Selective central vascular ligation (D3 lymphadenectomy) in patients undergoing minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: optimizing the risk–benefit equation

Aim Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been advocated for right colon adenocarcinoma (RC), but the radicality of vascular dissection remains controversial. Our aim is to report outcomes of selective CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) during minimally invasive CME for RC...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Colorectal disease 2020-01, Vol.22 (1), p.53-61
Hauptverfasser: Sammour, T., Malakorn, S., Thampy, R., Kaur, H., Bednarski, B. K., Messick, C. A., Taggart, M., Chang, G. J., You, Y. N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 61
container_issue 1
container_start_page 53
container_title Colorectal disease
container_volume 22
creator Sammour, T.
Malakorn, S.
Thampy, R.
Kaur, H.
Bednarski, B. K.
Messick, C. A.
Taggart, M.
Chang, G. J.
You, Y. N.
description Aim Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been advocated for right colon adenocarcinoma (RC), but the radicality of vascular dissection remains controversial. Our aim is to report outcomes of selective CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) during minimally invasive CME for RC. Method A prospective database identified patients who were treated for RC between 2009 and 2016. Minimally invasive CME was standard. The radicality of lymphadenectomy was defined as high ligation (HL) versus CVL based on operative reports and videos. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated the pre‐ and postoperative CT scans for radiographically abnormal nodes. Results Of 197 patients who underwent CME, HL was performed in 56 (28%) and CVL in 141 (72%). There were no baseline differences in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score or pathological staging, and there were no major intra‐operative complications in either group (including no major vascular injuries). The median total number of nodes retrieved was 27 and 31 (P = 0.011) in HL and CVL groups, resepctively, with pathologically positive nodes identified in 33.9% and 39.8% (P = 0.704), respectively. Preoperative imaging identified abnormal cN3 nodes in 1.5% of patients; all of whom underwent CVL. No abnormal cN2 or cN3 nodes remained on postoperative imaging. The 60‐day mortality was 0.5%, and major morbidity was 4%. One patient (0.5%) had an anastomotic recurrence after a median follow‐up of 22 months. Conclusion With imperfect preoperative clinical nodal staging, and in the absence of randomized data, the low morbidity and oncological outcomes observed support the approach of CME with HL as a minimum standard, with CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) in selected cases.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/codi.14794
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2267013498</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2267013498</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-1a0a82d859f28d722cb4ff3f72fa3966fc35802813c6a3375a391d1f3aab55fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi0EIiGw4QDIEpuA1MFl9zM7NOERKVIWwLrlcZcnDn507O5As-IOHIb7cBI8M4EFC7xxyfX5c8k_IU-BnUBer1QYzAmUTVfeI4dQ1qIAAe39Xc2LtgN2QB6ldM0Y1A20D8mBAFHVDYdD8vMDWlSTuUWq0E9RWnork5qtjNSajZxM8PT4TFC7uPFKDugzHdzyghpPx9zOlxKd_YBxE4zfUGe8cdLaJQPZtBMHN1qckDpMQQVrFMWvyqStWoeY-zZXSnqF8ZSGcTLOfNu6piuk0aTPv77_WOeHtZko3sy7mR6TB1rahE_u9iPy6e2bj6v3xcXlu_PV64tCiU6UBUgmWz60Vad5OzScq3WptdAN11J0da2VqFrGWxCqlkI0VT6FAbSQcl1VmTkix3vvGMPNjGnqnUkKrZUew5x6zuuGgSi7NqPP_0Gvwxx9nq7nQkDddayDTL3cUyqGlCLqfoz5w-LSA-u3cfbbOPtdnBl-dqec1w6Hv-if_DIAe-CLsbj8R9WvLs_O99Lf0Mmv6Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2331699091</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Selective central vascular ligation (D3 lymphadenectomy) in patients undergoing minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: optimizing the risk–benefit equation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Sammour, T. ; Malakorn, S. ; Thampy, R. ; Kaur, H. ; Bednarski, B. K. ; Messick, C. A. ; Taggart, M. ; Chang, G. J. ; You, Y. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sammour, T. ; Malakorn, S. ; Thampy, R. ; Kaur, H. ; Bednarski, B. K. ; Messick, C. A. ; Taggart, M. ; Chang, G. J. ; You, Y. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been advocated for right colon adenocarcinoma (RC), but the radicality of vascular dissection remains controversial. Our aim is to report outcomes of selective CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) during minimally invasive CME for RC. Method A prospective database identified patients who were treated for RC between 2009 and 2016. Minimally invasive CME was standard. The radicality of lymphadenectomy was defined as high ligation (HL) versus CVL based on operative reports and videos. