Assessment of the aerosol distribution pattern of a single-port device for intraperitoneal administration of therapeutic substances

Background In the last 20 years, intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) has been explored as a modality for the management of peritoneal metastases of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and primary peritoneal tumors. Direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity space has proved superi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2019-10, Vol.33 (10), p.3503-3510
Hauptverfasser: Seitenfus, Rafael, Kalil, Antonio Nocchi, de Barros, Eduardo Dipp, Galeano Zettler, Claudio, dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira, Glehen, Olivier, Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto, Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3510
container_issue 10
container_start_page 3503
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 33
creator Seitenfus, Rafael
Kalil, Antonio Nocchi
de Barros, Eduardo Dipp
Galeano Zettler, Claudio
dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira
Glehen, Olivier
Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto
Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter
description Background In the last 20 years, intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) has been explored as a modality for the management of peritoneal metastases of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and primary peritoneal tumors. Direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity space has proved superior to systemic chemotherapy when evaluating characteristics such as drug concentration reached in the peritoneal space, penetration into peritoneal metastases, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. Traditionally, IPC is delivered by peritoneal lavage with a liquid solution. This form of delivery has limitations, including inhomogeneous intraperitoneal distribution and limited ability to penetrate tissues and metastatic nodules. An alternative mode of delivery is so-called pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Within this context, the present study sought to identify the pattern of spatial distribution of therapeutic solutions aerosolized into the peritoneal space using a single-port PIPAC device and ascertain whether the aerosolized method is superior to the traditional (liquid) mode of IPC delivery. Methods Analysis of the rate of intra-abdominal staining with aerosolized 2% silver nitrate in five porcine models. Results Assessment of differences in stain impregnation between the upper, middle, and lower abdomen did not reveal significant differences ( p  = 0.42). The median sum scores were 1 for the upper abdomen and 3 for the middle and lower abdomen. Conclusions Aerosolization does not reach all regions of the abdomen homogeneously. However, adequate exposure of the upper abdomen, mid-abdomen, and lower abdomen to chemotherapeutic agents can be achieved with PIPAC.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-019-07043-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268309689</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2268309689</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-da8ec8fb4bdd3c075258b2561b6f15b690d9608ee0fb461ea12a2409fa2c0ae13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kb1u1jAUQC0Eol8LL8CALLGwBK7t_NhjVZW2UiUWmCMnuSmuEjv4Okjf3BfHaVqQGJg8-Nxj6x7G3gn4JACazwRQ1mUBwhTQQKmK4wt2EKWShZRCv2QHMAoK2ZjyhJ0S3UPmjahesxMlVCO1Ngf2cE6ERDP6xMPI0w_kFmOgMPHBUYquW5MLni82JYx-Yywn5-8mLJYQEx_wl-uRjyFy51O0C0aXgkc7cTvMzm8S-6jY9RuRlT2ntaNkfY_0hr0a7UT49uk8Y9-_XH67uC5uv17dXJzfFr1qqlQMVmOvx67shkH10FSy0p2satHVo6i62sBgatCIkJlaoBXSyhLMaGUPFoU6Yx937xLDzxUptbOjHqfJegwrtVLWWoGptcnoh3_Q-7BGn3-3UU2lNehNKHeqzxujiGO7RDfbeGwFtFuidk_U5kTtY6L2mIfeP6nXbsbhz8hzkwyoHaB85e8w_n37P9rfc7egMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2267588081</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the aerosol distribution pattern of a single-port device for intraperitoneal administration of therapeutic substances</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Seitenfus, Rafael ; Kalil, Antonio Nocchi ; de Barros, Eduardo Dipp ; Galeano Zettler, Claudio ; dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira ; Glehen, Olivier ; Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto ; Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter</creator><creatorcontrib>Seitenfus, Rafael ; Kalil, Antonio Nocchi ; de Barros, Eduardo Dipp ; Galeano Zettler, Claudio ; dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira ; Glehen, Olivier ; Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto ; Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter</creatorcontrib><description>Background In the last 20 years, intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) has been explored as a modality for the management of peritoneal metastases of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and primary peritoneal tumors. Direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity space has proved superior to systemic chemotherapy when evaluating characteristics such as drug concentration reached in the peritoneal space, penetration into peritoneal metastases, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. Traditionally, IPC is delivered by peritoneal lavage with a liquid solution. This form of delivery has limitations, including inhomogeneous intraperitoneal distribution and limited ability to penetrate tissues and metastatic nodules. An alternative mode of delivery is so-called pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Within this context, the present study sought to identify the pattern of spatial distribution of therapeutic solutions aerosolized into the peritoneal space using a single-port PIPAC device and ascertain whether the aerosolized method is superior to the traditional (liquid) mode of IPC delivery. Methods Analysis of the rate of intra-abdominal staining with aerosolized 2% silver nitrate in five porcine models. Results Assessment