An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)
The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Toxicologic pathology 2019-07, Vol.47 (5), p.649-655 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 655 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 649 |
container_title | Toxicologic pathology |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Adams, Khary Clemons, Donna Impelluso, Lynn Collura Lee, Donna Maguire, Sean Myers, Alexis Petursson, Christopher Schulingkamp, Robert Trouba, Kevin Wright, Matthew |
description | The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0192623319857976 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253834870</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0192623319857976</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2253834870</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-7df2c9690e1460023da5c52f57981d9b04cf00490148ad5bf60251e220be97a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1uEzEUhS0EoqGwZ4W8LBID1_b8eVlCSitVbSjpeuR47iQuGXuwPZH6yH0LPE3LAgnJkiWfc75rnUvIewafGauqL8AkL7kQTNZFJavyBZmxQoiMlcBektkkZ5N-RN6EcAfAapbDa3IkGK-hlHJGHk4tvfhB584G56MZe7pEHwbU0eyROktXW6Q_tUEbTWd0Mva9iREftXNUu7j9RBd2b7yzfTKpHVW2pYse_cbYDb0x4VegZ8Ym4Xow1qRYOjFRrxBb2jlPr5zdjr2ydOlNryIGaiz9alyPrdEpd4MBlddp0NK7dkxfS4RpygpDnIa47lkJj-_fcG90wpzcDm3iUQ6s-viWvOrULuC7p_uY3J4tVvPz7PL6-8X89DLTopIxq9qOa1lKQJaXAFy0qtAF71K_NWvlGnLdAeQSWF6rtlh3JfCCIeewRlkpJo7JyYE7ePd7TD9sehM07nbKohtDw3khapHXFSQrHKzauxA8ds0wNeDvGwbNtODm3wWnyIcn-rhO_fwNPG80GbKDIagNNndu9Kn68H_gHyQ1rwM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253834870</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Adams, Khary ; Clemons, Donna ; Impelluso, Lynn Collura ; Lee, Donna ; Maguire, Sean ; Myers, Alexis ; Petursson, Christopher ; Schulingkamp, Robert ; Trouba, Kevin ; Wright, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Adams, Khary ; Clemons, Donna ; Impelluso, Lynn Collura ; Lee, Donna ; Maguire, Sean ; Myers, Alexis ; Petursson, Christopher ; Schulingkamp, Robert ; Trouba, Kevin ; Wright, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0192-6233</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-1601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0192623319857976</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31280699</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animal Use Alternatives - ethics ; Animal Use Alternatives - legislation & jurisprudence ; Animal Use Alternatives - trends ; Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Bioethics ; Biomedical Research - ethics ; Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence ; Biomedical Research - methods ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - ethics ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods ; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - trends ; European Union ; Government Regulation ; Primates</subject><ispartof>Toxicologic pathology, 2019-07, Vol.47 (5), p.649-655</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-7df2c9690e1460023da5c52f57981d9b04cf00490148ad5bf60251e220be97a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-7df2c9690e1460023da5c52f57981d9b04cf00490148ad5bf60251e220be97a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4620-1161</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0192623319857976$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0192623319857976$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31280699$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adams, Khary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemons, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Impelluso, Lynn Collura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petursson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulingkamp, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouba, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)</title><title>Toxicologic pathology</title><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><description>The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.</description><subject>Animal Use Alternatives - ethics</subject><subject>Animal Use Alternatives - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Animal Use Alternatives - trends</subject><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - ethics</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence</subject><subject>Biomedical Research - methods</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - ethics</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</subject><subject>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - trends</subject><subject>European Union</subject><subject>Government Regulation</subject><subject>Primates</subject><issn>0192-6233</issn><issn>1533-1601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1uEzEUhS0EoqGwZ4W8LBID1_b8eVlCSitVbSjpeuR47iQuGXuwPZH6yH0LPE3LAgnJkiWfc75rnUvIewafGauqL8AkL7kQTNZFJavyBZmxQoiMlcBektkkZ5N-RN6EcAfAapbDa3IkGK-hlHJGHk4tvfhB584G56MZe7pEHwbU0eyROktXW6Q_tUEbTWd0Mva9iREftXNUu7j9RBd2b7yzfTKpHVW2pYse_cbYDb0x4VegZ8Ym4Xow1qRYOjFRrxBb2jlPr5zdjr2ydOlNryIGaiz9alyPrdEpd4MBlddp0NK7dkxfS4RpygpDnIa47lkJj-_fcG90wpzcDm3iUQ6s-viWvOrULuC7p_uY3J4tVvPz7PL6-8X89DLTopIxq9qOa1lKQJaXAFy0qtAF71K_NWvlGnLdAeQSWF6rtlh3JfCCIeewRlkpJo7JyYE7ePd7TD9sehM07nbKohtDw3khapHXFSQrHKzauxA8ds0wNeDvGwbNtODm3wWnyIcn-rhO_fwNPG80GbKDIagNNndu9Kn68H_gHyQ1rwM</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Adams, Khary</creator><creator>Clemons, Donna</creator><creator>Impelluso, Lynn