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated the pre‐ and postoperative CT scans for radiographically abnormal nodes. Results Of 197 patients who underwent CME, HL was performed in 56 (28%) and CVL in 141 (72%). There were no baseline differences in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score or pathological staging, and there were no major intra‐operative complications in either group (including no major vascular injuries). The median total number of nodes retrieved was 27 and 31 (P = 0.011) in HL and CVL groups, resepctively, with pathologically positive nodes identified in 33.9% and 39.8% (P = 0.704), respectively. Preoperative imaging identified abnormal cN3 nodes in 1.5% of patients; all of whom underwent CVL. No abnormal cN2 or cN3 nodes remained on postoperative imaging. The 60‐day mortality was 0.5%, and major morbidity was 4%. One patient (0.5%) had an anastomotic recurrence after a median follow‐up of 22 months. Conclusion With imperfect preoperative clinical nodal staging, and in the absence of randomized data, the low morbidity and oncological outcomes observed support the approach of CME with HL as a minimum standard, with CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) in selected cases.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1462-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1463-1318</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/codi.14794</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31356721</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adenocarcinoma ; Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging ; Adenocarcinoma - surgery ; Aged ; Body mass ; Body mass index ; central vascular ligation ; CME ; Colectomy - adverse effects ; Colectomy - methods ; Colon cancer ; Colonic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Colonic Neoplasms - surgery ; complete mesocolic excision ; Complications ; Computed tomography ; Databases, Factual ; Female ; Health risks ; Humans ; Ligation - adverse effects ; Ligation - methods ; Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects ; Lymph Node Excision - methods ; lymph nodes ; Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging ; Lymph Nodes - surgery ; lymphadenectomy ; Male ; Mesenteric Arteries - surgery ; Mesenteric Veins - surgery ; Mesocolon - blood supply ; Mesocolon - surgery ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Nodes ; Prospective Studies ; Risk Assessment ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Colorectal disease, 2020-01, Vol.22 (1), p.53-61</ispartof><rights>Colorectal Disease © 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><rights>Colorectal Disease © 2019 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-1a0a82d859f28d722cb4ff3f72fa3966fc35802813c6a3375a391d1f3aab55fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-1a0a82d859f28d722cb4ff3f72fa3966fc35802813c6a3375a391d1f3aab55fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4918-8871</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcodi.14794$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcodi.14794$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31356721$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sammour, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malakorn, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thampy, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bednarski, B. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messick, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taggart, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Y. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Selective central vascular ligation (D3 lymphadenectomy) in patients undergoing minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: optimizing the risk–benefit equation</title><title>Colorectal disease</title><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><description>Aim Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been advocated for right colon adenocarcinoma (RC), but the radicality of vascular dissection remains controversial. Our aim is to report outcomes of selective CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) during minimally invasive CME for RC. Method A prospective database identified patients who were treated for RC between 2009 and 2016. Minimally invasive CME was standard. The radicality of lymphadenectomy was defined as high ligation (HL) versus CVL based on operative reports and videos. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated the pre‐ and postoperative CT scans for radiographically abnormal nodes. Results Of 197 patients who underwent CME, HL was performed in 56 (28%) and CVL in 141 (72%). There were no baseline differences in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score or pathological staging, and there were no major intra‐operative complications in either group (including no major vascular injuries). The median total number of nodes retrieved was 27 and 31 (P = 0.011) in HL and CVL groups, resepctively, with pathologically positive nodes identified in 33.9% and 39.8% (P = 0.704), respectively. Preoperative imaging identified abnormal cN3 nodes in 1.5% of patients; all of whom underwent CVL. No abnormal cN2 or cN3 nodes remained on postoperative imaging. The 60‐day mortality was 0.5%, and major morbidity was 4%. One patient (0.5%) had an anastomotic recurrence after a median follow‐up of 22 months. Conclusion With imperfect preoperative clinical nodal staging, and in the absence of randomized data, the low morbidity and oncological outcomes observed support the approach of CME with HL as a minimum standard, with CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) in selected cases.</description><subject>Adenocarcinoma</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Body mass</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>central vascular ligation</subject><subject>CME</subject><subject>Colectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Colectomy - methods</subject><subject>Colon cancer</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>complete mesocolic excision</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Ligation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Ligation - methods</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lymph Node Excision - methods</subject><subject>lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - surgery</subject><subject>lymphadenectomy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mesenteric Arteries - surgery</subject><subject>Mesenteric Veins - surgery</subject><subject>Mesocolon - blood supply</subject><subject>Mesocolon - surgery</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Nodes</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1462-8910</issn><issn>1463-1318</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtuFDEQhi0EIiGw4QDIEpuA1MFl9zM7NOERKVIWwLrlcZcnDn507O5As-IOHIb7cBI8M4EFC7xxyfX5c8k_IU-BnUBer1QYzAmUTVfeI4dQ1qIAAe39Xc2LtgN2QB6ldM0Y1A20D8mBAFHVDYdD8vMDWlSTuUWq0E9RWnork5qtjNSajZxM8PT4TFC7uPFKDugzHdzyghpPx9zOlxKd_YBxE4zfUGe8cdLaJQPZtBMHN1qckDpMQQVrFMWvyqStWoeY-zZXSnqF8ZSGcTLOfNu6piuk0aTPv77_WOeHtZko3sy7mR6TB1rahE_u9iPy6e2bj6v3xcXlu_PV64tCiU6UBUgmWz60Vad5OzScq3WptdAN11J0da2VqFrGWxCqlkI0VT6FAbSQcl1VmTkix3vvGMPNjGnqnUkKrZUew5x6zuuGgSi7NqPP_0Gvwxx9nq7nQkDddayDTL3cUyqGlCLqfoz5w-LSA-u3cfbbOPtdnBl-dqec1w6Hv-if_DIAe-CLsbj8R9WvLs_O99Lf0Mmv6Q</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Sammour, T.</creator><creator>Malakorn, S.</creator><creator>Thampy, R.</creator><creator>Kaur, H.</creator><creator>Bednarski, B. K.</creator><creator>Messick, C. A.</creator><creator>Taggart, M.</creator><creator>Chang, G. J.</creator><creator>You, Y. N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-8871</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Selective central vascular ligation (D3 lymphadenectomy) in patients undergoing minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: optimizing the risk–benefit equation</title><author>Sammour, T. ; Malakorn, S. ; Thampy, R. ; Kaur, H. ; Bednarski, B. K. ; Messick, C. A. ; Taggart, M. ; Chang, G. J. ; You, Y. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3934-1a0a82d859f28d722cb4ff3f72fa3966fc35802813c6a3375a391d1f3aab55fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adenocarcinoma</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Adenocarcinoma - surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Body mass</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>central vascular ligation</topic><topic>CME</topic><topic>Colectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Colectomy - methods</topic><topic>Colon cancer</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Colonic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>complete mesocolic excision</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Ligation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Ligation - methods</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lymph Node Excision - methods</topic><topic>lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - surgery</topic><topic>lymphadenectomy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mesenteric Arteries - surgery</topic><topic>Mesenteric Veins - surgery</topic><topic>Mesocolon - blood supply</topic><topic>Mesocolon - surgery</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Nodes</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sammour, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malakorn, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thampy, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaur, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bednarski, B. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messick, C. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taggart, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, G. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>You, Y. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sammour, T.</au><au>Malakorn, S.</au><au>Thampy, R.</au><au>Kaur, H.</au><au>Bednarski, B. K.</au><au>Messick, C. A.</au><au>Taggart, M.</au><au>Chang, G. J.</au><au>You, Y. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Selective central vascular ligation (D3 lymphadenectomy) in patients undergoing minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: optimizing the risk–benefit equation</atitle><jtitle>Colorectal disease</jtitle><addtitle>Colorectal Dis</addtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>53</spage><epage>61</epage><pages>53-61</pages><issn>1462-8910</issn><eissn>1463-1318</eissn><abstract>Aim Complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation (CVL) has been advocated for right colon adenocarcinoma (RC), but the radicality of vascular dissection remains controversial. Our aim is to report outcomes of selective CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) during minimally invasive CME for RC. Method A prospective database identified patients who were treated for RC between 2009 and 2016. Minimally invasive CME was standard. The radicality of lymphadenectomy was defined as high ligation (HL) versus CVL based on operative reports and videos. Two blinded radiologists independently evaluated the pre‐ and postoperative CT scans for radiographically abnormal nodes. Results Of 197 patients who underwent CME, HL was performed in 56 (28%) and CVL in 141 (72%). There were no baseline differences in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score or pathological staging, and there were no major intra‐operative complications in either group (including no major vascular injuries). The median total number of nodes retrieved was 27 and 31 (P = 0.011) in HL and CVL groups, resepctively, with pathologically positive nodes identified in 33.9% and 39.8% (P = 0.704), respectively. Preoperative imaging identified abnormal cN3 nodes in 1.5% of patients; all of whom underwent CVL. No abnormal cN2 or cN3 nodes remained on postoperative imaging. The 60‐day mortality was 0.5%, and major morbidity was 4%. One patient (0.5%) had an anastomotic recurrence after a median follow‐up of 22 months. Conclusion With imperfect preoperative clinical nodal staging, and in the absence of randomized data, the low morbidity and oncological outcomes observed support the approach of CME with HL as a minimum standard, with CVL (D3 lymphadenectomy) in selected cases.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31356721</pmid><doi>10.1111/codi.14794</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4918-8871</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1462-8910
ispartof Colorectal disease, 2020-01, Vol.22 (1), p.53-61
issn 1462-8910
1463-1318
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2267013498
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adenocarcinoma
Adenocarcinoma - diagnostic imaging
Adenocarcinoma - surgery
Aged
Body mass
Body mass index
central vascular ligation
CME
Colectomy - adverse effects
Colectomy - methods
Colon cancer
Colonic Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Colonic Neoplasms - surgery
complete mesocolic excision
Complications
Computed tomography
Databases, Factual
Female
Health risks
Humans
Ligation - adverse effects
Ligation - methods
Lymph Node Excision - adverse effects
Lymph Node Excision - methods
lymph nodes
Lymph Nodes - diagnostic imaging
Lymph Nodes - surgery
lymphadenectomy
Male
Mesenteric Arteries - surgery
Mesenteric Veins - surgery
Mesocolon - blood supply
Mesocolon - surgery
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Nodes
Prospective Studies
Risk Assessment
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
title Selective central vascular ligation (D3 lymphadenectomy) in patients undergoing minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision for colon cancer: optimizing the risk–benefit equation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T00%3A24%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Selective%20central%20vascular%20ligation%20(D3%20lymphadenectomy)%20in%20patients%20undergoing%20minimally%20invasive%20complete%20mesocolic%20excision%20for%20colon%20cancer:%20optimizing%20the%20risk%E2%80%93benefit%20equation&rft.jtitle=Colorectal%20disease&rft.au=Sammour,%20T.&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=53&rft.epage=61&rft.pages=53-61&rft.issn=1462-8910&rft.eissn=1463-1318&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/codi.14794&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2267013498%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2331699091&rft_id=info:pmid/31356721&rfr_iscdi=true