Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee
Purpose Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-09, Vol.28 (9), p.2893-2904 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2904 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2893 |
container_title | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie Saiz, Augustine Shelton, Trevor Howell, Stephen M. Hull, Maury L. |
description | Purpose
Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up.
Methods
Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact.
Results
Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm,
p
= 0.0009 and 7 mm,
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273216058</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2273216058</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6e78a07610abc468621449055a4219a50cbcfaa720b7ffc003d253ca3e3baf153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU9vFSEUxYnR2NfqF3BhSNy4Gb38G2aWTaPW2MSFdU0Y3uVJy0AFnqbfXtpXNXHhhks4v3O4ySHkBYM3DEC_rQBs1AOweQA1qmlgj8iGSSEGLaR-TDYwSz7wrh2R41qvAPpVzk_JkWCSgeJqQ9qX1cZIt8F7LJgcVhoSbWEJNlKXU7Ou0ZidbSGnSn2OMf8MaUevQ8K1v7puv6U2hl3CLb38dEp9yStt35CmLv_A-5Rio23YT3qdEJ-RJ97Gis8f5gn5-v7d5dn5cPH5w8ez04vBSTa3YUQ9WdAjA7s4OU4jZ1LOoJSVnM1WgVuct1ZzWLT3DkBsuRLOChSL9UyJE_L6kHtT8vc91mbWUB3GaBPmfTWca8HZCGrq6Kt_0Ku8L6lvd0dxOYGex07xA-VKrrWgNzclrLbcGgbmrhNz6MT0Tsx9J4Z108uH6P2y4vaP5XcJHRAHoHYp7bD8_fs_sb8AlEaX0Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2272480796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie ; Saiz, Augustine ; Shelton, Trevor ; Howell, Stephen M. ; Hull, Maury L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie ; Saiz, Augustine ; Shelton, Trevor ; Howell, Stephen M. ; Hull, Maury L.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up.
Methods
Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact.
Results
Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm,
p
= 0.0009 and 7 mm,
p
< 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm,
p
< 0.0001 and 8 mm,
p
< 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48).
Conclusions
Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic, Level III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0942-2056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31410525</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Alignment ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods ; Bearing ; Bend properties ; Biomechanical Phenomena ; Compartments ; Female ; Fluoroscopy ; Humans ; Image registration ; Incidence ; Joint Instability - prevention & control ; Kinematics ; Knee ; Knee Joint - physiology ; Knee Joint - surgery ; Knee Prosthesis ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Orthopedics ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Three dimensional models ; Tibia - physiology ; Two dimensional models</subject><ispartof>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-09, Vol.28 (9), p.2893-2904</ispartof><rights>European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019</rights><rights>European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA) 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6e78a07610abc468621449055a4219a50cbcfaa720b7ffc003d253ca3e3baf153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6e78a07610abc468621449055a4219a50cbcfaa720b7ffc003d253ca3e3baf153</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8305-4589</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31410525$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiz, Augustine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Maury L.</creatorcontrib><title>Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee</title><title>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</title><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><description>Purpose
Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up.
Methods
Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact.
Results
Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm,
p
= 0.0009 and 7 mm,
p
< 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm,
p
< 0.0001 and 8 mm,
p
< 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48).
Conclusions
Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic, Level III.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Alignment</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</subject><subject>Bearing</subject><subject>Bend properties</subject><subject>Biomechanical Phenomena</subject><subject>Compartments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fluoroscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image registration</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Joint Instability - prevention & control</subject><subject>Kinematics</subject><subject>Knee</subject><subject>Knee Joint - physiology</subject><subject>Knee Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Knee Prosthesis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Orthopedics</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Tibia - physiology</subject><subject>Two dimensional models</subject><issn>0942-2056</issn><issn>1433-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU9vFSEUxYnR2NfqF3BhSNy4Gb38G2aWTaPW2MSFdU0Y3uVJy0AFnqbfXtpXNXHhhks4v3O4ySHkBYM3DEC_rQBs1AOweQA1qmlgj8iGSSEGLaR-TDYwSz7wrh2R41qvAPpVzk_JkWCSgeJqQ9qX1cZIt8F7LJgcVhoSbWEJNlKXU7Ou0ZidbSGnSn2OMf8MaUevQ8K1v7puv6U2hl3CLb38dEp9yStt35CmLv_A-5Rio23YT3qdEJ-RJ97Gis8f5gn5-v7d5dn5cPH5w8ez04vBSTa3YUQ9WdAjA7s4OU4jZ1LOoJSVnM1WgVuct1ZzWLT3DkBsuRLOChSL9UyJE_L6kHtT8vc91mbWUB3GaBPmfTWca8HZCGrq6Kt_0Ku8L6lvd0dxOYGex07xA-VKrrWgNzclrLbcGgbmrhNz6MT0Tsx9J4Z108uH6P2y4vaP5XcJHRAHoHYp7bD8_fs_sb8AlEaX0Q</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie</creator><creator>Saiz, Augustine</creator><creator>Shelton, Trevor</creator><creator>Howell, Stephen M.</creator><creator>Hull, Maury L.