Skin prick testing a better predictor than blood testing for the diagnosis of peanut allergy in Chinese children
Peanut allergy is common in Chinese children, yet the most predictive diagnostic cut-offs for skin prick test (SPT) and blood testing in this population are unclear. We aimed to determine the optimal cut-off values for whole-peanut SPT, specific IgE (sIgE) and component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) fo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology 2021-12, Vol.39 (4), p.241-248 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 248 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 241 |
container_title | Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Chua, Gilbert T Chong, Patrick Cy Au, Elaine Yl Cheong, K N Wong, Wilfred Hs Chan, Eric Yt Ho, Marco Hk Lau, Y L Duque, Jaime S Rosa |
description | Peanut allergy is common in Chinese children, yet the most predictive diagnostic cut-offs for skin prick test (SPT) and blood testing in this population are unclear.
We aimed to determine the optimal cut-off values for whole-peanut SPT, specific IgE (sIgE) and component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) for Chinese children based on outcomes of open oral food challenges (OFC) to peanut.
We recruited ethnic-Chinese patients 1-18 years old who were suspected of having peanut allergy based on a history of reactions after exposure or sensitization although peanut naïve. Considering the AUC value of 0.8, 80% power and 5% level of significance with two tails, 26 patients were needed. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) and their area-under-curves (AUCs) for SPT, peanut sIgE, and CRD were compared.
Thirty-one subjects participated. Only SPT reached statistical significance (AUC 0.91, p = 0.0001), but not the other tests. Seven retrospective data were added to optimize the power. SPT remained to be the best predictor, followed by Ara h 2 sIgE (AUC 0.72, p = 0.02). An SPT wheal size of 3 mm and Ara h 2 sIgE of 0.14 kU(A)/L yielded the highest Youden's index. The specificity of SPT and Ara h 2 sIgE reached 94% at 6 mm and 0.74 kU(A)/L, respectively. Comparisons of ROCs revealed that SPT was significantly better than Ara h 2 sIgE (p = 0.03) and whole-peanut sIgE (AUC 0.61, p = 0.26).
In Chinese children, SPT appeared to be the best predictor for peanut allergy, followed by Ara h 2 sIgE. |
doi_str_mv | 10.12932/AP-110319-0519 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2258735678</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2258735678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5a42ac422b31df490563ba2d1a5a65d13925f75e37cc1a4a1fc2b78fa609fe9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkTFrHDEQhYVJsA_bdbogSJNmbY200krlccRJwBCDE0i3aLWjO9l70kXaLfzvo_hsF5lmYPjm8XiPkA_AroAbwa_Xdw0AE2AaJsGckBXnXDdamfYdWTHgstFd9_uMXJbywOooAC3bU3ImQACD1qzI4f4xRHrIwT3SGcsc4pZaOuA8Y65nHIObU6bzzkY6TCmNb5R_PiMdg93GVEKhydMD2rjM1E4T5u0TrdKbXYhYkLpdmMaM8YK893YqePmyz8mvmy8_N9-a2x9fv2_Wt40TSs2NtC23ruV8EDD61jCpxGD5CFZaJUcQhkvfSRSdc2BbC97xodPeKmY8GhTn5PNR95DTn6V67vehOJwmGzEtpedc6k5I1emKfvoPfUhLjtVdzxVoDR1jolLXR8rlVEpG39fU9jY_9cD65z769V1_7KP_10f9-Piiuwx7HN_41_TFX-3VhaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2618817003</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skin prick testing a better predictor than blood testing for the diagnosis of peanut allergy in Chinese children</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chua, Gilbert T ; Chong, Patrick Cy ; Au, Elaine Yl ; Cheong, K N ; Wong, Wilfred Hs ; Chan, Eric Yt ; Ho, Marco Hk ; Lau, Y L ; Duque, Jaime S Rosa</creator><creatorcontrib>Chua, Gilbert T ; Chong, Patrick Cy ; Au, Elaine Yl ; Cheong, K N ; Wong, Wilfred Hs ; Chan, Eric Yt ; Ho, Marco Hk ; Lau, Y L ; Duque, Jaime S Rosa</creatorcontrib><description>Peanut allergy is common in Chinese children, yet the most predictive diagnostic cut-offs for skin prick test (SPT) and blood testing in this population are unclear.
We aimed to determine the optimal cut-off values for whole-peanut SPT, specific IgE (sIgE) and component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) for Chinese children based on outcomes of open oral food challenges (OFC) to peanut.
We recruited ethnic-Chinese patients 1-18 years old who were suspected of having peanut allergy based on a history of reactions after exposure or sensitization although peanut naïve. Considering the AUC value of 0.8, 80% power and 5% level of significance with two tails, 26 patients were needed. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) and their area-under-curves (AUCs) for SPT, peanut sIgE, and CRD were compared.
