Genomic selection improves the possibility of applying multiple breeding programs in different environments

One joint breeding program (BP) for different dairy cattle environments can be advantageous for genetic gain depending on the genetic correlation between environments (rg). The break-even correlation (rb) refers to the specific rg where genetic gain with 1 joint BP is equal to the genetic gain of 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of dairy science 2019-09, Vol.102 (9), p.8197-8209
Hauptverfasser: Slagboom, M., Kargo, M., Sørensen, A.C., Thomasen, J.R., Mulder, H.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8209
container_issue 9
container_start_page 8197
container_title Journal of dairy science
container_volume 102
creator Slagboom, M.
Kargo, M.
Sørensen, A.C.
Thomasen, J.R.
Mulder, H.A.
description One joint breeding program (BP) for different dairy cattle environments can be advantageous for genetic gain depending on the genetic correlation between environments (rg). The break-even correlation (rb) refers to the specific rg where genetic gain with 1 joint BP is equal to the genetic gain of 2 environment-specific BP. One joint BP has the highest genetic gain if rg is higher than rb, whereas 2 environment-specific BP have higher genetic gain if rg is lower than rb. Genetic gain in this context is evaluated from a breeding company's perspective that aims to improve genetic gain in both environments. With the implementation of genomic selection, 2 types of collaboration can be identified: exchanging breeding animals and exchanging genomic information. The aim of this study was to study genetic gain in multiple environments with different breeding strategies with genomic selection. The specific aims were (1) to find rb when applying genomic selection; (2) to assess how much genetic gain is lost when applying a suboptimal breeding strategy; (3) to study the effect of the reliability of direct genomic values, number of genotyped animals, and environments of different size on rb and genetic gain; and (4) to find rb from each environment's point of view. Three breeding strategies were simulated: 1 joint BP for both environments, 2 environment-specific BP with selection of bulls across environments, and 2 environment-specific BP with selection of bulls within environments. The rb was 0.65 and not different from rb with progeny-testing breeding programs when compared at the same selection intensity. The maximum loss in genetic gain in a suboptimal breeding strategy was 24%. A higher direct genomic value reliability and an increased number of genotyped selection candidates increased genetic gain, and the effect on rb was not large. A different size in 2 environments decreased rb by, at most, 0.10 points. From a large environment's point of view, 1 joint BP was the optimal breeding strategy in most scenarios. From a small environment's point of view, 1 joint BP was only the optimal breeding strategy at high rg. When the exchange of breeding animals between environments was restricted, genetic gain could still increase in each environment. This was due to the exchange of genomic information between environments, even when rg between environments were as low as 0.4. Thus, genomic selection improves the possibility of applying environment-specific BP.
doi_str_mv 10.3168/jds.2018-15939
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2261976168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022030219306137</els_id><sourcerecordid>2261976168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e2eade183f5c2e7d8abab660bf6f34bc0997d023e4eac83aee93fe4a256dd4353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EoqWwMiKPLCl-JKkzIgQFqRILzJZjXxeXxAl2Uqn_HpcWNiY_dO6n-x2ErimZc1qKu42Jc0aoyGhR8eoETWnBiozTSpyiKSGMZYQTNkEXMW7SkzJSnKMJp5yVVLAp-lyC71qncYQG9OA6j13bh24LEQ8fgPsuRle7xg073Fms-r7ZOb_G7dgMrm8A1wHA7H_S0DqoNmLnsXHWQgA_YPBbFzrfpnu8RGdWNRGujucMvT89vj08Z6vX5cvD_SrTXORDBgyUASq4LTSDhRGqVnVZktqWlue1JlW1MIRxyEFpwRVAxS3kihWlMTkv-AzdHnLTSl8jxEG2LmpoGuWhG6NkqXu1KJO-hM4PqA6paAAr--BaFXaSErkXLJNguRcsfwSngZtj9li3YP7wX6MJEAcAUsOtgyCjduB1khSSYGk691_2N9wEjW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2261976168</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genomic selection improves the possibility of applying multiple breeding programs in different environments</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Slagboom, M. ; Kargo, M. ; Sørensen, A.C. ; Thomasen, J.R. ; Mulder, H.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Slagboom, M. ; Kargo, M. ; Sørensen, A.C. ; Thomasen, J.R. ; Mulder, H.A.</creatorcontrib><description>One joint breeding program (BP) for different dairy cattle environments can be advantageous for genetic gain depending on the genetic correlation between environments (rg). The break-even correlation (rb) refers to the specific rg where genetic gain with 1 joint BP is equal to the genetic gain of 2 environment-specific BP. One joint BP has the highest genetic gain if rg is higher than rb, whereas 2 environment-specific BP have higher genetic gain if rg is lower than rb. Genetic gain in this context is evaluated from a breeding company's perspective that aims to improve genetic gain in both environments. With the implementation of genomic selection, 2 types of collaboration can be identified: exchanging breeding animals and exchanging genomic information. The aim of this study was to study genetic gain in multiple environments with different breeding strategies with genomic selection. The specific aims were (1) to find rb when applying genomic selection; (2) to assess how much genetic gain is lost when applying a suboptimal breeding strategy; (3) to study the