A biomechanical investigation of the retentive force of pedicle screw structures for different screw tulip designs

Pedicle screw based spinal fixation systems have been widely used for treating a variety of spinal diseases. The retentive force is an important factor that determines structural stability. The screw tulip design and the magnitude of nut tightening torque influence the retentive force. This study in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical biomechanics (Bristol) 2019-12, Vol.70, p.23-30
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Po-Yi, Lai, Po-Liang, Lin, Chun-Li
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 30
container_issue
container_start_page 23
container_title Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)
container_volume 70
creator Liu, Po-Yi
Lai, Po-Liang
Lin, Chun-Li
description Pedicle screw based spinal fixation systems have been widely used for treating a variety of spinal diseases. The retentive force is an important factor that determines structural stability. The screw tulip design and the magnitude of nut tightening torque influence the retentive force. This study investigated the influences of varied tilt angles between the shaft-rod interface and varied nut tightening torques on the retentive force of the monoaxial, polyaxial, and uniplanar screws. Three types of tulip constructs were biomechanically tested. Two parameters that affect the retentive force include the tilt angle and the nut tightening torque. The retentive force was investigated by an axial gripping capacity test and axial torque gripping capacity test. Among all combinations of screw designs and tilt angles, the 12 Nm nut tightening torque offered a greater retentive force than the 8 Nm, except for monoaxial screws with a 0 degree tilt angle. For monoaxial screws, the retentive force was negatively correlated with increasing tilt angles. For polyaxial and uniplanar screws, the retentive forces remained constant with increasing tilt angles. In monoaxial screws, when the axis of the shaft isn't perpendicular to the axis of the rod, a gap is formed between the tulip-rod interface. This results in a decreased retentive force. In polyaxial and uniplanar screws, the contact surfaces were the same in different tilt angles, therefore, the retentive force remained constant, which was attributed to the adjustable tulips always being perpendicular to the axis of the rods. •Pedicle screw biomechanical test to assess the retentive force•This study involved three type screws (monoaxial, polyaxial and uniplanar screws).•The strength of polyaxial screws remained constant with the different tilt angles.•The strength of uniplanar screws remained constant with the different tilt angles.•The strength of monoaxial screw decreased as the tilt angles increased.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.06.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268944139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S026800331831009X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2268944139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7dd4a1032d9d445f3d947c8276f41464f098ec58c9db48b0d1438d00ca3f14683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v2zAMhoViQ5tm-wuDetvFLvURWzoWQb-AAr1sZ8GRqFaBY2eSnKH_fjKSDj32RIB8SOJ9CLliUDNgzfW2tn0YNmHcoX2tOTBdQ1MDiDOyYKrVFeMt-0IWwBtVlba4IJcpbQFA8lV7Ti4EE4pzgAWJN_R0pxuC7XoahgOmHF66HMaBjp7mV6QRMw45HJD6MVqc23t0wfZIk434l6YcJ5uniGkmqAveYywrp3Ge-rCnDlN4GdI38tV3fcLvp7okv-9uf60fqqfn-8f1zVNlpRS5ap2THQPBnXZSrrxwWrZW8bbxkslGetAK7UpZ7TZSbcAxKZQDsJ3wZa7Ekvw83t3H8c9UQpldSBb7vhtwnJLhxY6WkgldUH1EbRxTiujNPoZdF98MAzMrN1vzQbmZlRtozOx2SX6c3kybHbr_m--OC7A-AljCHgJGk2zAwRaBEW02bgyfePMPh7OaEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2268944139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A biomechanical investigation of the retentive force of pedicle screw structures for different screw tulip designs</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Liu, Po-Yi ; Lai, Po-Liang ; Lin, Chun-Li</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Po-Yi ; Lai, Po-Liang ; Lin, Chun-Li</creatorcontrib><description>Pedicle screw based spinal fixation systems have been widely used for treating a variety of spinal diseases. The retentive force is an important factor that determines structural stability. The screw tulip design and the magnitude of nut tightening torque influence the retentive force. This study investigated the influences of varied tilt angles between the shaft-rod interface and varied nut tightening torques on the retentive force of the monoaxial, polyaxial, and uniplanar screws. Three types of tulip constructs were biomechanically tested. Two parameters that affect the retentive force include the tilt angle and the nut tightening torque. The retentive force was investigated by an axial gripping capacity test and axial torque gripping capacity test. Among all combinations of screw designs