Views and practices of induced abortion among Australian Fellows and trainees of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: A second study

Objectives Knowledge of current practices of abortion is important for planning of health services in Australia and for future training. Aims To conduct an online survey of the Fellows and specialist trainees of RANZCOG regarding their views and practices of induced abortion and compare these with r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology 2020-04, Vol.60 (2), p.290-295
Hauptverfasser: Cheng, Hon Chuen, Black, Kirsten, Woods, Cindy, Costa, Caroline
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 295
container_issue 2
container_start_page 290
container_title Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology
container_volume 60
creator Cheng, Hon Chuen
Black, Kirsten
Woods, Cindy
Costa, Caroline
description Objectives Knowledge of current practices of abortion is important for planning of health services in Australia and for future training. Aims To conduct an online survey of the Fellows and specialist trainees of RANZCOG regarding their views and practices of induced abortion and compare these with results of a similar study from 2010. Methods and Materials A questionnaire was distributed to Australian Fellows and specialist trainees. Data collected were descriptively analysed and thematic analysis used for free comments. Results Approximately 25% of those emailed responded (632 of 2542); 13.7% reported total opposition to abortion on religious or conscientious grounds; the remainder did not. 83.5% believed that abortion should be part of general obstetric and gynaecological practice; 90% believed that education about abortion should be part of the curriculum for RANZCOG trainees. 92% supported public hospital provision of abortion services. A range of views was explored using thematic analysis. Discussion While a majority of Fellows and trainees do not hold religious or conscientious objections to abortion a significant minority do; this has changed little since 2010. Many respondents distinguish between ‘medical’ and ‘social’ indications for abortion although definitions of ‘social’ appear variable. There was strong support for the inclusion of abortion in the Fellowship training curriculum. Conclusion Although the response rate was lower than for the 2010 survey participants expressed strong support for the provision of abortion services in the public sector in Australia, and for incorporation of information about abortion in the training curriculum for Fellowship of RANZCOG.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajo.13038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2261981364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2261981364</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-c1eab93e8716e6a3576d4c47ee771b2dce2e5ab5a696c7d5c7bd5eb6c7ed0d553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgH-GQ1o5jO-G2WtEWVLESKghxiSb27OLKG2_tRKs8Fm-It1kQF3yZ8fibT7J-Ql5zdsHzuYT7cMEFE_UTsuCVboq6rL8_JQvGWFXUSqkz8iKle8Z4I3n1nJwJLsq6lHpBfn1zeEgUekv3EczgDCYaNtT1djRoKXQhDi70FHah39LlmIYI3kFPr9D7cFrNM9fjvHn3E-mXMIH_Fz5Cn_FAfyD4Y78K3uMWj_y6SwMO0ZnMzbbrqQc0wYetS0N6T5c05Wt-SMNop5fk2QZ8wlenek6-Xn24W90Ut-vrj6vlbWFEKevCcISuEVhrrlCBkFrZylQaUWveldZgiRI6CapRRltpdGcldrlHy6yU4py8nb37GB5GTEO7c8nkT0OPYUxtWSre1FyoKqPvZtTEkFLETbuPbgdxajlrjwm1OaH2MaHMvjlpx26H9i_5J5IMXM7AwXmc_m9ql5_Ws_I3U4WefQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261981364</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Views and practices of induced abortion among Australian Fellows and trainees of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: A second study</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cheng, Hon Chuen ; Black, Kirsten ; Woods, Cindy ; Costa, Caroline</creator><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Hon Chuen ; Black, Kirsten ; Woods, Cindy ; Costa, Caroline</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives Knowledge of current practices of abortion is important for planning of health services in Australia and for future training. Aims To conduct an online survey of the Fellows and specialist trainees of RANZCOG regarding their views and practices of induced abortion and compare these with results of a similar study from 2010. Methods and Materials A questionnaire was distributed to Australian Fellows and specialist trainees. Data collected were descriptively analysed and thematic analysis used for free comments. Results Approximately 25% of those emailed responded (632 of 2542); 13.7% reported total opposition to abortion on religious or conscientious grounds; the remainder did not. 83.5% believed that abortion should be part of general obstetric and gynaecological practice; 90% believed that education about abortion should be part of the curriculum for RANZCOG trainees. 