Flushing of an intravenous catheter: a cause for unreliable laboratory results

INTRODUCTIONPhlebotomy is an error-prone process in which mistakes are difficult to reveal. This case report describes the effect on laboratory results originating from a blood sample collected in close proximity to an intravenous catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODSA 69-year-old male patient was referre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biochemia medica 2019, Vol.29 (3), p.031001-031001
Hauptverfasser: Hengeveld, Rutger C C, Gerards, Maaike C, Olofsen, Bianca E, Ridderikhof, Milan L, Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A, Leenhouts, Peter A, van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 031001
container_issue 3
container_start_page 031001
container_title Biochemia medica
container_volume 29
creator Hengeveld, Rutger C C
Gerards, Maaike C
Olofsen, Bianca E
Ridderikhof, Milan L
Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A
Leenhouts, Peter A
van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C
description INTRODUCTIONPhlebotomy is an error-prone process in which mistakes are difficult to reveal. This case report describes the effect on laboratory results originating from a blood sample collected in close proximity to an intravenous catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODSA 69-year-old male patient was referred to the Emergency department where pneumonia was suspected. Phlebotomy was performed to collect blood samples to assess electrolytes, renal function, liver function, infection and haematological parameters. RESULTSThe laboratory analysis showed reduced potassium and calcium concentrations. To prevent life-threatening cardiac failure the clinician decided to correct those electrolytes. Remarkably, the electrocardiogram showed no abnormalities corresponding to hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia. This observation, in combination with an overall increase in laboratory parameters with the exception of sodium and chloride, led to the suspicion of a preanalytical error. Retrospectively, an intravenous catheter was inserted in close proximity of the puncture place but no continuous infusion was started prior to phlebotomy. However, the intravenous catheter was flushed with sodium chloride. Since potential other causes were excluded, the flushing of the intravenous catheter with sodium chloride prior to phlebotomy was the most probable cause for the deviating laboratory results and subsequently for the unnecessary potassium and calcium suppletion. CONCLUSIONThis case underlines the importance of caution in the interpretation of laboratory results obtained from specimens that are collected in the proximity of an intravenous catheter, even in the absence of continuous infusion.
doi_str_mv 10.11613/BM.2019.031001
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268571356</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268571356</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_22685713563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjbFuwjAQQC2kSg1tZ9YbuxB8SZykjFQgFpjY0RFdmiBjg89G6t-XoT_A9N7wpKfUDHWOWGO5WO3yQuNXrkvUGicqw7aq503VFq9qKnLW2hjTNpnab2ySYXQ_4HsgB6OLge7sfBLoKA4cOSyBHp6EofcBkgtsRzpZBksnHyj68AuBJdko7-qlJyv88c839blZH76382vwt8QSj5dROraWHD8Wx6KoW9NgaeryifQPWa1HBQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype><pqid>2268571356</pqid></control><display><type>report</type><title>Flushing of an intravenous catheter: a cause for unreliable laboratory results</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Hengeveld, Rutger C C ; Gerards, Maaike C ; Olofsen, Bianca E ; Ridderikhof, Milan L ; Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A ; Leenhouts, Peter A ; van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C</creator><creatorcontrib>Hengeveld, Rutger C C ; Gerards, Maaike C ; Olofsen, Bianca E ; Ridderikhof, Milan L ; Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A ; Leenhouts, Peter A ; van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C</creatorcontrib><description>INTRODUCTIONPhlebotomy is an error-prone process in which mistakes are difficult to reveal. This case report describes the effect on laboratory results originating from a blood sample collected in close proximity to an intravenous catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODSA 69-year-old male patient was referred to the Emergency department where pneumonia was suspected. Phlebotomy was performed to collect blood samples to assess electrolytes, renal function, liver function, infection and haematological parameters. RESULTSThe laboratory analysis showed reduced potassium and calcium concentrations. To prevent life-threatening cardiac failure the clinician decided to correct those electrolytes. Remarkably, the electrocardiogram showed no abnormalities corresponding to hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia. This observation, in combination with an overall increase in laboratory parameters with the exception of sodium and chloride, led to the suspicion of a preanalytical error. Retrospectively, an intravenous catheter was inserted in close proximity of the puncture place but no continuous infusion was started prior to phlebotomy. However, the intravenous catheter was flushed with sodium chloride. Since potential other causes were excluded, the flushing of the intravenous catheter with sodium chloride prior to phlebotomy was the most probable cause for the deviating laboratory results and subsequently for the unnecessary potassium and calcium suppletion. CONCLUSIONThis case underlines the importance of caution in the interpretation of laboratory results obtained from specimens that are collected in the proximity of an intravenous catheter, even in the absence of continuous infusion.