and tilt angles, the 12 Nm nut tightening torque offered a greater retentive force than the 8 Nm, except for monoaxial screws with a 0 degree tilt angle. For monoaxial screws, the retentive force was negatively correlated with increasing tilt angles. For polyaxial and uniplanar screws, the retentive forces remained constant with increasing tilt angles. In monoaxial screws, when the axis of the shaft isn't perpendicular to the axis of the rod, a gap is formed between the tulip-rod interface. This results in a decreased retentive force. In polyaxial and uniplanar screws, the contact surfaces were the same in different tilt angles, therefore, the retentive force remained constant, which was attributed to the adjustable tulips always being perpendicular to the axis of the rods. •Pedicle screw biomechanical test to assess the retentive force•This study involved three type screws (monoaxial, polyaxial and uniplanar screws).•The strength of polyaxial screws remained constant with the different tilt angles.•The strength of uniplanar screws remained constant with the different tilt angles.•The strength of monoaxial screw decreased as the tilt angles increased.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-0033</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.06.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31382200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Nut tightening torque ; Pedicle screw ; Screw tulip design ; Tilt angle</subject><ispartof>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2019-12, Vol.70, p.23-30</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7dd4a1032d9d445f3d947c8276f41464f098ec58c9db48b0d1438d00ca3f14683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7dd4a1032d9d445f3d947c8276f41464f098ec58c9db48b0d1438d00ca3f14683</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5958-0949</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026800331831009X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31382200$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Po-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Po-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-Li</creatorcontrib><title>A biomechanical investigation of the retentive force of pedicle screw structures for different screw tulip designs</title><title>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</title><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><description>Pedicle screw based spinal fixation systems have been widely used for treating a variety of spinal diseases. The retentive force is an important factor that determines structural stability. The screw tulip design and the magnitude of nut tightening torque influence the retentive force. This study investigated the influences of varied tilt angles between the shaft-rod interface and varied nut tightening torques on the retentive force of the monoaxial, polyaxial, and uniplanar screws. Three types of tulip constructs were biomechanically tested. Two parameters that affect the retentive force include the tilt angle and the nut tightening torque. The retentive force was investigated by an axial gripping capacity test and axial torque gripping capacity test. Among all combinations of screw designs and tilt angles, the 12 Nm nut tightening torque offered a greater retentive force than the 8 Nm, except for monoaxial screws with a 0 degree tilt angle. For monoaxial screws, the retentive force was negatively correlated with increasing tilt angles. For polyaxial and uniplanar screws, the retentive forces remained constant with increasing tilt angles. In monoaxial screws, when the axis of the shaft isn't perpendicular to the axis of the rod, a gap is formed between the tulip-rod interface. This results in a decreased retentive force. In polyaxial and uniplanar screws, the contact surfaces were the same in different tilt angles, therefore, the retentive force remained constant, which was attributed to the adjustable tulips always being perpendicular to the axis of the rods. •Pedicle screw biomechanical test to assess the retentive force•This study involved three type screws (monoaxial, polyaxial and uniplanar screws).•The strength of polyaxial screws remained constant with the different tilt angles.•The strength of uniplanar screws remained constant with the different tilt angles.•The strength of monoaxial screw decreased as the tilt angles increased.