An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)

The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicologic pathology 2019-07, Vol.47 (5), p.649-655
Hauptverfasser: Adams, Khary, Clemons, Donna, Impelluso, Lynn Collura, Lee, Donna, Maguire, Sean, Myers, Alexis, Petursson, Christopher, Schulingkamp, Robert, Trouba, Kevin, Wright, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 655
container_issue 5
container_start_page 649
container_title Toxicologic pathology
container_volume 47
creator Adams, Khary
Clemons, Donna
Impelluso, Lynn Collura
Lee, Donna
Maguire, Sean
Myers, Alexis
Petursson, Christopher
Schulingkamp, Robert
Trouba, Kevin
Wright, Matthew
description The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0192623319857976
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253834870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0192623319857976</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2253834870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-7df2c9690e1460023da5c52f57981d9b04cf00490148ad5bf60251e220be97a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1uEzEUhS0EoqGwZ4W8LBID1_b8eVlCSitVbSjpeuR47iQuGXuwPZH6yH0LPE3LAgnJkiWfc75rnUvIewafGauqL8AkL7kQTNZFJavyBZmxQoiMlcBektkkZ5N-RN6EcAfAapbDa3IkGK-hlHJGHk4tvfhB584G56MZe7pEHwbU0eyROktXW6Q_tUEbTWd0Mva9iREftXNUu7j9RBd2b7yzfTKpHVW2pYse_cbYDb0x4VegZ8Ym4Xow1qRYOjFRrxBb2jlPr5zdjr2ydOlNryIGaiz9alyPrdEpd4MBlddp0NK7dkxfS4RpygpDnIa47lkJj-_fcG90wpzcDm3iUQ6s-viWvOrULuC7p_uY3J4tVvPz7PL6-8X89DLTopIxq9qOa1lKQJaXAFy0qtAF71K_NWvlGnLdAeQSWF6rtlh3JfCCIeewRlkpJo7JyYE7ePd7TD9sehM07nbKohtDw3khapHXFSQrHKzauxA8ds0wNeDvGwbNtODm3wWnyIcn-rhO_fwNPG80GbKDIagNNndu9Kn68H_gHyQ1rwM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253834870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adams, Khary ; Clemons, Donna ; Impelluso, Lynn Collura ; Lee, Donna ; Maguire, Sean ; Myers, Alexis ; Petursson, Christopher ; Schulingkamp, Robert ; Trouba, Kevin ; Wright, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Khary ; Clemons, Donna ; Impelluso, Lynn Collura ; Lee, Donna ; Maguire, Sean ; Myers, Alexis ; Petursson, Christopher ; Schulingkamp, Robert ; Trouba, Kevin ; Wright, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-6233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-1601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0192623319857976</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31280699</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animal Use Alternatives - ethics ; Animal Use Alternatives - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Animal Use Alternatives - trends ; Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Bioethics ; Biomedical Research - ethics ; Biomedical Research - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Biomedical Research - methods ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - ethics ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - trends ; European Union ; Government Regulation ; Primates</subject><ispartof>Toxicologic pathology, 2019-07, Vol.47 (5), p.649-655</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-7df2c9690e1460023da5c52f57981d9b04cf00490148ad5bf60251e220be97a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-7df2c9690e1460023da5c52f57981d9b04cf00490148ad5bf60251e220be97a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4620-1161</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0192623319857976$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192623319857976$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31280699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Khary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemons, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Impelluso, Lynn Collura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petursson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulingkamp, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouba, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)</title><title>Toxicologic pathology</title><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><description>The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.