Can theta burst stimulation safely influence auditory hearing thresholds in healthy young adults?

•Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) of auditory cortex was not associated with hearing impairment of other side effects.•Intermittent TBS (iTBS) of auditory cortex resulted in lowering of hearing threshold.•This effect occurred most prominently at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz. This TBS sham-controlled study aimed...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical neurophysiology 2019-10, Vol.130 (10), p.1900-1907
Hauptverfasser: Pinto, Nuno, Oliveira, Iris, Ferreira, Joana, Gama, Jorge, Vaz Pato, Maria
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1907
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1900
container_title Clinical neurophysiology
container_volume 130
creator Pinto, Nuno
Oliveira, Iris
Ferreira, Joana
Gama, Jorge
Vaz Pato, Maria
description •Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) of auditory cortex was not associated with hearing impairment of other side effects.•Intermittent TBS (iTBS) of auditory cortex resulted in lowering of hearing threshold.•This effect occurred most prominently at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz. This TBS sham-controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) upon ipsilateral hearing thresholds after stimulation on the left auditory cortex. Sixty healthy adults, aged between 19 and 32 years (median of 23 years), were randomly distributed into three groups and underwent iTBS, cTBS or sham stimulation. Each double-blind experimental session comprised two pure tone audiometric evaluations per subject, before and after stimulation. To assess volunteer safety, a follow-up of at least 48 hours was implemented. The iTBS group mean thresholds displayed a tendency to decrease after stimulation, predominantly in the 500 Hz–6000 Hz interval and group comparisons revealed significant differences between the iTBS and sham groups for 500 Hz (p = 0.041) and between the iTBS and cTBS groups for 4000 Hz (p = 0.038). Neither relevant side effects nor any significant hearing threshold impairment after active or sham stimulation were found. A single stimulation session led to an effective neuromodulation of the auditory cortex, reflected in lower thresholds when using iTBS. These encouraging results with this safe noninvasive tool suggest that iTBS may have the potential to positively influence hearing thresholds.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273206770</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1388245719311666</els_id><sourcerecordid>2273206770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7434850497a4db363930a0f986097ad6fe5a44aefb2b17dc5327b308b9ca6eaf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv1DAURi1URB_wDxDKkk3S60fiZANCI6CVKrGBteXYN8QjTzL4USn_vh5Ny7Krz7o-n698CPlIoaFAu9t9Y7xbjnPDgA4NyKbEG3JFe8nqfmjZRTnzvq-ZaOUluY5xDwASBHtHLjkV0MuBXhG900uVZky6GnOIqYrJHbLXya1LFfWEfqvcMvmMi8FKZ-vSGrZqRh3c8rc0A8Z59TYW6jT1ad6qbc3lTtvsU_z6nrydtI_44TlvyJ8f33_v7uqHXz_vd98easMpTbUUXPQtiEFqYUfe8YGDhmnoOygj203YaiE0TiMbqbSm5UyOHPpxMLpDPfEb8vn87jGs_zLGpA4uGvReL7jmqBiTnEEnJRRUnFET1hgDTuoY3EGHTVFQJ7lqr85y1UmuAqlKlNqn5w15PKD9X3qxWYAvZwDLPx8dBhWNO4mzLqBJyq7u9Q1PEimOgw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2273206770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can theta burst stimulation safely influence auditory hearing thresholds in healthy young adults?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Pinto, Nuno ; Oliveira, Iris ; Ferreira, Joana ; Gama, Jorge ; Vaz Pato, Maria</creator><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Nuno ; Oliveira, Iris ; Ferreira, Joana ; Gama, Jorge ; Vaz Pato, Maria</creatorcontrib><description>•Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) of auditory cortex was not associated with hearing impairment of other side effects.•Intermittent TBS (iTBS) of auditory cortex resulted in lowering of hearing threshold.•This effect occurred most prominently at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz. This TBS sham-controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) upon ipsilateral hearing thresholds after stimulation on the left auditory cortex. Sixty healthy adults, aged between 19 and 32 years (median of 23 years), were randomly distributed into three groups and underwent iTBS, cTBS or sham stimulation. Each double-blind experimental session comprised two pure tone audiometric evaluations per subject, before and after stimulation. To assess volunteer safety, a follow-up of at least 48 hours was implemented. The iTBS group mean thresholds displayed a tendency to decrease after stimulation, predominantly in the 500 Hz–6000 Hz interval and group comparisons revealed significant