Considerations for Optimal Trial Design for Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention Studies
The field of rheumatology has made major contributions to medicine through the identification of cellular and molecular targets and with the development of therapies for the treatment of an impressive range of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. In recent years new milestones have been achieved. The...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical therapeutics 2019-07, Vol.41 (7), p.1299-1311 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1311 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1299 |
container_title | Clinical therapeutics |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Cope, Andrew P. |
description | The field of rheumatology has made major contributions to medicine through the identification of cellular and molecular targets and with the development of therapies for the treatment of an impressive range of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. In recent years new milestones have been achieved. These include the recognition of an “at risk” state, defined by distinct clusters of characteristics, including disease-specific autoantibodies in serum and symptom complexes that include inflammatory joint pain. Studies seeking to prevent high-risk individuals from progressing to a state of clinically apparent arthritis have been initiated. Here, exploiting the current evidence base, an experimental framework to inform trial design is described, taking into consideration study patient phenotypes and highlighting the impact of risk stratification and the options available for therapeutic intervention according to the different phases of the preclinical syndrome. Pragmatic primary end points and suggestions for a set of risk-focused trial outcome measures are proposed, including both clinical assessments and patient-reported outcome measures. Rheumatoid arthritis prevention studies provide an important experimental framework for generating deeper insights into risk stratification and for refining trial design in the future. To this end, a research agenda is suggested, together with some considerations for imaging and for biological sampling. This commentary concludes with some of the operational issues that arise from such studies and addresses some of the challenges associated with recruitment and retention of the at-risk trial participant. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2254504150</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S014929181930178X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2252658185</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-bc441b638725e05893cf92a4414abd7078a84d87267640fb477163906b2a7cd93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2Kqmxp_0KJxIVLgu3487jalrYSEhVQqTfLsSddr7LJYjtI_fd4WcqBCxePNfPMa-tB6JTghmAiLjaNG8KY1xBtQzHRDWYNJuwdWhAldU0I-3OEFqWja6qJOkYfU9pgjFvN6Qd03BKiheB4gW5X05iCLzk5lFvVT7G63uWwtUN1F0M5v0IKf8enwc0a5q3NU_DVMuZ1DDmk6leEBxj329Vtnn2A9Am97-2Q4PNzPUG_L7_drX7UV9fff66WV7VjTOW6K4V0olWScsBc6db1mtrSZLbzEktlFfNlKqRguO-YlES0GouOWum8bk_Q-SF3F6f7GVI225AcDIMdYZqToZQzjhnhuKBnr9DNNMex_G5PUcEVUbxQ8kC5OKUUoTe7WEzEf4Zgs_duNubFu9l7N5iZYrlsfnnOn7st-Je9_6ILsDwAUIQ8BIgmuQCjAx8iuGz8FN585BHVvJcs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2252658185</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Considerations for Optimal Trial Design for Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention Studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Cope, Andrew P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cope, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><description>The field of rheumatology has made major contributions to medicine through the identification of cellular and molecular targets and with the development of therapies for the treatment of an impressive range of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. In recent years new milestones have been achieved. These include the recognition of an “at risk” state, defined by distinct clusters of characteristics, including disease-specific autoantibodies in serum and symptom complexes that include inflammatory joint pain. Studies seeking to prevent high-risk individuals from progressing to a state of clinically apparent arthritis have been initiated. Here, exploiting the current evidence base, an experimental framework to inform trial design is described, taking into consideration study patient phenotypes and highlighting the impact of risk stratification and the options available for therapeutic intervention according to the different phases of the preclinical syndrome. Pragmatic primary end points and suggestions for a set of risk-focused trial outcome measures are proposed, including both clinical assessments and patient-reported outcome measures. Rheumatoid arthritis prevention studies provide an important experimental framework for generating deeper insights into risk stratification and for refining trial design in the future. To this end, a research agenda is suggested, together with some considerations for imaging and for biological sampling. This commentary concludes with some of the operational issues that arise from such studies and addresses some of the challenges associated with recruitment and retention of the at-risk trial participant.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-2918</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.014</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31196650</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - pharmacology ; Arthritis ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy ; Arthritis, Rheumatoid - prevention & control ; Autoantibodies ; Biological sampling ; Clinical Protocols ; Clinical trails ; Clinical trials ; Clinical Trials as Topic ; Design ; Disease prevention ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Intervention ; Laboratories ; Lifestyles ; Pain ; Patient Selection ; Patients ; Phenotypes ; Prevention ; Questionnaires ; Rheumatoid arthritis ; Rheumatology ; Risk ; Studies ; Trial design</subject><ispartof>Clinical therapeutics, 2019-07, Vol.41 (7), p.1299-1311</ispartof><rights>2019</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jul 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-bc441b638725e05893cf92a4414abd7078a84d87267640fb477163906b2a7cd93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-bc441b638725e05893cf92a4414abd7078a84d87267640fb477163906b2a7cd93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2252658185?