Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?
Purpose Our aim was to assess the educational quality of the YouTube video content related to laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods An objective scoring tool named as Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation (PACE) score was used to measure and quantify seven critica...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2020-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1195-1199 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1199 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 1195 |
| container_title | World journal of urology |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Arslan, Burak Gönültaş, Serkan Gökmen, Ersin Özman, Oktay Onuk, Özkan Yazıcı, Gökhan Göv, Taha Özdemir, Enver |
| description | Purpose
Our aim was to assess the educational quality of the YouTube video content related to laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods
An objective scoring tool named as Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation (PACE) score was used to measure and quantify seven critical steps in RP including bladder drop, preparation of the prostate, bladder neck dissection, posterior/seminal vesicle dissection, neurovascular bundle preservation, apical dissection, and urethro-vesical anastomosis. A five-point scale was used for grading the seven steps, where a score of 1 and 5 represented the lowest and ideal performance, respectively. Additionally, descriptive statistics including the upload time, video length, view count, number of comments, likes, and dislikes were all recorded.
Results
Of the 1688 videos (551 from laparoscopic RP, 567 from robotic RP, and 570 from robot-assisted RP), 226 videos were analyzed after excluding duplicate and irrelevant videos. Robotic/robot-assisted RP videos were found to be statistically longer than laparoscopic RP videos (
p
= 0.016). The PACE score of urethro-vesical anastomosis step in robotic RP videos was statistically higher than laparoscopic RP videos (
p
= 0.021). A weak but significant positive correlation between the video length and total PACE score (rho: 0.51;
p
= 0.04 for laparoscopic RP and rho: 0.43;
p
= 0.03 for robotic/robot-assisted RP) was found. A weak but positive correlation was also determined between number of likes and total PACE score (rho: 0.39;
p
= 0.02) for robotic/robot-assisted RP videos.
Conclusions
Although YouTube website includes high-quality videos for both laparoscopic and robotic/robot-assisted RP, there is no objective parameter to predict the educational quality of the videos. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00345-019-02904-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2271836326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2271836326</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df287e1a8be3e37c0b6ea23815ff8f5cd1ea0718a18fd3a63f8ae2a2282b6e0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CALHHhYhjbSeycECoUkCpxKQdO1sQZb12y8dZODvvv8bIFJA6cZqR55p2Pl7EXEt5IAPO2AOimFSB7AaqHRnSP2EY2WgtrVPeYbcCoRjS91WfsvJQ7AGk6aJ-yMy1131vVbNiPD4kK_57Wm3UgHmc_rSPx27i9FfcrTnE58EwlrdlXLKTMl4xxjvOWp5lPuMecik_76DnOI89pSEvNM47R48T3tbrgQn5Ju8O7Z-xJwKnQ84d4wb5dfby5_Cyuv376cvn-Wnht2kWMQVlDEu1AmrTxMHSESlvZhmBD60dJCEZalDaMGjsdLJJCpayqJAz6gr0-6dbx9yuVxe1i8TRNOFNai1OqdutOq66ir_5B7-qtc93uSIGyVhpVKXWifL2nZApun-MO88FJcEcr3MkKV61wv6xwR-mXD9LrsKPxT8vv31dAn4BSS_OW8t_Z_5H9CRIWlfc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2270288172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Arslan, Burak ; Gönültaş, Serkan ; Gökmen, Ersin ; Özman, Oktay ; Onuk, Özkan ; Yazıcı, Gökhan ; Göv, Taha ; Özdemir, Enver</creator><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Burak ; Gönültaş, Serkan ; Gökmen, Ersin ; Özman, Oktay ; Onuk, Özkan ; Yazıcı, Gökhan ; Göv, Taha ; Özdemir, Enver</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Our aim was to assess the educational quality of the YouTube video content related to laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods
An objective scoring tool named as Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation (PACE) score was used to measure and quantify seven critical steps in RP including bladder drop, preparation of the prostate, bladder neck dissection, posterior/seminal vesicle dissection, neurovascular bundle preservation, apical dissection, and urethro-vesical anastomosis. A five-point scale was used for grading the seven steps, where a score of 1 and 5 represented the lowest and ideal performance, respectively. Additionally, descriptive statistics including the upload time, video length, view count, number of comments, likes, and dislikes were all recorded.
