Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw
Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2019-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1600-1607 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1607 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1600 |
container_title | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Wehrhan, Falk Weber, Manuel Neukam, Friedrich W. Geppert, Carol-Immanuel Kesting, Marco Preidl, Raimund H.M. |
description | Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack of histopathological studies correlating the intraoperative fluorescence situation to histopathological analyses of the respective bone areas in order to further validate this method.
Histopathological sections from intraoperatively detected fluorescence- and non−fluorescence-labeled bone were analyzed detecting osteocyte and collagen content, RANK(L) and TRAP expression as well as proportion of immature bone regeneration. Samples were compared with viable-looking bone areas according to the intraoperative clinical situation.
Staining revealed a significant decrease of osteocytes and collagen type-I fibers in necrotic, non-fluorescing areas compared to fluorescing bone (R/RGB [%]: 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 3.18 ± 2.22 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of osteocytes was higher in fluorescing, clinically viable bone samples (cell/mm2: 151.26 ± 95.77 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.028). Additionally, the amount of immature bone was substantially increased in luminescent jaw bone (proportion of red [%]: 6.78 ± 7.00 (fluorescence positive) vs. 2.24 ± 1.36 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.442). RANK(L) and TRAP expression did not differ between the investigated areas, resembling a generalized decrease in osteocyte−osteoclast function all over the jaw (RANK(L) −positive cells per mm2: 8.97 ± 7.85 (fluorescence positive) vs. 7.76 ± 6.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.793; TRAP-positive cells per mm2: 0.36 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.33 ± 0.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.887).
Intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery might be more precise in identifying and resecting the necrotic bone compared to previous indicators like bone bleeding, which could be useful to further improve surgical therapy in MRONJ patients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2269399292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518219302239</els_id><sourcerecordid>2269399292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5111d4d5cdec51a0436d668dba5b1b9e95bd80428ddc78953d9d15601b7b09873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaD7aP9BD0bEXuzPy2pZKLsuSTQqBXNqzkKXZRMZrbSU7Yf99ZDbpsSeJ4ZmXeR_GviKUCNj86Mve7lMpAFUJbQkoPrALlK0sVojqY_4DQlGjFOfsMqUeABqQ6hM7r7DKWAUXrN8Oc4iULI2WisfZO3K8CyPxPCQ7-TD-5Gv-5NMUhvDorRm4Gc1wTD5xP_I9uTxbsCLSYKa8HdJEOcDGsDBhx6cn4r15-czOdmZI9OXtvWJ_tje_N3fF_cPtr836vrBV3Uz5XkS3crV1ZGs0sKoa1zTSdabusFOk6s5JWAnpnG2lqiunHNYNYNd2oGRbXbHvp9xDDH9nSpPe-9xvGMxIYU5aiEZVSgklMipO6HJsirTTh-j3Jh41gl4c614vjvXiWEOrs-O89O0tf-5y_X8r71IzcH0CKLd89hR1sn7x63zMSrUL_n_5r3u-jtM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2269399292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wehrhan, Falk ; Weber, Manuel ; Neukam, Friedrich W. ; Geppert, Carol-Immanuel ; Kesting, Marco ; Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wehrhan, Falk ; Weber, Manuel ; Neukam, Friedrich W. ; Geppert, Carol-Immanuel ; Kesting, Marco ; Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack of histopathological studies correlating the intraoperative fluorescence situation to histopathological analyses of the respective bone areas in order to further validate this method.
Histopathological sections from intraoperatively detected fluorescence- and non−fluorescence-labeled bone were analyzed detecting osteocyte and collagen content, RANK(L) and TRAP expression as well as proportion of immature bone regeneration. Samples were compared with viable-looking bone areas according to the intraoperative clinical situation.
Staining revealed a significant decrease of osteocytes and collagen type-I fibers in necrotic, non-fluorescing areas compared to fluorescing bone (R/RGB [%]: 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 3.18 ± 2.22 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of osteocytes was higher in fluorescing, clinically viable bone samples (cell/mm2: 151.26 ± 95.77 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.028). Additionally, the amount of immature bone was substantially increased in luminescent jaw bone (proportion of red [%]: 6.78 ± 7.00 (fluorescence positive) vs. 2.24 ± 1.36 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.442). RANK(L) and TRAP expression did not differ between the investigated areas, resembling a generalized decrease in osteocyte−osteoclast function all over the jaw (RANK(L) −positive cells per mm2: 8.97 ± 7.85 (fluorescence positive) vs. 7.76 ± 6.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.793; TRAP-positive cells per mm2: 0.36 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.33 ± 0.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.887).
Intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery might be more precise in identifying and resecting the necrotic bone compared to previous indicators like bone bleeding, which could be useful to further improve surgical therapy in MRONJ patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31387830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bisphosphonate ; Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; Bone fluorescence ; BRONJ ; Dentistry ; Diphosphonates ; Doxycycline ; Fluorescence ; Humans ; MRONJ ; Osteoclasts</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2019-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1600-1607</ispartof><rights>2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5111d4d5cdec51a0436d668dba5b1b9e95bd80428ddc78953d9d15601b7b09873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5111d4d5cdec51a0436d668dba5b1b9e95bd80428ddc78953d9d15601b7b09873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31387830$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wehrhan, Falk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neukam, Friedrich W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geppert, Carol-Immanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesting, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack of histopathological studies correlating the intraoperative fluorescence situation to histopathological analyses of the respective bone areas in order to further validate this method.
Histopathological sections from intraoperatively detected fluorescence- and non−fluorescence-labeled bone were analyzed detecting osteocyte and collagen content, RANK(L) and TRAP expression as well as proportion of immature bone regeneration. Samples were compared with viable-looking bone areas according to the intraoperative clinical situation.
