Divergent host plant utilization by adults and offspring is related to intra-plant variation in chemical defences

Adult and juvenile herbivores of the same species can use divergent feeding strategies, and thus may inhabit and consume different parts of the plant. Because the expression of chemical defences often differs between host plant tissues, this variation may result in disparate performance outcomes for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of animal ecology 2019-11, Vol.88 (11), p.1789-1798
Hauptverfasser: Mason, Charles J., Long, David C., Lindroth, Richard L., Hoover, Kelli
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1798
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1789
container_title The Journal of animal ecology
container_volume 88
creator Mason, Charles J.
Long, David C.
Lindroth, Richard L.
Hoover, Kelli
description Adult and juvenile herbivores of the same species can use divergent feeding strategies, and thus may inhabit and consume different parts of the plant. Because the expression of chemical defences often differs between host plant tissues, this variation may result in disparate performance outcomes for adult and juvenile conspecifics that feed on distinct dietary substrates. The goal of this study was to evaluate how host range may differ between adults and juveniles in a generalist herbivore. We addressed the impacts of among‐ and within‐plant defence variation using the wood‐feeding Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) and three host plants having a range of putative resistance. Impacts of host plants on adult and offspring performance were assessed using a series of controlled bioassays. We evaluated adult‐feeding and egg‐laying behaviours in choice and no‐choice experiments using the different hosts, and subsequent offspring establishment. We then evaluated host plant chemical composition related to nutrition and defence. Different plants had strong impacts on adult performance, but these patterns did not extend to effects on offspring. Females were capable of developing eggs when provided Acer rubrum, but not Populus deltoides or Populus tomentosa. Females that produced eggs by feeding on A. rubrum, however, deposited eggs into all three plant species. Larvae hatched and consumed tissues in all three hosts. The differences between adult and juvenile utilization of Populus spp. were reflected in markedly higher salicinoid phenolic concentrations in bark (>2% dw), while wood had trace quantities. Our results demonstrate that plant resistance mechanisms can differentially act upon adult and juvenile life stages of a polyphagous herbivore when there is differential expression of chemical defences among plant tissue types. Anoplophora glabripennis has been a globally successful invader due in part to its broad host range, and our results suggest a mechanism that permits the beetle to exploit marginally resistant plants. This study has implications for how host range differs between insect feeding stages, which is particularly important for invasive, polyphagous species encountering novel food sources. This study demonstrates that variation of chemical expression between‐ and within‐plant substrates affects the patterns of colonization between life stages of herbivorous insects. These results have implications in the inferences of plant resistanc
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2656.13063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2257713588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>48579902</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48579902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4353-aeb99420c4564526f2689007bdd0d607cdcd9cee019aeca02473732b438b0e083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0EokvhzAlkiQuXtBM7seNjVcpHVbUXOFuOPWm9ysZb2yla_nq8pN0Dl_oylvV7zzNvCHlfw0ldzmnNRVsx0YqTmoPgL8jq8PKSrABYXXVSwRF5k9IaACQD_poc8ZopKVWzIvdf_APGW5wyvQsp0-1oynXOfvR_TPZhov2OGjePOVEzORqGIW2jn26pTzTiaDI6mgP1U46mWtQPJvpF6ydq73DjrRmpwwEni-kteTWYMeG7x3pMfn29-Hn-vbq6-fbj_Oyqsg1veWWwV6phYJtWNC0TAxOdKgP0zoETIK2zTllEqJVBa4A1kkvO-oZ3PSB0_Jh8Xny3MdzPmLLe-GRxLC1imJNmrJWy5m23Rz_9h67DHKfSnWYlKijfKVGo04WyMaQUcdAliI2JO12D3m9D77PX--z1v20UxcdH37nfoDvwT_EXQCzAbz_i7jk_fXl2ffHk_GERrlMO8SBsulYqBYz_BcDjngo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2312060796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Divergent host plant utilization by adults and offspring is related to intra-plant variation in chemical defences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><creator>Mason, Charles J. ; Long, David C. ; Lindroth, Richard L. ; Hoover, Kelli</creator><contributor>Behmer, Spencer</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mason, Charles J. ; Long, David C. ; Lindroth, Richard L. ; Hoover, Kelli ; Behmer, Spencer</creatorcontrib><description>Adult and juvenile herbivores of the same species can use divergent feeding strategies, and thus may inhabit and consume different parts of the plant. Because the expression of chemical defences often differs between host plant tissues, this variation may result in disparate performance outcomes for adult and juvenile conspecifics that feed on distinct dietary substrates. The goal of this study was to evaluate how host range may differ between adults and juveniles in a generalist herbivore. We addressed the