Results
Of the 1688 videos (551 from laparoscopic RP, 567 from robotic RP, and 570 from robot-assisted RP), 226 videos were analyzed after excluding duplicate and irrelevant videos. Robotic/robot-assisted RP videos were found to be statistically longer than laparoscopic RP videos (
p
= 0.016). The PACE score of urethro-vesical anastomosis step in robotic RP videos was statistically higher than laparoscopic RP videos (
p
= 0.021). A weak but significant positive correlation between the video length and total PACE score (rho: 0.51;
p
= 0.04 for laparoscopic RP and rho: 0.43;
p
= 0.03 for robotic/robot-assisted RP) was found. A weak but positive correlation was also determined between number of likes and total PACE score (rho: 0.39;
p
= 0.02) for robotic/robot-assisted RP videos.
Conclusions
Although YouTube website includes high-quality videos for both laparoscopic and robotic/robot-assisted RP, there is no objective parameter to predict the educational quality of the videos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02904-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31399824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anastomosis ; Cancer surgery ; Dissection ; Humans ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - education ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nephrology ; Oncology ; Original Article ; Preservation ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - education ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - education ; Robotics ; Robots ; Seminal vesicle ; Social Media ; Urological surgery ; Urology ; Webcasts as Topic - standards</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 2020-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1195-1199</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df287e1a8be3e37c0b6ea23815ff8f5cd1ea0718a18fd3a63f8ae2a2282b6e0b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df287e1a8be3e37c0b6ea23815ff8f5cd1ea0718a18fd3a63f8ae2a2282b6e0b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6629-5153</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00345-019-02904-6$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-019-02904-6$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399824$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gönültaş, Serkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gökmen, Ersin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özman, Oktay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onuk, Özkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazıcı, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göv, Taha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Enver</creatorcontrib><title>Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Our aim was to assess the educational quality of the YouTube video content related to laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods
An objective scoring tool named as Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation (PACE) score was used to measure and quantify seven critical steps in RP including bladder drop, preparation of the prostate, bladder neck dissection, posterior/seminal vesicle dissection, neurovascular bundle preservation, apical dissection, and urethro-vesical anastomosis. A five-point scale was used for grading the seven steps, where a score of 1 and 5 represented the lowest and ideal performance, respectively. Additionally, descriptive statistics including the upload time, video length, view count, number of comments, likes, and dislikes were all recorded.
Results
Of the 1688 videos (551 from laparoscopic RP, 567 from robotic RP, and 570 from robot-assisted RP), 226 videos were analyzed after excluding duplicate and irrelevant videos. Robotic/robot-assisted RP videos were found to be statistically longer than laparoscopic RP videos (
p
= 0.016). The PACE score of urethro-vesical anastomosis step in robotic RP videos was statistically higher than laparoscopic RP videos (
p
= 0.021). A weak but significant positive correlation between the video length and total PACE score (rho: 0.51;
p
= 0.04 for laparoscopic RP and rho: 0.43;
p
= 0.03 for robotic/robot-assisted RP) was found. A weak but positive correlation was also determined between number of likes and total PACE score (rho: 0.39;
p
= 0.02) for robotic/robot-assisted RP videos.
