Clinical applications of ear reconstruction with Medpor

To discuss clinical practice, efficacy and surgical techniques for ear reconstruction with Medpor.
 Methods: Medpor ear reconstructions were used to treat 19 microtia in 17 patients (including 2 bilateral patients) in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2011 to December 2015. Rec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Journal of Central South University. Yi xue ban 2019-05, Vol.44 (5), p.562-570
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Bihang, Zeng, Xiaoling, Yang, Xinghua
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 570
container_issue 5
container_start_page 562
container_title Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Journal of Central South University. Yi xue ban
container_volume 44
creator Zhang, Bihang
Zeng, Xiaoling
Yang, Xinghua
description To discuss clinical practice, efficacy and surgical techniques for ear reconstruction with Medpor.
 Methods: Medpor ear reconstructions were used to treat 19 microtia in 17 patients (including 2 bilateral patients) in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2011 to December 2015. Reconstructions included 2 patients with one-stage ear reconstruction with temporoparietal fascial flap, 2 patients with one-stage operation implanting Medpor directly into skin pocket, and 13 patients with two-stage ear reconstruction.
 Results: After 1-3 years of follow-up, 16 microtia in 14 patients gained ideal appearance. Scaffold exposure occurred in 3 unilateral cases, among which one patient who underwent debridement, removal of superficial exposed scaffold and transposition of local flap to salvage exposure was not significantly influenced, and the other 2 patients' scaffolds were still exposed after repairs and finally removed. One stent was removed at the patient's urging because it induced an exacerbation of periarthritis of the right shoulder.
 Conclusion: Medpor ear scaffold has advantages, such as easy assembly, good immunologic compatibility, fast vascular ingrowth, simple operation, short operative time and ideal appearance of the reconstructed ear. Medpor is an alternative for microtia repair when patients are unwilling to use autologous rib cartilage or costal cartilages are calcified. However, the relatively high incidence of scaffold exposure reminds us that the indications of Medpor should be taken seriously, and measures to avoid skin necrosis and scaffold exposure should be implemented. Long-term follow-up efficacy needs to be proved.
doi_str_mv 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.05.014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2258152150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2258152150</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1161-d2155a3d96f634ccbe57c3664a0b00a0a116751055d415942b60821d868157593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9j0tPwzAQhH0A0ar0L6BckLgk7PqZHFHFSyriAufIcRzhynlgJ0L8e1xRmMvujD7tagi5RigQS1S3h8LFOBQoFc0V46qggFUBogDkZ2T9n6_INsYDAFCBR12QFUMGTFJcE7XzbnBG-0xPk0_L7MYhZmOXWR2yYE1yc1jMMc6-3PyRvdh2GsMlOe-0j3Z7mhvy_nD_tnvK96-Pz7u7fW4QJeYtRSE0ayvZScaNaaxQhknJNTQAGnSilEAQouUoKk4bCSXFtpQlCiUqtiE3v3enMH4uNs5176Kx3uvBjkusKRWJTF8goVcndGl629ZTcL0O3_VfWfYDzcNWAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2258152150</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical applications of ear reconstruction with Medpor</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Zhang, Bihang ; Zeng, Xiaoling ; Yang, Xinghua</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bihang ; Zeng, Xiaoling ; Yang, Xinghua</creatorcontrib><description>To discuss clinical practice, efficacy and surgical techniques for ear reconstruction with Medpor.
 Methods: Medpor ear reconstructions were used to treat 19 microtia in 17 patients (including 2 bilateral patients) in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2011 to December 2015. Reconstructions included 2 patients with one-stage ear reconstruction with temporoparietal fascial flap, 2 patients with one-stage operation implanting Medpor directly into skin pocket, and 13 patients with two-stage ear reconstruction.
 Results: After 1-3 years of follow-up, 16 microtia in 14 patients gained ideal appearance. Scaffold exposure occurred in 3 unilateral cases, among which one patient who underwent debridement, removal of superficial exposed scaffold and transposition of local flap to salvage exposure was not significantly influenced, and the other 2 patients' scaffolds were still exposed after repairs and finally removed. One stent was removed at the patient's urging because it induced an exacerbation of periarthritis of the right shoulder.
 Conclusion: Medpor ear scaffold has advantages, such as easy assembly, good immunologic compatibility, fast vascular ingrowth, simple operation, short operative time and ideal appearance of the reconstructed ear. Medpor is an alternative for microtia repair when patients are unwilling to use autologous rib cartilage or costal cartilages are calcified. However, the relatively high incidence of scaffold exposure reminds us that the indications of Medpor should be taken seriously, and measures to avoid skin necrosis and scaffold exposure should be implemented. Long-term follow-up efficacy needs to be proved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1672-7347</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.05.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31303621</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China</publisher><subject>Ear, External ; Humans ; Polyethylenes ; Reconstructive Surgical Procedures ; Surgical Flaps</subject><ispartof>Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Journal of Central South University. Yi xue ban, 2019-05, Vol.44 (5), p.562-570</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1161-d2155a3d96f634ccbe57c3664a0b00a0a116751055d415942b60821d868157593</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31303621$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bihang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xinghua</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical applications of ear reconstruction with Medpor</title><title>Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Journal of Central South University. Yi xue ban</title><addtitle>Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban</addtitle><description>To discuss clinical practice, efficacy and surgical techniques for ear reconstruction with Medpor.
