CBCT Performance and Endodontic Sealer Influence in the Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures

To evaluate the performance of three cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines in detecting vertical root fractures (VRFs) in teeth filled with different sealers. A total of 80 single-rooted premolars were subjected to instrumentation and restoration with gutta-percha + AH Plus sealer, gutta-per...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of contemporary dental practice 2019-05, Vol.20 (5), p.552-556
Hauptverfasser: Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra, Mármora, Belkiss, Barriviera, Maurício, Panzarella, Francine Kühl, Raitz, Ricardo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 556
container_issue 5
container_start_page 552
container_title The journal of contemporary dental practice
container_volume 20
creator Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra
Mármora, Belkiss
Barriviera, Maurício
Panzarella, Francine Kühl
Raitz, Ricardo
description To evaluate the performance of three cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines in detecting vertical root fractures (VRFs) in teeth filled with different sealers. A total of 80 single-rooted premolars were subjected to instrumentation and restoration with gutta-percha + AH Plus sealer, gutta-percha + sealer 26, gutta-percha + fill canal, and gutta-percha without sealer as the control. Half of the samples were randomly subjected to root fracture and all the teeth were scanned by i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, USA), PreXion (PreXion Inc., San Mateo, USA), and OrthoPhos XG (Sirona Dental System, Bensheim, Germany). Three examiners analyzed the images for the presence of fractures. The highest accuracy was obtained with the PreXion device, with Az = 0.85, while the i-CAT device provided higher sensitivity (0.93). The specificity values observed ranged between 0.75 and 0.70. Chi-squared tests ( > 0.05) demonstrated that the sealers did not exert a significant influence on the diagnosis of VRF. It may be concluded that endodontic sealers do not influence the detection of VRF. The PreXion device was the most accurate, having the highest specificity value. Radiopaque materials might affect the diagnosis of VRFs because they can simulate fracture lines, leading to false-positive results. Moreover, CBCT machines present different specificities that could exert some influence on that.
doi_str_mv 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2556
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2259902886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2259902886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2746-c128f4f0da880017e0a7850bc6dbefffae14fe614f833998938e6817b79ea95d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkMlOwzAQQC0EoqXwC5WPXAJeasc5QmmhUiUQFE5IlpuMIVFiFzs58PektEVcZkaaN4seQmNKrgQh4rraJJXvgjN1TCghbJIwIeQRGlLBZMJTSo__1QN0FmPVY5yl5BQNOOVUEiqH6H16O13hJwjWh8a4HLBxBZ65whfetWWOX8DUEPDC2bqDbb90uP0EfFeaD-djGbG3-A1Cz5oaP3vf4nkwedsFiOfoxPYPwsU-j9DrfLaaPiTLx_vF9GaZ5CydyCSnTNmJJYVRihCaAjGpEmSdy2IN1loDdGJB9kFxnmUq4wqkouk6zcBkouAjdLnbuwn-q4PY6qaMOdS1ceC7qBkTWUaYUrJH5Q7Ng48xgNWbUDYmfGtK9Nasrjb6YFb_mtVbs_3geH-jWzdQ_I0dVPIfXuh3oA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259902886</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CBCT Performance and Endodontic Sealer Influence in the Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra ; Mármora, Belkiss ; Barriviera, Maurício ; Panzarella, Francine Kühl ; Raitz, Ricardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra ; Mármora, Belkiss ; Barriviera, Maurício ; Panzarella, Francine Kühl ; Raitz, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><description>To evaluate the performance of three cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines in detecting vertical root fractures (VRFs) in teeth filled with different sealers. A total of 80 single-rooted premolars were subjected to instrumentation and restoration with gutta-percha + AH Plus sealer, gutta-percha + sealer 26, gutta-percha + fill canal, and gutta-percha without sealer as the control. Half of the samples were randomly subjected to root fracture and all the teeth were scanned by i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, USA), PreXion (PreXion Inc., San Mateo, USA), and OrthoPhos XG (Sirona Dental System, Bensheim, Germany). Three examiners analyzed the images for the presence of fractures. The highest accuracy was obtained with the PreXion device, with Az = 0.85, while the i-CAT device provided higher sensitivity (0.93). The specificity values observed ranged between 0.75 and 0.70. Chi-squared tests ( &gt; 0.05) demonstrated that the sealers did not exert a significant influence on the diagnosis of VRF. It may be concluded that endodontic sealers do not influence the detection of VRF. The PreXion device was the most accurate, having the highest specificity value. Radiopaque materials might affect the diagnosis of VRFs because they can simulate fracture lines, leading to false-positive results. Moreover, CBCT machines present different specificities that could exert some influence on that.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-3711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-3711</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2556</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31316016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India</publisher><subject>Dentistry</subject><ispartof>The journal of contemporary dental practice, 2019-05, Vol.20 (5), p.552-556</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2746-c128f4f0da880017e0a7850bc6dbefffae14fe614f833998938e6817b79ea95d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2746-c128f4f0da880017e0a7850bc6dbefffae14fe614f833998938e6817b79ea95d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31316016$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mármora, Belkiss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barriviera, Maurício</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzarella, Francine Kühl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raitz, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><title>CBCT Performance and Endodontic Sealer Influence in the Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures</title><title>The journal of contemporary dental practice</title><addtitle>J Contemp Dent Pract</addtitle><description>To evaluate the performance of three cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines in detecting vertical root fractures (VRFs) in teeth filled with different sealers. A total of 80 single-rooted premolars were subjected to instrumentation and restoration with gutta-percha + AH Plus sealer, gutta-percha + sealer 26, gutta-percha + fill canal, and gutta-percha without sealer as the control. Half of the samples were randomly subjected to root fracture and all the teeth were scanned by i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, USA), PreXion (PreXion Inc., San Mateo, USA), and OrthoPhos XG (Sirona Dental System, Bensheim, Germany). Three examiners analyzed the images for the presence of fractures. The highest accuracy was obtained with the PreXion device, with Az = 0.85, while the i-CAT device provided higher sensitivity (0.93). The specificity values observed ranged between 0.75 and 0.70. Chi-squared tests ( &gt; 0.05) demonstrated that the sealers did not exert a significant influence on the diagnosis of VRF. It may be concluded that endodontic sealers do not influence the detection of VRF. The PreXion device was the most accurate, having the highest specificity value. Radiopaque materials might affect the diagnosis of VRFs because they can simulate fracture lines, leading to false-positive results. Moreover, CBCT machines present different specificities that could exert some influence on that.</description><subject>Dentistry</subject><issn>1526-3711</issn><issn>1526-3711</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkMlOwzAQQC0EoqXwC5WPXAJeasc5QmmhUiUQFE5IlpuMIVFiFzs58PektEVcZkaaN4seQmNKrgQh4rraJJXvgjN1TCghbJIwIeQRGlLBZMJTSo__1QN0FmPVY5yl5BQNOOVUEiqH6H16O13hJwjWh8a4HLBxBZ65whfetWWOX8DUEPDC2bqDbb90uP0EfFeaD-djGbG3-A1Cz5oaP3vf4nkwedsFiOfoxPYPwsU-j9DrfLaaPiTLx_vF9GaZ5CydyCSnTNmJJYVRihCaAjGpEmSdy2IN1loDdGJB9kFxnmUq4wqkouk6zcBkouAjdLnbuwn-q4PY6qaMOdS1ceC7qBkTWUaYUrJH5Q7Ng48xgNWbUDYmfGtK9Nasrjb6YFb_mtVbs_3geH-jWzdQ_I0dVPIfXuh3oA</recordid><startdate>20190501</startdate><enddate>20190501</enddate><creator>Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra</creator><creator>Mármora, Belkiss</creator><creator>Barriviera, Maurício</creator><creator>Panzarella, Francine Kühl</creator><creator>Raitz, Ricardo</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190501</creationdate><title>CBCT Performance and Endodontic Sealer Influence in the Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures</title><author>Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra ; Mármora, Belkiss ; Barriviera, Maurício ; Panzarella, Francine Kühl ; Raitz, Ricardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2746-c128f4f0da880017e0a7850bc6dbefffae14fe614f833998938e6817b79ea95d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Dentistry</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mármora, Belkiss</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barriviera, Maurício</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panzarella, Francine Kühl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raitz, Ricardo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The journal of contemporary dental practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Freitas-E-Silva, Alessandra</au><au>Mármora, Belkiss</au><au>Barriviera, Maurício</au><au>Panzarella, Francine Kühl</au><au>Raitz, Ricardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CBCT Performance and Endodontic Sealer Influence in the Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures</atitle><jtitle>The journal of contemporary dental practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Contemp Dent Pract</addtitle><date>2019-05-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>552</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>552-556</pages><issn>1526-3711</issn><eissn>1526-3711</eissn><abstract>To evaluate the performance of three cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) machines in detecting vertical root fractures (VRFs) in teeth filled with different sealers. A total of 80 single-rooted premolars were subjected to instrumentation and restoration with gutta-percha + AH Plus sealer, gutta-percha + sealer 26, gutta-percha + fill canal, and gutta-percha without sealer as the control. Half of the samples were randomly subjected to root fracture and all the teeth were scanned by i-CAT (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, USA), PreXion (PreXion Inc., San Mateo, USA), and OrthoPhos XG (Sirona Dental System, Bensheim, Germany). Three examiners analyzed the images for the presence of fractures. The highest accuracy was obtained with the PreXion device, with Az = 0.85, while the i-CAT device provided higher sensitivity (0.93). The specificity values observed ranged between 0.75 and 0.70. Chi-squared tests ( &gt; 0.05) demonstrated that the sealers did not exert a significant influence on the diagnosis of VRF. It may be concluded that endodontic sealers do not influence the detection of VRF. The PreXion device was the most accurate, having the highest specificity value. Radiopaque materials might affect the diagnosis of VRFs because they can simulate fracture lines, leading to false-positive results. Moreover, CBCT machines present different specificities that could exert some influence on that.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pmid>31316016</pmid><doi>10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2556</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-3711
ispartof The journal of contemporary dental practice, 2019-05, Vol.20 (5), p.552-556
issn 1526-3711
1526-3711
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2259902886
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Dentistry
title CBCT Performance and Endodontic Sealer Influence in the Diagnosis of Vertical Root Fractures
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T15%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CBCT%20Performance%20and%20Endodontic%20Sealer%20Influence%20in%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Vertical%20Root%20Fractures&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20contemporary%20dental%20practice&rft.au=Freitas-E-Silva,%20Alessandra&rft.date=2019-05-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=552&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=552-556&rft.issn=1526-3711&rft.eissn=1526-3711&rft_id=info:doi/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2259902886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259902886&rft_id=info:pmid/31316016&rfr_iscdi=true