differences between the iTBS and sham groups for 500 Hz (p = 0.041) and between the iTBS and cTBS groups for 4000 Hz (p = 0.038). Neither relevant side effects nor any significant hearing threshold impairment after active or sham stimulation were found. A single stimulation session led to an effective neuromodulation of the auditory cortex, reflected in lower thresholds when using iTBS. These encouraging results with this safe noninvasive tool suggest that iTBS may have the potential to positively influence hearing thresholds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1388-2457</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8952</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31408791</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Adult ; Audiometry ; Audiometry - methods ; Auditory cortex ; Auditory Cortex - physiology ; Auditory threshold ; Auditory Threshold - physiology ; Deep Brain Stimulation - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Hearing - physiology ; Humans ; Male ; Prospective Studies ; Safety ; Theta burst stimulation ; Theta Rhythm - physiology ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Clinical neurophysiology, 2019-10, Vol.130 (10), p.1900-1907</ispartof><rights>2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7434850497a4db363930a0f986097ad6fe5a44aefb2b17dc5327b308b9ca6eaf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.019$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31408791$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Nuno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Joana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gama, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz Pato, Maria</creatorcontrib><title>Can theta burst stimulation safely influence auditory hearing thresholds in healthy young adults?</title><title>Clinical neurophysiology</title><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><description>•Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) of auditory cortex was not associated with hearing impairment of other side effects.•Intermittent TBS (iTBS) of auditory cortex resulted in lowering of hearing threshold.•This effect occurred most prominently at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz. This TBS sham-controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) upon ipsilateral hearing thresholds after stimulation on the left auditory cortex. Sixty healthy adults, aged between 19 and 32 years (median of 23 years), were randomly distributed into three groups and underwent iTBS, cTBS or sham stimulation. Each double-blind experimental session comprised two pure tone audiometric evaluations per subject, before and after stimulation. To assess volunteer safety, a follow-up of at least 48 hours was implemented. The iTBS group mean thresholds displayed a tendency to decrease after stimulation, predominantly in the 500 Hz–6000 Hz interval and group comparisons revealed significant differences between the iTBS and sham groups for 500 Hz (p = 0.041) and between the iTBS and cTBS groups for 4000 Hz (p = 0.038). Neither relevant side effects nor any significant hearing threshold impairment after active or sham stimulation were found. A single stimulation session led to an effective neuromodulation of the auditory cortex, reflected in lower thresholds when using iTBS. These encouraging results with this safe noninvasive tool suggest that iTBS may have the potential to positively influence hearing thresholds.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audiometry</subject><subject>Audiometry - methods</subject><subject>Auditory cortex</subject><subject>Auditory Cortex - physiology</subject><subject>Auditory threshold</subject><subject>Auditory Threshold - physiology</subject><subject>Deep Brain Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hearing - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Theta burst stimulation</subject><subject>Theta Rhythm - physiology</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1388-2457</issn><issn>1872-8952</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtv1DAURi1URB_wDxDKkk3S60fiZANCI6CVKrGBteXYN8QjTzL4USn_vh5Ny7Krz7o-n698CPlIoaFAu9t9Y7xbjnPDgA4NyKbEG3JFe8nqfmjZRTnzvq-ZaOUluY5xDwASBHtHLjkV0MuBXhG900uVZky6GnOIqYrJHbLXya1LFfWEfqvcMvmMi8FKZ-vSGrZqRh3c8rc0A8Z59TYW6jT1ad6qbc3lTtvsU_z6nrydtI_44TlvyJ8f33_v7uqHXz_vd98easMpTbUUXPQtiEFqYUfe8YGDhmnoOygj203YaiE0TiMbqbSm5UyOHPpxMLpDPfEb8vn87jGs_zLGpA4uGvReL7jmqBiTnEEnJRRUnFET1hgDTuoY3EGHTVFQJ7lqr85y1UmuAqlKlNqn5w15PKD9X3qxWYAvZwDLPx8dBhWNO4mzLqBJyq7u9Q1PEimOgw</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Pinto, Nuno</creator><creator>Oliveira, Iris</creator><creator>Ferreira, Joana</creator><creator>Gama, Jorge</creator><creator>Vaz Pato, Maria</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Can theta burst stimulation safely influence auditory hearing thresholds in healthy young adults?