Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method
BACKGROUND In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup. STUDY DESIGN AND...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2019-10, Vol.59 (10), p.3264-3274 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3274 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 3264 |
container_title | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.) |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Krog, Grethe Risum Rieneck, Klaus Clausen, Frederik Banch Steffensen, Rudi Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld |
description | BACKGROUND
In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
We developed 35 competitive allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes.
RESULTS
We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen‐negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction.
CONCLUSION
We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping‐only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost‐efficient than previous technologies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/trf.15474 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273753806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2273753806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-ef878c994b129cc7cb5fd2a46cdc1200e75c6af1a725a90e7bda136f7d9838513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun4c_AMS8KKHupmk2bTedPELFgRZvYY0SbuVbrMmrbL_3qxVD4JzGYb34WF4EToGcgFxxp0vL4CnIt1CI-BMJDTP-TYaEZJCAsDoHtoP4ZUQQnMCu2iPQQocCB-hl-vGOYMr7_oVrmzruvWqbivsSlx8Jca1zodL_K6a2qiudu0mU3hRV4tmjZXWvVedxVHQ1a3FS9stnDlEO6Vqgj363gfo-fZmPr1PZo93D9OrWaIZZ2liy0xkOs_TAmiutdAFLw1V6UQbDZQQK7ieqBKUoFzl8SyMAjYphckzlnFgB-hs8K68e-tt6OSyDto2jWqt64OkVDDBWUYmET39g7663rfxO0kZoYwBTbNInQ-U9i4Eb0u58vVS-bUEIjdly1i2_Co7siffxr5YWvNL_rQbgfEAfNSNXf9vkvOn20H5CbOyiFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2302331248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Krog, Grethe Risum ; Rieneck, Klaus ; Clausen, Frederik Banch ; Steffensen, Rudi ; Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creator><creatorcontrib>Krog, Grethe Risum ; Rieneck, Klaus ; Clausen, Frederik Banch ; Steffensen, Rudi ; Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND
In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
We developed 35 competitive allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes.
RESULTS
We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen‐negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction.
CONCLUSION
We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping‐only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost‐efficient than previous technologies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0041-1132</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-2995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/trf.15474</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31415105</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Antigens ; Blood & organ donations ; Blood donors ; Blood groups ; Blood transfusion ; Erythrocytes ; Genotypes ; Genotyping ; New technology ; Phenotypes ; Polymerase chain reaction ; Predictions ; Serology ; Serotyping ; Transfusion</subject><ispartof>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019-10, Vol.59 (10), p.3264-3274</ispartof><rights>2019 AABB</rights><rights>2019 AABB.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-ef878c994b129cc7cb5fd2a46cdc1200e75c6af1a725a90e7bda136f7d9838513</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-ef878c994b129cc7cb5fd2a46cdc1200e75c6af1a725a90e7bda136f7d9838513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9663-8476 ; 0000-0001-8034-1523</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftrf.15474$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftrf.15474$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31415105$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krog, Grethe Risum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieneck, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Frederik Banch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffensen, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creatorcontrib><title>Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method</title><title>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND
In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
We developed 35 competitive allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes.
RESULTS
We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen‐negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction.
