Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw

Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2019-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1600-1607
Hauptverfasser: Wehrhan, Falk, Weber, Manuel, Neukam, Friedrich W., Geppert, Carol-Immanuel, Kesting, Marco, Preidl, Raimund H.M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1607
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1600
container_title Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery
container_volume 47
creator Wehrhan, Falk
Weber, Manuel
Neukam, Friedrich W.
Geppert, Carol-Immanuel
Kesting, Marco
Preidl, Raimund H.M.
description Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack of histopathological studies correlating the intraoperative fluorescence situation to histopathological analyses of the respective bone areas in order to further validate this method. Histopathological sections from intraoperatively detected fluorescence- and non−fluorescence-labeled bone were analyzed detecting osteocyte and collagen content, RANK(L) and TRAP expression as well as proportion of immature bone regeneration. Samples were compared with viable-looking bone areas according to the intraoperative clinical situation. Staining revealed a significant decrease of osteocytes and collagen type-I fibers in necrotic, non-fluorescing areas compared to fluorescing bone (R/RGB [%]: 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 3.18 ± 2.22 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of osteocytes was higher in fluorescing, clinically viable bone samples (cell/mm2: 151.26 ± 95.77 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.028). Additionally, the amount of immature bone was substantially increased in luminescent jaw bone (proportion of red [%]: 6.78 ± 7.00 (fluorescence positive) vs. 2.24 ± 1.36 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.442). RANK(L) and TRAP expression did not differ between the investigated areas, resembling a generalized decrease in osteocyte−osteoclast function all over the jaw (RANK(L) −positive cells per mm2: 8.97 ± 7.85 (fluorescence positive) vs. 7.76 ± 6.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.793; TRAP-positive cells per mm2: 0.36 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.33 ± 0.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.887). Intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery might be more precise in identifying and resecting the necrotic bone compared to previous indicators like bone bleeding, which could be useful to further improve surgical therapy in MRONJ patients.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2269399292</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1010518219302239</els_id><sourcerecordid>2269399292</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5111d4d5cdec51a0436d668dba5b1b9e95bd80428ddc78953d9d15601b7b09873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaD7aP9BD0bEXuzPy2pZKLsuSTQqBXNqzkKXZRMZrbSU7Yf99ZDbpsSeJ4ZmXeR_GviKUCNj86Mve7lMpAFUJbQkoPrALlK0sVojqY_4DQlGjFOfsMqUeABqQ6hM7r7DKWAUXrN8Oc4iULI2WisfZO3K8CyPxPCQ7-TD-5Gv-5NMUhvDorRm4Gc1wTD5xP_I9uTxbsCLSYKa8HdJEOcDGsDBhx6cn4r15-czOdmZI9OXtvWJ_tje_N3fF_cPtr836vrBV3Uz5XkS3crV1ZGs0sKoa1zTSdabusFOk6s5JWAnpnG2lqiunHNYNYNd2oGRbXbHvp9xDDH9nSpPe-9xvGMxIYU5aiEZVSgklMipO6HJsirTTh-j3Jh41gl4c614vjvXiWEOrs-O89O0tf-5y_X8r71IzcH0CKLd89hR1sn7x63zMSrUL_n_5r3u-jtM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2269399292</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wehrhan, Falk ; Weber, Manuel ; Neukam, Friedrich W. ; Geppert, Carol-Immanuel ; Kesting, Marco ; Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wehrhan, Falk ; Weber, Manuel ; Neukam, Friedrich W. ; Geppert, Carol-Immanuel ; Kesting, Marco ; Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack of histopathological studies correlating the intraoperative fluorescence situation to histopathological analyses of the respective bone areas in order to further validate this method. Histopathological sections from intraoperatively detected fluorescence- and non−fluorescence-labeled bone were analyzed detecting osteocyte and collagen content, RANK(L) and TRAP expression as well as proportion of immature bone regeneration. Samples were compared with viable-looking bone areas according to the intraoperative clinical situation. Staining revealed a significant decrease of osteocytes and collagen type-I fibers in necrotic, non-fluorescing areas compared to fluorescing bone (R/RGB [%]: 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 3.18 ± 2.22 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of osteocytes was higher in fluorescing, clinically viable bone samples (cell/mm2: 151.26 ± 95.77 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.028). Additionally, the amount of immature bone was substantially increased in luminescent jaw bone (proportion of red [%]: 6.78 ± 7.00 (fluorescence positive) vs. 2.24 ± 1.36 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.442). RANK(L) and TRAP expression did not differ between the investigated areas, resembling a generalized decrease in osteocyte−osteoclast function all over the jaw (RANK(L) −positive cells per mm2: 8.97 ± 7.85 (fluorescence positive) vs. 7.76 ± 6.