Safety of Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis
The preferred method of dialysis for children is chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD), and these children may require delayed gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. Investigators have reported a high risk of fungal peritonitis, early bacterial peritonitis, and catheter loss when percutaneous endoscopic gastr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of surgical research 2019-12, Vol.244, p.460-467 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 467 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 460 |
container_title | The Journal of surgical research |
container_volume | 244 |
creator | Dorman, R. Michael Benedict, Leo Andrew Sujka, Joseph Sobrino, Justin Dekonenko, Charlene Andrews, Walter Warady, Bradley Oyetunji, Tolulope A. Hendrickson, Richard J. |
description | The preferred method of dialysis for children is chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD), and these children may require delayed gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. Investigators have reported a high risk of fungal peritonitis, early bacterial peritonitis, and catheter loss when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is performed in children already undergoing CPD. Current International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines recommend only open GT for these patients. We sought to report the safety of laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) among children already receiving PD.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of children who had initiated CPD before GT placement between 2010 and 2017 at our pediatric hospital. Demographic data, clinical details, and peritonitis rates were recorded. Peritonitis was defined as peritoneal WBC count >100/mm3 and >50% neutrophils, with or without a positive peritoneal culture.
Twenty-three subjects had both undergone CPD and had a GT placed in the study period. Of these, 13 had a GT placed after CPD had been initiated. One of these was excluded for open technique and another excluded because of no overlap of GT and PD catheter, leaving 11 for analysis. Median age at the time of LG was 1.32 y and median weight-for-age z-score was −1.86 (IQR −2.9, −1.3). Median days to PD catheter and GT use after LG were 2 (range 0-4) and 1 (range 0-2). Median weight z-score change at 90 d was +0.5 (IQR −0.1, +0.9). All patients received antifungal and antibiotic coverage at time of GT placement. No subjects developed fungal peritonitis or early bacterial peritonitis, although one developed bacterial peritonitis within 30 d. The overall rate of peritonitis after laparoscopic gastrostomy tube was 0.35 episodes/patient-year. This was similar to a rate of 0.45 episodes/patient-year during PD but before laparoscopic gastrostomy tube in the same patients (P = 0.679). Four subjects required periods of hemodialysis, two of which were because of PD catheter removal due to infection. One of the latter was due to a relapse of pre-LG peritonitis and the patient later resumed PD. The other was due to remote post-LG peritonitis and the patient continued hemodialysis until renal transplant, both after 6 mo.
We found that, in children already receiving PD, LG is similar in safety profile, efficacy, and technical principle to open gastrostomy. LG is therefore an appropriate and safe alternative to open gastrostomy in this setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.090 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2263316998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480419304822</els_id><sourcerecordid>2263316998</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96cef651c7b41a3077c526484d88d78a318cffc29cae017b440f6465aac51163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMobk5_gC_SR19ab5o2TfBJpk6hoOjeQ5beakrXzqQb9N-bMfXRp8uB7xy4HyGXFBIKlN80SeN9kgKVCfAEJByRKQWZx4IX7JhMAdI0zgRkE3LmfQMhy4KdkgmjjEEq5JSU77rGYYz6Oir1Rrvem35jTbTQfghh6NdjZLto_mnbymEXvaFBu7PdR_SKzg59h7qN7q1uR2_9OTmpdevx4ufOyPLxYTl_isuXxfP8rowNy9kQS26w5jk1xSqjmkFRmDzlmcgqIapCaEaFqWuTSqMRaIAyqHnGc61NTilnM3J9mN24_muLflBr6w22re6w33qVppwxyqUUAaUH1IRnvMNabZxdazcqCmrvUDUqOFR7hwq4Cg5D5-pnfrtaY_XX-JUWgNsDgOHHnUWnvLHYGaysQzOoqrf_zH8DBtuB3A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2263316998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety of Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Dorman, R. Michael ; Benedict, Leo Andrew ; Sujka, Joseph ; Sobrino, Justin ; Dekonenko, Charlene ; Andrews, Walter ; Warady, Bradley ; Oyetunji, Tolulope A. ; Hendrickson, Richard J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dorman, R. Michael ; Benedict, Leo Andrew ; Sujka, Joseph ; Sobrino, Justin ; Dekonenko, Charlene ; Andrews, Walter ; Warady, Bradley ; Oyetunji, Tolulope A. ; Hendrickson, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><description>The preferred method of dialysis for children is chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD), and these children may require delayed gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. Investigators have reported a high risk of fungal peritonitis, early bacterial peritonitis, and catheter loss when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is performed in children already undergoing CPD. Current International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines recommend only open GT for these patients. We sought to report the safety of laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) among children already receiving PD.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of children who had initiated CPD before GT placement between 2010 and 2017 at our pediatric hospital. Demographic data, clinical details, and peritonitis rates were recorded. Peritonitis was defined as peritoneal WBC count >100/mm3 and >50% neutrophils, with or without a positive peritoneal culture.