of differences in stain impregnation between the upper, middle, and lower abdomen did not reveal significant differences ( p  = 0.42). The median sum scores were 1 for the upper abdomen and 3 for the middle and lower abdomen. Conclusions Aerosolization does not reach all regions of the abdomen homogeneously. However, adequate exposure of the upper abdomen, mid-abdomen, and lower abdomen to chemotherapeutic agents can be achieved with PIPAC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07043-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31372889</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Abdominal Cavity - pathology ; Abdominal Surgery ; Aerosols - administration &amp; dosage ; Aerosols - pharmacology ; Animals ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology ; Chemotherapy ; Drug Therapy - instrumentation ; Drug Therapy - methods ; Endoscopy ; Equipment Design ; Gastric cancer ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Injections, Intraperitoneal - instrumentation ; Injections, Intraperitoneal - methods ; Laboratory animals ; Medical equipment ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Metastasis ; New Technology ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary ; Peritoneum - drug effects ; Proctology ; Statistical analysis ; Studies ; Surgery ; Swine</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2019-10, Vol.33 (10), p.3503-3510</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>Surgical Endoscopy is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-da8ec8fb4bdd3c075258b2561b6f15b690d9608ee0fb461ea12a2409fa2c0ae13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-da8ec8fb4bdd3c075258b2561b6f15b690d9608ee0fb461ea12a2409fa2c0ae13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8481-2759</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-019-07043-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-019-07043-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31372889$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seitenfus, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalil, Antonio Nocchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros, Eduardo Dipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galeano Zettler, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glehen, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the aerosol distribution pattern of a single-port device for intraperitoneal administration of therapeutic substances</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background In the last 20 years, intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) has been explored as a modality for the management of peritoneal metastases of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and primary peritoneal tumors. Direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity space has proved superior to systemic chemotherapy when evaluating characteristics such as drug concentration reached in the peritoneal space, penetration into peritoneal metastases, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. Traditionally, IPC is delivered by peritoneal lavage with a liquid solution. This form of delivery has limitations, including inhomogeneous intraperitoneal distribution and limited ability to penetrate tissues and metastatic nodules. An alternative mode of delivery is so-called pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Within this context, the present study sought to identify the pattern of spatial distribution of therapeutic solutions aerosolized into the peritoneal space using a single-port PIPAC device and ascertain whether the aerosolized method is superior to the traditional (liquid) mode of IPC delivery. Methods Analysis of the rate of intra-abdominal staining with aerosolized 2% silver nitrate in five porcine models. Results Assessment of differences in stain impregnation between the upper, middle, and lower abdomen did not reveal significant differences ( p  = 0.42). The median sum scores were 1 for the upper abdomen and 3 for the middle and lower abdomen. Conclusions Aerosolization does not reach all regions of the abdomen homogeneously. However, adequate exposure of the upper abdomen, mid-abdomen, and lower abdomen to chemotherapeutic agents can be achieved with PIPAC.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Abdominal Cavity - pathology</subject><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Aerosols - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Aerosols - pharmacology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Drug Therapy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Drug Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Gastric cancer</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Injections, Intraperitoneal - instrumentation</subject><subject>Injections, Intraperitoneal - methods</subject><subject>Laboratory animals</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>New Technology</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary</subject><subject>Peritoneum - drug effects</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Swine</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kb1u1jAUQC0Eol8LL8CALLGwBK7t_NhjVZW2UiUWmCMnuSmuEjv4Okjf3BfHaVqQGJg8-Nxj6x7G3gn4JACazwRQ1mUBwhTQQKmK4wt2EKWShZRCv2QHMAoK2ZjyhJ0S3UPmjahesxMlVCO1Ngf2cE6ERDP6xMPI0w_kFmOgMPHBUYquW5MLni82JYx-Yywn5-8mLJYQEx_wl-uRjyFy51O0C0aXgkc7cTvMzm8S-6jY9RuRlT2ntaNkfY_0hr0a7UT49uk8Y9-_XH67uC5uv17dXJzfFr1qqlQMVmOvx67shkH10FSy0p2satHVo6i62sBgatCIkJlaoBXSyhLMaGUPFoU6Yx937xLDzxUptbOjHqfJegwrtVLWWoGptcnoh3_Q-7BGn3-3UU2lNehNKHeqzxujiGO7RDfbeGwFtFuidk_U5kTtY6L2mIfeP6nXbsbhz8hzkwyoHaB85e8w_n37P9rfc7egMA</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Seitenfus, Rafael</creator><creator>Kalil, Antonio Nocchi</creator><creator>de Barros, Eduardo Dipp</creator><creator>Galeano Zettler, Claudio</creator><creator>dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira</creator><creator>Glehen, Olivier</creator><creator>Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto</creator><creator>Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-2759</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Assessment