Thirty-one subjects participated. Only SPT reached statistical significance (AUC 0.91, p = 0.0001), but not the other tests. Seven retrospective data were added to optimize the power. SPT remained to be the best predictor, followed by Ara h 2 sIgE (AUC 0.72, p = 0.02). An SPT wheal size of 3 mm and Ara h 2 sIgE of 0.14 kU(A)/L yielded the highest Youden's index. The specificity of SPT and Ara h 2 sIgE reached 94% at 6 mm and 0.74 kU(A)/L, respectively. Comparisons of ROCs revealed that SPT was significantly better than Ara h 2 sIgE (p = 0.03) and whole-peanut sIgE (AUC 0.61, p = 0.26).
In Chinese children, SPT appeared to be the best predictor for peanut allergy, followed by Ara h 2 sIgE.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0125-877X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2228-8694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12932/AP-110319-0519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31310149</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thailand: The Allergy and Immunology Society</publisher><subject>Allergies ; Ara h 2 antigen ; Blood tests ; Children ; Children & youth ; Diagnostic tests ; Food allergies ; Immunoglobulin E ; Peanuts ; Skin tests</subject><ispartof>Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology, 2021-12, Vol.39 (4), p.241-248</ispartof><rights>Copyright The Allergy and Immunology Society Dec 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5a42ac422b31df490563ba2d1a5a65d13925f75e37cc1a4a1fc2b78fa609fe9e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31310149$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chua, Gilbert T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Patrick Cy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, Elaine Yl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, K N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Wilfred Hs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Eric Yt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Marco Hk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Y L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duque, Jaime S Rosa</creatorcontrib><title>Skin prick testing a better predictor than blood testing for the diagnosis of peanut allergy in Chinese children</title><title>Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology</title><addtitle>Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol</addtitle><description>Peanut allergy is common in Chinese children, yet the most predictive diagnostic cut-offs for skin prick test (SPT) and blood testing in this population are unclear.
We aimed to determine the optimal cut-off values for whole-peanut SPT, specific IgE (sIgE) and component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) for Chinese children based on outcomes of open oral food challenges (OFC) to peanut.
We recruited ethnic-Chinese patients 1-18 years old who were suspected of having peanut allergy based on a history of reactions after exposure or sensitization although peanut naïve. Considering the AUC value of 0.8, 80% power and 5% level of significance with two tails, 26 patients were needed. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) and their area-under-curves (AUCs) for SPT, peanut sIgE, and CRD were compared.
Thirty-one subjects participated. Only SPT reached statistical significance (AUC 0.91, p = 0.0001), but not the other tests. Seven retrospective data were added to optimize the power. SPT remained to be the best predictor, followed by Ara h 2 sIgE (AUC 0.72, p = 0.02). An SPT wheal size of 3 mm and Ara h 2 sIgE of 0.14 kU(A)/L yielded the highest Youden's index. The specificity of SPT and Ara h 2 sIgE reached 94% at 6 mm and 0.74 kU(A)/L, respectively. Comparisons of ROCs revealed that SPT was significantly better than Ara h 2 sIgE (p = 0.03) and whole-peanut sIgE (AUC 0.61, p = 0.26).