Twenty-three subjects had both undergone CPD and had a GT placed in the study period. Of these, 13 had a GT placed after CPD had been initiated. One of these was excluded for open technique and another excluded because of no overlap of GT and PD catheter, leaving 11 for analysis. Median age at the time of LG was 1.32 y and median weight-for-age z-score was −1.86 (IQR −2.9, −1.3). Median days to PD catheter and GT use after LG were 2 (range 0-4) and 1 (range 0-2). Median weight z-score change at 90 d was +0.5 (IQR −0.1, +0.9). All patients received antifungal and antibiotic coverage at time of GT placement. No subjects developed fungal peritonitis or early bacterial peritonitis, although one developed bacterial peritonitis within 30 d. The overall rate of peritonitis after laparoscopic gastrostomy tube was 0.35 episodes/patient-year. This was similar to a rate of 0.45 episodes/patient-year during PD but before laparoscopic gastrostomy tube in the same patients (P = 0.679). Four subjects required periods of hemodialysis, two of which were because of PD catheter removal due to infection. One of the latter was due to a relapse of pre-LG peritonitis and the patient later resumed PD. The other was due to remote post-LG peritonitis and the patient continued hemodialysis until renal transplant, both after 6 mo.
We found that, in children already receiving PD, LG is similar in safety profile, efficacy, and technical principle to open gastrostomy. LG is therefore an appropriate and safe alternative to open gastrostomy in this setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.090</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31330289</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Female ; Gastrostomy - adverse effects ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; laparoscopic gastrostomy ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Male ; Perioperative Care ; Peritoneal Dialysis ; peritonitis ; Peritonitis - epidemiology ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2019-12, Vol.244, p.460-467</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96cef651c7b41a3077c526484d88d78a318cffc29cae017b440f6465aac51163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96cef651c7b41a3077c526484d88d78a318cffc29cae017b440f6465aac51163</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0516-8879</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.090$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31330289$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dorman, R. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Leo Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sujka, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrino, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekonenko, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warady, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyetunji, Tolulope A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><title>Safety of Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>The preferred method of dialysis for children is chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD), and these children may require delayed gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. Investigators have reported a high risk of fungal peritonitis, early bacterial peritonitis, and catheter loss when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is performed in children already undergoing CPD. Current International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines recommend only open GT for these patients. We sought to report the safety of laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) among children already receiving PD.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of children who had initiated CPD before GT placement between 2010 and 2017 at our pediatric hospital. Demographic data, clinical details, and peritonitis rates were recorded. Peritonitis was defined as peritoneal WBC count >100/mm3 and >50% neutrophils, with or without a positive peritoneal culture.
Twenty-three subjects had both undergone CPD and had a GT placed in the study period. Of these, 13 had a GT placed after CPD had been initiated. One of these was excluded for open technique and another excluded because of no overlap of GT and PD catheter, leaving 11 for analysis. Median age at the time of LG was 1.32 y and median weight-for-age z-score was −1.86 (IQR −2.9, −1.3). Median days to PD catheter and GT use after LG were 2 (range 0-4) and 1 (range 0-2). Median weight z-score change at 90 d was +0.5 (IQR −0.1, +0.9). All patients received antifungal and antibiotic coverage at time of GT placement. No subjects developed fungal peritonitis or early bacterial peritonitis, although one developed bacterial peritonitis within 30 d. The overall rate of peritonitis after laparoscopic gastrostomy tube was 0.35 episodes/patient-year. This was similar to a rate of 0.45 episodes/patient-year during PD but before laparoscopic gastrostomy tube in the same patients (P = 0.679). Four subjects required periods of hemodialysis, two of which were because of PD catheter removal due to infection. One of the latter was due to a relapse of pre-LG peritonitis and the patient later resumed PD. The other was due to remote post-LG peritonitis and the patient continued hemodialysis until renal transplant, both after 6 mo.