CONCLUSION
We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping‐only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost‐efficient than previous technologies.</description><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Blood & organ donations</subject><subject>Blood donors</subject><subject>Blood groups</subject><subject>Blood transfusion</subject><subject>Erythrocytes</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Genotyping</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Polymerase chain reaction</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Serology</subject><subject>Serotyping</subject><subject>Transfusion</subject><issn>0041-1132</issn><issn>1537-2995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1LxDAQhoMoun4c_AMS8KKHupmk2bTedPELFgRZvYY0SbuVbrMmrbL_3qxVD4JzGYb34WF4EToGcgFxxp0vL4CnIt1CI-BMJDTP-TYaEZJCAsDoHtoP4ZUQQnMCu2iPQQocCB-hl-vGOYMr7_oVrmzruvWqbivsSlx8Jca1zodL_K6a2qiudu0mU3hRV4tmjZXWvVedxVHQ1a3FS9stnDlEO6Vqgj363gfo-fZmPr1PZo93D9OrWaIZZ2liy0xkOs_TAmiutdAFLw1V6UQbDZQQK7ieqBKUoFzl8SyMAjYphckzlnFgB-hs8K68e-tt6OSyDto2jWqt64OkVDDBWUYmET39g7663rfxO0kZoYwBTbNInQ-U9i4Eb0u58vVS-bUEIjdly1i2_Co7siffxr5YWvNL_rQbgfEAfNSNXf9vkvOn20H5CbOyiFA</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Krog, Grethe Risum</creator><creator>Rieneck, Klaus</creator><creator>Clausen, Frederik Banch</creator><creator>Steffensen, Rudi</creator><creator>Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-8476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-1523</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method</title><author>Krog, Grethe Risum ; Rieneck, Klaus ; Clausen, Frederik Banch ; Steffensen, Rudi ; Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3534-ef878c994b129cc7cb5fd2a46cdc1200e75c6af1a725a90e7bda136f7d9838513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Blood & organ donations</topic><topic>Blood donors</topic><topic>Blood groups</topic><topic>Blood transfusion</topic><topic>Erythrocytes</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Genotyping</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Polymerase chain reaction</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Serology</topic><topic>Serotyping</topic><topic>Transfusion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krog, Grethe Risum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rieneck, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clausen, Frederik Banch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steffensen, Rudi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krog, Grethe Risum</au><au>Rieneck, Klaus</au><au>Clausen, Frederik Banch</au><au>Steffensen, Rudi</au><au>Dziegiel, Morten Hanefeld</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method</atitle><jtitle>Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><addtitle>Transfusion</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3264</spage><epage>3274</epage><pages>3264-3274</pages><issn>0041-1132</issn><eissn>1537-2995</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND
In the past century, blood group determination using serology has been the standard method. Now, molecular methods are gaining traction, which provide additional and easily accessible information. Here we designed and validated a high‐throughput extended genotyping setup.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
We developed 35 competitive allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction assays for genotyping of blood donors. Samples from 1034 Danish blood donors were genotyped, and 45,314 red blood cell antigens and 6148 platelet antigens were predicted. Predicted phenotypes were compared with 16,119 serologic phenotypes.
RESULTS
We found 62 discrepancies of which 43 were due to serology. After exclusion of the discrepancies caused by serology, the accuracy of genotyping was 99.9%. Of 17 discrepancies caused by the genotype, three were incorrect antigen‐negative predictions and could potentially, as the solitary analysis, have caused an adverse transfusion reaction.
CONCLUSION
We have established a robust and highly accurate blood group genotyping system with a very high capacity for screening blood donors. The system represents a significant improvement over the former serotyping‐only procedure. Almost all new technology in medicine incurs increased costs, but the presented efficient genotyping system is a rare example of a significant qualitative and quantitative technologic progress that is also more cost‐efficient than previous technologies.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31415105</pmid><doi>10.1111/trf.15474</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9663-8476</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8034-1523</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0041-1132 |
ispartof | Transfusion (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2019-10, Vol.59 (10), p.3264-3274 |
issn | 0041-1132 1537-2995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273753806 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Antigens Blood & organ donations Blood donors Blood groups Blood transfusion Erythrocytes Genotypes Genotyping New technology Phenotypes Polymerase chain reaction Predictions Serology Serotyping Transfusion |
title | Blood group genotyping of blood donors: validation of a highly accurate routine method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A01%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Blood%20group%20genotyping%20of%20blood%20donors:%20validation%20of%20a%20highly%20accurate%20routine%20method&rft.jtitle=Transfusion%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Krog,%20Grethe%20Risum&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3264&rft.epage=3274&rft.pages=3264-3274&rft.issn=0041-1132&rft.eissn=1537-2995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/trf.15474&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2273753806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2302331248&rft_id=info:pmid/31415105&rfr_iscdi=true |