Body Composition Values of NCAA Division 1 Female Athletes Derived From Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry

Dobrosielski, DA, Leppert, KM, Knuth, ND, Wilder, JN, Kovacs, L, and Lisman, PJ. Body composition values of NCAA Division 1 female athletes derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Strength Cond Res 35(10): 2886–2893, 2021—This study generated descriptive data for regional and total body com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of strength and conditioning research 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2886-2893
Hauptverfasser: Dobrosielski, Devon A., Leppert, Kyle M., Knuth, Nick D., Wilder, Joshua N., Kovacs, Louis, Lisman, Peter J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2893
container_issue 10
container_start_page 2886
container_title Journal of strength and conditioning research
container_volume 35
creator Dobrosielski, Devon A.
Leppert, Kyle M.
Knuth, Nick D.
Wilder, Joshua N.
Kovacs, Louis
Lisman, Peter J.
description Dobrosielski, DA, Leppert, KM, Knuth, ND, Wilder, JN, Kovacs, L, and Lisman, PJ. Body composition values of NCAA Division 1 female athletes derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Strength Cond Res 35(10): 2886–2893, 2021—This study generated descriptive data for regional and total body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) measures using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) across 12 NCAA Division 1 female competitive sports. Two hundred seventy-eight female collegiate athletes underwent DXA: basketball (BB; n = 28), cross country ( CC = 11), field hockey (FH; n = 35), gymnastics (GYM; n = 23), lacrosse (LAX; n = 48), soccer (SOC; CC = 27), softball (SB; n = 24), swimming and diving (SW; n = 35), tennis (TN; n = 11), track and field ([TR-throw; n = 10]; [TR-run; n = 10]), and volleyball (VB; n = 16). Descriptive statistics for all body composition and BMD measures were calculated. Group mean differences in all regional and total body composition (all, p < 0.001; η 2 range = 0.177–0.365) and BMD (all, p < 0.001; η 2 range = 0.317–0.383) measures were observed between teams. The total BF% for gymnasts (23.5%) was lower than TN, FH, LAX, SB, and TR-throw (mean difference range: −4.6 to −12.9%, all p < 0.01); TR-throw had the highest total BF% (36.4%). Cross country had lower total BMD (1.17 g·cm −2 ) than FH, TR-throw, LAX, GYM, SOC, SB, VB, and BB (mean difference range: −0.12 to −0.26 g·cm −2 , all p < 0.01); BB and TR-throw had the highest total BMD (1.40 and 1.43 g·cm −2 , respectively). Our data confirm that regional and total body composition and BMD measures varied across female collegiate sports. These findings may assist sports medicine and strength and conditioning practitioners with identifying sport-specific goal values for BF% and BMD to optimize program design.
doi_str_mv 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003213
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2264223050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575081563</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-58f07f30724022396caf868895533885b60ed18e3c866dfb2e70d7c219c066083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9P3DAQxaMKpPLvG3Cw1EsvhrEdO95jmmWBCrVSSytuljeZdAPOerETVvn29bKVqJjLjEa_9zTzsuycwQWTbHb59Wd1Af-V4Ex8yI6YFILmXBcHaQaVUw2MfcyOY3wE4FJKcZStvvhmIpXvNz52Q-fX5Ld1I0biW_KtKksy7166uNszssDeOiTlsHI4JGSOoXvBhiyC78l8tI5erTH8mcgD_WEnUi6jD5vk2eMQptPssLUu4tm_fpL9WlzdVzf07vv1bVXe0VrIglOpWyhaAQXPgXMxU7VttdJ6lq4VWsulAmyYRlFrpZp2ybGApqg5m9WgFGhxkn3e-26Cf06PDKbvYo3O2TX6MRrOVZ6MQUJCP71DH_0Y1uk6w2UhQTOpRKLyPVUHH2PA1mxC19swGQZmF79J8Zv38b_Jtt4NGOKTG7cYzAqtG1YJZzznhaYcOGM7EX0Vir-ckoRE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575081563</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Body Composition Values of NCAA Division 1 Female Athletes Derived From Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Dobrosielski, Devon A. ; Leppert, Kyle M. ; Knuth, Nick D. ; Wilder, Joshua N. ; Kovacs, Louis ; Lisman, Peter J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dobrosielski, Devon A. ; Leppert, Kyle M. ; Knuth, Nick D. ; Wilder, Joshua N. ; Kovacs, Louis ; Lisman, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><description>Dobrosielski, DA, Leppert, KM, Knuth, ND, Wilder, JN, Kovacs, L, and Lisman, PJ. Body composition values of NCAA Division 1 female athletes derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Strength Cond Res 35(10): 2886–2893, 2021—This study generated descriptive data for regional and total body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) measures using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) across 12 NCAA Division 1 female competitive sports. Two hundred seventy-eight female collegiate athletes underwent DXA: basketball (BB; n = 28), cross country ( CC = 11), field hockey (FH; n = 35), gymnastics (GYM; n = 23), lacrosse (LAX; n = 48), soccer (SOC; CC = 27), softball (SB; n = 24), swimming and diving (SW; n = 35), tennis (TN; n = 11), track and field ([TR-throw; n = 10]; [TR-run; n = 10]), and volleyball (VB; n = 16). Descriptive statistics for all body composition and BMD measures were calculated. Group mean differences in all regional and total body composition (all, p &lt; 0.001; η 2 range = 0.177–0.365) and BMD (all, p &lt; 0.001; η 2 range = 0.317–0.383) measures were observed between teams. The total BF% for gymnasts (23.5%) was lower than TN, FH, LAX, SB, and TR-throw (mean difference range: −4.6 to −12.9%, all p &lt; 0.01); TR-throw had the highest total BF% (36.4%). Cross country had lower total BMD (1.17 g·cm −2 ) than FH, TR-throw, LAX, GYM, SOC, SB, VB, and BB (mean difference range: −0.12 to −0.26 g·cm −2 , all p &lt; 0.01); BB and TR-throw had the highest total BMD (1.40 and 1.43 g·cm −2 , respectively). Our data confirm that regional and total body composition and BMD measures varied across female collegiate sports. These findings may assist sports medicine and strength and conditioning practitioners with identifying sport-specific goal values for BF% and BMD to optimize program design.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8011</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-4287</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</publisher><subject>Body composition ; Bone composition ; Bone mineral density ; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry ; X-rays</subject><ispartof>Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2886-2893</ispartof><rights>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</rights><rights>2019 National Strength and Conditioning Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-58f07f30724022396caf868895533885b60ed18e3c866dfb2e70d7c219c066083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-58f07f30724022396caf868895533885b60ed18e3c866dfb2e70d7c219c066083</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dobrosielski, Devon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leppert, Kyle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knuth, Nick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilder, Joshua N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisman, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><title>Body Composition Values of NCAA Division 1 Female Athletes Derived From Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry</title><title>Journal of strength and conditioning research</title><description>Dobrosielski, DA, Leppert, KM, Knuth, ND, Wilder, JN, Kovacs, L, and Lisman, PJ. Body composition values of NCAA Division 1 female athletes derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Strength Cond Res 35(10): 2886–2893, 2021—This study generated descriptive data for regional and total body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) measures using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) across 12 NCAA Division 1 female competitive sports. Two hundred seventy-eight female collegiate athletes underwent DXA: basketball (BB; n = 28), cross country ( CC = 11), field hockey (FH; n = 35), gymnastics (GYM; n = 23), lacrosse (LAX; n = 48), soccer (SOC; CC = 27), softball (SB; n = 24), swimming and diving (SW; n = 35), tennis (TN; n = 11), track and field ([TR-throw; n = 10]; [TR-run; n = 10]), and volleyball (VB; n = 16). Descriptive statistics for all body composition and BMD measures were calculated. Group mean differences in all regional and total body composition (all, p &lt; 0.001; η 2 range = 0.177–0.365) and BMD (all, p &lt; 0.001; η 2 range = 0.317–0.383) measures were observed between teams. The total BF% for gymnasts (23.5%) was lower than TN, FH, LAX, SB, and TR-throw (mean difference range: −4.6 to −12.9%, all p &lt; 0.01); TR-throw had the highest total BF% (36.4%). Cross country had lower total BMD (1.17 g·cm −2 ) than FH, TR-throw, LAX, GYM, SOC, SB, VB, and BB (mean difference range: −0.12 to −0.26 g·cm −2 , all p &lt; 0.01); BB and TR-throw had the highest total BMD (1.40 and 1.43 g·cm −2 , respectively). Our data confirm that regional and total body composition and BMD measures varied across female collegiate sports. These findings may assist sports medicine and strength and conditioning practitioners with identifying sport-specific goal values for BF% and BMD to optimize program design.</description><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Bone composition</subject><subject>Bone mineral density</subject><subject>Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry</subject><subject>X-rays</subject><issn>1064-8011</issn><issn>1533-4287</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE9P3DAQxaMKpPLvG3Cw1EsvhrEdO95jmmWBCrVSSytuljeZdAPOerETVvn29bKVqJjLjEa_9zTzsuycwQWTbHb59Wd1Af-V4Ex8yI6YFILmXBcHaQaVUw2MfcyOY3wE4FJKcZStvvhmIpXvNz52Q-fX5Ld1I0biW_KtKksy7166uNszssDeOiTlsHI4JGSOoXvBhiyC78l8tI5erTH8mcgD_WEnUi6jD5vk2eMQptPssLUu4tm_fpL9WlzdVzf07vv1bVXe0VrIglOpWyhaAQXPgXMxU7VttdJ6lq4VWsulAmyYRlFrpZp2ybGApqg5m9WgFGhxkn3e-26Cf06PDKbvYo3O2TX6MRrOVZ6MQUJCP71DH_0Y1uk6w2UhQTOpRKLyPVUHH2PA1mxC19swGQZmF79J8Zv38b_Jtt4NGOKTG7cYzAqtG1YJZzznhaYcOGM7EX0Vir-ckoRE</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Dobrosielski, Devon A.