We found that, in children already receiving PD, LG is similar in safety profile, efficacy, and technical principle to open gastrostomy. LG is therefore an appropriate and safe alternative to open gastrostomy in this setting.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrostomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>laparoscopic gastrostomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Perioperative Care</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis</subject><subject>peritonitis</subject><subject>Peritonitis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFLwzAUhYMobk5_gC_SR19ab5o2TfBJpk6hoOjeQ5beakrXzqQb9N-bMfXRp8uB7xy4HyGXFBIKlN80SeN9kgKVCfAEJByRKQWZx4IX7JhMAdI0zgRkE3LmfQMhy4KdkgmjjEEq5JSU77rGYYz6Oir1Rrvem35jTbTQfghh6NdjZLto_mnbymEXvaFBu7PdR_SKzg59h7qN7q1uR2_9OTmpdevx4ufOyPLxYTl_isuXxfP8rowNy9kQS26w5jk1xSqjmkFRmDzlmcgqIapCaEaFqWuTSqMRaIAyqHnGc61NTilnM3J9mN24_muLflBr6w22re6w33qVppwxyqUUAaUH1IRnvMNabZxdazcqCmrvUDUqOFR7hwq4Cg5D5-pnfrtaY_XX-JUWgNsDgOHHnUWnvLHYGaysQzOoqrf_zH8DBtuB3A</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Dorman, R. Michael</creator><creator>Benedict, Leo Andrew</creator><creator>Sujka, Joseph</creator><creator>Sobrino, Justin</creator><creator>Dekonenko, Charlene</creator><creator>Andrews, Walter</creator><creator>Warady, Bradley</creator><creator>Oyetunji, Tolulope A.</creator><creator>Hendrickson, Richard J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-8879</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Safety of Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis</title><author>Dorman, R. Michael ; Benedict, Leo Andrew ; Sujka, Joseph ; Sobrino, Justin ; Dekonenko, Charlene ; Andrews, Walter ; Warady, Bradley ; Oyetunji, Tolulope A. ; Hendrickson, Richard J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-96cef651c7b41a3077c526484d88d78a318cffc29cae017b440f6465aac51163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrostomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>laparoscopic gastrostomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Perioperative Care</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis</topic><topic>peritonitis</topic><topic>Peritonitis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dorman, R. Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Benedict, Leo Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sujka, Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobrino, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dekonenko, Charlene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrews, Walter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warady, Bradley</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyetunji, Tolulope A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hendrickson, Richard J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dorman, R. Michael</au><au>Benedict, Leo Andrew</au><au>Sujka, Joseph</au><au>Sobrino, Justin</au><au>Dekonenko, Charlene</au><au>Andrews, Walter</au><au>Warady, Bradley</au><au>Oyetunji, Tolulope A.</au><au>Hendrickson, Richard J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety of Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>244</volume><spage>460</spage><epage>467</epage><pages>460-467</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>The preferred method of dialysis for children is chronic peritoneal dialysis (CPD), and these children may require delayed gastrostomy tube (GT) placement. Investigators have reported a high risk of fungal peritonitis, early bacterial peritonitis, and catheter loss when percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy is performed in children already undergoing CPD. Current International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis guidelines recommend only open GT for these patients. We sought to report the safety of laparoscopic gastrostomy (LG) among children already receiving PD.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of children who had initiated CPD before GT placement between 2010 and 2017 at our pediatric hospital. Demographic data, clinical details, and peritonitis rates were recorded. Peritonitis was defined as peritoneal WBC count >100/mm3 and >50% neutrophils, with or without a positive peritoneal culture.
Twenty-three subjects had both undergone CPD and had a GT placed in the study period. Of these, 13 had a GT placed after CPD had been initiated. One of these was excluded for open technique and another excluded because of no overlap of GT and PD catheter, leaving 11 for analysis. Median age at the time of LG was 1.32 y and median weight-for-age z-score was −1.86 (IQR −2.9, −1.3). Median days to PD catheter and GT use after LG were 2 (range 0-4) and 1 (range 0-2). Median weight z-score change at 90 d was +0.5 (IQR −0.1, +0.9). All patients received antifungal and antibiotic coverage at time of GT placement. No subjects developed fungal peritonitis or early bacterial peritonitis, although one developed bacterial peritonitis within 30 d. The overall rate of peritonitis after laparoscopic gastrostomy tube was 0.35 episodes/patient-year. This was similar to a rate of 0.45 episodes/patient-year during PD but before laparoscopic gastrostomy tube in the same patients (P = 0.679). Four subjects required periods of hemodialysis, two of which were because of PD catheter removal due to infection. One of the latter was due to a relapse of pre-LG peritonitis and the patient later resumed PD. The other was due to remote post-LG peritonitis and the patient continued hemodialysis until renal transplant, both after 6 mo.
We found that, in children already receiving PD, LG is similar in safety profile, efficacy, and technical principle to open gastrostomy. LG is therefore an appropriate and safe alternative to open gastrostomy in this setting.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31330289</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.090</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0516-8879</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-4804 |
ispartof | The Journal of surgical research, 2019-12, Vol.244, p.460-467 |
issn | 0022-4804 1095-8673 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2263316998 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Adolescent Child Child, Preschool Female Gastrostomy - adverse effects Humans Infant Infant, Newborn laparoscopic gastrostomy Laparoscopy - adverse effects Male Perioperative Care Peritoneal Dialysis peritonitis Peritonitis - epidemiology Retrospective Studies |
title | Safety of Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children Receiving Peritoneal Dialysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T13%3A14%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20of%20Laparoscopic%20Gastrostomy%20in%20Children%20Receiving%20Peritoneal%20Dialysis&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Dorman,%20R.%20Michael&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=244&rft.spage=460&rft.epage=467&rft.pages=460-467&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.090&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2263316998%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2263316998&rft_id=info:pmid/31330289&rft_els_id=S0022480419304822&rfr_iscdi=true |