Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Analysis of Findings of Systematic Reviews
Post lumbar surgery syndrome is common and often results in chronic, persistent pain and disability, which can lead to multiple interventions. After failure of conservative treatment, either surgical treatment or a nonsurgical modality of treatment such as epidural injections, percutaneous adhesioly...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Pain physician 2019-07, Vol.22 (4), p.307-322 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 322 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 307 |
| container_title | Pain physician |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Manchikanti, Laxmaiah Soin, Amol Boswell, Mark V Kaye, Alan D Sanapati, Mahendra Hirsch, Joshua A |
| description | Post lumbar surgery syndrome is common and often results in chronic, persistent pain and disability, which can lead to multiple interventions. After failure of conservative treatment, either surgical treatment or a nonsurgical modality of treatment such as epidural injections, percutaneous adhesiolysis are often contemplated in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome. Multiple previous systematic reviews have reached discordant conclusions about the level of evidence for the effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome and other conditions.
A systematic review of previously published systematic reviews assessing efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome.
To evaluate the value and validity of previous systematic reviews performed after 2015 on effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain secondary to post lumbar surgery syndrome.
Previous systematic reviews on percutaneous adhesiolysis were evaluated. The quality of each systematic review was assessed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).The randomized trials included in the available systematic reviews were assessed by Cochrane review criteria and Interventional Pain Management techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for methodologic quality.Data sources included relevant systematic reviews and the randomized trials included in those systematic reviews published since 2015 with searches of PubMed, Cochrane reviews, and Google Scholar through February 2019.
Outcome measures were significant improvement defined as 50% pain relief and improvement in functional status. Short-term efficacy was defined as improvement of 6 months or less, whereas long-term efficacy was defined as more than 6 months.
Three systematic reviews and 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of post lumbar surgery syndrome with chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain showed notable evidence of significant pain relief. Only one systematic review, which was of low quality with inappropriate analysis, showed lack of evidence.
Overall, the present analysis shows Level I evidence for percutaneous adhesiolysis based on significant evidence from published RCTs and 3 of the 4 systematic reviews.
Post lumbar surgery syndrome, epidural fibrosis, percutaneous |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2263317767</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2263317767</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-43242cac3bfacb90794bbdc648aafce1ac3e8eec6dbbbd393fb945b5e91bc8a73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BVnw4iWQzWQ3XW-htCoULFbPYXczqVvyp-4mlZz94kZbQTzNY-Y3D947IeOI8TBgLJanZMw4QACMyxG58H4bhiCkhHMyAgaQMBGOyee8KNC0do81ek-bgq7Qma5VNTadp2n-ht42Ze-tp7amq8a3dNlVWjm67twGXU_XfZ27psI7mg7at1ip1hqa1urwNngubJ3bevOj_yDPuLf44S_JWaFKj1fHOSGvi_nL7CFYPt0_ztJlsItAtkEMURwZZUAXymgZJjLWOjcinipVGGTDBaeIRuR62IOEQsuYa46SaTNVCUzI7cF355r3Dn2bVdYbLMtD2CyKBABLEvGN3vxDt03nhkQDJTiXMom5GKjrI9XpCvNs52ylXJ_91gtfNix6tQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2655997456</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Analysis of Findings of Systematic Reviews</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Manchikanti, Laxmaiah ; Soin, Amol ; Boswell, Mark V ; Kaye, Alan D ; Sanapati, Mahendra ; Hirsch, Joshua A</creator><creatorcontrib>Manchikanti, Laxmaiah ; Soin, Amol ; Boswell, Mark V ; Kaye, Alan D ; Sanapati, Mahendra ; Hirsch, Joshua A</creatorcontrib><description>Post lumbar surgery syndrome is common and often results in chronic, persistent pain and disability, which can lead to multiple interventions. After failure of conservative treatment, either surgical treatment or a nonsurgical modality of treatment such as epidural injections, percutaneous adhesiolysis are often contemplated in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome. Multiple previous systematic reviews have reached discordant conclusions about the level of evidence for the effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome and other conditions.
A systematic review of previously published systematic reviews assessing efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome.
To evaluate the value and validity of previous systematic reviews performed after 2015 on effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain secondary to post lumbar surgery syndrome.
Previous systematic reviews on percutaneous adhesiolysis were evaluated. The quality of each systematic review was assessed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).The randomized trials included in the available systematic reviews were assessed by Cochrane review criteria and Interventional Pain Management techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for methodologic quality.Data sources included relevant systematic reviews and the randomized trials included in those systematic reviews published since 2015 with searches of PubMed, Cochrane reviews, and Google Scholar through February 2019.
