Teeth&Tweets: the reach and reaction of an online social media oral health promotion campaign

Aim The aim of the study was to investigate: i) the geographical reach and reaction of the online participants engaging in an oral health campaign 'National Smile Month' UK 2016 (NSM); and ii) whether dental practices during NSM were using Twitter to help address regional oral health inequ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:British dental journal 2019-08, Vol.227 (3), p.217-222
Hauptverfasser: Potts, Gemma, Radford, David R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 222
container_issue 3
container_start_page 217
container_title British dental journal
container_volume 227
creator Potts, Gemma
Radford, David R.
description Aim The aim of the study was to investigate: i) the geographical reach and reaction of the online participants engaging in an oral health campaign 'National Smile Month' UK 2016 (NSM); and ii) whether dental practices during NSM were using Twitter to help address regional oral health inequalities. Methods Twitter posts, that is 'tweets', were collected using the application programming interface (API) software Mozdeh, for one month. Tweets were classified into high, medium or low engagement. Participants' postcode data of the organisation/practice were obtained via an internet search using Google. The geolocation of tweets was then linked by organisations' postcode to the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation and the oral health survey of five-year-olds 2014/15, and subsequently mapped using Google Fusion Tables. Results A total of 23,100 tweets were captured with a final total of 2,968 usable tweets from 763 separate accounts. Two hundred and twelve tweets were from dental practices, with 107 classified as low engagement, 99 medium, and 45 high engagement (39 of those tweets were from organisations allied to oral health). Interactive maps were created to give a visual representation of the relationship between those participants producing 'high' impact tweets and the level of dental decay in five-year-olds and deprivation levels. Conclusion The majority of tweets did not promote any specific preventative behaviour. Dental practices in England were not contributing to National Smile Month via Twitter in a way that would improve regional oral health inequalities. In areas of high-need there is evidence of proactive engagement with NSM via Twitter by local authorities and their healthcare partners.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s41415-019-0593-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2271830162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2271830162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287z-edbd6e30492a814f35f10618293da1a184d95b9858fcc290b9023b0c12a874c23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFq3DAQhkVp6G7TPkAuQVAIuTiZkWRbyi2EpC0Ectkci5BlOfZiWxvJJmSfvtps2kAgpxmhb2Z-PkKOEM4QuDyPAgXmGaDKIFc8234iSxRlkeW85J_JEgDKDAqEBfka4xoAhYDiC1lw5EoVEpbkz8q5qT1ZPaUSL-jUOhqcsS01Y_3STZ0fqW_Sm_qx70ZHo7ed6eng6s5QH1LbOtNPLd0EP_gX3pphY7qH8Rs5aEwf3ffXekjub65XV7-y27ufv68ubzPLZLnNXF3VheMgFDMSRcPzBlNsyRSvDRqUolZ5pWQuG2uZgkoB4xVYTHgpLOOH5HS_N0V4nF2c9NBF6_rejM7PUTNWouSAxQ798Q5d-zmMKd2OghxUkctE4Z6ywccYXKM3oRtMeNYIeude793r5F7v3Ottmjl-3TxXSc7_iX-yE8D2QExf44MLb6c_3voXJtiOHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2270509658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teeth&amp;Tweets: the reach and reaction of an online social media oral health promotion campaign</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Potts, Gemma ; Radford, David R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Potts, Gemma ; Radford, David R.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The aim of the study was to investigate: i) the geographical reach and reaction of the online participants engaging in an oral health campaign 'National Smile Month' UK 2016 (NSM); and ii) whether dental practices during NSM were using Twitter to help address regional oral health inequalities. Methods Twitter posts, that is 'tweets', were collected using the application programming interface (API) software Mozdeh, for one month. Tweets were classified into high, medium or low engagement. Participants' postcode data of the organisation/practice were obtained via an internet search using Google. The geolocation of tweets was then linked by organisations' postcode to the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation and the oral health survey of five-year-olds 2014/15, and subsequently mapped using Google Fusion Tables. Results A total of 23,100 tweets were captured with a final total of 2,968 usable tweets from 763 separate accounts. Two hundred and twelve tweets were from dental practices, with 107 classified as low engagement, 99 medium, and 45 high engagement (39 of those tweets were from organisations allied to oral health). Interactive maps were created to give a visual representation of the relationship between those participants producing 'high' impact tweets and the level of dental decay in five-year-olds and deprivation levels. Conclusion The majority of tweets did not promote any specific preventative behaviour. Dental practices in England were not contributing to National Smile Month via Twitter in a way that would improve regional oral health inequalities. In areas of high-need there is evidence of proactive engagement with NSM via Twitter by local authorities and their healthcare partners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5373</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41415-019-0593-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31399680</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>Dentistry ; Dentists ; England ; Health disparities ; Health Promotion ; Internet ; Oral Health ; Oral hygiene ; Social Media ; Social networks ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>British dental journal, 2019-08, Vol.227 (3), p.217-222</ispartof><rights>British Dental Association 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Nature Publishing Group Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287z-edbd6e30492a814f35f10618293da1a184d95b9858fcc290b9023b0c12a874c23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c287z-edbd6e30492a814f35f10618293da1a184d95b9858fcc290b9023b0c12a874c23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41415-019-0593-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41415-019-0593-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31399680$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potts, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radford, David R.