Maternity homes and social support: A cross-sectional survey stratifying outcomes
Poor social support is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. Maternity group homes (MGHs), residential programs for pregnant women, have been found to improve social support in small studies. The present study aimed to verify these previous studies, discover whether there is a group of women w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center 2019-07, Vol.32 (3), p.348-354 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 354 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 348 |
container_title | Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Buskmiller, Cara Columbus, Cristie Gavard, Jeffrey A. |
description | Poor social support is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. Maternity group homes (MGHs), residential programs for pregnant women, have been found to improve social support in small studies. The present study aimed to verify these previous studies, discover whether there is a group of women whom MGHs most benefit, identify what services offer that benefit, and identify how to predict who will most benefit from MGH admission. Forty-three US MGHs from 14 states were surveyed from August 2015 to February 2017. The primary outcome was self-reported social support before and during MGH admission. The secondary outcome was the perception that MGH admission would help current and future relationships. Among 95 respondents, 54% perceived better in-MGH support compared to pre-MGH support. Women with poor pre-MGH support reported improvement; the converse was true of high pre-MGH support (P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/08998280.2019.1588838 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268943273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268943273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-bf7373c2360a6a2961a7741c9bebcb34309c4c49b3cb81a4b228afd80090f5e23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhq0KVLa0P6EoEpdesoy_EruHqggVigRCleBsOV4HjBJ7azug_HsSdkG0B04-zDOvZ-ZB6CuGJQYBRyCkFETAkgCWS8yFEFR8QAvMCS8p4WQHLWamnKE99CmlewCGKa4_oj2KqWBY8AX6c6mzjd7lsbgLvU2F9qsiBeN0V6RhvQ4xfy-OCxNDSmWyJrvgn0vxwY5FylFn147O3xZhyGZO-Ix2W90l-2X77qOb01_XJ7_Li6uz85Pji9IwjEXZtDWtqSG0Al1pIius65phIxvbmIYyCtIww2RDTSOwZg0hQrcrASCh5ZbQffRjk7semt6ujPXTMJ1aR9frOKqgnfq34t2dug0Pqqo4EIKngG_bgBj-DjZl1btkbNdpb8OQFCGVkIySmk7o4X_ofRjidIiZqhkVnANMFN9Qz9eKtn0dBoOapakXaWqWprbSpr6Dt5u8dr1YmoCfG8D5NsReP4bYrVTWYxdiG7U3Lk3wu388AUltp3g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2274385500</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Maternity homes and social support: A cross-sectional survey stratifying outcomes</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Buskmiller, Cara ; Columbus, Cristie ; Gavard, Jeffrey A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Buskmiller, Cara ; Columbus, Cristie ; Gavard, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><description>Poor social support is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. Maternity group homes (MGHs), residential programs for pregnant women, have been found to improve social support in small studies. The present study aimed to verify these previous studies, discover whether there is a group of women whom MGHs most benefit, identify what services offer that benefit, and identify how to predict who will most benefit from MGH admission. Forty-three US MGHs from 14 states were surveyed from August 2015 to February 2017. The primary outcome was self-reported social support before and during MGH admission. The secondary outcome was the perception that MGH admission would help current and future relationships. Among 95 respondents, 54% perceived better in-MGH support compared to pre-MGH support. Women with poor pre-MGH support reported improvement; the converse was true of high pre-MGH support (P < 0.001). A total of 77% to 82% of participants anticipated that MGH admission would help current and future relationships, including 91% to 92% of women with stable or increased in-MGH support (P = 0.07 current, P < 0.01 future). Participants with increased in-MGH support reported more services as helpful (P < 0.05). In summary, MGHs are associated with improved support and relationships for most residents. The support score may identify which women may benefit most from MGH admission.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0899-8280</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3252</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2019.1588838</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31384185</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Consent ; Cross-sectional studies ; Group homes ; Interpersonal relationships ; maternal morbidity ; maternity group home ; maternity home ; Obstetrics ; Original Research ; Perceptions ; pregnancy ; Social support ; Studies ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center, 2019-07, Vol.32 (3), p.348-354</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2019 Baylor University Medical Center 2019</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. Jul 2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Baylor University Medical Center 2019 Baylor University Medical Center</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-bf7373c2360a6a2961a7741c9bebcb34309c4c49b3cb81a4b228afd80090f5e23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-bf7373c2360a6a2961a7741c9bebcb34309c4c49b3cb81a4b228afd80090f5e23</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0526-0314 ; 0000-0003-1313-1192 ; 0000-0001-5859-4786</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6650221/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6650221/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31384185$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buskmiller, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Columbus, Cristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavard, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><title>Maternity homes and social support: A cross-sectional survey stratifying outcomes</title><title>Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center</title><addtitle>Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)</addtitle><description>Poor social support is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. Maternity group homes (MGHs), residential programs for pregnant women, have been found to improve social support in small studies. The present study aimed to verify these previous studies, discover whether there is a group of women whom MGHs most benefit, identify what services offer that benefit, and identify how to predict who will most benefit from MGH admission. Forty-three US MGHs from 14 states were surveyed from August 2015 to February 2017. The primary outcome was self-reported social support before and during MGH admission. The secondary outcome was the perception that MGH admission would help current and future relationships. Among 95 respondents, 54% perceived better in-MGH support compared to pre-MGH support. Women with poor pre-MGH support reported improvement; the converse was true of high pre-MGH support (P < 0.001). A total of 77% to 82% of participants anticipated that MGH admission would help current and future relationships, including 91% to 92% of women with stable or increased in-MGH support (P = 0.07 current, P < 0.01 future). Participants with increased in-MGH support reported more services as helpful (P < 0.05). In summary, MGHs are associated with improved support and relationships for most residents. The support score may identify which women may benefit most from MGH admission.