Shared decision-making aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: moving from informative patient education to interactive critical thinking

Objectives To develop and evaluate an illustrated, stand-alone, interactive evidence-based shared decision making (SDM) aid for JIA children; its ability to produce positive perceived involvement of JIA patients in their own management and its impact on their adherence to therapy, school absenteeism...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical rheumatology 2019-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3217-3225
Hauptverfasser: El Miedany, Yasser, El Gaafary, M., Lotfy, H., El Aroussy, N., Mekkawy, D., Nasef, S. I., Farag, Y., Almedany, S., Wassif, Ghada
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3225
container_issue 11
container_start_page 3217
container_title Clinical rheumatology
container_volume 38
creator El Miedany, Yasser
El Gaafary, M.
Lotfy, H.
El Aroussy, N.
Mekkawy, D.
Nasef, S. I.
Farag, Y.
Almedany, S.
Wassif, Ghada
description Objectives To develop and evaluate an illustrated, stand-alone, interactive evidence-based shared decision making (SDM) aid for JIA children; its ability to produce positive perceived involvement of JIA patients in their own management and its impact on their adherence to therapy, school absenteeism and treatment outcomes. Methods The SDM aid was developed to offer information about the disease, risks and benefits of treatment. A multidisciplinary team defined SDM criteria based on international standards (IPDAS). Eight categories emerged as highly important for SDM. Each category was supported by simple illustrations in an interactive style. At the end of each category, the child is asked to make a decision in view of the information given. Ninety-four JIA children were provided with the tool, in a randomised controlled study, in comparison to a control group of 95 JIA patients treated according to standard protocols. Results A total of 97.5% of the study children reported comprehensibility of more than 90%. The patients’ adherence to therapy was significantly ( p  
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10067-019-04687-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2261970495</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2260499482</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c17d98439705f756d9bdd8ac3e1d703c859df51fbdb36d936093e9e1cbc46ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u3CAURlHUKpkmeYEuKqRuuqEBYxuTXRWlP1KkLJo9wnCdYWrDBPBI8wZ97OBMmkhdZANI93znIn0IfWT0K6NUXKRytoJQJgmt206Q_RFasZrXRMpavkMrKgQlnMnuBH1IaUMprTrJjtEJZ7wStGtW6O_vtY5gsQXjkgueTPqP8_dYO4uHEPFm3oF3I2BnXdjqvHYG65jX0WWXLvEUdgs9xDBh50tg0tntABfSgc8Y7GzKM3icQwEyRG2eALMIjB5xMfpl4xl6P-gxwfnzfYruvl_fXf0kN7c_fl19uyGGiyYTw4SVXc2loM0gmtbK3tpOGw7MCspN10g7NGzobc_LkLdUcpDATG_q1mh-ir4ctNsYHmZIWU0uGRhH7SHMSVVVy4q7lk1BP_-HbsIcffncQhVE1l1VqOpAmRhSijCobXSTjnvFqFpqUoeaVKlJPdWk9iX06Vk99xPYl8i_XgrAD0AqI38P8XX3G9pHECahlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2260499482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shared decision-making aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: moving from informative patient education to interactive critical thinking</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>El Miedany, Yasser ; El Gaafary, M. ; Lotfy, H. ; El Aroussy, N. ; Mekkawy, D. ; Nasef, S. I. ; Farag, Y. ; Almedany, S. ; Wassif, Ghada</creator><creatorcontrib>El Miedany, Yasser ; El Gaafary, M. ; Lotfy, H. ; El Aroussy, N. ; Mekkawy, D. ; Nasef, S. I. ; Farag, Y. ; Almedany, S. ; Wassif, Ghada ; PRINTO Egypt ; on behalf of PRINTO Egypt</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To develop and evaluate an illustrated, stand-alone, interactive evidence-based shared decision making (SDM) aid for JIA children; its ability to produce positive perceived involvement of JIA patients in their own management and its impact on their adherence to therapy, school absenteeism and treatment outcomes. Methods The SDM aid was developed to offer information about the disease, risks and benefits of treatment. A multidisciplinary team defined SDM criteria based on international standards (IPDAS). Eight categories emerged as highly important for SDM. Each category was supported by simple illustrations in an interactive style. At the end of each category, the child is asked to make a decision in view of the information given. Ninety-four JIA children were provided with the tool, in a randomised controlled study, in comparison to a control group of 95 JIA patients treated according to standard protocols. Results A total of 97.5% of the study children reported comprehensibility of more than 90%. The patients’ adherence to therapy was significantly ( p  &lt; 0.01) higher in the SDM group, whereas stopping DMARDs for intolerability was significantly higher in the control group at 12 months of treatment. There was a significant improvement in the patient-reported outcomes in the SDM group, and absence from school was significantly higher in the control group ( p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions The developed SDM aid offered the children evidence-based information about the pros and cons of treatment options and improved their understanding of the disease and their ability to make an informed decision that is reflected on their adherence to therapy and better treatment outcomes. Key Points • This work represents the second generation of shared decision-making tools. • The developed tool adopts an interactive style and enhances critical thinking, giving the patients the facility of making their own decision regarding their management. • The work gives an example of core domain set of outcomes which can be used for shared decision-making interventions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0770-3198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-9949</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04687-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31327085</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Arthritis ; Arthritis, Juvenile ; Child ; Children ; Clinical decision making ; Clinical outcomes ; Critical thinking ; Decision making ; Decision Making, Shared ; Female ; Humans ; International standards ; Male ; Medication Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article ; Patient compliance ; Patient Education as Topic ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; Patients ; Rheumatology</subject><ispartof>Clinical rheumatology, 2019-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3217-3225</ispartof><rights>International League of Associations for Rheumatology (ILAR) 2019</rights><rights>Clinical Rheumatology is a copyright of Springer, (2019). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c17d98439705f756d9bdd8ac3e1d703c859df51fbdb36d936093e9e1cbc46ca3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c17d98439705f756d9bdd8ac3e1d703c859df51fbdb36d936093e9e1cbc46ca3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4543-692X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10067-019-04687-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10067-019-04687-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31327085$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El Miedany, Yasser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Gaafary, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfy, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Aroussy, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mekkawy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasef, S. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farag, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almedany, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wassif, Ghada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRINTO Egypt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of PRINTO Egypt</creatorcontrib><title>Shared decision-making aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: moving from informative patient education to interactive critical thinking</title><title>Clinical rheumatology</title><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Objectives To develop and evaluate an illustrated, stand-alone, interactive evidence-based shared decision making (SDM) aid for JIA children; its ability to produce positive perceived involvement of JIA patients in their own management and its impact on their adherence to therapy, school absenteeism and treatment outcomes. Methods The SDM aid was developed to offer information about the disease, risks and benefits of treatment. A multidisciplinary team defined SDM criteria based on international standards (IPDAS). Eight categories emerged as highly important for SDM. Each category was supported by simple illustrations in an interactive style. At the end of each category, the child is asked to make a decision in view of the information given. Ninety-four JIA children were provided with the tool, in a randomised controlled study, in comparison to a control group of 95 JIA patients treated according to standard protocols. Results A total of 97.5% of the study children reported comprehensibility of more than 90%. The patients’ adherence to therapy was significantly ( p  &lt; 0.01) higher in the SDM group, whereas stopping DMARDs for intolerability was significantly higher in the control group at 12 months of treatment. There was a significant improvement in the patient-reported outcomes in the SDM group, and absence from school was significantly higher in the control group ( p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions The developed SDM aid offered the children evidence-based information about the pros and cons of treatment options and improved their understanding of the disease and their ability to make an informed decision that is reflected on their adherence to therapy and better treatment outcomes. Key Points • This work represents the second generation of shared decision-making tools. • The developed tool adopts an interactive style and enhances critical thinking, giving the patients the facility of making their own decision regarding their management. • The work gives an example of core domain set of outcomes which can be used for shared decision-making interventions.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthritis, Juvenile</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Critical thinking</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision Making, Shared</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>International standards</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medication Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Patient compliance</subject><subject>Patient Education as Topic</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><issn>0770-3198</issn><issn>1434-9949</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u3CAURlHUKpkmeYEuKqRuuqEBYxuTXRWlP1KkLJo9wnCdYWrDBPBI8wZ97OBMmkhdZANI93znIn0IfWT0K6NUXKRytoJQJgmt206Q_RFasZrXRMpavkMrKgQlnMnuBH1IaUMprTrJjtEJZ7wStGtW6O_vtY5gsQXjkgueTPqP8_dYO4uHEPFm3oF3I2BnXdjqvHYG65jX0WWXLvEUdgs9xDBh50tg0tntABfSgc8Y7GzKM3icQwEyRG2eALMIjB5xMfpl4xl6P-gxwfnzfYruvl_fXf0kN7c_fl19uyGGiyYTw4SVXc2loM0gmtbK3tpOGw7MCspN10g7NGzobc_LkLdUcpDATG_q1mh-ir4ctNsYHmZIWU0uGRhH7SHMSVVVy4q7lk1BP_-HbsIcffncQhVE1l1VqOpAmRhSijCobXSTjnvFqFpqUoeaVKlJPdWk9iX06Vk99xPYl8i_XgrAD0AqI38P8XX3G9pHECahlQ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>El Miedany, Yasser</creator><creator>El Gaafary, M.</creator><creator>Lotfy, H.</creator><creator>El Aroussy, N.</creator><creator>Mekkawy, D.</creator><creator>Nasef, S. I.</creator><creator>Farag, Y.</creator><creator>Almedany, S.