effect of the reliability of direct genomic values, number of genotyped animals, and environments of different size on rb and genetic gain; and (4) to find rb from each environment's point of view. Three breeding strategies were simulated: 1 joint BP for both environments, 2 environment-specific BP with selection of bulls across environments, and 2 environment-specific BP with selection of bulls within environments. The rb was 0.65 and not different from rb with progeny-testing breeding programs when compared at the same selection intensity. The maximum loss in genetic gain in a suboptimal breeding strategy was 24%. A higher direct genomic value reliability and an increased number of genotyped selection candidates increased genetic gain, and the effect on rb was not large. A different size in 2 environments decreased rb by, at most, 0.10 points. From a large environment's point of view, 1 joint BP was the optimal breeding strategy in most scenarios. From a small environment's point of view, 1 joint BP was only the optimal breeding strategy at high rg. When the exchange of breeding animals between environments was restricted, genetic gain could still increase in each environment. This was due to the exchange of genomic information between environments, even when rg between environments were as low as 0.4. Thus, genomic selection improves the possibility of applying environment-specific BP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0302</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3198</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3168/jds.2018-15939</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31326182</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>breeding strategy ; dairy cow ; genetic gain ; genotype by environment interaction</subject><ispartof>Journal of dairy science, 2019-09, Vol.102 (9), p.8197-8209</ispartof><rights>2019 American Dairy Science Association</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e2eade183f5c2e7d8abab660bf6f34bc0997d023e4eac83aee93fe4a256dd4353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e2eade183f5c2e7d8abab660bf6f34bc0997d023e4eac83aee93fe4a256dd4353</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15939$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31326182$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Slagboom, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kargo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomasen, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, H.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Genomic selection improves the possibility of applying multiple breeding programs in different environments</title><title>Journal of dairy science</title><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><description>One joint breeding program (BP) for different dairy cattle environments can be advantageous for genetic gain depending on the genetic correlation between environments (rg). The break-even correlation (rb) refers to the specific rg where genetic gain with 1 joint BP is equal to the genetic gain of 2 environment-specific BP. One joint BP has the highest genetic gain if rg is higher than rb, whereas 2 environment-specific BP have higher genetic gain if rg is lower than rb. Genetic gain in this context is evaluated from a breeding company's perspective that aims to improve genetic gain in both environments. With the implementation of genomic selection, 2 types of collaboration can be identified: exchanging breeding animals and exchanging genomic information. The aim of this study was to study genetic gain in multiple environments with different breeding strategies with genomic selection. The specific aims were (1) to find rb when applying genomic selection; (2) to assess how much genetic gain is lost when applying a suboptimal breeding strategy; (3) to study the effect of the reliability of direct genomic values, number of genotyped animals, and environments of different size on rb and genetic gain; and (4) to find rb from each environment's point of view. Three breeding strategies were simulated: 1 joint BP for both environments, 2 environment-specific BP with selection of bulls across environments, and 2 environment-specific BP with selection of bulls within environments. The rb was 0.65 and not different from rb with progeny-testing breeding programs when compared at the same selection intensity. The maximum loss in genetic gain in a suboptimal breeding strategy was 24%. A higher direct genomic value reliability and an increased number of genotyped selection candidates increased genetic gain, and the effect on rb was not large. A different size in 2 environments decreased rb by, at most, 0.10 points. From a large environment's point of view, 1 joint BP was the optimal breeding strategy in most scenarios. From a small environment's point of view, 1 joint BP was only the optimal breeding strategy at high rg. When the exchange of breeding animals between environments was restricted, genetic gain could still increase in each environment. This was due to the exchange of genomic information between environments, even when rg between environments were as low as 0.4. Thus, genomic selection improves the possibility of applying environment-specific BP.</description><subject>breeding strategy</subject><subject>dairy cow</subject><subject>genetic gain</subject><subject>genotype by environment interaction</subject><issn>0022-0302</issn><issn>1525-3198</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDtPwzAURi0EoqWwMiKPLCl-JKkzIgQFqRILzJZjXxeXxAl2Uqn_HpcWNiY_dO6n-x2ErimZc1qKu42Jc0aoyGhR8eoETWnBiozTSpyiKSGMZYQTNkEXMW7SkzJSnKMJp5yVVLAp-lyC71qncYQG9OA6j13bh24LEQ8fgPsuRle7xg073Fms-r7ZOb_G7dgMrm8A1wHA7H_S0DqoNmLnsXHWQgA_YPBbFzrfpnu8RGdWNRGujucMvT89vj08Z6vX5cvD_SrTXORDBgyUASq4LTSDhRGqVnVZktqWlue1JlW1MIRxyEFpwRVAxS3kihWlMTkv-AzdHnLTSl8jxEG2LmpoGuWhG6NkqXu1KJO-hM4PqA6paAAr--BaFXaSErkXLJNguRcsfwSngZtj9li3YP7wX6MJEAcAUsOtgyCjduB1khSSYGk691_2N9wEjW8</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Slagboom, M.