Pattern and scale: evaluating generalities in crab distributions and marsh dynamics from small plots to a national scale
The generality of ecological patterns depends inextricably on the scale at which they are examined. We investigated patterns of crab distribution and the relationship between crabs and vegetation in salt marshes at multiple scales. By using consistent monitoring protocols across 15 U.S. National Est...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecology (Durham) 2019-10, Vol.100 (10), p.1-17 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Ecology (Durham) |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Wasson, Kerstin Raposa, Kenneth Almeida, Monica Beheshti, Kathryn Crooks, Jeffrey A. Deck, Anna Dix, Nikki Garvey, Caitlin Goldstein, Jason Johnson, David Samuel Lerberg, Scott Marcum, Pamela Peter, Christopher Puckett, Brandon Schmitt, Jenni Smith, Erik St. Laurent, Kari Swanson, Katie Tyrrell, Megan Guy, Rachel |
description | The generality of ecological patterns depends inextricably on the scale at which they are examined. We investigated patterns of crab distribution and the relationship between crabs and vegetation in salt marshes at multiple scales. By using consistent monitoring protocols across 15 U.S. National Estuarine Research Reserves, we were able to synthesize patterns from the scale of quadrats to the entire marsh landscape to regional and national scales. Some generalities emerged across marshes from our overall models, and these are useful for informing broad coastal management policy. We found that crab burrow distribution within a marsh could be predicted by marsh elevation, distance to creek and soil compressibility. While these physical factors also affected marsh vegetation cover, we did not find a strong or consistent overall effect of crabs at a broad scale in our multivariate model, though regressions conducted separately for each site revealed that crab burrows were negatively correlated with vegetation cover at 4 out of 15 sites. This contrasts with recent smaller-scale studies and meta-analyses synthesizing such studies that detected strong negative effects of crabs on marshes, likely because we sampled across the entire marsh landscape, while targeted studies are typically limited to low-lying areas near creeks, where crab burrow densities are highest. Our results suggest that sea-level rise generally poses a bigger threat to marshes than crabs, but there will likely be interactions between these physical and biological factors. Beyond these generalities across marshes, we detected some regional differences in crab community composition, richness, and abundance. However, we found striking differences among sites within regions, and within sites, in terms of crab abundance and relationships to marsh integrity. Although generalities are broadly useful, our findings indicate that local managers cannot rely on data from other nearby systems, but rather need local information for developing salt marsh management strategies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/ecy.2813 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2256108035</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26797830</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26797830</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-22f3da8139bdd0b74542b02abc7482f85d84ae00cc8a4e1c923c2286f441bb23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9LwzAYx_EgiptT0BegDLx46XzyJGmTo4z5BwZ62MVTSNIUNrpWkxbZuzdjc4JgLrl8-Cb8CLmkMKEAeO_dZoKSsiMypIqpTNECjskQgGKmciEH5CzGFaRDuTwlA0ZRUZ7nQ3L1ZrrOh2ZsmnIcnan9OTmpTB39xf4ekcXjbDF9zuavTy_Th3nmOAiWIVasNOlNZcsSbMEFRwtorCu4xEqKUnLjAZyThnvqFDKHKPOKc2otshG522U_QvvZ-9jp9TI6X9em8W0fNaLIKUhgItHbP3TV9qFJn0tKKc6V4PI36EIbY_CV_gjLtQkbTUFvV9JpJb1dKdGbfbC3a18e4M8sCWQ78LWs_ebfkJ5N3_fB651fxa4NB495oQrJgH0D67d2GA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299449548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pattern and scale: evaluating generalities in crab distributions and marsh dynamics from small plots to a national scale</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Wasson, Kerstin ; Raposa, Kenneth ; Almeida, Monica ; Beheshti, Kathryn ; Crooks, Jeffrey A. ; Deck, Anna ; Dix, Nikki ; Garvey, Caitlin ; Goldstein, Jason ; Johnson, David Samuel ; Lerberg, Scott ; Marcum, Pamela ; Peter, Christopher ; Puckett, Brandon ; Schmitt, Jenni ; Smith, Erik ; St. Laurent, Kari ; Swanson, Katie ; Tyrrell, Megan ; Guy, Rachel</creator><creatorcontrib>Wasson, Kerstin ; Raposa, Kenneth ; Almeida, Monica ; Beheshti, Kathryn ; Crooks, Jeffrey A. ; Deck, Anna ; Dix, Nikki ; Garvey, Caitlin ; Goldstein, Jason ; Johnson, David Samuel ; Lerberg, Scott ; Marcum, Pamela ; Peter, Christopher ; Puckett, Brandon ; Schmitt, Jenni ; Smith, Erik ; St. Laurent, Kari ; Swanson, Katie ; Tyrrell, Megan ; Guy, Rachel</creatorcontrib><description>The generality of ecological patterns depends inextricably on the scale at which they are examined. We investigated patterns of crab distribution and the relationship between crabs and vegetation in salt marshes at multiple scales. By using consistent monitoring protocols across 15 U.S. National Estuarine Research Reserves, we were able to synthesize patterns from the scale of quadrats to the entire marsh landscape to regional and national scales. Some generalities emerged across marshes from our overall models, and these are useful for informing broad