Collura</creator><creator>Lee, Donna</creator><creator>Maguire, Sean</creator><creator>Myers, Alexis</creator><creator>Petursson, Christopher</creator><creator>Schulingkamp, Robert</creator><creator>Trouba, Kevin</creator><creator>Wright, Matthew</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-1161</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)</title><author>Adams, Khary ; Clemons, Donna ; Impelluso, Lynn Collura ; Lee, Donna ; Maguire, Sean ; Myers, Alexis ; Petursson, Christopher ; Schulingkamp, Robert ; Trouba, Kevin ; Wright, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c379t-7df2c9690e1460023da5c52f57981d9b04cf00490148ad5bf60251e220be97a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animal Use Alternatives - ethics</topic><topic>Animal Use Alternatives - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Animal Use Alternatives - trends</topic><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - ethics</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence</topic><topic>Biomedical Research - methods</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - ethics</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods</topic><topic>Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - trends</topic><topic>European Union</topic><topic>Government Regulation</topic><topic>Primates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adams, Khary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemons, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Impelluso, Lynn Collura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Donna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maguire, Sean</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myers, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petursson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schulingkamp, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trouba, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adams, Khary</au><au>Clemons, Donna</au><au>Impelluso, Lynn Collura</au><au>Lee, Donna</au><au>Maguire, Sean</au><au>Myers, Alexis</au><au>Petursson, Christopher</au><au>Schulingkamp, Robert</au><au>Trouba, Kevin</au><au>Wright, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017)</atitle><jtitle>Toxicologic pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Pathol</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>649</spage><epage>655</epage><pages>649-655</pages><issn>0192-6233</issn><eissn>1533-1601</eissn><abstract>The recent Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on “The need for nonhuman primates in biomedical research, production and testing of products and devices” (2017 SCHEER) highlights approaches that could significantly contribute to the replacement, reduction, and refinement of nonhuman primate (NHP) studies. Initiatives that have the potential to affect NHP welfare and/or their use are expected to be appropriate, fair, and objective and publicly disseminated information focused on NHPs in biomedical research, which includes toxicologic and pathologic research and testing, should be objectively evaluated by stakeholder scientists, researchers, and veterinarians. Thus, IQ Consortium member companies convened to develop an informed and objective response, focusing on identifying areas of agreement, potential gaps, or missing information in 2017 SCHEER. Overall, the authors agree that many positions in the 2017 SCHEER Opinion generally align with industry views on the use of NHPs in research and testing, including the ongoing need of NHPs in many areas of research. From the perspective of the IQ Consortium, there are several topics in the 2017 SCHEER that merit additional comment, attention, or research, as well as consideration in future opinions.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>31280699</pmid><doi>10.1177/0192623319857976</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4620-1161</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0192-6233 |
ispartof | Toxicologic pathology, 2019-07, Vol.47 (5), p.649-655 |
issn | 0192-6233 1533-1601 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253834870 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Animal Use Alternatives - ethics Animal Use Alternatives - legislation & jurisprudence Animal Use Alternatives - trends Animal Welfare Animals Bioethics Biomedical Research - ethics Biomedical Research - legislation & jurisprudence Biomedical Research - methods Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - ethics Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - methods Drug Evaluation, Preclinical - trends European Union Government Regulation Primates |
title | An IQ Consortium Perspective on The Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks Final Opinion on the Need for Nonhuman Primates in Biomedical Research, Production and Testing of Products and Devices (Update 2017) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T04%3A22%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20IQ%20Consortium%20Perspective%20on%20The%20Scientific%20Committee%20on%20Health,%20Environmental%20and%20Emerging%20Risks%20Final%20Opinion%20on%20the%20Need%20for%20Nonhuman%20Primates%20in%20Biomedical%20Research,%20Production%20and%20Testing%20of%20Products%20and%20Devices%20(Update%202017)&rft.jtitle=Toxicologic%20pathology&rft.au=Adams,%20Khary&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=649&rft.epage=655&rft.pages=649-655&rft.issn=0192-6233&rft.eissn=1533-1601&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0192623319857976&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253834870%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253834870&rft_id=info:pmid/31280699&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0192623319857976&rfr_iscdi=true |