</creator><creator>Kargo, M.</creator><creator>Sørensen, A.C.</creator><creator>Thomasen, J.R.</creator><creator>Mulder, H.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Genomic selection improves the possibility of applying multiple breeding programs in different environments</title><author>Slagboom, M. ; Kargo, M. ; Sørensen, A.C. ; Thomasen, J.R. ; Mulder, H.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-e2eade183f5c2e7d8abab660bf6f34bc0997d023e4eac83aee93fe4a256dd4353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>breeding strategy</topic><topic>dairy cow</topic><topic>genetic gain</topic><topic>genotype by environment interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Slagboom, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kargo, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sørensen, A.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomasen, J.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulder, H.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Slagboom, M.</au><au>Kargo, M.</au><au>Sørensen, A.C.</au><au>Thomasen, J.R.</au><au>Mulder, H.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genomic selection improves the possibility of applying multiple breeding programs in different environments</atitle><jtitle>Journal of dairy science</jtitle><addtitle>J Dairy Sci</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>102</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>8197</spage><epage>8209</epage><pages>8197-8209</pages><issn>0022-0302</issn><eissn>1525-3198</eissn><abstract>One joint breeding program (BP) for different dairy cattle environments can be advantageous for genetic gain depending on the genetic correlation between environments (rg). The break-even correlation (rb) refers to the specific rg where genetic gain with 1 joint BP is equal to the genetic gain of 2 environment-specific BP. One joint BP has the highest genetic gain if rg is higher than rb, whereas 2 environment-specific BP have higher genetic gain if rg is lower than rb. Genetic gain in this context is evaluated from a breeding company's perspective that aims to improve genetic gain in both environments. With the implementation of genomic selection, 2 types of collaboration can be identified: exchanging breeding animals and exchanging genomic information. The aim of this study was to study genetic gain in multiple environments with different breeding strategies with genomic selection. The specific aims were (1) to find rb when applying genomic selection; (2) to assess how much genetic gain is lost when applying a suboptimal breeding strategy; (3) to study the effect of the reliability of direct genomic values, number of genotyped animals, and environments of different size on rb and genetic gain; and (4) to find rb from each environment's point of view. Three breeding strategies were simulated: 1 joint BP for both environments, 2 environment-specific BP with selection of bulls across environments, and 2 environment-specific BP with selection of bulls within environments. The rb was 0.65 and not different from rb with progeny-testing breeding programs when compared at the same selection intensity. The maximum loss in genetic gain in a suboptimal breeding strategy was 24%. A higher direct genomic value reliability and an increased number of genotyped selection candidates increased genetic gain, and the effect on rb was not large. A different size in 2 environments decreased rb by, at most, 0.10 points. From a large environment's point of view, 1 joint BP was the optimal breeding strategy in most scenarios. From a small environment's point of view, 1 joint BP was only the optimal breeding strategy at high rg. When the exchange of breeding animals between environments was restricted, genetic gain could still increase in each environment. This was due to the exchange of genomic information between environments, even when rg between environments were as low as 0.4. Thus, genomic selection improves the possibility of applying environment-specific BP.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31326182</pmid><doi>10.3168/jds.2018-15939</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0302
ispartof Journal of dairy science, 2019-09, Vol.102 (9), p.8197-8209
issn 0022-0302
1525-3198
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2261976168
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects breeding strategy
dairy cow
genetic gain
genotype by environment interaction
title Genomic selection improves the possibility of applying multiple breeding programs in different environments
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A20%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genomic%20selection%20improves%20the%20possibility%20of%20applying%20multiple%20breeding%20programs%20in%20different%20environments&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20dairy%20science&rft.au=Slagboom,%20M.&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=102&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=8197&rft.epage=8209&rft.pages=8197-8209&rft.issn=0022-0302&rft.eissn=1525-3198&rft_id=info:doi/10.3168/jds.2018-15939&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2261976168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2261976168&rft_id=info:pmid/31326182&rft_els_id=S0022030219306137&rfr_iscdi=true