In Chinese children, SPT appeared to be the best predictor for peanut allergy, followed by Ara h 2 sIgE.</description><subject>Allergies</subject><subject>Ara h 2 antigen</subject><subject>Blood tests</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Children & youth</subject><subject>Diagnostic tests</subject><subject>Food allergies</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin E</subject><subject>Peanuts</subject><subject>Skin tests</subject><issn>0125-877X</issn><issn>2228-8694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkTFrHDEQhYVJsA_bdbogSJNmbY200krlccRJwBCDE0i3aLWjO9l70kXaLfzvo_hsF5lmYPjm8XiPkA_AroAbwa_Xdw0AE2AaJsGckBXnXDdamfYdWTHgstFd9_uMXJbywOooAC3bU3ImQACD1qzI4f4xRHrIwT3SGcsc4pZaOuA8Y65nHIObU6bzzkY6TCmNb5R_PiMdg93GVEKhydMD2rjM1E4T5u0TrdKbXYhYkLpdmMaM8YK893YqePmyz8mvmy8_N9-a2x9fv2_Wt40TSs2NtC23ruV8EDD61jCpxGD5CFZaJUcQhkvfSRSdc2BbC97xodPeKmY8GhTn5PNR95DTn6V67vehOJwmGzEtpedc6k5I1emKfvoPfUhLjtVdzxVoDR1jolLXR8rlVEpG39fU9jY_9cD65z769V1_7KP_10f9-Piiuwx7HN_41_TFX-3VhaI</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Chua, Gilbert T</creator><creator>Chong, Patrick Cy</creator><creator>Au, Elaine Yl</creator><creator>Cheong, K N</creator><creator>Wong, Wilfred Hs</creator><creator>Chan, Eric Yt</creator><creator>Ho, Marco Hk</creator><creator>Lau, Y L</creator><creator>Duque, Jaime S Rosa</creator><general>The Allergy and Immunology Society</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Skin prick testing a better predictor than blood testing for the diagnosis of peanut allergy in Chinese children</title><author>Chua, Gilbert T ; Chong, Patrick Cy ; Au, Elaine Yl ; Cheong, K N ; Wong, Wilfred Hs ; Chan, Eric Yt ; Ho, Marco Hk ; Lau, Y L ; Duque, Jaime S Rosa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-5a42ac422b31df490563ba2d1a5a65d13925f75e37cc1a4a1fc2b78fa609fe9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Allergies</topic><topic>Ara h 2 antigen</topic><topic>Blood tests</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Children & youth</topic><topic>Diagnostic tests</topic><topic>Food allergies</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin E</topic><topic>Peanuts</topic><topic>Skin tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chua, Gilbert T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Patrick Cy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Au, Elaine Yl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, K N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Wilfred Hs</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Eric Yt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Marco Hk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Y L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duque, Jaime S Rosa</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>East & South Asia Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chua, Gilbert T</au><au>Chong, Patrick Cy</au><au>Au, Elaine Yl</au><au>Cheong, K N</au><au>Wong, Wilfred Hs</au><au>Chan, Eric Yt</au><au>Ho, Marco Hk</au><au>Lau, Y L</au><au>Duque, Jaime S Rosa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skin prick testing a better predictor than blood testing for the diagnosis of peanut allergy in Chinese children</atitle><jtitle>Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology</jtitle><addtitle>Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol</addtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>241</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>241-248</pages><issn>0125-877X</issn><eissn>2228-8694</eissn><abstract>Peanut allergy is common in Chinese children, yet the most predictive diagnostic cut-offs for skin prick test (SPT) and blood testing in this population are unclear.
We aimed to determine the optimal cut-off values for whole-peanut SPT, specific IgE (sIgE) and component-resolved diagnostics (CRD) for Chinese children based on outcomes of open oral food challenges (OFC) to peanut.
We recruited ethnic-Chinese patients 1-18 years old who were suspected of having peanut allergy based on a history of reactions after exposure or sensitization although peanut naïve. Considering the AUC value of 0.8, 80% power and 5% level of significance with two tails, 26 patients were needed. Sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs) and their area-under-curves (AUCs) for SPT, peanut sIgE, and CRD were compared.
Thirty-one subjects participated. Only SPT reached statistical significance (AUC 0.91, p = 0.0001), but not the other tests. Seven retrospective data were added to optimize the power. SPT remained to be the best predictor, followed by Ara h 2 sIgE (AUC 0.72, p = 0.02). An SPT wheal size of 3 mm and Ara h 2 sIgE of 0.14 kU(A)/L yielded the highest Youden's index. The specificity of SPT and Ara h 2 sIgE reached 94% at 6 mm and 0.74 kU(A)/L, respectively. Comparisons of ROCs revealed that SPT was significantly better than Ara h 2 sIgE (p = 0.03) and whole-peanut sIgE (AUC 0.61, p = 0.26).
In Chinese children, SPT appeared to be the best predictor for peanut allergy, followed by Ara h 2 sIgE.</abstract><cop>Thailand</cop><pub>The Allergy and Immunology Society</pub><pmid>31310149</pmid><doi>10.12932/AP-110319-0519</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0125-877X |
ispartof | Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology, 2021-12, Vol.39 (4), p.241-248 |
issn | 0125-877X 2228-8694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2258735678 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Allergies Ara h 2 antigen Blood tests Children Children & youth Diagnostic tests Food allergies Immunoglobulin E Peanuts Skin tests |
title | Skin prick testing a better predictor than blood testing for the diagnosis of peanut allergy in Chinese children |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A47%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skin%20prick%20testing%20a%20better%20predictor%20than%20blood%20testing%20for%20the%20diagnosis%20of%20peanut%20allergy%20in%20Chinese%20children&rft.jtitle=Asian%20Pacific%20journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20immunology&rft.au=Chua,%20Gilbert%20T&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=241&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=241-248&rft.issn=0125-877X&rft.eissn=2228-8694&rft_id=info:doi/10.12932/AP-110319-0519&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2258735678%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2618817003&rft_id=info:pmid/31310149&rfr_iscdi=true |