Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee

Purpose Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-09, Vol.28 (9), p.2893-2904
Hauptverfasser: Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie, Saiz, Augustine, Shelton, Trevor, Howell, Stephen M., Hull, Maury L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2904
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2893
container_title Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
container_volume 28
creator Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie
Saiz, Augustine
Shelton, Trevor
Howell, Stephen M.
Hull, Maury L.
description Purpose Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up. Methods Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact. Results Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm, p  = 0.0009 and 7 mm, p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273216058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2273216058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6e78a07610abc468621449055a4219a50cbcfaa720b7ffc003d253ca3e3baf153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vFSEUxYnR2NfqF3BhSNy4Gb38G2aWTaPW2MSFdU0Y3uVJy0AFnqbfXtpXNXHhhks4v3O4ySHkBYM3DEC_rQBs1AOweQA1qmlgj8iGSSEGLaR-TDYwSz7wrh2R41qvAPpVzk_JkWCSgeJqQ9qX1cZIt8F7LJgcVhoSbWEJNlKXU7Ou0ZidbSGnSn2OMf8MaUevQ8K1v7puv6U2hl3CLb38dEp9yStt35CmLv_A-5Rio23YT3qdEJ-RJ97Gis8f5gn5-v7d5dn5cPH5w8ez04vBSTa3YUQ9WdAjA7s4OU4jZ1LOoJSVnM1WgVuct1ZzWLT3DkBsuRLOChSL9UyJE_L6kHtT8vc91mbWUB3GaBPmfTWca8HZCGrq6Kt_0Ku8L6lvd0dxOYGex07xA-VKrrWgNzclrLbcGgbmrhNz6MT0Tsx9J4Z108uH6P2y4vaP5XcJHRAHoHYp7bD8_fs_sb8AlEaX0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2272480796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie ; Saiz, Augustine ; Shelton, Trevor ; Howell, Stephen M. ; Hull, Maury L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie ; Saiz, Augustine ; Shelton, Trevor ; Howell, Stephen M. ; Hull, Maury L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up. Methods Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact. Results Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm, p  = 0.0009 and 7 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 and 8 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48). Conclusions Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores. Level of evidence Therapeutic, Level III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0942-2056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31410525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alignment ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Bearing ; Bend properties ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Compartments ; Female ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Image registration ; Incidence ; Joint Instability - prevention &amp; control ; Kinematics ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Three dimensional models ; Tibia - physiology ; Two dimensional models</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-09, Vol.28 (9), p.2893-2904</ispartof><rights>European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019</rights><rights>European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6e78a07610abc468621449055a4219a50cbcfaa720b7ffc003d253ca3e3baf153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6e78a07610abc468621449055a4219a50cbcfaa720b7ffc003d253ca3e3baf153</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8305-4589</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiz, Augustine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Maury L.</creatorcontrib><title>Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee</title><title>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><description>Purpose Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up. Methods Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact. Results Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm, p  = 0.0009 and 7 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 and 8 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48). Conclusions Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores. Level of evidence Therapeutic, Level III.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Bearing</subject><subject>Bend properties</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Compartments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image registration</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Joint Instability - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Tibia - physiology</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><issn>0942-2056</issn><issn>1433-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vFSEUxYnR2NfqF3BhSNy4Gb38G2aWTaPW2MSFdU0Y3uVJy0AFnqbfXtpXNXHhhks4v3O4ySHkBYM3DEC_rQBs1AOweQA1qmlgj8iGSSEGLaR-TDYwSz7wrh2R41qvAPpVzk_JkWCSgeJqQ9qX1cZIt8F7LJgcVhoSbWEJNlKXU7Ou0ZidbSGnSn2OMf8MaUevQ8K1v7puv6U2hl3CLb38dEp9yStt35CmLv_A-5Rio23YT3qdEJ-RJ97Gis8f5gn5-v7d5dn5cPH5w8ez04vBSTa3YUQ9WdAjA7s4OU4jZ1LOoJSVnM1WgVuct1ZzWLT3DkBsuRLOChSL9UyJE_L6kHtT8vc91mbWUB3GaBPmfTWca8HZCGrq6Kt_0Ku8L6lvd0dxOYGex07xA-VKrrWgNzclrLbcGgbmrhNz6MT0Tsx9J4Z108uH6P2y4vaP5XcJHRAHoHYp7bD8_fs_sb8AlEaX0Q</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie</creator><creator>Saiz, Augustine</creator><creator>Shelton, Trevor</creator><creator>Howell, Stephen M.</creator><creator>Hull, Maury L.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-4589</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee</title><author>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie ; Saiz, Augustine ; Shelton, Trevor ; Howell, Stephen M. ; Hull, Maury L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6e78a07610abc468621449055a4219a50cbcfaa720b7ffc003d253ca3e3baf153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Bearing</topic><topic>Bend properties</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Compartments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image registration</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Joint Instability - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Tibia - physiology</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiz, Augustine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Maury L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie</au><au>Saiz, Augustine</au><au>Shelton, Trevor</au><au>Howell, Stephen M.</au><au>Hull, Maury L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle><stitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</stitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2893</spage><epage>2904</epage><pages>2893-2904</pages><issn>0942-2056</issn><eissn>1433-7347</eissn><abstract>Purpose Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up. Methods Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact. Results Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm, p  = 0.0009 and 7 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 and 8 mm, p  &lt; 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48). Conclusions Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores. Level of evidence Therapeutic, Level III.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31410525</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-4589</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0942-2056
ispartof Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-09, Vol.28 (9), p.2893-2904
issn 0942-2056
1433-7347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273216058
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Alignment
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods
Bearing
Bend properties
Biomechanical Phenomena
Compartments
Female
Fluoroscopy
Humans
Image registration
Incidence
Joint Instability - prevention & control
Kinematics
Knee
Knee Joint - physiology
Knee Joint - surgery
Knee Prosthesis
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Orthopedics
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Range of Motion, Articular
Three dimensional models
Tibia - physiology
Two dimensional models
title Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A22%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small%20differences%20in%20tibial%20contact%20locations%20following%20kinematically%20aligned%20TKA%20from%20the%20native%20contralateral%20knee&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery,%20sports%20traumatology,%20arthroscopy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20ESSKA&rft.au=Nicolet-Petersen,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2893&rft.epage=2904&rft.pages=2893-2904&rft.issn=0942-2056&rft.eissn=1433-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2273216058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2272480796&rft_id=info:pmid/31410525&rfr_iscdi=true