coastal management policy. We found that crab burrow distribution within a marsh could be predicted by marsh elevation, distance to creek and soil compressibility. While these physical factors also affected marsh vegetation cover, we did not find a strong or consistent overall effect of crabs at a broad scale in our multivariate model, though regressions conducted separately for each site revealed that crab burrows were negatively correlated with vegetation cover at 4 out of 15 sites. This contrasts with recent smaller-scale studies and meta-analyses synthesizing such studies that detected strong negative effects of crabs on marshes, likely because we sampled across the entire marsh landscape, while targeted studies are typically limited to low-lying areas near creeks, where crab burrow densities are highest. Our results suggest that sea-level rise generally poses a bigger threat to marshes than crabs, but there will likely be interactions between these physical and biological factors. Beyond these generalities across marshes, we detected some regional differences in crab community composition, richness, and abundance. However, we found striking differences among sites within regions, and within sites, in terms of crab abundance and relationships to marsh integrity. Although generalities are broadly useful, our findings indicate that local managers cannot rely on data from other nearby systems, but rather need local information for developing salt marsh management strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ecy.2813</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31291466</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley and Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Animals ; Brachyura ; Burrows ; Coastal management ; Coastal zone management ; Community composition ; Compressibility ; conservation ; consumer ; Creeks ; Crustaceans ; decapod crustacean ; Decapoda ; Ecology ; Estuaries ; Landscape ; long‐term monitoring ; Marsh management ; National Estuarine Research Reserves ; Physical factors ; plant–herbivore interactions ; Regression analysis ; salt marsh ; Salt marshes ; Sea level rise ; Soil ; Soil compressibility ; Synthesis ; Vegetation ; Vegetation cover ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 2019-10, Vol.100 (10), p.1-17</ispartof><rights>2019 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>2019 by the Ecological Society of America.</rights><rights>2019 Ecological Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-22f3da8139bdd0b74542b02abc7482f85d84ae00cc8a4e1c923c2286f441bb23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-22f3da8139bdd0b74542b02abc7482f85d84ae00cc8a4e1c923c2286f441bb23</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9998-3881 ; 0000-0002-1858-4505 ; 0000-0002-0063-5167 ; 0000-0001-9615-6242 ; 0000-0002-3995-7972 ; 0000-0002-7898-4893</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26797830$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26797830$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27903,27904,45553,45554,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31291466$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wasson, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raposa, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beheshti, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crooks, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deck, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dix, Nikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvey, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerberg, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcum, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puckett, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Jenni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Laurent, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrell, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, Rachel</creatorcontrib><title>Pattern and scale: evaluating generalities in crab distributions and marsh dynamics from small plots to a national scale</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><description>The generality of ecological patterns depends inextricably on the scale at which they are examined. We investigated patterns of crab distribution and the relationship between crabs and vegetation in salt marshes at multiple scales. By using consistent monitoring protocols across 15 U.S. National Estuarine Research Reserves, we were able to synthesize patterns from the scale of quadrats to the entire marsh landscape to regional and national scales. Some generalities emerged across marshes from our overall models, and these are useful for informing broad coastal management policy. We found that crab burrow distribution within a marsh could be predicted by marsh elevation, distance to creek and soil compressibility. While these physical factors also affected marsh vegetation cover, we did not find a strong or consistent overall effect of crabs at a broad scale in our multivariate model, though regressions conducted separately for each site revealed that crab burrows were negatively correlated with vegetation cover at 4 out of 15 sites. This contrasts with recent smaller-scale studies and meta-analyses synthesizing such studies that detected strong negative effects of crabs on marshes, likely because we sampled across the entire marsh landscape, while targeted studies are typically limited to low-lying areas near creeks, where crab burrow densities are highest. Our results suggest that sea-level rise generally poses a bigger threat to marshes than crabs, but there will likely be interactions between these physical and biological factors. Beyond these generalities across marshes, we detected some regional differences in crab community composition, richness, and abundance. However, we found striking differences among sites within regions, and within sites, in terms of crab abundance and relationships to marsh integrity. Although generalities are broadly useful, our findings indicate that local managers cannot rely on data from other nearby systems, but rather need local information for developing salt marsh management strategies.