Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study

Aims Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently incre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neurourology and urodynamics 2019-09, Vol.38 (7), p.1979-1984
Hauptverfasser: Finazzi Agrò, Enrico, Gregori, Andrea, Bianchi, Daniele, Carone, Roberto, Giammò, Alessandro, Ammirati, Enrico, Giovannelli, Vanni, Romanò, Ai Ling, Martino, Pasquale, Saracino, Alberto, Volpe, Alessandro, Favro, Michele, Canepa, Giorgio, Varca, Virginia, Pinto, Anna, Farullo, Giuseppe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1984
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1979
container_title Neurourology and urodynamics
container_volume 38
creator Finazzi Agrò, Enrico
Gregori, Andrea
Bianchi, Daniele
Carone, Roberto
Giammò, Alessandro
Ammirati, Enrico
Giovannelli, Vanni
Romanò, Ai Ling
Martino, Pasquale
Saracino, Alberto
Volpe, Alessandro
Favro, Michele
Canepa, Giorgio
Varca, Virginia
Pinto, Anna
Farullo, Giuseppe
description Aims Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system. Methods In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow‐up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow‐up and was assessed utilizing a 24‐hour pad test. Patients were considered: “Dry” if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24‐hour pad test; “Improved” if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but >8 g/24 hours); “Failure” if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long‐term complications. Results Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five‐year follow‐up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long‐term balloon failure. Conclusions ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long‐term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/nau.24103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2258158742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2277334343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-26bad1259947a7436cc98e2ca6f92112f90a69447d3dae68bd6605f676159ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUluFDEUhksIRJrAggsgS2ySRScequwqdlEUAlIYFmFdeu16jtyqshsPRLVjwQE4AxfiDjlJ3N2BBRLywrb06XvDX1UvGT1hlPJTB_mE14yKR9WCNZwupVLqcbWgSoglr6U6qJ7FuKaUtqLunlYHggnKO94uqt8XxlgNeibgBhLBYJqJNwSGdY4JViOSFYyj9y6So8_Bg053P34dk-RJCgiJTFCQWN4xkhysgzAT67R3yTp0GgmYhIFsgi-6VNAcbjDMb8gHHGyedmVH727uvv8s3ESML9Vuyy9vyAAJds0QB8l6ByOZ8pisRpeC1SRgKtoN6mS_bZvIw_y8emJgjPji4T6srt9eXJ-_W159unx_fna11KLZLkWuYGC86bpagaqF1LprkWuQpuOMcdNRkF1dq0EMgLJdDVLSxkglWdOhEYfV0V5b5vqaMaZ-slHjOIJDn2PPedOyplU1L-jrf9C1z6HMsqVUSagup1DHe0qXiWJA02-Cncoye0b7bch9CbnfhVzYVw_GvJpw-Ev-SbUAp3vg1o44_9_Ufzz7slfeA9Y6t-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2277334343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico ; Gregori, Andrea ; Bianchi, Daniele ; Carone, Roberto ; Giammò, Alessandro ; Ammirati, Enrico ; Giovannelli, Vanni ; Romanò, Ai Ling ; Martino, Pasquale ; Saracino, Alberto ; Volpe, Alessandro ; Favro, Michele ; Canepa, Giorgio ; Varca, Virginia ; Pinto, Anna ; Farullo, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico ; Gregori, Andrea ; Bianchi, Daniele ; Carone, Roberto ; Giammò, Alessandro ; Ammirati, Enrico ; Giovannelli, Vanni ; Romanò, Ai Ling ; Martino, Pasquale ; Saracino, Alberto ; Volpe, Alessandro ; Favro, Michele ; Canepa, Giorgio ; Varca, Virginia ; Pinto, Anna ; Farullo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>Aims Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system. Methods In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow‐up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow‐up and was assessed utilizing a 24‐hour pad test. Patients were considered: “Dry” if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24‐hour pad test; “Improved” if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but &gt;8 g/24 hours); “Failure” if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long‐term complications. Results Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five‐year follow‐up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long‐term balloon failure. Conclusions ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long‐term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.24103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31302928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Balloon treatment ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Safety ; Sphincter ; stress urinary incontinence ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019-09, Vol.38 (7), p.1979-1984</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-26bad1259947a7436cc98e2ca6f92112f90a69447d3dae68bd6605f676159ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-26bad1259947a7436cc98e2ca6f92112f90a69447d3dae68bd6605f676159ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0308-8824</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.24103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.24103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31302928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregori, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carone, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giammò, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammirati, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Vanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanò, Ai Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martino, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saracino, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpe, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favro, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canepa, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varca, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farullo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><description>Aims Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system. Methods In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow‐up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow‐up and was assessed utilizing a 24‐hour pad test. Patients were considered: “Dry” if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24‐hour pad test; “Improved” if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but &gt;8 g/24 hours); “Failure” if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long‐term complications. Results Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five‐year follow‐up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long‐term balloon failure. Conclusions ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long‐term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Balloon treatment</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sphincter</subject><subject>stress urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Sphincter, Artificial</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUluFDEUhksIRJrAggsgS2ySRScequwqdlEUAlIYFmFdeu16jtyqshsPRLVjwQE4AxfiDjlJ3N2BBRLywrb06XvDX1UvGT1hlPJTB_mE14yKR9WCNZwupVLqcbWgSoglr6U6qJ7FuKaUtqLunlYHggnKO94uqt8XxlgNeibgBhLBYJqJNwSGdY4JViOSFYyj9y6So8_Bg053P34dk-RJCgiJTFCQWN4xkhysgzAT67R3yTp0GgmYhIFsgi-6VNAcbjDMb8gHHGyedmVH727uvv8s3ESML9Vuyy9vyAAJds0QB8l6ByOZ8pisRpeC1SRgKtoN6mS_bZvIw_y8emJgjPji4T6srt9eXJ-_W159unx_fna11KLZLkWuYGC86bpagaqF1LprkWuQpuOMcdNRkF1dq0EMgLJdDVLSxkglWdOhEYfV0V5b5vqaMaZ-slHjOIJDn2PPedOyplU1L-jrf9C1z6HMsqVUSagup1DHe0qXiWJA02-Cncoye0b7bch9CbnfhVzYVw_GvJpw-Ev-SbUAp3vg1o44_9_Ufzz7slfeA9Y6t-8</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico</creator><creator>Gregori, Andrea</creator><creator>Bianchi, Daniele</creator><creator>Carone, Roberto</creator><creator>Giammò, Alessandro</creator><creator>Ammirati, Enrico</creator><creator>Giovannelli, Vanni</creator><creator>Romanò, Ai Ling</creator><creator>Martino, Pasquale</creator><creator>Saracino, Alberto</creator><creator>Volpe, Alessandro</creator><creator>Favro, Michele</creator><creator>Canepa, Giorgio</creator><creator>Varca, Virginia</creator><creator>Pinto, Anna</creator><creator>Farullo, Giuseppe</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-8824</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study</title><author>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico ; Gregori, Andrea ; Bianchi, Daniele ; Carone, Roberto ; Giammò, Alessandro ; Ammirati, Enrico ; Giovannelli, Vanni ; Romanò, Ai Ling ; Martino, Pasquale ; Saracino, Alberto ; Volpe, Alessandro ; Favro, Michele ; Canepa, Giorgio ; Varca, Virginia ; Pinto, Anna ; Farullo, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-26bad1259947a7436cc98e2ca6f92112f90a69447d3dae68bd6605f676159ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Balloon treatment</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sphincter</topic><topic>stress urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Sphincter, Artificial</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregori, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carone, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giammò, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammirati, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Vanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanò, Ai Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martino, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saracino, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpe, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favro, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canepa, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varca, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farullo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico</au><au>Gregori, Andrea</au><au>Bianchi, Daniele</au><au>Carone, Roberto</au><au>Giammò, Alessandro</au><au>Ammirati, Enrico</au><au>Giovannelli, Vanni</au><au>Romanò, Ai Ling</au><au>Martino, Pasquale</au><au>Saracino, Alberto</au><au>Volpe, Alessandro</au><au>Favro, Michele</au><au>Canepa, Giorgio</au><au>Varca, Virginia</au><au>Pinto, Anna</au><au>Farullo, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1979</spage><epage>1984</epage><pages>1979-1984</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system. Methods In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow‐up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow‐up and was assessed utilizing a 24‐hour pad test. Patients were considered: “Dry” if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24‐hour pad test; “Improved” if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but &gt;8 g/24 hours); “Failure” if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long‐term complications. Results Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five‐year follow‐up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long‐term balloon failure. Conclusions ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long‐term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31302928</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.24103</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-8824</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-2467
ispartof Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019-09, Vol.38 (7), p.1979-1984
issn 0733-2467
1520-6777
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2258158742
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Balloon treatment
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patients
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - surgery
Prostate
Prostate cancer
Prostatectomy
Prostatectomy - adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Safety
Sphincter
stress urinary incontinence
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
Urinary incontinence
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology
Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery
Urinary Sphincter, Artificial
Urine
title Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20adjustable%20balloons%20(Proact%E2%84%A2)%20to%20treat%20male%20stress%20urinary%20incontinence%20after%20prostate%20surgery:%20Medium%20and%20long%E2%80%90term%20follow%E2%80%90up%20data%20of%20a%20national%20multicentric%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Finazzi%20Agr%C3%B2,%20Enrico&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1979&rft.epage=1984&rft.pages=1979-1984&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.24103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2277334343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2277334343&rft_id=info:pmid/31302928&rfr_iscdi=true