs_TAmiutdAFLw1V6UQbDZQQK7ieqBKUoFzl8SyMAjYphckzlnFgB-hs8K68e-tt6OSyDto2jWqt64OkVDDBWUYmET39g7663rfxO0kZoYwBTbNInQ-U9i4Eb0u58vVS-bUEIjdly1i2_Co7siffxr5YWvNL_rQbgfEAfNSNXf9vkvOn20H5CbOyiFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2302331248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Krog, Grethe Risum ; Rieneck, Klaus ; Clausen, Frederik Banch ; Steffensen, Rudi ; Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creator><creatorcontrib>Krog, Grethe Risum ; Rieneck, Klaus ; Clausen, Frederik Banch ; Steffensen, Rudi ; Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We developed 35 competitive allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes. RESULTS We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen‐negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction. CONCLUSION We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping‐only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost‐efficient than previous technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/trf.15474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31415105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Blood &amp; organ donations ; Blood donors ; Blood groups ; Blood transfusion ; Erythrocytes ; Genotypes ; Genotyping ; New technology ; Phenotypes ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Predictions ; Serology ; Serotyping ; Transfusion</subject><ispartof>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019-10, Vol.59 (10), p.3264-3274</ispartof><rights>2019 AABB</rights><rights>2019 AABB.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-ef878c994b129cc7cb5fd2a46cdc1200e75c6af1a725a90e7bda136f7d9838513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-ef878c994b129cc7cb5fd2a46cdc1200e75c6af1a725a90e7bda136f7d9838513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9663-8476 ; 0000-0001-8034-1523</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftrf.15474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftrf.15474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31415105$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krog, Grethe Risum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieneck, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Frederik Banch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffensen, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creatorcontrib><title>Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method</title><title>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We developed 35 competitive allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes. RESULTS We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen‐negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction. CONCLUSION We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping‐only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost‐efficient than previous technologies.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Blood &amp; organ donations</subject><subject>Blood donors</subject><subject>Blood groups</subject><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Serotyping</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><issn>0041-1132</issn><issn>1537-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun4c_AMS8KKHupmk2bTedPELFgRZvYY0SbuVbrMmrbL_3qxVD4JzGYb34WF4EToGcgFxxp0vL4CnIt1CI-BMJDTP-TYaEZJCAsDoHtoP4ZUQQnMCu2iPQQocCB-hl-vGOYMr7_oVrmzruvWqbivsSlx8Jca1zodL_K6a2qiudu0mU3hRV4tmjZXWvVedxVHQ1a3FS9stnDlEO6Vqgj363gfo-fZmPr1PZo93D9OrWaIZZ2liy0xkOs_TAmiutdAFLw1V6UQbDZQQK7ieqBKUoFzl8SyMAjYphckzlnFgB-hs8K68e-tt6OSyDto2jWqt64OkVDDBWUYmET39g7663rfxO0kZoYwBTbNInQ-U9i4Eb0u58vVS-bUEIjdly1i2_Co7siffxr5YWvNL_rQbgfEAfNSNXf9vkvOn20H5CbOyiFA</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Krog, Grethe Risum</creator><creator>Rieneck, Klaus</creator><creator>Clausen, Frederik Banch</creator><creator>Steffensen, Rudi</creator><creator>Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-8476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-1523</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method</title><author>Krog, Grethe Risum ; Rieneck, Klaus ; Clausen, Frederik Banch ; Steffensen, Rudi ; Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-ef878c994b129cc7cb5fd2a46cdc1200e75c6af1a725a90e7bda136f7d9838513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Blood &amp; organ donations</topic><topic>Blood donors</topic><topic>Blood groups</topic><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Serotyping</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krog, Grethe Risum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieneck, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Frederik Banch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffensen, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krog, Grethe Risum</au><au>Rieneck, Klaus</au><au>Clausen, Frederik Banch</au><au>Steffensen, Rudi</au><au>Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3264</spage><epage>3274</epage><pages>3264-3274</pages><issn>0041-1132</issn><eissn>1537-2995</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS We developed 35 competitive allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes. RESULTS We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen‐negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction. CONCLUSION We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping‐only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost‐efficient than previous technologies.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31415105</pmid><doi>10.1111/trf.15474</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-8476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-1523</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0041-1132
ispartof Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019-10, Vol.59 (10), p.3264-3274
issn 0041-1132
1537-2995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273753806
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Antigens
Blood & organ donations
Blood donors
Blood groups
Blood transfusion
Erythrocytes
Genotypes
Genotyping
New technology
Phenotypes
Polymerase chain reaction
Predictions
Serology
Serotyping
Transfusion
title Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A01%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood%20group%20genotyping%20of%20blood%20donors:%20validation%20of%20a%20highly%20accurate%20routine%20method&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Krog,%20Grethe%20Risum&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3264&rft.epage=3274&rft.pages=3264-3274&rft.issn=0041-1132&rft.eissn=1537-2995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/trf.15474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2273753806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2302331248&rft_id=info:pmid/31415105&rfr_iscdi=true