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Brachyura</subject><subject>Burrows</subject><subject>Coastal management</subject><subject>Coastal zone management</subject><subject>Community composition</subject><subject>Compressibility</subject><subject>conservation</subject><subject>consumer</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>decapod crustacean</subject><subject>Decapoda</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>long‐term monitoring</subject><subject>Marsh management</subject><subject>National Estuarine Research Reserves</subject><subject>Physical factors</subject><subject>plant–herbivore interactions</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>salt marsh</subject><subject>Salt marshes</subject><subject>Sea level rise</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil compressibility</subject><subject>Synthesis</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation cover</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E9LwzAYx_EgiptT0BegDLx46XzyJGmTo4z5BwZ62MVTSNIUNrpWkxbZuzdjc4JgLrl8-Cb8CLmkMKEAeO_dZoKSsiMypIqpTNECjskQgGKmciEH5CzGFaRDuTwlA0ZRUZ7nQ3L1ZrrOh2ZsmnIcnan9OTmpTB39xf4ekcXjbDF9zuavTy_Th3nmOAiWIVasNOlNZcsSbMEFRwtorCu4xEqKUnLjAZyThnvqFDKHKPOKc2otshG522U_QvvZ-9jp9TI6X9em8W0fNaLIKUhgItHbP3TV9qFJn0tKKc6V4PI36EIbY_CV_gjLtQkbTUFvV9JpJb1dKdGbfbC3a18e4M8sCWQ78LWs_ebfkJ5N3_fB651fxa4NB495oQrJgH0D67d2GA</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Wasson, Kerstin</creator><creator>Raposa, Kenneth</creator><creator>Almeida, Monica</creator><creator>Beheshti, Kathryn</creator><creator>Crooks, Jeffrey A.</creator><creator>Deck, Anna</creator><creator>Dix, Nikki</creator><creator>Garvey, Caitlin</creator><creator>Goldstein, Jason</creator><creator>Johnson, David Samuel</creator><creator>Lerberg, Scott</creator><creator>Marcum, Pamela</creator><creator>Peter, Christopher</creator><creator>Puckett, Brandon</creator><creator>Schmitt, Jenni</creator><creator>Smith, Erik</creator><creator>St. Laurent, Kari</creator><creator>Swanson, Katie</creator><creator>Tyrrell, Megan</creator><creator>Guy, Rachel</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-3881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-4505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-5167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-6242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-7972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7898-4893</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Pattern and scale</title><author>Wasson, Kerstin ; Raposa, Kenneth ; Almeida, Monica ; Beheshti, Kathryn ; Crooks, Jeffrey A. ; Deck, Anna ; Dix, Nikki ; Garvey, Caitlin ; Goldstein, Jason ; Johnson, David Samuel ; Lerberg, Scott ; Marcum, Pamela ; Peter, Christopher ; Puckett, Brandon ; Schmitt, Jenni ; Smith, Erik ; St. Laurent, Kari ; Swanson, Katie ; Tyrrell, Megan ; Guy, Rachel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4053-22f3da8139bdd0b74542b02abc7482f85d84ae00cc8a4e1c923c2286f441bb23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Brachyura</topic><topic>Burrows</topic><topic>Coastal management</topic><topic>Coastal zone management</topic><topic>Community composition</topic><topic>Compressibility</topic><topic>conservation</topic><topic>consumer</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>decapod crustacean</topic><topic>Decapoda</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>long‐term monitoring</topic><topic>Marsh management</topic><topic>National Estuarine Research Reserves</topic><topic>Physical factors</topic><topic>plant–herbivore interactions</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>salt marsh</topic><topic>Salt marshes</topic><topic>Sea level rise</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil compressibility</topic><topic>Synthesis</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation cover</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wasson, Kerstin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raposa, Kenneth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Almeida, Monica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beheshti, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crooks, Jeffrey A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deck, Anna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dix, Nikki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garvey, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goldstein, Jason</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, David Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lerberg, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marcum, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peter, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puckett, Brandon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmitt, Jenni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Erik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>St. Laurent, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Swanson, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tyrrell, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guy, Rachel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wasson, Kerstin</au><au>Raposa, Kenneth</au><au>Almeida, Monica</au><au>Beheshti, Kathryn</au><au>Crooks, Jeffrey A.