Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study
Aims Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently incre...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Neurourology and urodynamics 2019-09, Vol.38 (7), p.1979-1984 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1984 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1979 |
container_title | Neurourology and urodynamics |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Finazzi Agrò, Enrico Gregori, Andrea Bianchi, Daniele Carone, Roberto Giammò, Alessandro Ammirati, Enrico Giovannelli, Vanni Romanò, Ai Ling Martino, Pasquale Saracino, Alberto Volpe, Alessandro Favro, Michele Canepa, Giorgio Varca, Virginia Pinto, Anna Farullo, Giuseppe |
description | Aims
Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system.
Methods
In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow‐up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow‐up and was assessed utilizing a 24‐hour pad test. Patients were considered: “Dry” if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24‐hour pad test; “Improved” if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but >8 g/24 hours); “Failure” if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long‐term complications.
Results
Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five‐year follow‐up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long‐term balloon failure.
Conclusions
ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long‐term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/nau.24103 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2258158742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2277334343</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-26bad1259947a7436cc98e2ca6f92112f90a69447d3dae68bd6605f676159ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUluFDEUhksIRJrAggsgS2ySRScequwqdlEUAlIYFmFdeu16jtyqshsPRLVjwQE4AxfiDjlJ3N2BBRLywrb06XvDX1UvGT1hlPJTB_mE14yKR9WCNZwupVLqcbWgSoglr6U6qJ7FuKaUtqLunlYHggnKO94uqt8XxlgNeibgBhLBYJqJNwSGdY4JViOSFYyj9y6So8_Bg053P34dk-RJCgiJTFCQWN4xkhysgzAT67R3yTp0GgmYhIFsgi-6VNAcbjDMb8gHHGyedmVH727uvv8s3ESML9Vuyy9vyAAJds0QB8l6ByOZ8pisRpeC1SRgKtoN6mS_bZvIw_y8emJgjPji4T6srt9eXJ-_W159unx_fna11KLZLkWuYGC86bpagaqF1LprkWuQpuOMcdNRkF1dq0EMgLJdDVLSxkglWdOhEYfV0V5b5vqaMaZ-slHjOIJDn2PPedOyplU1L-jrf9C1z6HMsqVUSagup1DHe0qXiWJA02-Cncoye0b7bch9CbnfhVzYVw_GvJpw-Ev-SbUAp3vg1o44_9_Ufzz7slfeA9Y6t-8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2277334343</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico ; Gregori, Andrea ; Bianchi, Daniele ; Carone, Roberto ; Giammò, Alessandro ; Ammirati, Enrico ; Giovannelli, Vanni ; Romanò, Ai Ling ; Martino, Pasquale ; Saracino, Alberto ; Volpe, Alessandro ; Favro, Michele ; Canepa, Giorgio ; Varca, Virginia ; Pinto, Anna ; Farullo, Giuseppe</creator><creatorcontrib>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico ; Gregori, Andrea ; Bianchi, Daniele ; Carone, Roberto ; Giammò, Alessandro ; Ammirati, Enrico ; Giovannelli, Vanni ; Romanò, Ai Ling ; Martino, Pasquale ; Saracino, Alberto ; Volpe, Alessandro ; Favro, Michele ; Canepa, Giorgio ; Varca, Virginia ; Pinto, Anna ; Farullo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><description>Aims
Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system.
Methods
In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow‐up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow‐up and was assessed utilizing a 24‐hour pad test. Patients were considered: “Dry” if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24‐hour pad test; “Improved” if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but >8 g/24 hours); “Failure” if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long‐term complications.
Results
Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five‐year follow‐up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long‐term balloon failure.