 Methods: Medpor ear reconstructions were used to treat 19 microtia in 17 patients (including 2 bilateral patients) in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2011 to December 2015. Reconstructions included 2 patients with one-stage ear reconstruction with temporoparietal fascial flap, 2 patients with one-stage operation implanting Medpor directly into skin pocket, and 13 patients with two-stage ear reconstruction.
 Results: After 1-3 years of follow-up, 16 microtia in 14 patients gained ideal appearance. Scaffold exposure occurred in 3 unilateral cases, among which one patient who underwent debridement, removal of superficial exposed scaffold and transposition of local flap to salvage exposure was not significantly influenced, and the other 2 patients' scaffolds were still exposed after repairs and finally removed. One stent was removed at the patient's urging because it induced an exacerbation of periarthritis of the right shoulder.
 Conclusion: Medpor ear scaffold has advantages, such as easy assembly, good immunologic compatibility, fast vascular ingrowth, simple operation, short operative time and ideal appearance of the reconstructed ear. Medpor is an alternative for microtia repair when patients are unwilling to use autologous rib cartilage or costal cartilages are calcified. However, the relatively high incidence of scaffold exposure reminds us that the indications of Medpor should be taken seriously, and measures to avoid skin necrosis and scaffold exposure should be implemented. Long-term follow-up efficacy needs to be proved.</description><subject>Ear, External</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Polyethylenes</subject><subject>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Surgical Flaps</subject><issn>1672-7347</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9j0tPwzAQhH0A0ar0L6BckLgk7PqZHFHFSyriAufIcRzhynlgJ0L8e1xRmMvujD7tagi5RigQS1S3h8LFOBQoFc0V46qggFUBogDkZ2T9n6_INsYDAFCBR12QFUMGTFJcE7XzbnBG-0xPk0_L7MYhZmOXWR2yYE1yc1jMMc6-3PyRvdh2GsMlOe-0j3Z7mhvy_nD_tnvK96-Pz7u7fW4QJeYtRSE0ayvZScaNaaxQhknJNTQAGnSilEAQouUoKk4bCSXFtpQlCiUqtiE3v3enMH4uNs5176Kx3uvBjkusKRWJTF8goVcndGl629ZTcL0O3_VfWfYDzcNWAg</recordid><startdate>20190528</startdate><enddate>20190528</enddate><creator>Zhang, Bihang</creator><creator>Zeng, Xiaoling</creator><creator>Yang, Xinghua</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190528</creationdate><title>Clinical applications of ear reconstruction with Medpor</title><author>Zhang, Bihang ; Zeng, Xiaoling ; Yang, Xinghua</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1161-d2155a3d96f634ccbe57c3664a0b00a0a116751055d415942b60821d868157593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ear, External</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Polyethylenes</topic><topic>Reconstructive Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Surgical Flaps</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Bihang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xiaoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xinghua</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Journal of Central South University. Yi xue ban</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Bihang</au><au>Zeng, Xiaoling</au><au>Yang, Xinghua</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical applications of ear reconstruction with Medpor</atitle><jtitle>Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Journal of Central South University. Yi xue ban</jtitle><addtitle>Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban</addtitle><date>2019-05-28</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>562</spage><epage>570</epage><pages>562-570</pages><issn>1672-7347</issn><abstract>To discuss clinical practice, efficacy and surgical techniques for ear reconstruction with Medpor.
 Methods: Medpor ear reconstructions were used to treat 19 microtia in 17 patients (including 2 bilateral patients) in Xiangya Hospital, Central South University from January 2011 to December 2015. Reconstructions included 2 patients with one-stage ear reconstruction with temporoparietal fascial flap, 2 patients with one-stage operation implanting Medpor directly into skin pocket, and 13 patients with two-stage ear reconstruction.
 Results: After 1-3 years of follow-up, 16 microtia in 14 patients gained ideal appearance. Scaffold exposure occurred in 3 unilateral cases, among which one patient who underwent debridement, removal of superficial exposed scaffold and transposition of local flap to salvage exposure was not significantly influenced, and the other 2 patients' scaffolds were still exposed after repairs and finally removed. One stent was removed at the patient's urging because it induced an exacerbation of periarthritis of the right shoulder.
 Conclusion: Medpor ear scaffold has advantages, such as easy assembly, good immunologic compatibility, fast vascular ingrowth, simple operation, short operative time and ideal appearance of the reconstructed ear. Medpor is an alternative for microtia repair when patients are unwilling to use autologous rib cartilage or costal cartilages are calcified. However, the relatively high incidence of scaffold exposure reminds us that the indications of Medpor should be taken seriously, and measures to avoid skin necrosis and scaffold exposure should be implemented. Long-term follow-up efficacy needs to be proved.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pmid>31303621</pmid><doi>10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.05.014</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1672-7347
ispartof Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Journal of Central South University. Yi xue ban, 2019-05, Vol.44 (5), p.562-570
issn 1672-7347
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2258152150
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Ear, External
Humans
Polyethylenes
Reconstructive Surgical Procedures
Surgical Flaps
title Clinical applications of ear reconstruction with Medpor
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A05%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20applications%20of%20ear%20reconstruction%20with%20Medpor&rft.jtitle=Zhong%20nan%20da%20xue%20xue%20bao.%20Journal%20of%20Central%20South%20University.%20Yi%20xue%20ban&rft.au=Zhang,%20Bihang&rft.date=2019-05-28&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=562&rft.epage=570&rft.pages=562-570&rft.issn=1672-7347&rft_id=info:doi/10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2019.05.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2258152150%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2258152150&rft_id=info:pmid/31303621&rfr_iscdi=true