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.793; TRAP-positive cells per mm2: 0.36 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.33 ± 0.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.887). Intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery might be more precise in identifying and resecting the necrotic bone compared to previous indicators like bone bleeding, which could be useful to further improve surgical therapy in MRONJ patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1010-5182</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4119</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31387830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bisphosphonate ; Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw ; Bone Density Conservation Agents ; Bone fluorescence ; BRONJ ; Dentistry ; Diphosphonates ; Doxycycline ; Fluorescence ; Humans ; MRONJ ; Osteoclasts</subject><ispartof>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2019-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1600-1607</ispartof><rights>2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5111d4d5cdec51a0436d668dba5b1b9e95bd80428ddc78953d9d15601b7b09873</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5111d4d5cdec51a0436d668dba5b1b9e95bd80428ddc78953d9d15601b7b09873</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,3539,27907,27908,45978</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31387830$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wehrhan, Falk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neukam, Friedrich W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geppert, Carol-Immanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesting, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw</title><title>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</title><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><description>Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack of histopathological studies correlating the intraoperative fluorescence situation to histopathological analyses of the respective bone areas in order to further validate this method. Histopathological sections from intraoperatively detected fluorescence- and non−fluorescence-labeled bone were analyzed detecting osteocyte and collagen content, RANK(L) and TRAP expression as well as proportion of immature bone regeneration. Samples were compared with viable-looking bone areas according to the intraoperative clinical situation. Staining revealed a significant decrease of osteocytes and collagen type-I fibers in necrotic, non-fluorescing areas compared to fluorescing bone (R/RGB [%]: 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 3.18 ± 2.22 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of osteocytes was higher in fluorescing, clinically viable bone samples (cell/mm2: 151.26 ± 95.77 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.028). Additionally, the amount of immature bone was substantially increased in luminescent jaw bone (proportion of red [%]: 6.78 ± 7.00 (fluorescence positive) vs. 2.24 ± 1.36 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.442). RANK(L) and TRAP expression did not differ between the investigated areas, resembling a generalized decrease in osteocyte−osteoclast function all over the jaw (RANK(L) −positive cells per mm2: 8.97 ± 7.85 (fluorescence positive) vs. 7.76 ± 6.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.793; TRAP-positive cells per mm2: 0.36 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.33 ± 0.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.887). Intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery might be more precise in identifying and resecting the necrotic bone compared to previous indicators like bone bleeding, which could be useful to further improve surgical therapy in MRONJ patients.</description><subject>Bisphosphonate</subject><subject>Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents</subject><subject>Bone fluorescence</subject><subject>BRONJ</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Diphosphonates</subject><subject>Doxycycline</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>MRONJ</subject><subject>Osteoclasts</subject><issn>1010-5182</issn><issn>1878-4119</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAQhkVpaD7aP9BD0bEXuzPy2pZKLsuSTQqBXNqzkKXZRMZrbSU7Yf99ZDbpsSeJ4ZmXeR_GviKUCNj86Mve7lMpAFUJbQkoPrALlK0sVojqY_4DQlGjFOfsMqUeABqQ6hM7r7DKWAUXrN8Oc4iULI2WisfZO3K8CyPxPCQ7-TD-5Gv-5NMUhvDorRm4Gc1wTD5xP_I9uTxbsCLSYKa8HdJEOcDGsDBhx6cn4r15-czOdmZI9OXtvWJ_tje_N3fF_cPtr836vrBV3Uz5XkS3crV1ZGs0sKoa1zTSdabusFOk6s5JWAnpnG2lqiunHNYNYNd2oGRbXbHvp9xDDH9nSpPe-9xvGMxIYU5aiEZVSgklMipO6HJsirTTh-j3Jh41gl4c614vjvXiWEOrs-O89O0tf-5y_X8r71IzcH0CKLd89hR1sn7x63zMSrUL_n_5r3u-jtM</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Wehrhan, Falk</creator><creator>Weber, Manuel</creator><creator>Neukam, Friedrich W.</creator><creator>Geppert, Carol-Immanuel</creator><creator>Kesting, Marco</creator><creator>Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw</title><author>Wehrhan, Falk ; Weber, Manuel ; Neukam, Friedrich W. ; Geppert, Carol-Immanuel ; Kesting, Marco ; Preidl, Raimund H.