</description><subject>Consent</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Group homes</subject><subject>Interpersonal relationships</subject><subject>maternal morbidity</subject><subject>maternity group home</subject><subject>maternity home</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>pregnancy</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>0899-8280</issn><issn>1525-3252</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAQhq0KVLa0P6EoEpdesoy_EruHqggVigRCleBsOV4HjBJ7azug_HsSdkG0B04-zDOvZ-ZB6CuGJQYBRyCkFETAkgCWS8yFEFR8QAvMCS8p4WQHLWamnKE99CmlewCGKa4_oj2KqWBY8AX6c6mzjd7lsbgLvU2F9qsiBeN0V6RhvQ4xfy-OCxNDSmWyJrvgn0vxwY5FylFn147O3xZhyGZO-Ix2W90l-2X77qOb01_XJ7_Li6uz85Pji9IwjEXZtDWtqSG0Al1pIius65phIxvbmIYyCtIww2RDTSOwZg0hQrcrASCh5ZbQffRjk7semt6ujPXTMJ1aR9frOKqgnfq34t2dug0Pqqo4EIKngG_bgBj-DjZl1btkbNdpb8OQFCGVkIySmk7o4X_ofRjidIiZqhkVnANMFN9Qz9eKtn0dBoOapakXaWqWprbSpr6Dt5u8dr1YmoCfG8D5NsReP4bYrVTWYxdiG7U3Lk3wu388AUltp3g</recordid><startdate>20190703</startdate><enddate>20190703</enddate><creator>Buskmiller, Cara</creator><creator>Columbus, Cristie</creator><creator>Gavard, Jeffrey A.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-0314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-1192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-4786</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190703</creationdate><title>Maternity homes and social support: A cross-sectional survey stratifying outcomes</title><author>Buskmiller, Cara ; Columbus, Cristie ; Gavard, Jeffrey A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4118-bf7373c2360a6a2961a7741c9bebcb34309c4c49b3cb81a4b228afd80090f5e23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Consent</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Group homes</topic><topic>Interpersonal relationships</topic><topic>maternal morbidity</topic><topic>maternity group home</topic><topic>maternity home</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>pregnancy</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buskmiller, Cara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Columbus, Cristie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gavard, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buskmiller, Cara</au><au>Columbus, Cristie</au><au>Gavard, Jeffrey A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Maternity homes and social support: A cross-sectional survey stratifying outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center</jtitle><addtitle>Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)</addtitle><date>2019-07-03</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>348</spage><epage>354</epage><pages>348-354</pages><issn>0899-8280</issn><eissn>1525-3252</eissn><abstract>Poor social support is associated with adverse obstetric outcomes. Maternity group homes (MGHs), residential programs for pregnant women, have been found to improve social support in small studies. The present study aimed to verify these previous studies, discover whether there is a group of women whom MGHs most benefit, identify what services offer that benefit, and identify how to predict who will most benefit from MGH admission. Forty-three US MGHs from 14 states were surveyed from August 2015 to February 2017. The primary outcome was self-reported social support before and during MGH admission. The secondary outcome was the perception that MGH admission would help current and future relationships. Among 95 respondents, 54% perceived better in-MGH support compared to pre-MGH support. Women with poor pre-MGH support reported improvement; the converse was true of high pre-MGH support (P < 0.001). A total of 77% to 82% of participants anticipated that MGH admission would help current and future relationships, including 91% to 92% of women with stable or increased in-MGH support (P = 0.07 current, P < 0.01 future). Participants with increased in-MGH support reported more services as helpful (P < 0.05). In summary, MGHs are associated with improved support and relationships for most residents. The support score may identify which women may benefit most from MGH admission.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>31384185</pmid><doi>10.1080/08998280.2019.1588838</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0526-0314</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1313-1192</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5859-4786</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0899-8280 |
ispartof | Proceedings - Baylor University. Medical Center, 2019-07, Vol.32 (3), p.348-354 |
issn | 0899-8280 1525-3252 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268943273 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Consent Cross-sectional studies Group homes Interpersonal relationships maternal morbidity maternity group home maternity home Obstetrics Original Research Perceptions pregnancy Social support Studies Womens health |
title | Maternity homes and social support: A cross-sectional survey stratifying outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T12%3A33%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Maternity%20homes%20and%20social%20support:%20A%20cross-sectional%20survey%20stratifying%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20-%20Baylor%20University.%20Medical%20Center&rft.au=Buskmiller,%20Cara&rft.date=2019-07-03&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=348&rft.epage=354&rft.pages=348-354&rft.issn=0899-8280&rft.eissn=1525-3252&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/08998280.2019.1588838&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2268943273%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2274385500&rft_id=info:pmid/31384185&rfr_iscdi=true |