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-4589</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee</title><author>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie ; Saiz, Augustine ; Shelton, Trevor ; Howell, Stephen M. ; Hull, Maury L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c419t-6e78a07610abc468621449055a4219a50cbcfaa720b7ffc003d253ca3e3baf153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Alignment</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods</topic><topic>Bearing</topic><topic>Bend properties</topic><topic>Biomechanical Phenomena</topic><topic>Compartments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fluoroscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image registration</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Joint Instability - prevention & control</topic><topic>Kinematics</topic><topic>Knee</topic><topic>Knee Joint - physiology</topic><topic>Knee Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Knee Prosthesis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Orthopedics</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Tibia - physiology</topic><topic>Two dimensional models</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saiz, Augustine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shelton, Trevor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Howell, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hull, Maury L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nicolet-Petersen, Stephanie</au><au>Saiz, Augustine</au><au>Shelton, Trevor</au><au>Howell, Stephen M.</au><au>Hull, Maury L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee</atitle><jtitle>Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA</jtitle><stitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</stitle><addtitle>Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2893</spage><epage>2904</epage><pages>2893-2904</pages><issn>0942-2056</issn><eissn>1433-7347</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Kinematically aligned (KA) TKA strives to restore native limb and knee alignments without ligament release with the premise that knee function likewise will be closely restored to native to the extent enabled by the components used. This study determined differences in anterior–posterior (AP) tibial contact locations of a KA TKA performed with asymmetric, fixed bearing, posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) components from those of the native contralateral knee and also determined the incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert during a deep knee bend and a step-up.
Methods
Both knees were imaged using single-plane fluoroscopy for 25 patients with a calipered KA TKA and a native knee in the contralateral limb. AP tibial contact locations in each compartment were determined following 3D model-to-2D image registration. Differences in mean AP tibial contact locations in each compartment between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were analysed. Contact locations either on or beyond the most posterior point of the tibial insert determined the occurrence of posterior rim contact.
Results
Mean AP tibial contact locations for both native and KA TKA knees remained relatively centred in the medial compartment but moved posterior in the lateral compartment during flexion. In both the medial and lateral compartments, differences in mean AP tibial contact locations between the KA TKA knees and the native contralateral knees were more posterior and greatest at 0° flexion for both activities (4 mm,
p
= 0.0009 and 7 mm,
p
< 0.0001 for deep knee bend and 6 mm,
p
< 0.0001 and 8 mm,
p
< 0.0001 for step-up in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively). The incidence of posterior rim contact of the tibial insert was 16% (4 of 25 patients) but the lowest Oxford Knee Score was 43 for these patients. The median Oxford Knee Score for all patients was 46 (out of 48).
Conclusions
Calipered KA TKA with asymmetric, fixed bearing, PCR components resulted in mean AP tibial contact locations which were relatively centred in the compartments and differed at most from those of the native contralateral knee by approximately 15% of the AP dimension of a mid-sized tibial baseplate. Although posterior rim contact occurred in some patients, all such patients had high patient-reported outcome scores.
Level of evidence
Therapeutic, Level III.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31410525</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8305-4589</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0942-2056 |
ispartof | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2020-09, Vol.28 (9), p.2893-2904 |
issn | 0942-2056 1433-7347 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273216058 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Alignment Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee - methods Bearing Bend properties Biomechanical Phenomena Compartments Female Fluoroscopy Humans Image registration Incidence Joint Instability - prevention & control Kinematics Knee Knee Joint - physiology Knee Joint - surgery Knee Prosthesis Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Orthopedics Patient Reported Outcome Measures Range of Motion, Articular Three dimensional models Tibia - physiology Two dimensional models |
title | Small differences in tibial contact locations following kinematically aligned TKA from the native contralateral knee |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T20%3A22%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Small%20differences%20in%20tibial%20contact%20locations%20following%20kinematically%20aligned%20TKA%20from%20the%20native%20contralateral%20knee&rft.jtitle=Knee%20surgery,%20sports%20traumatology,%20arthroscopy%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20ESSKA&rft.au=Nicolet-Petersen,%20Stephanie&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2893&rft.epage=2904&rft.pages=2893-2904&rft.issn=0942-2056&rft.eissn=1433-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00167-019-05658-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2273216058%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2272480796&rft_id=info:pmid/31410525&rfr_iscdi=true |