The application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT, 670 nm) and diode laser (940 nm) as adjunctive approach in the conventional cause-related treatment of chronic periodontal disease: a randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial

Objectives The aim of the present randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the adjunctive use of photodynamic low-level laser therapy (670 nm), applying methylene blue as photosensitizer, and the effectiveness of a diode laser (940 nm) compared with conven...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral investigations 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1821-1827
Hauptverfasser: Katsikanis, Fotios, Strakas, Dimitris, Vouros, Ioannis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1827
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1821
container_title Clinical oral investigations
container_volume 24
creator Katsikanis, Fotios
Strakas, Dimitris
Vouros, Ioannis
description Objectives The aim of the present randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the adjunctive use of photodynamic low-level laser therapy (670 nm), applying methylene blue as photosensitizer, and the effectiveness of a diode laser (940 nm) compared with conventional non-surgical mechanical treatment in a group of patients with chronic periodontal disease. Materials and methods Twenty-one patients with moderate to severe periodontal disease with presence of 3 or more quadrants, each containing at least three sites with periodontal pocket depth (PPD) of ≥ 5 mm, were included in the study. Periodontal treatment comprising scaling and root planing (SRP) was accomplished for the whole mouth. Applying a split-mouth design, each quadrant was randomly treated with SRP alone (control group), SRP with diode laser (diode group), and SRP with photodynamic therapy (photodynamic group). Results All treatment modalities in this study lead to statistically significant improvements in the evaluated clinical parameters at 3 months and 6 months compared with baseline. There was no statistically significant difference regarding PD and BOP between groups. There was only a tendency for greater reduction of PD in the diode group for deep pockets at 3 months, but not statistically significant. Conclusions After 6 months of evaluation, the high intensity diode laser and the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy have not shown any additional benefits to the conventional periodontal treatment. Clinical relevance The diode or photodynamic laser therapy in conjunction with conventional SRP does not seem to be superior in reducing probing depth and bleeding on probing than SRP alone 6 months after treatment. More studies are necessary to prove the actual need of these types of lasers in the periodontal clinical practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00784-019-03045-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273217377</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2273217377</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-80d177e0b33d87ef89914d8561175cca38511a6e3b1427b470237df29f4f2c7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Us2O1SAUbozGGUdfwIUhcXNNrHKAltadGX-TSXRxXTcUqOWmhQp0kuvT-Cy-k3vPvXdGExdugHC-Hw7nK4rHQF8ApfJlwqURJYW2pJyKqoQ7xTkIXpdcSrh7PLOybhs4Kx6ktKMURC35_eKMgwBaS3Ze_NqOlqhlmZxW2QVPwkCUz252OobeqYksY8jB7L3CK5JHG9WyJxv1-c32Oakl_fnDz8-QYohxwVgyqWQj2bTitpKIMrvV6-yuj04xKD0S5w9aRAd_bf3BGJ20WpMto51UtobkaFWesXh4kh5j8Oi_2IguwWeEG5csmr0iikT0D7P7jjRUzDFMEx4TdpXLOax5JHpyyEdWjtjUw-LeoKZkH93sF8WXd2-3lx_Kq0_vP16-vio1l1UuG2pASkt7zk0j7dC0LQjTVDWArLRWvKkAVG15D4LJXkjKuDQDawcxMC01vyg2J13s-ttqU-5ml7SdJuVtWFPHmOQMJI4LoU__ge7CGvFbjigmGiagRhQ7oXA6KUU7dEt0s4r7Dmh3CEV3CkWHoeiOoegASU9upNd-tuYP5TYFCOAnQMKS_2rjX-__yP4G-7rHNQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2272482416</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT, 670 nm) and diode laser (940 nm) as adjunctive approach in the conventional cause-related treatment of chronic periodontal disease: a randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Katsikanis, Fotios ; Strakas, Dimitris ; Vouros, Ioannis</creator><creatorcontrib>Katsikanis, Fotios ; Strakas, Dimitris ; Vouros, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives The aim of the present randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the adjunctive use of photodynamic low-level laser therapy (670 nm), applying methylene blue as photosensitizer, and the effectiveness of a diode laser (940 nm) compared with conventional non-surgical mechanical treatment in a group of patients with chronic periodontal disease. Materials and methods Twenty-one patients with moderate to severe periodontal disease with presence of 3 or more quadrants, each containing at least three sites with periodontal pocket depth (PPD) of ≥ 5 mm, were included in the study. Periodontal treatment comprising scaling and root planing (SRP) was accomplished for the whole mouth. Applying a split-mouth design, each quadrant was randomly treated with SRP alone (control group), SRP with diode laser (diode group), and SRP with photodynamic therapy (photodynamic group). Results All treatment modalities in this study lead to statistically significant improvements in the evaluated clinical parameters at 3 months and 6 months compared with baseline. There was no