</creator><creator>Leppert, Kyle M.</creator><creator>Knuth, Nick D.</creator><creator>Wilder, Joshua N.</creator><creator>Kovacs, Louis</creator><creator>Lisman, Peter J.</creator><general>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</general><general>Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins Ovid Technologies</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Body Composition Values of NCAA Division 1 Female Athletes Derived From Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry</title><author>Dobrosielski, Devon A. ; Leppert, Kyle M. ; Knuth, Nick D. ; Wilder, Joshua N. ; Kovacs, Louis ; Lisman, Peter J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3572-58f07f30724022396caf868895533885b60ed18e3c866dfb2e70d7c219c066083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Bone composition</topic><topic>Bone mineral density</topic><topic>Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry</topic><topic>X-rays</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dobrosielski, Devon A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leppert, Kyle M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knuth, Nick D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilder, Joshua N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Louis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisman, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dobrosielski, Devon A.</au><au>Leppert, Kyle M.</au><au>Knuth, Nick D.</au><au>Wilder, Joshua N.</au><au>Kovacs, Louis</au><au>Lisman, Peter J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Body Composition Values of NCAA Division 1 Female Athletes Derived From Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of strength and conditioning research</jtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>2886</spage><epage>2893</epage><pages>2886-2893</pages><issn>1064-8011</issn><eissn>1533-4287</eissn><abstract>Dobrosielski, DA, Leppert, KM, Knuth, ND, Wilder, JN, Kovacs, L, and Lisman, PJ. Body composition values of NCAA Division 1 female athletes derived from dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. J Strength Cond Res 35(10): 2886–2893, 2021—This study generated descriptive data for regional and total body composition and bone mineral density (BMD) measures using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) across 12 NCAA Division 1 female competitive sports. Two hundred seventy-eight female collegiate athletes underwent DXA: basketball (BB; n = 28), cross country ( CC = 11), field hockey (FH; n = 35), gymnastics (GYM; n = 23), lacrosse (LAX; n = 48), soccer (SOC; CC = 27), softball (SB; n = 24), swimming and diving (SW; n = 35), tennis (TN; n = 11), track and field ([TR-throw; n = 10]; [TR-run; n = 10]), and volleyball (VB; n = 16). Descriptive statistics for all body composition and BMD measures were calculated. Group mean differences in all regional and total body composition (all, p &lt; 0.001; η 2 range = 0.177–0.365) and BMD (all, p &lt; 0.001; η 2 range = 0.317–0.383) measures were observed between teams. The total BF% for gymnasts (23.5%) was lower than TN, FH, LAX, SB, and TR-throw (mean difference range: −4.6 to −12.9%, all p &lt; 0.01); TR-throw had the highest total BF% (36.4%). Cross country had lower total BMD (1.17 g·cm −2 ) than FH, TR-throw, LAX, GYM, SOC, SB, VB, and BB (mean difference range: −0.12 to −0.26 g·cm −2 , all p &lt; 0.01); BB and TR-throw had the highest total BMD (1.40 and 1.43 g·cm −2 , respectively). Our data confirm that regional and total body composition and BMD measures varied across female collegiate sports. These findings may assist sports medicine and strength and conditioning practitioners with identifying sport-specific goal values for BF% and BMD to optimize program design.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research</pub><doi>10.1519/JSC.0000000000003213</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1064-8011
ispartof Journal of strength and conditioning research, 2021-10, Vol.35 (10), p.2886-2893
issn 1064-8011
1533-4287
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2264223050
source Journals@Ovid Complete
subjects Body composition
Bone composition
Bone mineral density
Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
X-rays
title Body Composition Values of NCAA Division 1 Female Athletes Derived From Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A33%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Body%20Composition%20Values%20of%20NCAA%20Division%201%20Female%20Athletes%20Derived%20From%20Dual-Energy%20X-Ray%20Absorptiometry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20strength%20and%20conditioning%20research&rft.au=Dobrosielski,%20Devon%20A.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=2886&rft.epage=2893&rft.pages=2886-2893&rft.issn=1064-8011&rft.eissn=1533-4287&rft_id=info:doi/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003213&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575081563%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575081563&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true