Outcome measures were significant improvement defined as 50% pain relief and improvement in functional status. Short-term efficacy was defined as improvement of 6 months or less, whereas long-term efficacy was defined as more than 6 months.
Three systematic reviews and 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of post lumbar surgery syndrome with chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain showed notable evidence of significant pain relief. Only one systematic review, which was of low quality with inappropriate analysis, showed lack of evidence.
Overall, the present analysis shows Level I evidence for percutaneous adhesiolysis based on significant evidence from published RCTs and 3 of the 4 systematic reviews.
Post lumbar surgery syndrome, epidural fibrosis, percutaneous adhesiolysis, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-3159</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2150-1149</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31337160</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</publisher><subject>Chronic Pain - therapy ; Failed Back Surgery Syndrome - therapy ; Humans ; Low Back Pain - etiology ; Low Back Pain - therapy ; Lumbosacral Region ; Pain ; Pain Management - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Surgery ; Systematic review ; Systematic Reviews as Topic ; Tissue Adhesions - therapy ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Pain physician, 2019-07, Vol.22 (4), p.307-322</ispartof><rights>2019. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31337160$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Manchikanti, Laxmaiah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soin, Amol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boswell, Mark V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Alan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanapati, Mahendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Joshua A</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Analysis of Findings of Systematic Reviews</title><title>Pain physician</title><addtitle>Pain Physician</addtitle><description>Post lumbar surgery syndrome is common and often results in chronic, persistent pain and disability, which can lead to multiple interventions. After failure of conservative treatment, either surgical treatment or a nonsurgical modality of treatment such as epidural injections, percutaneous adhesiolysis are often contemplated in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome. Multiple previous systematic reviews have reached discordant conclusions about the level of evidence for the effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome and other conditions.
A systematic review of previously published systematic reviews assessing efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome.
To evaluate the value and validity of previous systematic reviews performed after 2015 on effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain secondary to post lumbar surgery syndrome.
Previous systematic reviews on percutaneous adhesiolysis were evaluated. The quality of each systematic review was assessed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).The randomized trials included in the available systematic reviews were assessed by Cochrane review criteria and Interventional Pain Management techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for methodologic quality.Data sources included relevant systematic reviews and the randomized trials included in those systematic reviews published since 2015 with searches of PubMed, Cochrane reviews, and Google Scholar through February 2019.
Outcome measures were significant improvement defined as 50% pain relief and improvement in functional status. Short-term efficacy was defined as improvement of 6 months or less, whereas long-term efficacy was defined as more than 6 months.
Three systematic reviews and 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of post lumbar surgery syndrome with chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain showed notable evidence of significant pain relief. Only one systematic review, which was of low quality with inappropriate analysis, showed lack of evidence.
Overall, the present analysis shows Level I evidence for percutaneous adhesiolysis based on significant evidence from published RCTs and 3 of the 4 systematic reviews.
Post lumbar surgery syndrome, epidural fibrosis, percutaneous adhesiolysis, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials.</description><subject>Chronic Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Failed Back Surgery Syndrome - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - etiology</subject><subject>Low Back Pain - therapy</subject><subject>Lumbosacral Region</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain Management - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systematic Reviews as Topic</subject><subject>Tissue Adhesions - therapy</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>1533-3159</issn><issn>2150-1149</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkE9Lw0AQxRdRbK1-BVnw4iWQzWQ3XW-htCoULFbPYXczqVvyp-4mlZz94kZbQTzNY-Y3D947IeOI8TBgLJanZMw4QACMyxG58H4bhiCkhHMyAgaQMBGOyee8KNC0do81ek-bgq7Qma5VNTadp2n-ht42Ze-tp7amq8a3dNlVWjm67twGXU_XfZ27psI7mg7at1ip1hqa1urwNngubJ3bevOj_yDPuLf44S_JWaFKj1fHOSGvi_nL7CFYPt0_ztJlsItAtkEMURwZZUAXymgZJjLWOjcinipVGGTDBaeIRuR62IOEQsuYa46SaTNVCUzI7cF355r3Dn2bVdYbLMtD2CyKBABLEvGN3vxDt03nhkQDJTiXMom5GKjrI9XpCvNs52ylXJ_91gtfNix6tQ</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Manchikanti, Laxmaiah</creator><creator>Soin, Amol</creator><creator>Boswell, Mark V</creator><creator>Kaye, Alan D</creator><creator>Sanapati, Mahendra</creator><creator>Hirsch, Joshua