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5111d4d5cdec51a0436d668dba5b1b9e95bd80428ddc78953d9d15601b7b09873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Bisphosphonate</topic><topic>Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents</topic><topic>Bone fluorescence</topic><topic>BRONJ</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Diphosphonates</topic><topic>Doxycycline</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>MRONJ</topic><topic>Osteoclasts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wehrhan, Falk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Manuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neukam, Friedrich W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geppert, Carol-Immanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kesting, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Preidl, Raimund H.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wehrhan, Falk</au><au>Weber, Manuel</au><au>Neukam, Friedrich W.</au><au>Geppert, Carol-Immanuel</au><au>Kesting, Marco</au><au>Preidl, Raimund H.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery</jtitle><addtitle>J Craniomaxillofac Surg</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1600</spage><epage>1607</epage><pages>1600-1607</pages><issn>1010-5182</issn><eissn>1878-4119</eissn><abstract>Surgical treatment of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) consists of necrotic bone removal followed by dense mucosal closure. Fluorescence-guided surgery has become a promising tool to intraoperatively distinguish between healthy and necrotic bone. Until now, there has been a lack of histopathological studies correlating the intraoperative fluorescence situation to histopathological analyses of the respective bone areas in order to further validate this method. Histopathological sections from intraoperatively detected fluorescence- and non−fluorescence-labeled bone were analyzed detecting osteocyte and collagen content, RANK(L) and TRAP expression as well as proportion of immature bone regeneration. Samples were compared with viable-looking bone areas according to the intraoperative clinical situation. Staining revealed a significant decrease of osteocytes and collagen type-I fibers in necrotic, non-fluorescing areas compared to fluorescing bone (R/RGB [%]: 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 3.18 ± 2.22 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.041). Furthermore, the number of osteocytes was higher in fluorescing, clinically viable bone samples (cell/mm2: 151.26 ± 95.77 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.56 ± 0.38 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.028). Additionally, the amount of immature bone was substantially increased in luminescent jaw bone (proportion of red [%]: 6.78 ± 7.00 (fluorescence positive) vs. 2.24 ± 1.36 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.442). RANK(L) and TRAP expression did not differ between the investigated areas, resembling a generalized decrease in osteocyte−osteoclast function all over the jaw (RANK(L) −positive cells per mm2: 8.97 ± 7.85 (fluorescence positive) vs. 7.76 ± 6.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.793; TRAP-positive cells per mm2: 0.36 ± 0.38 (fluorescence positive) vs. 0.33 ± 0.41 (fluorescence negative), p = 0.887). Intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery might be more precise in identifying and resecting the necrotic bone compared to previous indicators like bone bleeding, which could be useful to further improve surgical therapy in MRONJ patients.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31387830</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1010-5182
ispartof Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery, 2019-10, Vol.47 (10), p.1600-1607
issn 1010-5182
1878-4119
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2269399292
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete - AutoHoldings; MEDLINE
subjects Bisphosphonate
Bisphosphonate-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Jaw
Bone Density Conservation Agents
Bone fluorescence
BRONJ
Dentistry
Diphosphonates
Doxycycline
Fluorescence
Humans
MRONJ
Osteoclasts
title Fluorescence-guided bone resection: A histological analysis in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T10%3A11%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fluorescence-guided%20bone%20resection:%20A%20histological%20analysis%20in%20medication-related%20osteonecrosis%20of%20the%20jaw&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cranio-maxillo-facial%20surgery&rft.au=Wehrhan,%20Falk&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1600&rft.epage=1607&rft.pages=1600-1607&rft.issn=1010-5182&rft.eissn=1878-4119&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.012&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2269399292%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2269399292&rft_id=info:pmid/31387830&rft_els_id=S1010518219302239&rfr_iscdi=true