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31196650$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cope, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><title>Considerations for Optimal Trial Design for Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention Studies</title><title>Clinical therapeutics</title><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><description>The field of rheumatology has made major contributions to medicine through the identification of cellular and molecular targets and with the development of therapies for the treatment of an impressive range of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. In recent years new milestones have been achieved. These include the recognition of an “at risk” state, defined by distinct clusters of characteristics, including disease-specific autoantibodies in serum and symptom complexes that include inflammatory joint pain. Studies seeking to prevent high-risk individuals from progressing to a state of clinically apparent arthritis have been initiated. Here, exploiting the current evidence base, an experimental framework to inform trial design is described, taking into consideration study patient phenotypes and highlighting the impact of risk stratification and the options available for therapeutic intervention according to the different phases of the preclinical syndrome. Pragmatic primary end points and suggestions for a set of risk-focused trial outcome measures are proposed, including both clinical assessments and patient-reported outcome measures. Rheumatoid arthritis prevention studies provide an important experimental framework for generating deeper insights into risk stratification and for refining trial design in the future. To this end, a research agenda is suggested, together with some considerations for imaging and for biological sampling. This commentary concludes with some of the operational issues that arise from such studies and addresses some of the challenges associated with recruitment and retention of the at-risk trial participant.</description><subject>Antirheumatic Agents - pharmacology</subject><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</subject><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - prevention & control</subject><subject>Autoantibodies</subject><subject>Biological sampling</subject><subject>Clinical Protocols</subject><subject>Clinical trails</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clinical Trials as Topic</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Lifestyles</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Phenotypes</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rheumatoid arthritis</subject><subject>Rheumatology</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Trial design</subject><issn>0149-2918</issn><issn>1879-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1P3DAQhq2Kqmxp_0KJxIVLgu3487jalrYSEhVQqTfLsSddr7LJYjtI_fd4WcqBCxePNfPMa-tB6JTghmAiLjaNG8KY1xBtQzHRDWYNJuwdWhAldU0I-3OEFqWja6qJOkYfU9pgjFvN6Qd03BKiheB4gW5X05iCLzk5lFvVT7G63uWwtUN1F0M5v0IKf8enwc0a5q3NU_DVMuZ1DDmk6leEBxj329Vtnn2A9Am97-2Q4PNzPUG_L7_drX7UV9fff66WV7VjTOW6K4V0olWScsBc6db1mtrSZLbzEktlFfNlKqRguO-YlES0GouOWum8bk_Q-SF3F6f7GVI225AcDIMdYZqToZQzjhnhuKBnr9DNNMex_G5PUcEVUbxQ8kC5OKUUoTe7WEzEf4Zgs_duNubFu9l7N5iZYrlsfnnOn7st-Je9_6ILsDwAUIQ8BIgmuQCjAx8iuGz8FN585BHVvJcs</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Cope, Andrew P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Considerations for Optimal Trial Design for Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention Studies</title><author>Cope, Andrew P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-bc441b638725e05893cf92a4414abd7078a84d87267640fb477163906b2a7cd93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antirheumatic Agents - pharmacology</topic><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy</topic><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - prevention & control</topic><topic>Autoantibodies</topic><topic>Biological sampling</topic><topic>Clinical Protocols</topic><topic>Clinical trails</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clinical Trials as Topic</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Lifestyles</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Phenotypes</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rheumatoid arthritis</topic><topic>Rheumatology</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Trial design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cope, Andrew P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cope, Andrew P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Considerations for Optimal Trial Design for Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention Studies</atitle><jtitle>Clinical therapeutics</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Ther</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1299</spage><epage>1311</epage><pages>1299-1311</pages><issn>0149-2918</issn><eissn>1879-114X</eissn><abstract>The field of rheumatology has made major contributions to medicine through the identification of cellular and molecular targets and with the development of therapies for the treatment of an impressive range of immune-mediated rheumatic diseases. In recent years new milestones have been achieved. These include the recognition of an “at risk” state, defined by distinct clusters of characteristics, including disease-specific autoantibodies in serum and symptom complexes that include inflammatory joint pain. Studies seeking to prevent high-risk individuals from progressing to a state of clinically apparent arthritis have been initiated. Here, exploiting the current evidence base, an experimental framework to inform trial design is described, taking into consideration study patient phenotypes and highlighting the impact of risk stratification and the options available for therapeutic intervention according to the different phases of the preclinical syndrome. Pragmatic primary end points and suggestions for a set of risk-focused trial outcome measures are proposed, including both clinical assessments and patient-reported outcome measures. Rheumatoid arthritis prevention studies provide an important experimental framework for generating deeper insights into risk stratification and for refining trial design in the future. To this end, a research agenda is suggested, together with some considerations for imaging and for biological sampling. This commentary concludes with some of the operational issues that arise from such studies and addresses some of the challenges associated with recruitment and retention of the at-risk trial participant.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31196650</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.014</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-2918 |
ispartof | Clinical therapeutics, 2019-07, Vol.41 (7), p.1299-1311 |
issn | 0149-2918 1879-114X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2254504150 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Antirheumatic Agents - pharmacology Arthritis Arthritis, Rheumatoid - drug therapy Arthritis, Rheumatoid - prevention & control Autoantibodies Biological sampling Clinical Protocols Clinical trails Clinical trials Clinical Trials as Topic Design Disease prevention Humans Inflammation Intervention Laboratories Lifestyles Pain Patient Selection Patients Phenotypes Prevention Questionnaires Rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology Risk Studies Trial design |
title | Considerations for Optimal Trial Design for Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention Studies |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T02%3A47%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Considerations%20for%20Optimal%20Trial%20Design%20for%20Rheumatoid%20Arthritis%20Prevention%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20therapeutics&rft.au=Cope,%20Andrew%20P.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1299&rft.epage=1311&rft.pages=1299-1311&rft.issn=0149-2918&rft.eissn=1879-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.04.014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2252658185%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2252658185&rft_id=info:pmid/31196650&rft_els_id=S014929181930178X&rfr_iscdi=true |