New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring

Hemodynamic monitoring is an essential part of the perioperative management of the cardiovascular patient. It helps to detect hemodynamic alterations, diagnose their underlying causes, and optimize oxygen delivery to the tissues. Furthermore, hemodynamic monitoring is necessary to evaluate the adequ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia 2019-08, Vol.33, p.S67-S72
Hauptverfasser: Scheeren, Thomas W.L., Ramsay, Michael A.E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page S72
container_issue
container_start_page S67
container_title Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia
container_volume 33
creator Scheeren, Thomas W.L.
Ramsay, Michael A.E.
description Hemodynamic monitoring is an essential part of the perioperative management of the cardiovascular patient. It helps to detect hemodynamic alterations, diagnose their underlying causes, and optimize oxygen delivery to the tissues. Furthermore, hemodynamic monitoring is necessary to evaluate the adequacy of therapeutic interventions such as volume expansion or vasoactive medications. Recent developments include the move from static to dynamic variables to assess conditions such as cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness and the transition to less-invasive or even noninvasive monitoring techniques, at least in the perioperative setting. This review describes the available techniques that currently are being used in the care of the cardiovascular patient and discusses their strengths and limitations. Even though the thermodilution method remains the gold standard for measuring cardiac output (CO), the use of the pulmonary artery catheter has declined over the last decades, even in the setting of cardiovascular anesthesia. The transpulmonary thermodilution method, in addition to accurately measuring CO, provides the user with some additional helpful variables, of which extravascular lung water is probably the most interesting. Less-invasive monitoring techniques use, for example, pulse contour analysis to originate flow-derived variables such as stroke volume and CO from the arterial pressure signal, or they may measure the velocity-time integral in the descending aorta to estimate the stroke volume, using, for example, the esophageal Doppler. Completely noninvasive methods such as the volume clamp method use finger cuffs to reconstruct the arterial pressure waveform, from which stroke volume and CO are calculated. All of these less-invasive CO monitoring devices have percentage errors around 40% compared with reference methods (thermodilution), meaning that the values are not interchangeable.
doi_str_mv 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.043
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253842782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1053077019303039</els_id><sourcerecordid>2253842782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e59f68deea5ad98a375ea24fa3d3021b937ce0d0f28e3f51a2754e5dd5097ebf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotlb_gAuZpQgz3iQTMwNupD4qVN3oOqTJHckwj5pMK_33prS6dHXv4jsHzkfIOYWMguDXdVavjc4Y0DIDnkHOD8iYCs7SImfsMP6RSkFKGJGTEGoASoWQx2TEKZMlF2JMrl7xO7nHNTb9ssVuCInrkhm2vd10unUmeek7N_TedZ-n5KjSTcCz_Z2Qj8eH9-ksnb89PU_v5qnJAYYURVndFBZRC23LQnMpULO80txyYHRRcmkQLFSsQF4JqpkUOQprBZQSFxWfkMtd79L3XysMg2pdMNg0usN-FRRjgseBsmARZTvU-D4Ej5Vaetdqv1EU1Ha9qtXWkdo6UsBVdBRDF_v-1aJF-xf5lRKB2x2AceXaoVfBOOwMWufRDMr27r_-Hzcld0c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253842782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Scheeren, Thomas W.L. ; Ramsay, Michael A.E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Scheeren, Thomas W.L. ; Ramsay, Michael A.E.</creatorcontrib><description>Hemodynamic monitoring is an essential part of the perioperative management of the cardiovascular patient. It helps to detect hemodynamic alterations, diagnose their underlying causes, and optimize oxygen delivery to the tissues. Furthermore, hemodynamic monitoring is necessary to evaluate the adequacy of therapeutic interventions such as volume expansion or vasoactive medications. Recent developments include the move from static to dynamic variables to assess conditions such as cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness and the transition to less-invasive or even noninvasive monitoring techniques, at least in the perioperative setting. This review describes the available techniques that currently are being used in the care of the cardiovascular patient and discusses their strengths and limitations. Even though the thermodilution method remains the gold standard for measuring cardiac output (CO), the use