Supported self-help to prevent relapse or recurrence of depression: Who benefits most?
•Supported self-help Preventive Cognitive Therapy aims to prevent relapse of depression.•S-PCT was effective in a broad range of participants.•S-PCT was cost-effective in participants with 2–3 depressive episodes.•S-PCT was not likely to be cost-effective in participants with ≥4 episodes.•S-PCT may...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of affective disorders 2019-10, Vol.257, p.180-186 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Supported self-help Preventive Cognitive Therapy aims to prevent relapse of depression.•S-PCT was effective in a broad range of participants.•S-PCT was cost-effective in participants with 2–3 depressive episodes.•S-PCT was not likely to be cost-effective in participants with ≥4 episodes.•S-PCT may best be offered to participants with fewer previous depressive episodes.
This study aimed to identify subgroups for whom supported self-help preventive cognitive therapy (S-PCT) is more (cost)effective than treatment as usual (TAU) in preventing relapse and recurrence of major depression.
We conducted a randomized controlled trial in which 248 remitted, recurrently depressed participants were randomized to S-PCT (n = 124) or TAU (n = 124). Clinical outcome was relapse or recurrence of major depressive disorder (SCID-I). We tested the moderating effects on relapse or recurrence of age, gender, education level, residual depressive symptoms, number of previous episodes, age of onset, antidepressant medication, somatization, and self-efficacy with logistic regression analyses adjusted for baseline values of depressive symptoms. We examined moderating effects on costs using linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline costs. A stratified cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to tease out differences in cost-effectiveness between subgroups.
We found no moderating effect on relapse or recurrence for any of the potential moderators. For costs, the number of previous depressive episodes was identified as a moderator. At a willingness-to-pay of 16,000€, the probability that S-PCT was cost-effective compared to TAU was 95% for participants with 2–3 episodes and 11% for participants with ≥4 episodes.
Participants and counselors were not blinded. The study was primarily designed to assess the (cost)effectiveness of S-PCT and not to conduct moderation analyses.
S-PCT was effective in preventing relapse or recurrence of depressive disorders in a broad range of participants, but is more likely to be cost-effective in participants with 2–3 episodes than ≥4 episodes. This indicates that S-PCT can best be offered to participants with fewer previous depressive episodes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jad.2019.07.006 |