</creatorcontrib><title>Teeth&amp;Tweets: the reach and reaction of an online social media oral health promotion campaign</title><title>British dental journal</title><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><description>Aim The aim of the study was to investigate: i) the geographical reach and reaction of the online participants engaging in an oral health campaign 'National Smile Month' UK 2016 (NSM); and ii) whether dental practices during NSM were using Twitter to help address regional oral health inequalities. Methods Twitter posts, that is 'tweets', were collected using the application programming interface (API) software Mozdeh, for one month. Tweets were classified into high, medium or low engagement. Participants' postcode data of the organisation/practice were obtained via an internet search using Google. The geolocation of tweets was then linked by organisations' postcode to the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation and the oral health survey of five-year-olds 2014/15, and subsequently mapped using Google Fusion Tables. Results A total of 23,100 tweets were captured with a final total of 2,968 usable tweets from 763 separate accounts. Two hundred and twelve tweets were from dental practices, with 107 classified as low engagement, 99 medium, and 45 high engagement (39 of those tweets were from organisations allied to oral health). Interactive maps were created to give a visual representation of the relationship between those participants producing 'high' impact tweets and the level of dental decay in five-year-olds and deprivation levels. Conclusion The majority of tweets did not promote any specific preventative behaviour. Dental practices in England were not contributing to National Smile Month via Twitter in a way that would improve regional oral health inequalities. In areas of high-need there is evidence of proactive engagement with NSM via Twitter by local authorities and their healthcare partners.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Health disparities</subject><subject>Health Promotion</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Oral Health</subject><subject>Oral hygiene</subject><subject>Social Media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0007-0610</issn><issn>1476-5373</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFq3DAQhkVp6G7TPkAuQVAIuTiZkWRbyi2EpC0Ectkci5BlOfZiWxvJJmSfvtps2kAgpxmhb2Z-PkKOEM4QuDyPAgXmGaDKIFc8234iSxRlkeW85J_JEgDKDAqEBfka4xoAhYDiC1lw5EoVEpbkz8q5qT1ZPaUSL-jUOhqcsS01Y_3STZ0fqW_Sm_qx70ZHo7ed6eng6s5QH1LbOtNPLd0EP_gX3pphY7qH8Rs5aEwf3ffXekjub65XV7-y27ufv68ubzPLZLnNXF3VheMgFDMSRcPzBlNsyRSvDRqUolZ5pWQuG2uZgkoB4xVYTHgpLOOH5HS_N0V4nF2c9NBF6_rejM7PUTNWouSAxQ798Q5d-zmMKd2OghxUkctE4Z6ywccYXKM3oRtMeNYIeude793r5F7v3Ottmjl-3TxXSc7_iX-yE8D2QExf44MLb6c_3voXJtiOHA</recordid><startdate>20190801</startdate><enddate>20190801</enddate><creator>Potts, Gemma</creator><creator>Radford, David R.</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190801</creationdate><title>Teeth&amp;Tweets: the reach and reaction of an online social media oral health promotion campaign</title><author>Potts, Gemma ; Radford, David R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c287z-edbd6e30492a814f35f10618293da1a184d95b9858fcc290b9023b0c12a874c23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Health disparities</topic><topic>Health Promotion</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Oral Health</topic><topic>Oral hygiene</topic><topic>Social Media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potts, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Radford, David R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>British dental journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potts, Gemma</au><au>Radford, David R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teeth&amp;Tweets: the reach and reaction of an online social media oral health promotion campaign</atitle><jtitle>British dental journal</jtitle><stitle>Br Dent J</stitle><addtitle>Br Dent J</addtitle><date>2019-08-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>227</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>217</spage><epage>222</epage><pages>217-222</pages><issn>0007-0610</issn><eissn>1476-5373</eissn><abstract>Aim The aim of the study was to investigate: i) the geographical reach and reaction of the online participants engaging in an oral health campaign 'National Smile Month' UK 2016 (NSM); and ii) whether dental practices during NSM were using Twitter to help address regional oral health inequalities. Methods Twitter posts, that is 'tweets', were collected using the application programming interface (API) software Mozdeh, for one month. Tweets were classified into high, medium or low engagement. Participants' postcode data of the organisation/practice were obtained via an internet search using Google. The geolocation of tweets was then linked by organisations' postcode to the 2015 Index of Multiple Deprivation and the oral health survey of five-year-olds 2014/15, and subsequently mapped using Google Fusion Tables. Results A total of 23,100 tweets were captured with a final total of 2,968 usable tweets from 763 separate accounts. Two hundred and twelve tweets were from dental practices, with 107 classified as low engagement, 99 medium, and 45 high engagement (39 of those tweets were from organisations allied to oral health). Interactive maps were created to give a visual representation of the relationship between those participants producing 'high' impact tweets and the level of dental decay in five-year-olds and deprivation levels. Conclusion The majority of tweets did not promote any specific preventative behaviour. Dental practices in England were not contributing to National Smile Month via Twitter in a way that would improve regional oral health inequalities. In areas of high-need there is evidence of proactive engagement with NSM via Twitter by local authorities and their healthcare partners.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>31399680</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41415-019-0593-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0007-0610
ispartof British dental journal, 2019-08, Vol.227 (3), p.217-222
issn 0007-0610
1476-5373
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2271830162
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Dentistry
Dentists
England
Health disparities
Health Promotion
Internet
Oral Health
Oral hygiene
Social Media
Social networks
Teeth
title Teeth&Tweets: the reach and reaction of an online social media oral health promotion campaign
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A24%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teeth&Tweets:%20the%20reach%20and%20reaction%20of%20an%20online%20social%20media%20oral%20health%20promotion%20campaign&rft.jtitle=British%20dental%20journal&rft.au=Potts,%20Gemma&rft.date=2019-08-01&rft.volume=227&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=217&rft.epage=222&rft.pages=217-222&rft.issn=0007-0610&rft.eissn=1476-5373&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41415-019-0593-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2271830162%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2270509658&rft_id=info:pmid/31399680&rfr_iscdi=true