statistically significant difference regarding PD and BOP between groups. There was only a tendency for greater reduction of PD in the diode group for deep pockets at 3 months, but not statistically significant. Conclusions After 6 months of evaluation, the high intensity diode laser and the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy have not shown any additional benefits to the conventional periodontal treatment. Clinical relevance The diode or photodynamic laser therapy in conjunction with conventional SRP does not seem to be superior in reducing probing depth and bleeding on probing than SRP alone 6 months after treatment. More studies are necessary to prove the actual need of these types of lasers in the periodontal clinical practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-6981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1436-3771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00784-019-03045-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31410672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Clinical trials ; Dentistry ; Gum disease ; Lasers ; Medicine ; Methylene blue ; Original Article ; Patients ; Periodontal diseases ; Photodynamic therapy ; Scaling ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral investigations, 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1821-1827</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-80d177e0b33d87ef89914d8561175cca38511a6e3b1427b470237df29f4f2c7c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-80d177e0b33d87ef89914d8561175cca38511a6e3b1427b470237df29f4f2c7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7327-8850</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00784-019-03045-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00784-019-03045-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410672$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katsikanis, Fotios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strakas, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vouros, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><title>The application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT, 670 nm) and diode laser (940 nm) as adjunctive approach in the conventional cause-related treatment of chronic periodontal disease: a randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial</title><title>Clinical oral investigations</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Invest</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><description>Objectives The aim of the present randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the adjunctive use of photodynamic low-level laser therapy (670 nm), applying methylene blue as photosensitizer, and the effectiveness of a diode laser (940 nm) compared with conventional non-surgical mechanical treatment in a group of patients with chronic periodontal disease. Materials and methods Twenty-one patients with moderate to severe periodontal disease with presence of 3 or more quadrants, each containing at least three sites with periodontal pocket depth (PPD) of ≥ 5 mm, were included in the study. Periodontal treatment comprising scaling and root planing (SRP) was accomplished for the whole mouth. Applying a split-mouth design, each quadrant was randomly treated with SRP alone (control group), SRP with diode laser (diode group), and SRP with photodynamic therapy (photodynamic group). Results All treatment modalities in this study lead to statistically significant improvements in the evaluated clinical parameters at 3 months and 6 months compared with baseline. There was no statistically significant difference regarding PD and BOP between groups. There was only a tendency for greater reduction of PD in the diode group for deep pockets at 3 months, but not statistically significant. Conclusions After 6 months of evaluation, the high intensity diode laser and the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy have not shown any additional benefits to the conventional periodontal treatment. Clinical relevance The diode or photodynamic laser therapy in conjunction with conventional SRP does not seem to be superior in reducing probing depth and bleeding on probing than SRP alone 6 months after treatment. More studies are necessary to prove the actual need of these types of lasers in the periodontal clinical practice.</description><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Gum disease</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Methylene blue</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Periodontal diseases</subject><subject>Photodynamic therapy</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>1432-6981</issn><issn>1436-3771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Us2O1SAUbozGGUdfwIUhcXNNrHKAltadGX-TSXRxXTcUqOWmhQp0kuvT-Cy-k3vPvXdGExdugHC-Hw7nK4rHQF8ApfJlwqURJYW2pJyKqoQ7xTkIXpdcSrh7PLOybhs4Kx6ktKMURC35_eKMgwBaS3Ze_NqOlqhlmZxW2QVPwkCUz252OobeqYksY8jB7L3CK5JHG9WyJxv1-c32Oakl_fnDz8-QYohxwVgyqWQj2bTitpKIMrvV6-yuj04xKD0S5w9aRAd_bf3BGJ20WpMto51UtobkaFWesXh4kh5j8Oi_2IguwWeEG5csmr0iikT0D7P7jjRUzDFMEx4TdpXLOax5JHpyyEdWjtjUw-LeoKZkH93sF8WXd2-3lx_Kq0_vP16-vio1l1UuG2pASkt7zk0j7dC0LQjTVDWArLRWvKkAVG15D4LJXkjKuDQDawcxMC01vyg2J13s-ttqU-5ml7SdJuVtWFPHmOQMJI4LoU__ge7CGvFbjigmGiagRhQ7oXA6KUU7dEt0s4r7Dmh3CEV3CkWHoeiOoegASU9upNd-tuYP5TYFCOAnQMKS_2rjX-__yP4G-7rHNQ</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Katsikanis, Fotios</creator><creator>Strakas, Dimitris</creator><creator>Vouros, Ioannis</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-8850</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>The