Response repetitions in auditory task switching: The influence of spatial response distance and of the response-stimulus interval
In task switching studies, response repetition effects are typically obtained: When the task repeats, response repetitions are faster than response switches (response repetition benefit), but when the task switches, the opposite is found (response repetition cost). Previously, it was found that spat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Acta psychologica 2019-08, Vol.199, p.102875-102875, Article 102875 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 102875 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 102875 |
| container_title | Acta psychologica |
| container_volume | 199 |
| creator | Seibold, Julia C. Koch, Iring Nolden, Sophie Proctor, Robert W. Vu, Kim-Phuong L. Schuch, Stefanie |
| description | In task switching studies, response repetition effects are typically obtained: When the task repeats, response repetitions are faster than response switches (response repetition benefit), but when the task switches, the opposite is found (response repetition cost). Previously, it was found that spatial response distance [RD] affected the response repetitions: separated response keys led to longer reaction times [RT] for response repetitions (in both task repetitions and task switches) than adjacent response keys. The goal of the present study was to replicate this RD effect in a modified setup with auditory stimuli (in Experiments 1 and 2). As we were interested in the temporal dynamics of the RD effect, we also introduced a block-wise manipulation of response-stimulus interval (RSI) in Experiment 2. RD modulated responding, replicating the results of a prior study that used visual stimuli, but only when the RSI was long. With short RSI, the RD effect was not obtained. At the same time, a long RSI led to more pronounced response repetition effects in the error rates. These results imply that response inhibition from the previous trial, which is assumed to contribute to the response repetition effect and to the modulation of responding by response distance, builds up over time. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102875 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2267014852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0001691818303251</els_id><sourcerecordid>2317877734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b439b6d116e66c0fa4eb0fcd33ce46cae608c5a352c7858b3e1f0d0e16a2b0e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVoSTYf_yAUQy-5eKsPW7J7KJSQpoFAISRnIUvjrLZe29XIKXvsP6-Mtzn0kNMwep95R8xLyCWja0aZ_LRdGxtH3K85ZXV64pUqj8iKVUrkktfqHVlRSlkua1adkFPEbWoLVrNjciKYKBWt-Yr8eQAchx4hCzBC9NGnJvN9Zibn4xD2WTT4M8PfPtqN758_Z48bSHrbTdBbyIY2w9FEb7pkcHByHqOZRdO7GYgbeBVzjH43ddO8I0J4Md05ed-aDuHiUM_I07ebx-vv-f2P27vrr_e5FTWNeVOIupGOMQlSWtqaAhraWieEhUJaA5JWtjSi5FZVZdUIYC11FJg0vElFnJGrxXcMw68JMOqdRwtdZ3oYJtScS0VZUZU8oR__Q7fDFPr0O80FU5VSShSJKhbKhgExQKvH4Hcm7DWjeo5Ib_USkZ4j0ktEaezDwXxqduBeh_5lkoAvCwDpGi8egkbr52M7H8BG7Qb_9oa_aMym-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2317877734</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Response repetitions in auditory task switching: The influence of spatial response distance and of the response-stimulus interval</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><creator>Seibold, Julia C. ; Koch, Iring ; Nolden, Sophie ; Proctor, Robert W. ; Vu, Kim-Phuong L. ; Schuch, Stefanie</creator><creatorcontrib>Seibold, Julia C. ; Koch, Iring ; Nolden, Sophie ; Proctor, Robert W. ; Vu, Kim-Phuong L. ; Schuch, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><description>In task switching studies, response repetition effects are typically obtained: When the task repeats, response repetitions are faster than response switches (response repetition benefit), but when the task switches, the opposite is found (response repetition cost). Previously, it was found that spatial response distance [RD] affected the response repetitions: separated response keys led to longer reaction times [RT] for response repetitions (in both task repetitions and task switches) than adjacent response keys. The goal of the present study was to replicate this RD effect in a modified setup with auditory stimuli (in Experiments 1 and 2). As we were interested in the temporal dynamics of the RD effect, we also introduced a block-wise manipulation of response-stimulus interval (RSI) in Experiment 2. RD modulated responding, replicating the results of a prior study that used visual stimuli, but only when the RSI was long. With short RSI, the RD effect was not obtained. At the same time, a long RSI led to more pronounced response repetition effects in the error rates. These results imply that response inhibition from the previous trial, which is assumed to contribute to the response repetition effect and to the modulation of responding by response distance, builds up over time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-6918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102875</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31357092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Audition ; Auditory stimuli ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Photic Stimulation - methods ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; Reaction Time - physiology ; Repetition ; Response inhibition ; Response repetition effects ; Task switching ; Time Factors ; Visual stimuli ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Acta psychologica, 2019-08, Vol.199, p.102875-102875, Article 102875</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b439b6d116e66c0fa4eb0fcd33ce46cae608c5a352c7858b3e1f0d0e16a2b0e13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b439b6d116e66c0fa4eb0fcd33ce46cae608c5a352c7858b3e1f0d0e16a2b0e13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102875$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27850,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31357092$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seibold, Julia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Iring</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolden, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proctor, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Kim-Phuong L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuch, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><title>Response repetitions in auditory task switching: The influence of spatial response distance and of the response-stimulus interval</title><title>Acta psychologica</title><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><description>In task switching studies, response repetition effects are typically obtained: When the task repeats, response repetitions are faster than response switches (response repetition benefit), but when the task switches, the opposite is found (response repetition cost). Previously, it was found that spatial response distance [RD] affected the response repetitions: separated response keys led to longer reaction times [RT] for response repetitions (in both task repetitions and task switches) than adjacent response keys. The goal of the present study was to replicate this RD effect in a modified setup with auditory stimuli (in Experiments 1 and 2). As we were interested in the temporal dynamics of the RD effect, we also introduced a block-wise manipulation of response-stimulus interval (RSI) in Experiment 2. RD modulated responding, replicating the results of a prior study that used visual stimuli, but only when the RSI was long. With short RSI, the RD effect was not obtained. At the same time, a long RSI led to more pronounced response repetition effects in the error rates. These results imply that response inhibition from the previous trial, which is assumed to contribute to the response repetition effect and to the modulation of responding by response distance, builds up over time.