impacts of among‐ and within‐plant defence variation using the wood‐feeding Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) and three host plants having a range of putative resistance. Impacts of host plants on adult and offspring performance were assessed using a series of controlled bioassays. We evaluated adult‐feeding and egg‐laying behaviours in choice and no‐choice experiments using the different hosts, and subsequent offspring establishment. We then evaluated host plant chemical composition related to nutrition and defence. Different plants had strong impacts on adult performance, but these patterns did not extend to effects on offspring. Females were capable of developing eggs when provided Acer rubrum, but not Populus deltoides or Populus tomentosa. Females that produced eggs by feeding on A. rubrum, however, deposited eggs into all three plant species. Larvae hatched and consumed tissues in all three hosts. The differences between adult and juvenile utilization of Populus spp. were reflected in markedly higher salicinoid phenolic concentrations in bark (&gt;2% dw), while wood had trace quantities. Our results demonstrate that plant resistance mechanisms can differentially act upon adult and juvenile life stages of a polyphagous herbivore when there is differential expression of chemical defences among plant tissue types. Anoplophora glabripennis has been a globally successful invader due in part to its broad host range, and our results suggest a mechanism that permits the beetle to exploit marginally resistant plants. This study has implications for how host range differs between insect feeding stages, which is particularly important for invasive, polyphagous species encountering novel food sources. This study demonstrates that variation of chemical expression between‐ and within‐plant substrates affects the patterns of colonization between life stages of herbivorous insects. These results have implications in the inferences of plant resistance, and the mechanisms that herbivores use to exploit diverse resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2656</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31297794</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley</publisher><subject>Adults ; Animals ; Anoplophora glabripennis ; Asian longhorned beetle ; Bark ; Bioassays ; Chemical composition ; chemical defences ; Chemical defense ; Coleoptera ; Conspecifics ; Diet ; Divergence ; Eggs ; Feeding ; Female ; Females ; Food sources ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; Host plants ; Host range ; Impact resistance ; Insects ; Introduced Species ; invasive ; Juveniles ; Larva ; Larvae ; maple ; Novel foods ; Nutrition ; Offspring ; Organic chemistry ; Ovum ; Pest resistance ; Phenolic compounds ; phenolic glycosides ; Phenols ; Plant nutrition ; Plant resistance ; Plant species ; Plant tissues ; poplar ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; salicinoids ; Species ; Substrates ; Variation ; wood borer</subject><ispartof>The Journal of animal ecology, 2019-11, Vol.88 (11), p.1789-1798</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors. © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2019 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society.</rights><rights>Journal of Animal Ecology © 2019 British Ecological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4353-aeb99420c4564526f2689007bdd0d607cdcd9cee019aeca02473732b438b0e083</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4353-aeb99420c4564526f2689007bdd0d607cdcd9cee019aeca02473732b438b0e083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9205-8511 ; 0000-0003-4587-7255 ; 0000-0002-9888-585X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1365-2656.13063$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1365-2656.13063$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46814</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31297794$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Behmer, Spencer</contributor><creatorcontrib>Mason, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindroth, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Kelli</creatorcontrib><title>Divergent host plant utilization by adults and offspring is related to intra-plant variation in chemical defences</title><title>The Journal of animal ecology</title><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><description>Adult and juvenile herbivores of the same species can use divergent feeding strategies, and thus may inhabit and consume different parts of the plant. Because the expression of chemical defences often differs between host plant tissues, this variation may result in disparate performance outcomes for adult and juvenile conspecifics that feed on distinct dietary substrates. The goal of this study was to evaluate how host range may differ between adults and juveniles in a generalist herbivore. We addressed the impacts of among‐ and within‐plant defence variation using the wood‐feeding Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) and three host plants having a range of putative resistance. Impacts of host plants on adult and offspring performance were assessed using a series of controlled bioassays. We evaluated adult‐feeding and egg‐laying behaviours in choice and no‐choice experiments using the different hosts, and