application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT, 670 nm) and diode laser (940 nm) as adjunctive approach in the conventional cause-related treatment of chronic periodontal disease: a randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial</title><author>Katsikanis, Fotios ; Strakas, Dimitris ; Vouros, Ioannis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-80d177e0b33d87ef89914d8561175cca38511a6e3b1427b470237df29f4f2c7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Gum disease</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Methylene blue</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Periodontal diseases</topic><topic>Photodynamic therapy</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katsikanis, Fotios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strakas, Dimitris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vouros, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katsikanis, Fotios</au><au>Strakas, Dimitris</au><au>Vouros, Ioannis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT, 670 nm) and diode laser (940 nm) as adjunctive approach in the conventional cause-related treatment of chronic periodontal disease: a randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral investigations</jtitle><stitle>Clin Oral Invest</stitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Investig</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1821</spage><epage>1827</epage><pages>1821-1827</pages><issn>1432-6981</issn><eissn>1436-3771</eissn><abstract>Objectives The aim of the present randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of the adjunctive use of photodynamic low-level laser therapy (670 nm), applying methylene blue as photosensitizer, and the effectiveness of a diode laser (940 nm) compared with conventional non-surgical mechanical treatment in a group of patients with chronic periodontal disease. Materials and methods Twenty-one patients with moderate to severe periodontal disease with presence of 3 or more quadrants, each containing at least three sites with periodontal pocket depth (PPD) of ≥ 5 mm, were included in the study. Periodontal treatment comprising scaling and root planing (SRP) was accomplished for the whole mouth. Applying a split-mouth design, each quadrant was randomly treated with SRP alone (control group), SRP with diode laser (diode group), and SRP with photodynamic therapy (photodynamic group). Results All treatment modalities in this study lead to statistically significant improvements in the evaluated clinical parameters at 3 months and 6 months compared with baseline. There was no statistically significant difference regarding PD and BOP between groups. There was only a tendency for greater reduction of PD in the diode group for deep pockets at 3 months, but not statistically significant. Conclusions After 6 months of evaluation, the high intensity diode laser and the antimicrobial photodynamic therapy have not shown any additional benefits to the conventional periodontal treatment. Clinical relevance The diode or photodynamic laser therapy in conjunction with conventional SRP does not seem to be superior in reducing probing depth and bleeding on probing than SRP alone 6 months after treatment. More studies are necessary to prove the actual need of these types of lasers in the periodontal clinical practice.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31410672</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00784-019-03045-1</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-8850</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-6981
ispartof Clinical oral investigations, 2020-05, Vol.24 (5), p.1821-1827
issn 1432-6981
1436-3771
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273217377
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Clinical trials
Dentistry
Gum disease
Lasers
Medicine
Methylene blue
Original Article
Patients
Periodontal diseases
Photodynamic therapy
Scaling
Statistical analysis
title The application of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy (aPDT, 670 nm) and diode laser (940 nm) as adjunctive approach in the conventional cause-related treatment of chronic periodontal disease: a randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T12%3A29%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20application%20of%20antimicrobial%20photodynamic%20therapy%20(aPDT,%20670%C2%A0nm)%20and%20diode%20laser%20(940%C2%A0nm)%20as%20adjunctive%20approach%20in%20the%20conventional%20cause-related%20treatment%20of%20chronic%20periodontal%20disease:%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20split-mouth%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20investigations&rft.au=Katsikanis,%20Fotios&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1821&rft.epage=1827&rft.pages=1821-1827&rft.issn=1432-6981&rft.eissn=1436-3771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00784-019-03045-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2273217377%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2272482416&rft_id=info:pmid/31410672&rfr_iscdi=true