</description><identifier>EISSN: 1846-7482</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11613/BM.2019.031001</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Biochemia medica, 2019, Vol.29 (3), p.031001-031001</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>780,784,864,4490,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hengeveld, Rutger C C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerards, Maaike C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olofsen, Bianca E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridderikhof, Milan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leenhouts, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C</creatorcontrib><title>Flushing of an intravenous catheter: a cause for unreliable laboratory results</title><title>Biochemia medica</title><description>INTRODUCTIONPhlebotomy is an error-prone process in which mistakes are difficult to reveal. This case report describes the effect on laboratory results originating from a blood sample collected in close proximity to an intravenous catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODSA 69-year-old male patient was referred to the Emergency department where pneumonia was suspected. Phlebotomy was performed to collect blood samples to assess electrolytes, renal function, liver function, infection and haematological parameters. RESULTSThe laboratory analysis showed reduced potassium and calcium concentrations. To prevent life-threatening cardiac failure the clinician decided to correct those electrolytes. Remarkably, the electrocardiogram showed no abnormalities corresponding to hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia. This observation, in combination with an overall increase in laboratory parameters with the exception of sodium and chloride, led to the suspicion of a preanalytical error. Retrospectively, an intravenous catheter was inserted in close proximity of the puncture place but no continuous infusion was started prior to phlebotomy. However, the intravenous catheter was flushed with sodium chloride. Since potential other causes were excluded, the flushing of the intravenous catheter with sodium chloride prior to phlebotomy was the most probable cause for the deviating laboratory results and subsequently for the unnecessary potassium and calcium suppletion. CONCLUSIONThis case underlines the importance of caution in the interpretation of laboratory results obtained from specimens that are collected in the proximity of an intravenous catheter, even in the absence of continuous infusion.</description><issn>1846-7482</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjbFuwjAQQC2kSg1tZ9YbuxB8SZykjFQgFpjY0RFdmiBjg89G6t-XoT_A9N7wpKfUDHWOWGO5WO3yQuNXrkvUGicqw7aq503VFq9qKnLW2hjTNpnab2ySYXQ_4HsgB6OLge7sfBLoKA4cOSyBHp6EofcBkgtsRzpZBksnHyj68AuBJdko7-qlJyv88c839blZH76382vwt8QSj5dROraWHD8Wx6KoW9NgaeryifQPWa1HBQ</recordid><startdate>20191015</startdate><enddate>20191015</enddate><creator>Hengeveld, Rutger C C</creator><creator>Gerards, Maaike C</creator><creator>Olofsen, Bianca E</creator><creator>Ridderikhof, Milan L</creator><creator>Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A</creator><creator>Leenhouts, Peter A</creator><creator>van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C</creator><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191015</creationdate><title>Flushing of an intravenous catheter: a cause for unreliable laboratory results</title><author>Hengeveld, Rutger C C ; Gerards, Maaike C ; Olofsen, Bianca E ; Ridderikhof, Milan L ; Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A ; Leenhouts, Peter A ; van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_22685713563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hengeveld, Rutger C C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerards, Maaike C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olofsen, Bianca E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ridderikhof, Milan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leenhouts, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C</creatorcontrib><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hengeveld, Rutger C C</au><au>Gerards, Maaike C</au><au>Olofsen, Bianca E</au><au>Ridderikhof, Milan L</au><au>Hakkenberg van Gaasbeek, Victor F H A</au><au>Leenhouts, Peter A</au><au>van Dongen-Lases, Edmée C</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><atitle>Flushing of an intravenous catheter: a cause for unreliable laboratory results</atitle><jtitle>Biochemia medica</jtitle><date>2019-10-15</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>031001</spage><epage>031001</epage><pages>031001-031001</pages><eissn>1846-7482</eissn><abstract>INTRODUCTIONPhlebotomy is an error-prone process in which mistakes are difficult to reveal. This case report describes the effect on laboratory results originating from a blood sample collected in close proximity to an intravenous catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODSA 69-year-old male patient was referred to the Emergency department where pneumonia was suspected. Phlebotomy was performed to collect blood samples to assess electrolytes, renal function, liver function, infection and haematological parameters. RESULTSThe laboratory analysis showed reduced potassium and calcium concentrations. To prevent life-threatening cardiac failure the clinician decided to correct those electrolytes. Remarkably, the electrocardiogram showed no abnormalities corresponding to hypokalaemia and hypocalcaemia. This observation, in combination with an overall increase in laboratory parameters with the exception of sodium and chloride, led to the suspicion of a preanalytical error. Retrospectively, an intravenous catheter was inserted in close proximity of the puncture place but no continuous infusion was started prior to phlebotomy. However, the intravenous catheter was flushed with sodium chloride. Since potential other causes were excluded, the flushing of the intravenous catheter with sodium chloride prior to phlebotomy was the most probable cause for the deviating laboratory results and subsequently for the unnecessary potassium and calcium suppletion. CONCLUSIONThis case underlines the importance of caution in the interpretation of laboratory results obtained from specimens that are collected in the proximity of an intravenous catheter, even in the absence of continuous infusion.</abstract><doi>10.11613/BM.2019.031001</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 1846-7482
ispartof Biochemia medica, 2019, Vol.29 (3), p.031001-031001
issn 1846-7482
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268571356
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
title Flushing of an intravenous catheter: a cause for unreliable laboratory results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A50%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Flushing%20of%20an%20intravenous%20catheter:%20a%20cause%20for%20unreliable%20laboratory%20results&rft.jtitle=Biochemia%20medica&rft.au=Hengeveld,%20Rutger%20C%20C&rft.date=2019-10-15&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=031001&rft.epage=031001&rft.pages=031001-031001&rft.eissn=1846-7482&rft_id=info:doi/10.11613/BM.2019.031001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2268571356%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2268571356&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true