Conclusions
ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long‐term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-2467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6777</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/nau.24103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31302928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Balloon treatment ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - surgery ; Prostate ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; Safety ; Sphincter ; stress urinary incontinence ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology ; Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery ; Urinary Sphincter, Artificial ; Urine</subject><ispartof>Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019-09, Vol.38 (7), p.1979-1984</ispartof><rights>2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-26bad1259947a7436cc98e2ca6f92112f90a69447d3dae68bd6605f676159ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-26bad1259947a7436cc98e2ca6f92112f90a69447d3dae68bd6605f676159ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0308-8824</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fnau.24103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fnau.24103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31302928$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregori, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carone, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giammò, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammirati, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Vanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanò, Ai Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martino, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saracino, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpe, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favro, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canepa, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varca, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farullo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study</title><title>Neurourology and urodynamics</title><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><description>Aims
Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system.
Methods
In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow‐up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow‐up and was assessed utilizing a 24‐hour pad test. Patients were considered: “Dry” if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24‐hour pad test; “Improved” if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but >8 g/24 hours); “Failure” if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long‐term complications.
Results
Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five‐year follow‐up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long‐term balloon failure.
Conclusions
ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long‐term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Balloon treatment</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - surgery</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sphincter</subject><subject>stress urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</subject><subject>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</subject><subject>Urinary Sphincter, Artificial</subject><subject>Urine</subject><issn>0733-2467</issn><issn>1520-6777</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUluFDEUhksIRJrAggsgS2ySRScequwqdlEUAlIYFmFdeu16jtyqshsPRLVjwQE4AxfiDjlJ3N2BBRLywrb06XvDX1UvGT1hlPJTB_mE14yKR9WCNZwupVLqcbWgSoglr6U6qJ7FuKaUtqLunlYHggnKO94uqt8XxlgNeibgBhLBYJqJNwSGdY4JViOSFYyj9y6So8_Bg053P34dk-RJCgiJTFCQWN4xkhysgzAT67R3yTp0GgmYhIFsgi-6VNAcbjDMb8gHHGyedmVH727uvv8s3ESML9Vuyy9vyAAJds0QB8l6ByOZ8pisRpeC1SRgKtoN6mS_bZvIw_y8emJgjPji4T6srt9eXJ-_W159unx_fna11KLZLkWuYGC86bpagaqF1LprkWuQpuOMcdNRkF1dq0EMgLJdDVLSxkglWdOhEYfV0V5b5vqaMaZ-slHjOIJDn2PPedOyplU1L-jrf9C1z6HMsqVUSagup1DHe0qXiWJA02-Cncoye0b7bch9CbnfhVzYVw_GvJpw-Ev-SbUAp3vg1o44_9_Ufzz7slfeA9Y6t-8</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico</creator><creator>Gregori, Andrea</creator><creator>Bianchi, Daniele</creator><creator>Carone, Roberto</creator><creator>Giammò, Alessandro</creator><creator>Ammirati, Enrico</creator><creator>Giovannelli, Vanni</creator><creator>Romanò, Ai Ling</creator><creator>Martino, Pasquale</creator><creator>Saracino, Alberto</creator><creator>Volpe, Alessandro</creator><creator>Favro, Michele</creator><creator>Canepa, Giorgio</creator><creator>Varca, Virginia</creator><creator>Pinto, Anna</creator><creator>Farullo, Giuseppe</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-8824</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study</title><author>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico ; Gregori, Andrea ; Bianchi, Daniele ; Carone, Roberto ; Giammò, Alessandro ; Ammirati, Enrico ; Giovannelli, Vanni ; Romanò, Ai Ling ; Martino, Pasquale ; Saracino, Alberto ; Volpe, Alessandro ; Favro, Michele ; Canepa, Giorgio ; Varca, Virginia ; Pinto, Anna ; Farullo, Giuseppe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3533-26bad1259947a7436cc98e2ca6f92112f90a69447d3dae68bd6605f676159ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Balloon treatment</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - surgery</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sphincter</topic><topic>stress urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology</topic><topic>Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery</topic><topic>Urinary Sphincter, Artificial</topic><topic>Urine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregori, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bianchi, Daniele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carone, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giammò, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammirati, Enrico</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovannelli, Vanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romanò, Ai Ling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martino, Pasquale</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saracino, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volpe, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Favro, Michele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Canepa, Giorgio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varca, Virginia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinto, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farullo, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Finazzi Agrò, Enrico</au><au>Gregori, Andrea</au><au>Bianchi, Daniele</au><au>Carone, Roberto</au><au>Giammò, Alessandro</au><au>Ammirati, Enrico</au><au>Giovannelli, Vanni</au><au>Romanò, Ai Ling</au><au>Martino, Pasquale</au><au>Saracino, Alberto</au><au>Volpe, Alessandro</au><au>Favro, Michele</au><au>Canepa, Giorgio</au><au>Varca, Virginia</au><au>Pinto, Anna</au><au>Farullo, Giuseppe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study</atitle><jtitle>Neurourology and urodynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Neurourol Urodyn</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1979</spage><epage>1984</epage><pages>1979-1984</pages><issn>0733-2467</issn><eissn>1520-6777</eissn><abstract>Aims
Male stress urinary incontinence (SUI) represents a complication after radical prostatectomy or benign prostatic obstruction surgery. The artificial urinary sphincter is considered the standard treatment but interest on minimally invasive devices, such as adjustable balloons, has recently increased. Aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the ProACT system.
Methods
In this multicentric retrospective study, we reported the data from nine centers. Patients with SUI who underwent a ProACT device implantation for postoperative SUI and had a minimum follow‐up of 24 months were included. Efficacy was evaluated at the maximum available follow‐up and was assessed utilizing a 24‐hour pad test. Patients were considered: “Dry” if presenting a urine leak weight lower than 8 g at the 24‐hour pad test; “Improved” if presenting a reduction of urine leak higher than 50% (but >8 g/24 hours); “Failure” if presenting a reduction in urine leak lower than 50%. The evaluation included a record of intraoperative and long‐term complications.
Results
Safety and efficacy results are reported on 240 patients. 29.6% of patients were dry at 24 months, 37.5% were improved and 32.9% of patients were considered failures. The baseline mean pad weight of 367 g was reduced to 123 g at 24 months. Five‐year follow‐up on 152 patients showed similar efficacy. The complication rate was 22.5%, with the top complication being long‐term balloon failure.
Conclusions
ProACT implantation represents a safe and efficacious treatment for male postoperative SUI at both medium and long‐term follow up. 67.1% of patients were dry or improved at 24 months. The majority of complications are low grade.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31302928</pmid><doi>10.1002/nau.24103</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0308-8824</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-2467 |
ispartof | Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019-09, Vol.38 (7), p.1979-1984 |
issn | 0733-2467 1520-6777 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2258158742 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Balloon treatment Follow-Up Studies Humans Male Middle Aged Patients Postoperative Complications - etiology Postoperative Complications - surgery Prostate Prostate cancer Prostatectomy Prostatectomy - adverse effects Retrospective Studies Safety Sphincter stress urinary incontinence Surgery Treatment Outcome Urinary incontinence Urinary Incontinence, Stress - etiology Urinary Incontinence, Stress - surgery Urinary Sphincter, Artificial Urine |
title | Efficacy and safety of adjustable balloons (Proact™) to treat male stress urinary incontinence after prostate surgery: Medium and long‐term follow‐up data of a national multicentric retrospective study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A35%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of%20adjustable%20balloons%20(Proact%E2%84%A2)%20to%20treat%20male%20stress%20urinary%20incontinence%20after%20prostate%20surgery:%20Medium%20and%20long%E2%80%90term%20follow%E2%80%90up%20data%20of%20a%20national%20multicentric%20retrospective%20study&rft.jtitle=Neurourology%20and%20urodynamics&rft.au=Finazzi%20Agr%C3%B2,%20Enrico&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1979&rft.epage=1984&rft.pages=1979-1984&rft.issn=0733-2467&rft.eissn=1520-6777&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/nau.24103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2277334343%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2277334343&rft_id=info:pmid/31302928&rfr_iscdi=true |