Conclusions
Although YouTube website includes high-quality videos for both laparoscopic and robotic/robot-assisted RP, there is no objective parameter to predict the educational quality of the videos.</description><subject>Anastomosis</subject><subject>Cancer surgery</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - education</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - education</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - education</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Seminal vesicle</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><subject>Webcasts as Topic - standards</subject><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1v1DAQhi0EotvCH-CALHHhYhjbSeycECoUkCpxKQdO1sQZb12y8dZODvvv8bIFJA6cZqR55p2Pl7EXEt5IAPO2AOimFSB7AaqHRnSP2EY2WgtrVPeYbcCoRjS91WfsvJQ7AGk6aJ-yMy1131vVbNiPD4kK_57Wm3UgHmc_rSPx27i9FfcrTnE58EwlrdlXLKTMl4xxjvOWp5lPuMecik_76DnOI89pSEvNM47R48T3tbrgQn5Ju8O7Z-xJwKnQ84d4wb5dfby5_Cyuv376cvn-Wnht2kWMQVlDEu1AmrTxMHSESlvZhmBD60dJCEZalDaMGjsdLJJCpayqJAz6gr0-6dbx9yuVxe1i8TRNOFNai1OqdutOq66ir_5B7-qtc93uSIGyVhpVKXWifL2nZApun-MO88FJcEcr3MkKV61wv6xwR-mXD9LrsKPxT8vv31dAn4BSS_OW8t_Z_5H9CRIWlfc</recordid><startdate>20200501</startdate><enddate>20200501</enddate><creator>Arslan, Burak</creator><creator>Gönültaş, Serkan</creator><creator>Gökmen, Ersin</creator><creator>Özman, Oktay</creator><creator>Onuk, Özkan</creator><creator>Yazıcı, Gökhan</creator><creator>Göv, Taha</creator><creator>Özdemir, Enver</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-5153</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200501</creationdate><title>Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?</title><author>Arslan, Burak ; Gönültaş, Serkan ; Gökmen, Ersin ; Özman, Oktay ; Onuk, Özkan ; Yazıcı, Gökhan ; Göv, Taha ; Özdemir, Enver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-df287e1a8be3e37c0b6ea23815ff8f5cd1ea0718a18fd3a63f8ae2a2282b6e0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anastomosis</topic><topic>Cancer surgery</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - education</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - education</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - education</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Seminal vesicle</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><topic>Webcasts as Topic - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Burak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gönültaş, Serkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gökmen, Ersin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özman, Oktay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Onuk, Özkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yazıcı, Gökhan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göv, Taha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Özdemir, Enver</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arslan, Burak</au><au>Gönültaş, Serkan</au><au>Gökmen, Ersin</au><au>Özman, Oktay</au><au>Onuk, Özkan</au><au>Yazıcı, Gökhan</au><au>Göv, Taha</au><au>Özdemir, Enver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy?</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><stitle>World J Urol</stitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>2020-05-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1195</spage><epage>1199</epage><pages>1195-1199</pages><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Our aim was to assess the educational quality of the YouTube video content related to laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy (RP).
Methods
An objective scoring tool named as Prostatectomy Assessment and Competency Evaluation (PACE) score was used to measure and quantify seven critical steps in RP including bladder drop, preparation of the prostate, bladder neck dissection, posterior/seminal vesicle dissection, neurovascular bundle preservation, apical dissection, and urethro-vesical anastomosis. A five-point scale was used for grading the seven steps, where a score of 1 and 5 represented the lowest and ideal performance, respectively. Additionally, descriptive statistics including the upload time, video length, view count, number of comments, likes, and dislikes were all recorded.
Results
Of the 1688 videos (551 from laparoscopic RP, 567 from robotic RP, and 570 from robot-assisted RP), 226 videos were analyzed after excluding duplicate and irrelevant videos. Robotic/robot-assisted RP videos were found to be statistically longer than laparoscopic RP videos (
p
= 0.016). The PACE score of urethro-vesical anastomosis step in robotic RP videos was statistically higher than laparoscopic RP videos (
p
= 0.021). A weak but significant positive correlation between the video length and total PACE score (rho: 0.51;
p
= 0.04 for laparoscopic RP and rho: 0.43;
p
= 0.03 for robotic/robot-assisted RP) was found. A weak but positive correlation was also determined between number of likes and total PACE score (rho: 0.39;
p
= 0.02) for robotic/robot-assisted RP videos.
Conclusions
Although YouTube website includes high-quality videos for both laparoscopic and robotic/robot-assisted RP, there is no objective parameter to predict the educational quality of the videos.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>31399824</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00345-019-02904-6</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6629-5153</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0724-4983 |
| ispartof | World journal of urology, 2020-05, Vol.38 (5), p.1195-1199 |
| issn | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2271836326 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Anastomosis Cancer surgery Dissection Humans Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - education Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nephrology Oncology Original Article Preservation Prostate Prostate cancer Prostatectomy Prostatectomy - education Prostatectomy - methods Robotic Surgical Procedures - education Robotics Robots Seminal vesicle Social Media Urological surgery Urology Webcasts as Topic - standards |
| title | Does YouTube include high-quality resources for training on laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy? |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T00%3A44%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20YouTube%20include%20high-quality%20resources%20for%20training%20on%20laparoscopic%20and%20robotic%20radical%20prostatectomy?&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Arslan,%20Burak&rft.date=2020-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1195&rft.epage=1199&rft.pages=1195-1199&rft.issn=0724-4983&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00345-019-02904-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2271836326%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2270288172&rft_id=info:pmid/31399824&rfr_iscdi=true |