Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning
In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learn...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.487-496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 496 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 487 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Peng, Yaoping Tullis, Jonathan G. |
description | In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy of their study choices. We manipulated learners' theories of intelligence across two experiments. Learners then studied a list of words for a later memory test, chose half of the words to restudy, and restudied their chosen items. Learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was malleable chose to restudy more poorly learned items and ultimately learned more than learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was fixed. Learners' underlying beliefs about the nature of intelligence may affect learners' goals and ultimately their metacognitive control. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xlm0000740 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253831826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1244853</ericid><sourcerecordid>2253369846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-621387875008790027af5db2574dc5b186a5f436c547a36188152664f29e7c1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMoWqsX78qCF1FW853sUUrVSkGweg5pdrZu2e7WZBfsvze1VcGDuUyGeeadlxmETgi-Jpipm49qgeNTHO-gHslYlhKqxS7qYap0qljGDtBhCPM1hJneRwcsAlRR1UPjlzdofAkhaYpkVLdQVeUMagcxKaru6zeBqkifYdZVtoU8mbRdvkoGb03pYput82QM1tdlPTtCe4WtAhxvYx-93g1fBg_p-Ol-NLgdp5Zj0qaSEqaVVgJjrTIcXdpC5FMqFM-dmBItrSg4k05wZZkkWhNBpeQFzUA5YlkfXWx0l7557yC0ZlEGF63bGpouGEoF04xoKiN6_gedN52voztDmY7rkFxn_1JRi8lM87XW5YZyvgnBQ2GWvlxYvzIEm_UlzO8lIny2leymC8h_0O_VR-B0A4Av3U95-Ego5zrO7KOrTd0urVmGlbO-LV0FwXXeQ92uhxkuDTNcK_YJlI6YmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253369846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Peng, Yaoping ; Tullis, Jonathan G.</creator><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yaoping ; Tullis, Jonathan G. ; Benjamin, Aaron S</creatorcontrib><description>In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy of their study choices. We manipulated learners' theories of intelligence across two experiments. Learners then studied a list of words for a later memory test, chose half of the words to restudy, and restudied their chosen items. Learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was malleable chose to restudy more poorly learned items and ultimately learned more than learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was fixed. Learners' underlying beliefs about the nature of intelligence may affect learners' goals and ultimately their metacognitive control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000740</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31282727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; Human ; Independent Study ; Intelligence ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Metacognition ; Monitoring ; Self-Regulated Learning ; Student Attitudes ; Study Habits ; Theories ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.487-496</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-621387875008790027af5db2574dc5b186a5f436c547a36188152664f29e7c1a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1244853$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullis, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><title>Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy of their study choices. We manipulated learners' theories of intelligence across two experiments. Learners then studied a list of words for a later memory test, chose half of the words to restudy, and restudied their chosen items. Learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was malleable chose to restudy more poorly learned items and ultimately learned more than learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was fixed. Learners' underlying beliefs about the nature of intelligence may affect learners' goals and ultimately their metacognitive control.</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Independent Study</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Self-Regulated Learning</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Study Habits</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMoWqsX78qCF1FW853sUUrVSkGweg5pdrZu2e7WZBfsvze1VcGDuUyGeeadlxmETgi-Jpipm49qgeNTHO-gHslYlhKqxS7qYap0qljGDtBhCPM1hJneRwcsAlRR1UPjlzdofAkhaYpkVLdQVeUMagcxKaru6zeBqkifYdZVtoU8mbRdvkoGb03pYput82QM1tdlPTtCe4WtAhxvYx-93g1fBg_p-Ol-NLgdp5Zj0qaSEqaVVgJjrTIcXdpC5FMqFM-dmBItrSg4k05wZZkkWhNBpeQFzUA5YlkfXWx0l7557yC0ZlEGF63bGpouGEoF04xoKiN6_gedN52voztDmY7rkFxn_1JRi8lM87XW5YZyvgnBQ2GWvlxYvzIEm_UlzO8lIny2leymC8h_0O_VR-B0A4Av3U95-Ego5zrO7KOrTd0urVmGlbO-LV0FwXXeQ92uhxkuDTNcK_YJlI6YmQ</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Peng, Yaoping</creator><creator>Tullis, Jonathan G.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning</title><author>Peng, Yaoping ; Tullis, Jonathan G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-621387875008790027af5db2574dc5b186a5f436c547a36188152664f29e7c1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Independent Study</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Self-Regulated Learning</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Study Habits</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullis, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Yaoping</au><au>Tullis, Jonathan G.</au><au>Benjamin, Aaron S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1244853</ericid><atitle>Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>487-496</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy of their study choices. We manipulated learners' theories of intelligence across two experiments. Learners then studied a list of words for a later memory test, chose half of the words to restudy, and restudied their chosen items. Learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was malleable chose to restudy more poorly learned items and ultimately learned more than learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was fixed. Learners' underlying beliefs about the nature of intelligence may affect learners' goals and ultimately their metacognitive control.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31282727</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000740</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0278-7393 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.487-496 |
issn | 0278-7393 1939-1285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253831826 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Beliefs Human Independent Study Intelligence Learning Learning Processes Metacognition Monitoring Self-Regulated Learning Student Attitudes Study Habits Theories Undergraduate Students |
title | Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A24%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theories%20of%20Intelligence%20Influence%20Self-Regulated%20Study%20Choices%20and%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Peng,%20Yaoping&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=487-496&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253369846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253369846&rft_id=info:pmid/31282727&rft_ericid=EJ1244853&rfr_iscdi=true |