</description><subject>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Audition</subject><subject>Auditory stimuli</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Photic Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>Reaction Time - physiology</subject><subject>Repetition</subject><subject>Response inhibition</subject><subject>Response repetition effects</subject><subject>Task switching</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0001-6918</issn><issn>1873-6297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1r3DAQhkVoSTYf_yAUQy-5eKsPW7J7KJSQpoFAISRnIUvjrLZe29XIKXvsP6-Mtzn0kNMwep95R8xLyCWja0aZ_LRdGxtH3K85ZXV64pUqj8iKVUrkktfqHVlRSlkua1adkFPEbWoLVrNjciKYKBWt-Yr8eQAchx4hCzBC9NGnJvN9Zibn4xD2WTT4M8PfPtqN758_Z48bSHrbTdBbyIY2w9FEb7pkcHByHqOZRdO7GYgbeBVzjH43ddO8I0J4Md05ed-aDuHiUM_I07ebx-vv-f2P27vrr_e5FTWNeVOIupGOMQlSWtqaAhraWieEhUJaA5JWtjSi5FZVZdUIYC11FJg0vElFnJGrxXcMw68JMOqdRwtdZ3oYJtScS0VZUZU8oR__Q7fDFPr0O80FU5VSShSJKhbKhgExQKvH4Hcm7DWjeo5Ib_USkZ4j0ktEaezDwXxqduBeh_5lkoAvCwDpGi8egkbr52M7H8BG7Qb_9oa_aMym-Q</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Seibold, Julia C.</creator><creator>Koch, Iring</creator><creator>Nolden, Sophie</creator><creator>Proctor, Robert W.</creator><creator>Vu, Kim-Phuong L.</creator><creator>Schuch, Stefanie</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ICWRT</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>Response repetitions in auditory task switching: The influence of spatial response distance and of the response-stimulus interval</title><author>Seibold, Julia C. ; Koch, Iring ; Nolden, Sophie ; Proctor, Robert W. ; Vu, Kim-Phuong L. ; Schuch, Stefanie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-b439b6d116e66c0fa4eb0fcd33ce46cae608c5a352c7858b3e1f0d0e16a2b0e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Acoustic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Audition</topic><topic>Auditory stimuli</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Photic Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>Reaction Time - physiology</topic><topic>Repetition</topic><topic>Response inhibition</topic><topic>Response repetition effects</topic><topic>Task switching</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seibold, Julia C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Iring</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nolden, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proctor, Robert W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vu, Kim-Phuong L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuch, Stefanie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 28</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seibold, Julia C.</au><au>Koch, Iring</au><au>Nolden, Sophie</au><au>Proctor, Robert W.</au><au>Vu, Kim-Phuong L.</au><au>Schuch, Stefanie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Response repetitions in auditory task switching: The influence of spatial response distance and of the response-stimulus interval</atitle><jtitle>Acta psychologica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Psychol (Amst)</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>199</volume><spage>102875</spage><epage>102875</epage><pages>102875-102875</pages><artnum>102875</artnum><issn>0001-6918</issn><eissn>1873-6297</eissn><abstract>In task switching studies, response repetition effects are typically obtained: When the task repeats, response repetitions are faster than response switches (response repetition benefit), but when the task switches, the opposite is found (response repetition cost). Previously, it was found that spatial response distance [RD] affected the response repetitions: separated response keys led to longer reaction times [RT] for response repetitions (in both task repetitions and task switches) than adjacent response keys. The goal of the present study was to replicate this RD effect in a modified setup with auditory stimuli (in Experiments 1 and 2). As we were interested in the temporal dynamics of the RD effect, we also introduced a block-wise manipulation of response-stimulus interval (RSI) in Experiment 2. RD modulated responding, replicating the results of a prior study that used visual stimuli, but only when the RSI was long. With short RSI, the RD effect was not obtained. At the same time, a long RSI led to more pronounced response repetition effects in the error rates. These results imply that response inhibition from the previous trial, which is assumed to contribute to the response repetition effect and to the modulation of responding by response distance, builds up over time.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31357092</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102875</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0001-6918 |
| ispartof | Acta psychologica, 2019-08, Vol.199, p.102875-102875, Article 102875 |
| issn | 0001-6918 1873-6297 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2267014852 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Periodicals Index Online |
| subjects | Acoustic Stimulation - methods Adolescent Adult Audition Auditory stimuli Female Humans Male Photic Stimulation - methods Psychomotor Performance - physiology Reaction Time - physiology Repetition Response inhibition Response repetition effects Task switching Time Factors Visual stimuli Young Adult |
| title | Response repetitions in auditory task switching: The influence of spatial response distance and of the response-stimulus interval |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T04%3A23%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Response%20repetitions%20in%20auditory%20task%20switching:%20The%20influence%20of%20spatial%20response%20distance%20and%20of%20the%20response-stimulus%20interval&rft.jtitle=Acta%20psychologica&rft.au=Seibold,%20Julia%20C.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=199&rft.spage=102875&rft.epage=102875&rft.pages=102875-102875&rft.artnum=102875&rft.issn=0001-6918&rft.eissn=1873-6297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102875&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2317877734%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2317877734&rft_id=info:pmid/31357092&rft_els_id=S0001691818303251&rfr_iscdi=true |