</creator><creator>Wassif, Ghada</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-692X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Shared decision-making aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: moving from informative patient education to interactive critical thinking</title><author>El Miedany, Yasser ; El Gaafary, M. ; Lotfy, H. ; El Aroussy, N. ; Mekkawy, D. ; Nasef, S. I. ; Farag, Y. ; Almedany, S. ; Wassif, Ghada</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c375t-c17d98439705f756d9bdd8ac3e1d703c859df51fbdb36d936093e9e1cbc46ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthritis, Juvenile</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Critical thinking</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision Making, Shared</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>International standards</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medication Adherence - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Patient compliance</topic><topic>Patient Education as Topic</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El Miedany, Yasser</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Gaafary, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lotfy, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Aroussy, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mekkawy, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasef, S. I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farag, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almedany, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wassif, Ghada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PRINTO Egypt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>on behalf of PRINTO Egypt</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El Miedany, Yasser</au><au>El Gaafary, M.</au><au>Lotfy, H.</au><au>El Aroussy, N.</au><au>Mekkawy, D.</au><au>Nasef, S. I.</au><au>Farag, Y.</au><au>Almedany, S.</au><au>Wassif, Ghada</au><aucorp>PRINTO Egypt</aucorp><aucorp>on behalf of PRINTO Egypt</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shared decision-making aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: moving from informative patient education to interactive critical thinking</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rheumatology</jtitle><stitle>Clin Rheumatol</stitle><addtitle>Clin Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>3217</spage><epage>3225</epage><pages>3217-3225</pages><issn>0770-3198</issn><eissn>1434-9949</eissn><abstract>Objectives To develop and evaluate an illustrated, stand-alone, interactive evidence-based shared decision making (SDM) aid for JIA children; its ability to produce positive perceived involvement of JIA patients in their own management and its impact on their adherence to therapy, school absenteeism and treatment outcomes. Methods The SDM aid was developed to offer information about the disease, risks and benefits of treatment. A multidisciplinary team defined SDM criteria based on international standards (IPDAS). Eight categories emerged as highly important for SDM. Each category was supported by simple illustrations in an interactive style. At the end of each category, the child is asked to make a decision in view of the information given. Ninety-four JIA children were provided with the tool, in a randomised controlled study, in comparison to a control group of 95 JIA patients treated according to standard protocols. Results A total of 97.5% of the study children reported comprehensibility of more than 90%. The patients’ adherence to therapy was significantly ( p  &lt; 0.01) higher in the SDM group, whereas stopping DMARDs for intolerability was significantly higher in the control group at 12 months of treatment. There was a significant improvement in the patient-reported outcomes in the SDM group, and absence from school was significantly higher in the control group ( p  &lt; 0.01). Conclusions The developed SDM aid offered the children evidence-based information about the pros and cons of treatment options and improved their understanding of the disease and their ability to make an informed decision that is reflected on their adherence to therapy and better treatment outcomes. Key Points • This work represents the second generation of shared decision-making tools. • The developed tool adopts an interactive style and enhances critical thinking, giving the patients the facility of making their own decision regarding their management. • The work gives an example of core domain set of outcomes which can be used for shared decision-making interventions.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><pmid>31327085</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10067-019-04687-y</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4543-692X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0770-3198
ispartof Clinical rheumatology, 2019-11, Vol.38 (11), p.3217-3225
issn 0770-3198
1434-9949
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2261970495
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adolescent
Arthritis
Arthritis, Juvenile
Child
Children
Clinical decision making
Clinical outcomes
Critical thinking
Decision making
Decision Making, Shared
Female
Humans
International standards
Male
Medication Adherence - statistics & numerical data
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Patient compliance
Patient Education as Topic
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Patients
Rheumatology
title Shared decision-making aid for juvenile idiopathic arthritis: moving from informative patient education to interactive critical thinking
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T07%3A57%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shared%20decision-making%20aid%20for%20juvenile%20idiopathic%20arthritis:%20moving%20from%20informative%20patient%20education%20to%20interactive%20critical%20thinking&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rheumatology&rft.au=El%20Miedany,%20Yasser&rft.aucorp=PRINTO%20Egypt&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=3217&rft.epage=3225&rft.pages=3217-3225&rft.issn=0770-3198&rft.eissn=1434-9949&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10067-019-04687-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2260499482%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2260499482&rft_id=info:pmid/31327085&rfr_iscdi=true