of the pulmonary artery catheter has declined over the last decades, even in the setting of cardiovascular anesthesia. The transpulmonary thermodilution method, in addition to accurately measuring CO, provides the user with some additional helpful variables, of which extravascular lung water is probably the most interesting. Less-invasive monitoring techniques use, for example, pulse contour analysis to originate flow-derived variables such as stroke volume and CO from the arterial pressure signal, or they may measure the velocity-time integral in the descending aorta to estimate the stroke volume, using, for example, the esophageal Doppler. Completely noninvasive methods such as the volume clamp method use finger cuffs to reconstruct the arterial pressure waveform, from which stroke volume and CO are calculated. All of these less-invasive CO monitoring devices have percentage errors around 40% compared with reference methods (thermodilution), meaning that the values are not interchangeable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-0770</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8422</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.043</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31279355</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>cardiac output ; cardiovascular dynamics ; fluid responsiveness ; hemodynamic monitoring ; measurement techniques ; predictive analytics ; preload</subject><ispartof>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2019-08, Vol.33, p.S67-S72</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e59f68deea5ad98a375ea24fa3d3021b937ce0d0f28e3f51a2754e5dd5097ebf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e59f68deea5ad98a375ea24fa3d3021b937ce0d0f28e3f51a2754e5dd5097ebf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077019303039$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31279355$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scheeren, Thomas W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Michael A.E.</creatorcontrib><title>New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring</title><title>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><description>Hemodynamic monitoring is an essential part of the perioperative management of the cardiovascular patient. It helps to detect hemodynamic alterations, diagnose their underlying causes, and optimize oxygen delivery to the tissues. Furthermore, hemodynamic monitoring is necessary to evaluate the adequacy of therapeutic interventions such as volume expansion or vasoactive medications. Recent developments include the move from static to dynamic variables to assess conditions such as cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness and the transition to less-invasive or even noninvasive monitoring techniques, at least in the perioperative setting. This review describes the available techniques that currently are being used in the care of the cardiovascular patient and discusses their strengths and limitations. Even though the thermodilution method remains the gold standard for measuring cardiac output (CO), the use of the pulmonary artery catheter has declined over the last decades, even in the setting of cardiovascular anesthesia. The transpulmonary thermodilution method, in addition to accurately measuring CO, provides the user with some additional helpful variables, of which extravascular lung water is probably the most interesting. Less-invasive monitoring techniques use, for example, pulse contour analysis to originate flow-derived variables such as stroke volume and CO from the arterial pressure signal, or they may measure the velocity-time integral in the descending aorta to estimate the stroke volume, using, for example, the esophageal Doppler. Completely noninvasive methods such as the volume clamp method use finger cuffs to reconstruct the arterial pressure waveform, from which stroke volume and CO are calculated. All of these less-invasive CO monitoring devices have percentage errors around 40% compared with reference methods (thermodilution), meaning that the values are not interchangeable.</description><subject>cardiac output</subject><subject>cardiovascular dynamics</subject><subject>fluid responsiveness</subject><subject>hemodynamic monitoring</subject><subject>measurement techniques</subject><subject>predictive analytics</subject><subject>preload</subject><issn>1053-0770</issn><issn>1532-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMotlb_gAuZpQgz3iQTMwNupD4qVN3oOqTJHckwj5pMK_33prS6dHXv4jsHzkfIOYWMguDXdVavjc4Y0DIDnkHOD8iYCs7SImfsMP6RSkFKGJGTEGoASoWQx2TEKZMlF2JMrl7xO7nHNTb9ssVuCInrkhm2vd10unUmeek7N_TedZ-n5KjSTcCz_Z2Qj8eH9-ksnb89PU_v5qnJAYYURVndFBZRC23LQnMpULO80txyYHRRcmkQLFSsQF4JqpkUOQprBZQSFxWfkMtd79L3XysMg2pdMNg0usN-FRRjgseBsmARZTvU-D4Ej5Vaetdqv1EU1Ha9qtXWkdo6UsBVdBRDF_v-1aJF-xf5lRKB2x2AceXaoVfBOOwMWufRDMr27r_-Hzcld0c</recordid><startdate>201908</startdate><enddate>201908</enddate><creator>Scheeren, Thomas W.L.