subsequent offspring establishment. We then evaluated host plant chemical composition related to nutrition and defence. Different plants had strong impacts on adult performance, but these patterns did not extend to effects on offspring. Females were capable of developing eggs when provided Acer rubrum, but not Populus deltoides or Populus tomentosa. Females that produced eggs by feeding on A. rubrum, however, deposited eggs into all three plant species. Larvae hatched and consumed tissues in all three hosts. The differences between adult and juvenile utilization of Populus spp. were reflected in markedly higher salicinoid phenolic concentrations in bark (&gt;2% dw), while wood had trace quantities. Our results demonstrate that plant resistance mechanisms can differentially act upon adult and juvenile life stages of a polyphagous herbivore when there is differential expression of chemical defences among plant tissue types. Anoplophora glabripennis has been a globally successful invader due in part to its broad host range, and our results suggest a mechanism that permits the beetle to exploit marginally resistant plants. This study has implications for how host range differs between insect feeding stages, which is particularly important for invasive, polyphagous species encountering novel food sources. This study demonstrates that variation of chemical expression between‐ and within‐plant substrates affects the patterns of colonization between life stages of herbivorous insects. These results have implications in the inferences of plant resistance, and the mechanisms that herbivores use to exploit diverse resources.</description><subject>Adults</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anoplophora glabripennis</subject><subject>Asian longhorned beetle</subject><subject>Bark</subject><subject>Bioassays</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>chemical defences</subject><subject>Chemical defense</subject><subject>Coleoptera</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>Host plants</subject><subject>Host range</subject><subject>Impact resistance</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Introduced Species</subject><subject>invasive</subject><subject>Juveniles</subject><subject>Larva</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>maple</subject><subject>Novel foods</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Ovum</subject><subject>Pest resistance</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>phenolic glycosides</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Plant nutrition</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plant tissues</subject><subject>poplar</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>salicinoids</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>wood borer</subject><issn>0021-8790</issn><issn>1365-2656</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkc1v1DAQxS0EokvhzAlkiQuXtBM7seNjVcpHVbUXOFuOPWm9ysZb2yla_nq8pN0Dl_oylvV7zzNvCHlfw0ldzmnNRVsx0YqTmoPgL8jq8PKSrABYXXVSwRF5k9IaACQD_poc8ZopKVWzIvdf_APGW5wyvQsp0-1oynXOfvR_TPZhov2OGjePOVEzORqGIW2jn26pTzTiaDI6mgP1U46mWtQPJvpF6ydq73DjrRmpwwEni-kteTWYMeG7x3pMfn29-Hn-vbq6-fbj_Oyqsg1veWWwV6phYJtWNC0TAxOdKgP0zoETIK2zTllEqJVBa4A1kkvO-oZ3PSB0_Jh8Xny3MdzPmLLe-GRxLC1imJNmrJWy5m23Rz_9h67DHKfSnWYlKijfKVGo04WyMaQUcdAliI2JO12D3m9D77PX--z1v20UxcdH37nfoDvwT_EXQCzAbz_i7jk_fXl2ffHk_GERrlMO8SBsulYqBYz_BcDjngo</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Mason, Charles J.</creator><creator>Long, David C.</creator><creator>Lindroth, Richard L.</creator><creator>Hoover, Kelli</creator><general>Wiley</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9205-8511</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-7255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9888-585X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Divergent host plant utilization by adults and offspring is related to intra-plant variation in chemical defences</title><author>Mason, Charles J. ; Long, David C. ; Lindroth, Richard L. ; Hoover, Kelli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4353-aeb99420c4564526f2689007bdd0d607cdcd9cee019aeca02473732b438b0e083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adults</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anoplophora glabripennis</topic><topic>Asian longhorned beetle</topic><topic>Bark</topic><topic>Bioassays</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>chemical defences</topic><topic>Chemical defense</topic><topic>Coleoptera</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>Host plants</topic><topic>Host range</topic><topic>Impact resistance</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Introduced Species</topic><topic>invasive</topic><topic>Juveniles</topic><topic>Larva</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>maple</topic><topic>Novel foods</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Ovum</topic><topic>Pest resistance</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>phenolic glycosides</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Plant nutrition</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plant tissues</topic><topic>poplar</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>salicinoids</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>wood borer</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mason, Charles J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindroth, Richard L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoover, Kelli</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mason, Charles J.