92% supported public hospital provision of abortion services. A range of views was explored using thematic analysis. Discussion While a majority of Fellows and trainees do not hold religious or conscientious objections to abortion a significant minority do; this has changed little since 2010. Many respondents distinguish between ‘medical’ and ‘social’ indications for abortion although definitions of ‘social’ appear variable. There was strong support for the inclusion of abortion in the Fellowship training curriculum. Conclusion Although the response rate was lower than for the 2010 survey participants expressed strong support for the provision of abortion services in the public sector in Australia, and for incorporation of information about abortion in the training curriculum for Fellowship of RANZCOG.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1479-828X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31328257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia</publisher><subject>abortion ; Australia ; current practice ; induced</subject><ispartof>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology, 2020-04, Vol.60 (2), p.290-295</ispartof><rights>2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists</rights><rights>2019 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-c1eab93e8716e6a3576d4c47ee771b2dce2e5ab5a696c7d5c7bd5eb6c7ed0d553</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-c1eab93e8716e6a3576d4c47ee771b2dce2e5ab5a696c7d5c7bd5eb6c7ed0d553</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6333-8648 ; 0000-0002-4994-7196 ; 0000-0003-0030-2431</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajo.13038$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajo.13038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31328257$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Hon Chuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Caroline</creatorcontrib><title>Views and practices of induced abortion among Australian Fellows and trainees of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: A second study</title><title>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</title><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><description>Objectives Knowledge of current practices of abortion is important for planning of health services in Australia and for future training. Aims To conduct an online survey of the Fellows and specialist trainees of RANZCOG regarding their views and practices of induced abortion and compare these with results of a similar study from 2010. Methods and Materials A questionnaire was distributed to Australian Fellows and specialist trainees. Data collected were descriptively analysed and thematic analysis used for free comments. Results Approximately 25% of those emailed responded (632 of 2542); 13.7% reported total opposition to abortion on religious or conscientious grounds; the remainder did not. 83.5% believed that abortion should be part of general obstetric and gynaecological practice; 90% believed that education about abortion should be part of the curriculum for RANZCOG trainees. 92% supported public hospital provision of abortion services. A range of views was explored using thematic analysis. Discussion While a majority of Fellows and trainees do not hold religious or conscientious objections to abortion a significant minority do; this has changed little since 2010. Many respondents distinguish between ‘medical’ and ‘social’ indications for abortion although definitions of ‘social’ appear variable. There was strong support for the inclusion of abortion in the Fellowship training curriculum. Conclusion Although the response rate was lower than for the 2010 survey participants expressed strong support for the provision of abortion services in the public sector in Australia, and for incorporation of information about abortion in the training curriculum for Fellowship of RANZCOG.</description><subject>abortion</subject><subject>Australia</subject><subject>current practice</subject><subject>induced</subject><issn>0004-8666</issn><issn>1479-828X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kcFu1DAQhi0EokvhwAsgH-GQ1o5jO-G2WtEWVLESKghxiSb27OLKG2_tRKs8Fm-It1kQF3yZ8fibT7J-Ql5zdsHzuYT7cMEFE_UTsuCVboq6rL8_JQvGWFXUSqkz8iKle8Z4I3n1nJwJLsq6lHpBfn1zeEgUekv3EczgDCYaNtT1djRoKXQhDi70FHah39LlmIYI3kFPr9D7cFrNM9fjvHn3E-mXMIH_Fz5Cn_FAfyD4Y78K3uMWj_y6SwMO0ZnMzbbrqQc0wYetS0N6T5c05Wt-SMNop5fk2QZ8wlenek6-Xn24W90Ut-vrj6vlbWFEKevCcISuEVhrrlCBkFrZylQaUWveldZgiRI6CapRRltpdGcldrlHy6yU4py8nb37GB5GTEO7c8nkT0OPYUxtWSre1FyoKqPvZtTEkFLETbuPbgdxajlrjwm1OaH2MaHMvjlpx26H9i_5J5IMXM7AwXmc_m9ql5_Ws_I3U4WefQ</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Cheng, Hon Chuen</creator><creator>Black, Kirsten</creator><creator>Woods, Cindy</creator><creator>Costa, Caroline</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-8648</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-7196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0030-2431</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Views