</description><subject>Animal Use Alternatives - ethics</subject><subject>Animal Use Alternatives - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Animal Use Alternatives - trends</subject><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - ethics</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - trends</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Primates</subject><issn>0192-6233</issn><issn>1533-1601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1uEzEUhS0EoqGwZ4W8LBID1_b8eVlCSitVbSjpeuR47iQuGXuwPZH6yH0LPE3LAgnJkiWfc75rnUvIewafGauqL8AkL7kQTNZFJavyBZmxQoiMlcBektkkZ5N-RN6EcAfAapbDa3IkGK-hlHJGHk4tvfhB584G56MZe7pEHwbU0eyROktXW6Q_tUEbTWd0Mva9iREftXNUu7j9RBd2b7yzfTKpHVW2pYse_cbYDb0x4VegZ8Ym4Xow1qRYOjFRrxBb2jlPr5zdjr2ydOlNryIGaiz9alyPrdEpd4MBlddp0NK7dkxfS4RpygpDnIa47lkJj-_fcG90wpzcDm3iUQ6s-viWvOrULuC7p_uY3J4tVvPz7PL6-8X89DLTopIxq9qOa1lKQJaXAFy0qtAF71K_NWvlGnLdAeQSWF6rtlh3JfCCIeewRlkpJo7JyYE7ePd7TD9sehM07nbKohtDw3khapHXFSQrHKzauxA8ds0wNeDvGwbNtODm3wWnyIcn-rhO_fwNPG80GbKDIagNNndu9Kn68H_gHyQ1rwM</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Adams, Khary</creator><creator>Clemons, Donna</creator><creator>Impelluso, Lynn Collura</creator><creator>Lee, Donna</creator><creator>Maguire, Sean</creator><creator>Myers, Alexis</creator><creator>Petursson, Christopher</creator><creator>Schulingkamp, Robert</creator><creator>Trouba, Kevin</creator><creator>Wright, Matthew</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-1161</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)</title><author>Adams, Khary ; Clemons, Donna ; Impelluso, Lynn Collura ; Lee, Donna ; Maguire, Sean ; Myers, Alexis ; Petursson, Christopher ; Schulingkamp, Robert ; Trouba, Kevin ; Wright, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-7df2c9690e1460023da5c52f57981d9b04cf00490148ad5bf60251e220be97a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Use Alternatives - ethics</topic><topic>Animal Use Alternatives - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Animal Use Alternatives - trends</topic><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - ethics</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - trends</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Primates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Khary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemons, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Impelluso, Lynn Collura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petursson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulingkamp, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouba, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Khary</au><au>Clemons, Donna</au><au>Impelluso, Lynn Collura</au><au>Lee, Donna</au><au>Maguire, Sean</au><au>Myers, Alexis</au><au>Petursson, Christopher</au><au>Schulingkamp, Robert</au><au>Trouba, Kevin</au><au>Wright, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)</atitle><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>655</epage><pages>649-655</pages><issn>0192-6233</issn><eissn>1533-1601</eissn><abstract>The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31280699</pmid><doi>10.1177/0192623319857976</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-1161</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0192-6233
ispartof Toxicologic pathology, 2019-07, Vol.47 (5), p.649-655
issn 0192-6233
1533-1601
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253834870
source MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Animal Use Alternatives - ethics
Animal Use Alternatives - legislation & jurisprudence
Animal Use Alternatives - trends
Animal Welfare
Animals
Bioethics
Biomedical Research - ethics
Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence
Biomedical Research - methods
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - ethics
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods
Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - trends
European Union
Government Regulation
Primates
title An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T04%3A22%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20IQ%20Consortium%20Perspective%20on%20The%20Scientific%20Committee%20on%20Health,%20Environmental%20and%20Emerging%20Risks%20Final%20Opinion%20on%20the%20Need%20for%20Nonhuman%20Primates%20in%20Biomedical%20Research,%20Production%20and%20Testing%20of%20Products%20and%20Devices%20(Update%202017)&rft.jtitle=Toxicologic%20pathology&rft.au=Adams,%20Khary&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=655&rft.pages=649-655&rft.issn=0192-6233&rft.eissn=1533-1601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0192623319857976&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253834870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253834870&rft_id=info:pmid/31280699&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0192623319857976&rfr_iscdi=true