</au><au>Long, David C.</au><au>Lindroth, Richard L.</au><au>Hoover, Kelli</au><au>Behmer, Spencer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Divergent host plant utilization by adults and offspring is related to intra-plant variation in chemical defences</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of animal ecology</jtitle><addtitle>J Anim Ecol</addtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1789</spage><epage>1798</epage><pages>1789-1798</pages><issn>0021-8790</issn><eissn>1365-2656</eissn><abstract>Adult and juvenile herbivores of the same species can use divergent feeding strategies, and thus may inhabit and consume different parts of the plant. Because the expression of chemical defences often differs between host plant tissues, this variation may result in disparate performance outcomes for adult and juvenile conspecifics that feed on distinct dietary substrates. The goal of this study was to evaluate how host range may differ between adults and juveniles in a generalist herbivore. We addressed the impacts of among‐ and within‐plant defence variation using the wood‐feeding Asian longhorned beetle (Anoplophora glabripennis) and three host plants having a range of putative resistance. Impacts of host plants on adult and offspring performance were assessed using a series of controlled bioassays. We evaluated adult‐feeding and egg‐laying behaviours in choice and no‐choice experiments using the different hosts, and subsequent offspring establishment. We then evaluated host plant chemical composition related to nutrition and defence. Different plants had strong impacts on adult performance, but these patterns did not extend to effects on offspring. Females were capable of developing eggs when provided Acer rubrum, but not Populus deltoides or Populus tomentosa. Females that produced eggs by feeding on A. rubrum, however, deposited eggs into all three plant species. Larvae hatched and consumed tissues in all three hosts. The differences between adult and juvenile utilization of Populus spp. were reflected in markedly higher salicinoid phenolic concentrations in bark (&gt;2% dw), while wood had trace quantities. Our results demonstrate that plant resistance mechanisms can differentially act upon adult and juvenile life stages of a polyphagous herbivore when there is differential expression of chemical defences among plant tissue types. Anoplophora glabripennis has been a globally successful invader due in part to its broad host range, and our results suggest a mechanism that permits the beetle to exploit marginally resistant plants. This study has implications for how host range differs between insect feeding stages, which is particularly important for invasive, polyphagous species encountering novel food sources. This study demonstrates that variation of chemical expression between‐ and within‐plant substrates affects the patterns of colonization between life stages of herbivorous insects. These results have implications in the inferences of plant resistance, and the mechanisms that herbivores use to exploit diverse resources.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><pmid>31297794</pmid><doi>10.1111/1365-2656.13063</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9205-8511</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-7255</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9888-585X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8790
ispartof The Journal of animal ecology, 2019-11, Vol.88 (11), p.1789-1798
issn 0021-8790
1365-2656
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2257713588
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content
subjects Adults
Animals
Anoplophora glabripennis
Asian longhorned beetle
Bark
Bioassays
Chemical composition
chemical defences
Chemical defense
Coleoptera
Conspecifics
Diet
Divergence
Eggs
Feeding
Female
Females
Food sources
Herbivores
Herbivory
Host plants
Host range
Impact resistance
Insects
Introduced Species
invasive
Juveniles
Larva
Larvae
maple
Novel foods
Nutrition
Offspring
Organic chemistry
Ovum
Pest resistance
Phenolic compounds
phenolic glycosides
Phenols
Plant nutrition
Plant resistance
Plant species
Plant tissues
poplar
RESEARCH ARTICLE
salicinoids
Species
Substrates
Variation
wood borer
title Divergent host plant utilization by adults and offspring is related to intra-plant variation in chemical defences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T16%3A27%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Divergent%20host%20plant%20utilization%20by%20adults%20and%20offspring%20is%20related%20to%20intra-plant%20variation%20in%20chemical%20defences&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20animal%20ecology&rft.au=Mason,%20Charles%20J.&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1789&rft.epage=1798&rft.pages=1789-1798&rft.issn=0021-8790&rft.eissn=1365-2656&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2656.13063&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48579902%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2312060796&rft_id=info:pmid/31297794&rft_jstor_id=48579902&rfr_iscdi=true