</title><author>Pinto, Nuno ; Oliveira, Iris ; Ferreira, Joana ; Gama, Jorge ; Vaz Pato, Maria</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-7434850497a4db363930a0f986097ad6fe5a44aefb2b17dc5327b308b9ca6eaf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audiometry</topic><topic>Audiometry - methods</topic><topic>Auditory cortex</topic><topic>Auditory Cortex - physiology</topic><topic>Auditory threshold</topic><topic>Auditory Threshold - physiology</topic><topic>Deep Brain Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hearing - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Theta burst stimulation</topic><topic>Theta Rhythm - physiology</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Nuno</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Iris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Joana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gama, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vaz Pato, Maria</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pinto, Nuno</au><au>Oliveira, Iris</au><au>Ferreira, Joana</au><au>Gama, Jorge</au><au>Vaz Pato, Maria</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can theta burst stimulation safely influence auditory hearing thresholds in healthy young adults?</atitle><jtitle>Clinical neurophysiology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Neurophysiol</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1900</spage><epage>1907</epage><pages>1900-1907</pages><issn>1388-2457</issn><eissn>1872-8952</eissn><abstract>•Theta-burst stimulation (TBS) of auditory cortex was not associated with hearing impairment of other side effects.•Intermittent TBS (iTBS) of auditory cortex resulted in lowering of hearing threshold.•This effect occurred most prominently at 500 Hz and 4000 Hz. This TBS sham-controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of intermittent TBS (iTBS) and continuous TBS (cTBS) upon ipsilateral hearing thresholds after stimulation on the left auditory cortex. Sixty healthy adults, aged between 19 and 32 years (median of 23 years), were randomly distributed into three groups and underwent iTBS, cTBS or sham stimulation. Each double-blind experimental session comprised two pure tone audiometric evaluations per subject, before and after stimulation. To assess volunteer safety, a follow-up of at least 48 hours was implemented. The iTBS group mean thresholds displayed a tendency to decrease after stimulation, predominantly in the 500 Hz–6000 Hz interval and group comparisons revealed significant differences between the iTBS and sham groups for 500 Hz (p = 0.041) and between the iTBS and cTBS groups for 4000 Hz (p = 0.038). Neither relevant side effects nor any significant hearing threshold impairment after active or sham stimulation were found. A single stimulation session led to an effective neuromodulation of the auditory cortex, reflected in lower thresholds when using iTBS. These encouraging results with this safe noninvasive tool suggest that iTBS may have the potential to positively influence hearing thresholds.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31408791</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.019</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1388-2457
ispartof Clinical neurophysiology, 2019-10, Vol.130 (10), p.1900-1907
issn 1388-2457
1872-8952
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2273206770
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Adult
Audiometry
Audiometry - methods
Auditory cortex
Auditory Cortex - physiology
Auditory threshold
Auditory Threshold - physiology
Deep Brain Stimulation - methods
Double-Blind Method
Female
Hearing - physiology
Humans
Male
Prospective Studies
Safety
Theta burst stimulation
Theta Rhythm - physiology
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
Young Adult
title Can theta burst stimulation safely influence auditory hearing thresholds in healthy young adults?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A10%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20theta%20burst%20stimulation%20safely%20influence%20auditory%20hearing%20thresholds%20in%20healthy%20young%20adults?&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20neurophysiology&rft.au=Pinto,%20Nuno&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1900&rft.epage=1907&rft.pages=1900-1907&rft.issn=1388-2457&rft.eissn=1872-8952&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.07.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2273206770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2273206770&rft_id=info:pmid/31408791&rft_els_id=S1388245719311666&rfr_iscdi=true