A</creator><general>American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Analysis of Findings of Systematic Reviews</title><author>Manchikanti, Laxmaiah ; Soin, Amol ; Boswell, Mark V ; Kaye, Alan D ; Sanapati, Mahendra ; Hirsch, Joshua A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p239t-43242cac3bfacb90794bbdc648aafce1ac3e8eec6dbbbd393fb945b5e91bc8a73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Chronic Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Failed Back Surgery Syndrome - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - etiology</topic><topic>Low Back Pain - therapy</topic><topic>Lumbosacral Region</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain Management - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systematic Reviews as Topic</topic><topic>Tissue Adhesions - therapy</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manchikanti, Laxmaiah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soin, Amol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boswell, Mark V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaye, Alan D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanapati, Mahendra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirsch, Joshua A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Pain physician</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manchikanti, Laxmaiah</au><au>Soin, Amol</au><au>Boswell, Mark V</au><au>Kaye, Alan D</au><au>Sanapati, Mahendra</au><au>Hirsch, Joshua A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Analysis of Findings of Systematic Reviews</atitle><jtitle>Pain physician</jtitle><addtitle>Pain Physician</addtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>307</spage><epage>322</epage><pages>307-322</pages><issn>1533-3159</issn><eissn>2150-1149</eissn><abstract>Post lumbar surgery syndrome is common and often results in chronic, persistent pain and disability, which can lead to multiple interventions. After failure of conservative treatment, either surgical treatment or a nonsurgical modality of treatment such as epidural injections, percutaneous adhesiolysis are often contemplated in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome. Multiple previous systematic reviews have reached discordant conclusions about the level of evidence for the effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome and other conditions.
A systematic review of previously published systematic reviews assessing efficacy of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing post lumbar surgery syndrome.
To evaluate the value and validity of previous systematic reviews performed after 2015 on effectiveness of percutaneous adhesiolysis in managing chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain secondary to post lumbar surgery syndrome.
Previous systematic reviews on percutaneous adhesiolysis were evaluated. The quality of each systematic review was assessed by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR).The randomized trials included in the available systematic reviews were assessed by Cochrane review criteria and Interventional Pain Management techniques - Quality Appraisal of Reliability and Risk of Bias Assessment (IPM-QRB) for methodologic quality.Data sources included relevant systematic reviews and the randomized trials included in those systematic reviews published since 2015 with searches of PubMed, Cochrane reviews, and Google Scholar through February 2019.
Outcome measures were significant improvement defined as 50% pain relief and improvement in functional status. Short-term efficacy was defined as improvement of 6 months or less, whereas long-term efficacy was defined as more than 6 months.
Three systematic reviews and 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of post lumbar surgery syndrome with chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain showed notable evidence of significant pain relief. Only one systematic review, which was of low quality with inappropriate analysis, showed lack of evidence.
Overall, the present analysis shows Level I evidence for percutaneous adhesiolysis based on significant evidence from published RCTs and 3 of the 4 systematic reviews.
Post lumbar surgery syndrome, epidural fibrosis, percutaneous adhesiolysis, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society of Interventional Pain Physician</pub><pmid>31337160</pmid><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1533-3159 |
| ispartof | Pain physician, 2019-07, Vol.22 (4), p.307-322 |
| issn | 1533-3159 2150-1149 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2263317767 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Chronic Pain - therapy Failed Back Surgery Syndrome - therapy Humans Low Back Pain - etiology Low Back Pain - therapy Lumbosacral Region Pain Pain Management - methods Reproducibility of Results Surgery Systematic review Systematic Reviews as Topic Tissue Adhesions - therapy Treatment Outcome |
| title | Effectiveness of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis in Post Lumbar Surgery Syndrome: A Systematic Analysis of Findings of Systematic Reviews |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T22%3A01%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20Percutaneous%20Adhesiolysis%20in%20Post%20Lumbar%20Surgery%20Syndrome:%20A%20Systematic%20Analysis%20of%20Findings%20of%20Systematic%20Reviews&rft.jtitle=Pain%20physician&rft.au=Manchikanti,%20Laxmaiah&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=307&rft.epage=322&rft.pages=307-322&rft.issn=1533-3159&rft.eissn=2150-1149&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2263317767%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2655997456&rft_id=info:pmid/31337160&rfr_iscdi=true |