</au><au>Deck, Anna</au><au>Dix, Nikki</au><au>Garvey, Caitlin</au><au>Goldstein, Jason</au><au>Johnson, David Samuel</au><au>Lerberg, Scott</au><au>Marcum, Pamela</au><au>Peter, Christopher</au><au>Puckett, Brandon</au><au>Schmitt, Jenni</au><au>Smith, Erik</au><au>St. Laurent, Kari</au><au>Swanson, Katie</au><au>Tyrrell, Megan</au><au>Guy, Rachel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pattern and scale: evaluating generalities in crab distributions and marsh dynamics from small plots to a national scale</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><addtitle>Ecology</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>1-17</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><abstract>The generality of ecological patterns depends inextricably on the scale at which they are examined. We investigated patterns of crab distribution and the relationship between crabs and vegetation in salt marshes at multiple scales. By using consistent monitoring protocols across 15 U.S. National Estuarine Research Reserves, we were able to synthesize patterns from the scale of quadrats to the entire marsh landscape to regional and national scales. Some generalities emerged across marshes from our overall models, and these are useful for informing broad coastal management policy. We found that crab burrow distribution within a marsh could be predicted by marsh elevation, distance to creek and soil compressibility. While these physical factors also affected marsh vegetation cover, we did not find a strong or consistent overall effect of crabs at a broad scale in our multivariate model, though regressions conducted separately for each site revealed that crab burrows were negatively correlated with vegetation cover at 4 out of 15 sites. This contrasts with recent smaller-scale studies and meta-analyses synthesizing such studies that detected strong negative effects of crabs on marshes, likely because we sampled across the entire marsh landscape, while targeted studies are typically limited to low-lying areas near creeks, where crab burrow densities are highest. Our results suggest that sea-level rise generally poses a bigger threat to marshes than crabs, but there will likely be interactions between these physical and biological factors. Beyond these generalities across marshes, we detected some regional differences in crab community composition, richness, and abundance. However, we found striking differences among sites within regions, and within sites, in terms of crab abundance and relationships to marsh integrity. Although generalities are broadly useful, our findings indicate that local managers cannot rely on data from other nearby systems, but rather need local information for developing salt marsh management strategies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>31291466</pmid><doi>10.1002/ecy.2813</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9998-3881</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1858-4505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-5167</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9615-6242</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-7972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7898-4893</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9658 |
ispartof | Ecology (Durham), 2019-10, Vol.100 (10), p.1-17 |
issn | 0012-9658 1939-9170 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2256108035 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; MEDLINE |
subjects | Abundance Animals Brachyura Burrows Coastal management Coastal zone management Community composition Compressibility conservation consumer Creeks Crustaceans decapod crustacean Decapoda Ecology Estuaries Landscape long‐term monitoring Marsh management National Estuarine Research Reserves Physical factors plant–herbivore interactions Regression analysis salt marsh Salt marshes Sea level rise Soil Soil compressibility Synthesis Vegetation Vegetation cover Wetlands |
title | Pattern and scale: evaluating generalities in crab distributions and marsh dynamics from small plots to a national scale |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A18%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pattern%20and%20scale:%20evaluating%20generalities%20in%20crab%20distributions%20and%20marsh%20dynamics%20from%20small%20plots%20to%20a%20national%20scale&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Wasson,%20Kerstin&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=1-17&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ecy.2813&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26797830%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299449548&rft_id=info:pmid/31291466&rft_jstor_id=26797830&rfr_iscdi=true |