Safety of medical adjustment and confirmatory testing in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism

Objective Saline infusion test (SIT) and captopril challenge test (CCT) are standard confirmatory procedures routinely used in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism (PA). However, side effects and complications during testing have not been systematically studied. Design We performed a coho...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of endocrinology 2019-10, Vol.181 (4), p.421-428
Hauptverfasser: Heinrich, Daniel A, Adolf, Christian, Quinkler, Marcus, Holler, Finn, Lechner, Benjamin, Nirschl, Nina, Sturm, Lisa, Görge, Veronika, Beuschlein, Felix, Reincke, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 428
container_issue 4
container_start_page 421
container_title European journal of endocrinology
container_volume 181
creator Heinrich, Daniel A
Adolf, Christian
Quinkler, Marcus
Holler, Finn
Lechner, Benjamin
Nirschl, Nina
Sturm, Lisa
Görge, Veronika
Beuschlein, Felix
Reincke, Martin
description Objective Saline infusion test (SIT) and captopril challenge test (CCT) are standard confirmatory procedures routinely used in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism (PA). However, side effects and complications during testing have not been systematically studied. Design We performed a cohort study with patients undergoing SIT and/or CCT in two centers from 2016 until 2018. Methods We studied 272 study participants with suspected PA enrolled at two outpatient centers in Germany. We assessed the frequency and severity of side effects during adjustment of blood pressure medication and during SIT and CCT. Results During the adjustment phase prior confirmatory testing, side effects including palpitations, headaches, edema and hypertensive episodes occurred in 18.4% of study participants. Side effects were associated with higher defined daily doses (DDD) (r = 0.25, P 
doi_str_mv 10.1530/EJE-19-0138
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268320227</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2305084587</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-2f269e9ab7bef519d8b3fe384d09b3ab38bb589d81bd64d551edf091cee485fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtLAzEURoMoWh8r9xJwI8hoXjPNLKXUFwUXKrgLySSpqTNJTWaQ_ntTWl24cJVwc_i4OR8Apxhd4ZKi6-njtMB1gTDlO2CE2bguKk7fdsEIccQKVjF6AA5TWiCE8x3tgwOK6bjimIzA-7O0pl_BYGFntGtkC6VeDKnvjO-h9Bo2wVsXO9mHuIK9Sb3zc-g87N8N1E7OfcijBn6F-FEMy3XQMrpOZli2Or-ZGLxL3THYs7JN5mR7HoHX2-nL5L6YPd09TG5mhWIV6QtiSVWbWqqxMrbEteaKWkM506hWVCrKlSp5HmOlK6bLEhttUY0bYxgvraZH4GKTu4zhc8jris6lxrSt9CYMSRCS5RBEyDij53_QRRiiz9sJQlGJOCv5mrrcUE0MKUVjxfZ_AiOxLkDkAgSuxbqATJ9tMweVhf6yP8YzgDeAciE1Llt2Nmv_N_QbmXCSYw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2305084587</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of medical adjustment and confirmatory testing in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals</source><creator>Heinrich, Daniel A ; Adolf, Christian ; Quinkler, Marcus ; Holler, Finn ; Lechner, Benjamin ; Nirschl, Nina ; Sturm, Lisa ; Görge, Veronika ; Beuschlein, Felix ; Reincke, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Daniel A ; Adolf, Christian ; Quinkler, Marcus ; Holler, Finn ; Lechner, Benjamin ; Nirschl, Nina ; Sturm, Lisa ; Görge, Veronika ; Beuschlein, Felix ; Reincke, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>Objective Saline infusion test (SIT) and captopril challenge test (CCT) are standard confirmatory procedures routinely used in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism (PA). However, side effects and complications during testing have not been systematically studied. Design We performed a cohort study with patients undergoing SIT and/or CCT in two centers from 2016 until 2018. Methods We studied 272 study participants with suspected PA enrolled at two outpatient centers in Germany. We assessed the frequency and severity of side effects during adjustment of blood pressure medication and during SIT and CCT. Results During the adjustment phase prior confirmatory testing, side effects including palpitations, headaches, edema and hypertensive episodes occurred in 18.4% of study participants. Side effects were associated with higher defined daily doses (DDD) (r = 0.25, P &lt; 0.005), number of antihypertensive drugs (r = 0.285, P &lt; 0.005) and higher blood pressure (r = 0.145, P = 0.019). During SIT, 17.5% of study participants had side effects, associated with higher blood pressure (systolic: r = 0.541, P &lt; 0.0005; diastolic: r = 0.426, P &lt; 0.0005) and DDDs (r = 0.727, P &lt; 0.0005). During CCT, only 1.5% of study participants developed side effects. Conclusions In contrast to the high rate of side effects during SIT, CCT appears to be the safer test with a very low event rate. This makes CCT especially suitable for severely hypertensive patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0804-4643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-683X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1530/EJE-19-0138</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31376812</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Bioscientifica Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antihypertensives ; Blood pressure ; Clinical Study ; Cohort Studies ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - adverse effects ; Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards ; Edema ; Endocrine disorders ; Female ; Headache ; Humans ; Hyperaldosteronism - blood ; Hyperaldosteronism - diagnosis ; Hypertension ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Safety - standards ; Side effects</subject><ispartof>European journal of endocrinology, 2019-10, Vol.181 (4), p.421-428</ispartof><rights>2019 European Society of Endocrinology</rights><rights>Copyright BioScientifica Ltd. Oct 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-2f269e9ab7bef519d8b3fe384d09b3ab38bb589d81bd64d551edf091cee485fd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31376812$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolf, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinkler, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holler, Finn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechner, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirschl, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görge, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuschlein, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reincke, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of medical adjustment and confirmatory testing in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism</title><title>European journal of endocrinology</title><addtitle>Eur J Endocrinol</addtitle><description>Objective Saline infusion test (SIT) and captopril challenge test (CCT) are standard confirmatory procedures routinely used in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism (PA). However, side effects and complications during testing have not been systematically studied. Design We performed a cohort study with patients undergoing SIT and/or CCT in two centers from 2016 until 2018. Methods We studied 272 study participants with suspected PA enrolled at two outpatient centers in Germany. We assessed the frequency and severity of side effects during adjustment of blood pressure medication and during SIT and CCT. Results During the adjustment phase prior confirmatory testing, side effects including palpitations, headaches, edema and hypertensive episodes occurred in 18.4% of study participants. Side effects were associated with higher defined daily doses (DDD) (r = 0.25, P &lt; 0.005), number of antihypertensive drugs (r = 0.285, P &lt; 0.005) and higher blood pressure (r = 0.145, P = 0.019). During SIT, 17.5% of study participants had side effects, associated with higher blood pressure (systolic: r = 0.541, P &lt; 0.0005; diastolic: r = 0.426, P &lt; 0.0005) and DDDs (r = 0.727, P &lt; 0.0005). During CCT, only 1.5% of study participants developed side effects. Conclusions In contrast to the high rate of side effects during SIT, CCT appears to be the safer test with a very low event rate. This makes CCT especially suitable for severely hypertensive patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antihypertensives</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - adverse effects</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Endocrine disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperaldosteronism - blood</subject><subject>Hyperaldosteronism - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Safety - standards</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><issn>0804-4643</issn><issn>1479-683X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtLAzEURoMoWh8r9xJwI8hoXjPNLKXUFwUXKrgLySSpqTNJTWaQ_ntTWl24cJVwc_i4OR8Apxhd4ZKi6-njtMB1gTDlO2CE2bguKk7fdsEIccQKVjF6AA5TWiCE8x3tgwOK6bjimIzA-7O0pl_BYGFntGtkC6VeDKnvjO-h9Bo2wVsXO9mHuIK9Sb3zc-g87N8N1E7OfcijBn6F-FEMy3XQMrpOZli2Or-ZGLxL3THYs7JN5mR7HoHX2-nL5L6YPd09TG5mhWIV6QtiSVWbWqqxMrbEteaKWkM506hWVCrKlSp5HmOlK6bLEhttUY0bYxgvraZH4GKTu4zhc8jris6lxrSt9CYMSRCS5RBEyDij53_QRRiiz9sJQlGJOCv5mrrcUE0MKUVjxfZ_AiOxLkDkAgSuxbqATJ9tMweVhf6yP8YzgDeAciE1Llt2Nmv_N_QbmXCSYw</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Heinrich, Daniel A</creator><creator>Adolf, Christian</creator><creator>Quinkler, Marcus</creator><creator>Holler, Finn</creator><creator>Lechner, Benjamin</creator><creator>Nirschl, Nina</creator><creator>Sturm, Lisa</creator><creator>Görge, Veronika</creator><creator>Beuschlein, Felix</creator><creator>Reincke, Martin</creator><general>Bioscientifica Ltd</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Safety of medical adjustment and confirmatory testing in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism</title><author>Heinrich, Daniel A ; Adolf, Christian ; Quinkler, Marcus ; Holler, Finn ; Lechner, Benjamin ; Nirschl, Nina ; Sturm, Lisa ; Görge, Veronika ; Beuschlein, Felix ; Reincke, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b462t-2f269e9ab7bef519d8b3fe384d09b3ab38bb589d81bd64d551edf091cee485fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antihypertensives</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - adverse effects</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Endocrine disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperaldosteronism - blood</topic><topic>Hyperaldosteronism - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Safety - standards</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Heinrich, Daniel A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adolf, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quinkler, Marcus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holler, Finn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lechner, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nirschl, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sturm, Lisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Görge, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beuschlein, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reincke, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of endocrinology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Heinrich, Daniel A</au><au>Adolf, Christian</au><au>Quinkler, Marcus</au><au>Holler, Finn</au><au>Lechner, Benjamin</au><au>Nirschl, Nina</au><au>Sturm, Lisa</au><au>Görge, Veronika</au><au>Beuschlein, Felix</au><au>Reincke, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of medical adjustment and confirmatory testing in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism</atitle><jtitle>European journal of endocrinology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Endocrinol</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>181</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>421</spage><epage>428</epage><pages>421-428</pages><issn>0804-4643</issn><eissn>1479-683X</eissn><abstract>Objective Saline infusion test (SIT) and captopril challenge test (CCT) are standard confirmatory procedures routinely used in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism (PA). However, side effects and complications during testing have not been systematically studied. Design We performed a cohort study with patients undergoing SIT and/or CCT in two centers from 2016 until 2018. Methods We studied 272 study participants with suspected PA enrolled at two outpatient centers in Germany. We assessed the frequency and severity of side effects during adjustment of blood pressure medication and during SIT and CCT. Results During the adjustment phase prior confirmatory testing, side effects including palpitations, headaches, edema and hypertensive episodes occurred in 18.4% of study participants. Side effects were associated with higher defined daily doses (DDD) (r = 0.25, P &lt; 0.005), number of antihypertensive drugs (r = 0.285, P &lt; 0.005) and higher blood pressure (r = 0.145, P = 0.019). During SIT, 17.5% of study participants had side effects, associated with higher blood pressure (systolic: r = 0.541, P &lt; 0.0005; diastolic: r = 0.426, P &lt; 0.0005) and DDDs (r = 0.727, P &lt; 0.0005). During CCT, only 1.5% of study participants developed side effects. Conclusions In contrast to the high rate of side effects during SIT, CCT appears to be the safer test with a very low event rate. This makes CCT especially suitable for severely hypertensive patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Bioscientifica Ltd</pub><pmid>31376812</pmid><doi>10.1530/EJE-19-0138</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0804-4643
ispartof European journal of endocrinology, 2019-10, Vol.181 (4), p.421-428
issn 0804-4643
1479-683X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268320227
source MEDLINE; Oxford Journals
subjects Adult
Antihypertensives
Blood pressure
Clinical Study
Cohort Studies
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - adverse effects
Diagnostic Tests, Routine - standards
Edema
Endocrine disorders
Female
Headache
Humans
Hyperaldosteronism - blood
Hyperaldosteronism - diagnosis
Hypertension
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Safety - standards
Side effects
title Safety of medical adjustment and confirmatory testing in the diagnostic work-up of primary aldosteronism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T16%3A15%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20medical%20adjustment%20and%20confirmatory%20testing%20in%20the%20diagnostic%20work-up%20of%20primary%20aldosteronism&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20endocrinology&rft.au=Heinrich,%20Daniel%20A&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=181&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=421&rft.epage=428&rft.pages=421-428&rft.issn=0804-4643&rft.eissn=1479-683X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1530/EJE-19-0138&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2305084587%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2305084587&rft_id=info:pmid/31376812&rfr_iscdi=true