of the aerosol distribution pattern of a single-port device for intraperitoneal administration of therapeutic substances</title><author>Seitenfus, Rafael ; Kalil, Antonio Nocchi ; de Barros, Eduardo Dipp ; Galeano Zettler, Claudio ; dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira ; Glehen, Olivier ; Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto ; Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-da8ec8fb4bdd3c075258b2561b6f15b690d9608ee0fb461ea12a2409fa2c0ae13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Abdominal Cavity - pathology</topic><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Aerosols - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Aerosols - pharmacology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Drug Therapy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Drug Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Gastric cancer</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Injections, Intraperitoneal - instrumentation</topic><topic>Injections, Intraperitoneal - methods</topic><topic>Laboratory animals</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>New Technology</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary</topic><topic>Peritoneum - drug effects</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Swine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seitenfus, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalil, Antonio Nocchi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Barros, Eduardo Dipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galeano Zettler, Claudio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glehen, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seitenfus, Rafael</au><au>Kalil, Antonio Nocchi</au><au>de Barros, Eduardo Dipp</au><au>Galeano Zettler, Claudio</au><au>dos Santos, Gabriel Oliveira</au><au>Glehen, Olivier</au><au>Cereser Junior, Carlos Humberto</au><au>Ferreira, Paulo Roberto Walter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the aerosol distribution pattern of a single-port device for intraperitoneal administration of therapeutic substances</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>3503</spage><epage>3510</epage><pages>3503-3510</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background In the last 20 years, intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) has been explored as a modality for the management of peritoneal metastases of gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and primary peritoneal tumors. Direct delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to the peritoneal cavity space has proved superior to systemic chemotherapy when evaluating characteristics such as drug concentration reached in the peritoneal space, penetration into peritoneal metastases, and chemotherapy-related toxicity. Traditionally, IPC is delivered by peritoneal lavage with a liquid solution. This form of delivery has limitations, including inhomogeneous intraperitoneal distribution and limited ability to penetrate tissues and metastatic nodules. An alternative mode of delivery is so-called pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC). Within this context, the present study sought to identify the pattern of spatial distribution of therapeutic solutions aerosolized into the peritoneal space using a single-port PIPAC device and ascertain whether the aerosolized method is superior to the traditional (liquid) mode of IPC delivery. Methods Analysis of the rate of intra-abdominal staining with aerosolized 2% silver nitrate in five porcine models. Results Assessment of differences in stain impregnation between the upper, middle, and lower abdomen did not reveal significant differences ( p  = 0.42). The median sum scores were 1 for the upper abdomen and 3 for the middle and lower abdomen. Conclusions Aerosolization does not reach all regions of the abdomen homogeneously. However, adequate exposure of the upper abdomen, mid-abdomen, and lower abdomen to chemotherapeutic agents can be achieved with PIPAC.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>31372889</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-019-07043-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8481-2759</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2019-10, Vol.33 (10), p.3503-3510
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2268309689
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abdomen
Abdominal Cavity - pathology
Abdominal Surgery
Aerosols - administration & dosage
Aerosols - pharmacology
Animals
Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Antineoplastic Agents - pharmacology
Chemotherapy
Drug Therapy - instrumentation
Drug Therapy - methods
Endoscopy
Equipment Design
Gastric cancer
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Injections, Intraperitoneal - instrumentation
Injections, Intraperitoneal - methods
Laboratory animals
Medical equipment
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Metastasis
New Technology
Peritoneal Neoplasms - drug therapy
Peritoneal Neoplasms - secondary
Peritoneum - drug effects
Proctology
Statistical analysis
Studies
Surgery
Swine
title Assessment of the aerosol distribution pattern of a single-port device for intraperitoneal administration of therapeutic substances
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T22%3A15%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20aerosol%20distribution%20pattern%20of%20a%20single-port%20device%20for%20intraperitoneal%20administration%20of%20therapeutic%20substances&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Seitenfus,%20Rafael&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=3503&rft.epage=3510&rft.pages=3503-3510&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-019-07043-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2268309689%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2267588081&rft_id=info:pmid/31372889&rfr_iscdi=true