Staining revealed a significant decrease of osteocytes and collagen type-I fibers in necrotic, non-fluorescing areas compared to fluorescing bone (R/RGB [%]: 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 3.18 ± 2.22 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of osteocytes was higher in fluorescing, clinically viable bone samples (cell/mm2: 151.26 ± 95.77 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.028). Additionally, the amount of immature bone was substantially increased in luminescent jaw bone (proportion of red [%]: 6.78 ± 7.00 (fluorescence positive) vs. 2.24 ± 1.36 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.442). RANK(L) and TRAP expression did not differ between the investigated areas, resembling a generalized decrease in osteocyte−osteoclast function all over the jaw (RANK(L) −positive cells per mm2: 8.97 ± 7.85 (fluorescence positive) vs. 7.76 ± 6.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.793; TRAP-positive cells per mm2: 0.36 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.33 ± 0.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.887).
Intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery might be more precise in identifying and resecting the necrotic bone compared to previous indicators like bone bleeding, which could be useful to further improve surgical therapy in MRONJ patients.</description><subject>Bisphosphonate</subject><subject>Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents</subject><subject>Bone fluorescence</subject><subject>BRONJ</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diphosphonates</subject><subject>Doxycycline</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>MRONJ</subject><subject>Osteoclasts</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaD7aP9BD0bEXuzPy2pZKLsuSTQqBXNqzkKXZRMZrbSU7Yf99ZDbpsSeJ4ZmXeR_GviKUCNj86Mve7lMpAFUJbQkoPrALlK0sVojqY_4DQlGjFOfsMqUeABqQ6hM7r7DKWAUXrN8Oc4iULI2WisfZO3K8CyPxPCQ7-TD-5Gv-5NMUhvDorRm4Gc1wTD5xP_I9uTxbsCLSYKa8HdJEOcDGsDBhx6cn4r15-czOdmZI9OXtvWJ_tje_N3fF_cPtr836vrBV3Uz5XkS3crV1ZGs0sKoa1zTSdabusFOk6s5JWAnpnG2lqiunHNYNYNd2oGRbXbHvp9xDDH9nSpPe-9xvGMxIYU5aiEZVSgklMipO6HJsirTTh-j3Jh41gl4c614vjvXiWEOrs-O89O0tf-5y_X8r71IzcH0CKLd89hR1sn7x63zMSrUL_n_5r3u-jtM</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Wehrhan, Falk</creator><creator>Weber, Manuel</creator><creator>Neukam, Friedrich W.</creator><creator>Geppert, Carol-Immanuel</creator><creator>Kesting, Marco</creator><creator>Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw</title><author>Wehrhan, Falk ; Weber, Manuel ; Neukam, Friedrich W. ; Geppert, Carol-Immanuel ; Kesting, Marco ; Preidl, Raimund H.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5111d4d5cdec51a0436d668dba5b1b9e95bd80428ddc78953d9d15601b7b09873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bisphosphonate</topic><topic>Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents</topic><topic>Bone fluorescence</topic><topic>BRONJ</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diphosphonates</topic><topic>Doxycycline</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>MRONJ</topic><topic>Osteoclasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wehrhan, Falk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neukam, Friedrich W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geppert, Carol-Immanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesting, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wehrhan, Falk</au><au>Weber, Manuel</au><au>Neukam, Friedrich W.</au><au>Geppert, Carol-Immanuel</au><au>Kesting, Marco</au><au>Preidl, Raimund H.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1600</spage><epage>1607</epage><pages>1600-1607</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack of histopathological studies correlating the intraoperative fluorescence situation to histopathological analyses of the respective bone areas in order to further validate this method.
Histopathological sections from intraoperatively detected fluorescence- and non−fluorescence-labeled bone were analyzed detecting osteocyte and collagen content, RANK(L) and TRAP expression as well as proportion of immature bone regeneration. Samples were compared with viable-looking bone areas according to the intraoperative clinical situation.
Staining revealed a significant decrease of osteocytes and collagen type-I fibers in necrotic, non-fluorescing areas compared to fluorescing bone (R/RGB [%]: 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 3.18 ± 2.22 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of osteocytes was higher in fluorescing, clinically viable bone samples (cell/mm2: 151.26 ± 95.77 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.028). Additionally, the amount of immature bone was substantially increased in luminescent jaw bone (proportion of red [%]: 6.78 ± 7.00 (fluorescence positive) vs. 2.24 ± 1.36 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.442). RANK(L) and TRAP expression did not differ between the investigated areas, resembling a generalized decrease in osteocyte−osteoclast function all over the jaw (RANK(L) −positive cells per mm2: 8.97 ± 7.85 (fluorescence positive) vs. 7.76 ± 6.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.793; TRAP-positive cells per mm2: 0.36 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.33 ± 0.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.887).
Intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery might be more precise in identifying and resecting the necrotic bone compared to previous indicators like bone bleeding, which could be useful to further improve surgical therapy in MRONJ patients.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31387830</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1010-5182 |
ispartof | Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2019-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1600-1607 |
issn | 1010-5182 1878-4119 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2269399292 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE |
subjects | Bisphosphonate Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Bone Density Conservation Agents Bone fluorescence BRONJ Dentistry Diphosphonates Doxycycline Fluorescence Humans MRONJ Osteoclasts |
title | Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A11%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluorescence-guided%20bone%20resection:%20A%20histological%20analysis%20in%20medication-related%20osteonecrosis%20of%20the%20jaw&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Wehrhan,%20Falk&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1600&rft.epage=1607&rft.pages=1600-1607&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2269399292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2269399292&rft_id=info:pmid/31387830&rft_els_id=S1010518219302239&rfr_iscdi=true |