and practices of induced abortion among Australian Fellows and trainees of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: A second study</title><author>Cheng, Hon Chuen ; Black, Kirsten ; Woods, Cindy ; Costa, Caroline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3258-c1eab93e8716e6a3576d4c47ee771b2dce2e5ab5a696c7d5c7bd5eb6c7ed0d553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>abortion</topic><topic>Australia</topic><topic>current practice</topic><topic>induced</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Hon Chuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Black, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woods, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costa, Caroline</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cheng, Hon Chuen</au><au>Black, Kirsten</au><au>Woods, Cindy</au><au>Costa, Caroline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Views and practices of induced abortion among Australian Fellows and trainees of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: A second study</atitle><jtitle>Australian &amp; New Zealand journal of obstetrics &amp; gynaecology</jtitle><addtitle>Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol</addtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>290</spage><epage>295</epage><pages>290-295</pages><issn>0004-8666</issn><eissn>1479-828X</eissn><abstract>Objectives Knowledge of current practices of abortion is important for planning of health services in Australia and for future training. Aims To conduct an online survey of the Fellows and specialist trainees of RANZCOG regarding their views and practices of induced abortion and compare these with results of a similar study from 2010. Methods and Materials A questionnaire was distributed to Australian Fellows and specialist trainees. Data collected were descriptively analysed and thematic analysis used for free comments. Results Approximately 25% of those emailed responded (632 of 2542); 13.7% reported total opposition to abortion on religious or conscientious grounds; the remainder did not. 83.5% believed that abortion should be part of general obstetric and gynaecological practice; 90% believed that education about abortion should be part of the curriculum for RANZCOG trainees. 92% supported public hospital provision of abortion services. A range of views was explored using thematic analysis. Discussion While a majority of Fellows and trainees do not hold religious or conscientious objections to abortion a significant minority do; this has changed little since 2010. Many respondents distinguish between ‘medical’ and ‘social’ indications for abortion although definitions of ‘social’ appear variable. There was strong support for the inclusion of abortion in the Fellowship training curriculum. Conclusion Although the response rate was lower than for the 2010 survey participants expressed strong support for the provision of abortion services in the public sector in Australia, and for incorporation of information about abortion in the training curriculum for Fellowship of RANZCOG.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pmid>31328257</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajo.13038</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6333-8648</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4994-7196</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0030-2431</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8666
ispartof Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology, 2020-04, Vol.60 (2), p.290-295
issn 0004-8666
1479-828X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2261981364
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects abortion
Australia
current practice
induced
title Views and practices of induced abortion among Australian Fellows and trainees of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists: A second study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T04%3A05%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Views%20and%20practices%20of%20induced%20abortion%20among%20Australian%20Fellows%20and%20trainees%20of%20The%20Royal%20Australian%20and%20New%20Zealand%20College%20of%20Obstetricians%20and%20Gynaecologists:%20A%20second%20study&rft.jtitle=Australian%20&%20New%20Zealand%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynaecology&rft.au=Cheng,%20Hon%20Chuen&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=290&rft.epage=295&rft.pages=290-295&rft.issn=0004-8666&rft.eissn=1479-828X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajo.13038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261981364%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261981364&rft_id=info:pmid/31328257&rfr_iscdi=true