</description><subject>Nut tightening torque</subject><subject>Pedicle screw</subject><subject>Screw tulip design</subject><subject>Tilt angle</subject><issn>0268-0033</issn><issn>1879-1271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1v2zAMhoViQ5tm-wuDetvFLvURWzoWQb-AAr1sZ8GRqFaBY2eSnKH_fjKSDj32RIB8SOJ9CLliUDNgzfW2tn0YNmHcoX2tOTBdQ1MDiDOyYKrVFeMt-0IWwBtVlba4IJcpbQFA8lV7Ti4EE4pzgAWJN_R0pxuC7XoahgOmHF66HMaBjp7mV6QRMw45HJD6MVqc23t0wfZIk434l6YcJ5uniGkmqAveYywrp3Ge-rCnDlN4GdI38tV3fcLvp7okv-9uf60fqqfn-8f1zVNlpRS5ap2THQPBnXZSrrxwWrZW8bbxkslGetAK7UpZ7TZSbcAxKZQDsJ3wZa7Ekvw83t3H8c9UQpldSBb7vhtwnJLhxY6WkgldUH1EbRxTiujNPoZdF98MAzMrN1vzQbmZlRtozOx2SX6c3kybHbr_m--OC7A-AljCHgJGk2zAwRaBEW02bgyfePMPh7OaEw</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Liu, Po-Yi</creator><creator>Lai, Po-Liang</creator><creator>Lin, Chun-Li</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-0949</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>A biomechanical investigation of the retentive force of pedicle screw structures for different screw tulip designs</title><author>Liu, Po-Yi ; Lai, Po-Liang ; Lin, Chun-Li</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-7dd4a1032d9d445f3d947c8276f41464f098ec58c9db48b0d1438d00ca3f14683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Nut tightening torque</topic><topic>Pedicle screw</topic><topic>Screw tulip design</topic><topic>Tilt angle</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Po-Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Po-Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chun-Li</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Po-Yi</au><au>Lai, Po-Liang</au><au>Lin, Chun-Li</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A biomechanical investigation of the retentive force of pedicle screw structures for different screw tulip designs</atitle><jtitle>Clinical biomechanics (Bristol)</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>70</volume><spage>23</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>23-30</pages><issn>0268-0033</issn><eissn>1879-1271</eissn><abstract>Pedicle screw based spinal fixation systems have been widely used for treating a variety of spinal diseases. The retentive force is an important factor that determines structural stability. The screw tulip design and the magnitude of nut tightening torque influence the retentive force. This study investigated the influences of varied tilt angles between the shaft-rod interface and varied nut tightening torques on the retentive force of the monoaxial, polyaxial, and uniplanar screws. Three types of tulip constructs were biomechanically tested. Two parameters that affect the retentive force include the tilt angle and the nut tightening torque. The retentive force was investigated by an axial gripping capacity test and axial torque gripping capacity test. Among all combinations of screw designs and tilt angles, the 12 Nm nut tightening torque offered a greater retentive force than the 8 Nm, except for monoaxial screws with a 0 degree tilt angle. For monoaxial screws, the retentive force was negatively correlated with increasing tilt angles. For polyaxial and uniplanar screws, the retentive forces remained constant with increasing tilt angles. In monoaxial screws, when the axis of the shaft isn't perpendicular to the axis of the rod, a gap is formed between the tulip-rod interface. This results in a decreased retentive force. In polyaxial and uniplanar screws, the contact surfaces were the same in different tilt angles, therefore, the retentive force remained constant, which was attributed to the adjustable tulips always being perpendicular to the axis of the rods. •Pedicle screw biomechanical test to assess the retentive force•This study involved three type screws (monoaxial, polyaxial and uniplanar screws).•The strength of polyaxial screws remained constant with the different tilt angles.•The strength of uniplanar screws remained constant with the different tilt angles.•The strength of monoaxial screw decreased as the tilt angles increased.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31382200</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.06.003</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5958-0949</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-0033
ispartof Clinical biomechanics (Bristol), 2019-12, Vol.70, p.23-30
issn 0268-0033
1879-1271
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268944139
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Nut tightening torque
Pedicle screw
Screw tulip design
Tilt angle
title A biomechanical investigation of the retentive force of pedicle screw structures for different screw tulip designs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T11%3A02%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20biomechanical%20investigation%20of%20the%20retentive%20force%20of%20pedicle%20screw%20structures%20for%20different%20screw%20tulip%20designs&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20biomechanics%20(Bristol)&rft.au=Liu,%20Po-Yi&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=70&rft.spage=23&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=23-30&rft.issn=0268-0033&rft.eissn=1879-1271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.06.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268944139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268944139&rft_id=info:pmid/31382200&rft_els_id=S026800331831009X&rfr_iscdi=true