</creator><creator>Ramsay, Michael A.E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201908</creationdate><title>New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring</title><author>Scheeren, Thomas W.L. ; Ramsay, Michael A.E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c400t-e59f68deea5ad98a375ea24fa3d3021b937ce0d0f28e3f51a2754e5dd5097ebf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>cardiac output</topic><topic>cardiovascular dynamics</topic><topic>fluid responsiveness</topic><topic>hemodynamic monitoring</topic><topic>measurement techniques</topic><topic>predictive analytics</topic><topic>preload</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scheeren, Thomas W.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsay, Michael A.E.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scheeren, Thomas W.L.</au><au>Ramsay, Michael A.E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring</atitle><jtitle>Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia</jtitle><addtitle>J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth</addtitle><date>2019-08</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>33</volume><spage>S67</spage><epage>S72</epage><pages>S67-S72</pages><issn>1053-0770</issn><eissn>1532-8422</eissn><abstract>Hemodynamic monitoring is an essential part of the perioperative management of the cardiovascular patient. It helps to detect hemodynamic alterations, diagnose their underlying causes, and optimize oxygen delivery to the tissues. Furthermore, hemodynamic monitoring is necessary to evaluate the adequacy of therapeutic interventions such as volume expansion or vasoactive medications. Recent developments include the move from static to dynamic variables to assess conditions such as cardiac preload and fluid responsiveness and the transition to less-invasive or even noninvasive monitoring techniques, at least in the perioperative setting. This review describes the available techniques that currently are being used in the care of the cardiovascular patient and discusses their strengths and limitations. Even though the thermodilution method remains the gold standard for measuring cardiac output (CO), the use of the pulmonary artery catheter has declined over the last decades, even in the setting of cardiovascular anesthesia. The transpulmonary thermodilution method, in addition to accurately measuring CO, provides the user with some additional helpful variables, of which extravascular lung water is probably the most interesting. Less-invasive monitoring techniques use, for example, pulse contour analysis to originate flow-derived variables such as stroke volume and CO from the arterial pressure signal, or they may measure the velocity-time integral in the descending aorta to estimate the stroke volume, using, for example, the esophageal Doppler. Completely noninvasive methods such as the volume clamp method use finger cuffs to reconstruct the arterial pressure waveform, from which stroke volume and CO are calculated. All of these less-invasive CO monitoring devices have percentage errors around 40% compared with reference methods (thermodilution), meaning that the values are not interchangeable.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31279355</pmid><doi>10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.043</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-0770
ispartof Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, 2019-08, Vol.33, p.S67-S72
issn 1053-0770
1532-8422
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253842782
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects cardiac output
cardiovascular dynamics
fluid responsiveness
hemodynamic monitoring
measurement techniques
predictive analytics
preload
title New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T06%3A41%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=New%20Developments%20in%20Hemodynamic%20Monitoring&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20cardiothoracic%20and%20vascular%20anesthesia&rft.au=Scheeren,%20Thomas%20W.L.&rft.date=2019-08&rft.volume=33&rft.spage=S67&rft.epage=S72&rft.pages=S67-S72&rft.issn=1053-0770&rft.eissn=1532-8422&rft_id=info:doi/10.1053/j.jvca.2019.03.043&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253842782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253842782&rft_id=info:pmid/31279355&rft_els_id=S1053077019303039&rfr_iscdi=true