Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning

In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learn...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.487-496
Hauptverfasser: Peng, Yaoping, Tullis, Jonathan G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 496
container_issue 3
container_start_page 487
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
container_volume 46
creator Peng, Yaoping
Tullis, Jonathan G.
description In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy of their study choices. We manipulated learners' theories of intelligence across two experiments. Learners then studied a list of words for a later memory test, chose half of the words to restudy, and restudied their chosen items. Learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was malleable chose to restudy more poorly learned items and ultimately learned more than learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was fixed. Learners' underlying beliefs about the nature of intelligence may affect learners' goals and ultimately their metacognitive control.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xlm0000740
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253831826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1244853</ericid><sourcerecordid>2253369846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-621387875008790027af5db2574dc5b186a5f436c547a36188152664f29e7c1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMoWqsX78qCF1FW853sUUrVSkGweg5pdrZu2e7WZBfsvze1VcGDuUyGeeadlxmETgi-Jpipm49qgeNTHO-gHslYlhKqxS7qYap0qljGDtBhCPM1hJneRwcsAlRR1UPjlzdofAkhaYpkVLdQVeUMagcxKaru6zeBqkifYdZVtoU8mbRdvkoGb03pYput82QM1tdlPTtCe4WtAhxvYx-93g1fBg_p-Ol-NLgdp5Zj0qaSEqaVVgJjrTIcXdpC5FMqFM-dmBItrSg4k05wZZkkWhNBpeQFzUA5YlkfXWx0l7557yC0ZlEGF63bGpouGEoF04xoKiN6_gedN52voztDmY7rkFxn_1JRi8lM87XW5YZyvgnBQ2GWvlxYvzIEm_UlzO8lIny2leymC8h_0O_VR-B0A4Av3U95-Ego5zrO7KOrTd0urVmGlbO-LV0FwXXeQ92uhxkuDTNcK_YJlI6YmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253369846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Peng, Yaoping ; Tullis, Jonathan G.</creator><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yaoping ; Tullis, Jonathan G. ; Benjamin, Aaron S</creatorcontrib><description>In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy of their study choices. We manipulated learners' theories of intelligence across two experiments. Learners then studied a list of words for a later memory test, chose half of the words to restudy, and restudied their chosen items. Learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was malleable chose to restudy more poorly learned items and ultimately learned more than learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was fixed. Learners' underlying beliefs about the nature of intelligence may affect learners' goals and ultimately their metacognitive control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-7393</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000740</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31282727</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Beliefs ; Human ; Independent Study ; Intelligence ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Metacognition ; Monitoring ; Self-Regulated Learning ; Student Attitudes ; Study Habits ; Theories ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.487-496</ispartof><rights>2019 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2019, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-621387875008790027af5db2574dc5b186a5f436c547a36188152664f29e7c1a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1244853$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31282727$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Benjamin, Aaron S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullis, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><title>Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><description>In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy of their study choices. We manipulated learners' theories of intelligence across two experiments. Learners then studied a list of words for a later memory test, chose half of the words to restudy, and restudied their chosen items. Learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was malleable chose to restudy more poorly learned items and ultimately learned more than learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was fixed. Learners' underlying beliefs about the nature of intelligence may affect learners' goals and ultimately their metacognitive control.</description><subject>Beliefs</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Independent Study</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Self-Regulated Learning</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Study Habits</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>0278-7393</issn><issn>1939-1285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU1LAzEQhoMoWqsX78qCF1FW853sUUrVSkGweg5pdrZu2e7WZBfsvze1VcGDuUyGeeadlxmETgi-Jpipm49qgeNTHO-gHslYlhKqxS7qYap0qljGDtBhCPM1hJneRwcsAlRR1UPjlzdofAkhaYpkVLdQVeUMagcxKaru6zeBqkifYdZVtoU8mbRdvkoGb03pYput82QM1tdlPTtCe4WtAhxvYx-93g1fBg_p-Ol-NLgdp5Zj0qaSEqaVVgJjrTIcXdpC5FMqFM-dmBItrSg4k05wZZkkWhNBpeQFzUA5YlkfXWx0l7557yC0ZlEGF63bGpouGEoF04xoKiN6_gedN52voztDmY7rkFxn_1JRi8lM87XW5YZyvgnBQ2GWvlxYvzIEm_UlzO8lIny2leymC8h_0O_VR-B0A4Av3U95-Ego5zrO7KOrTd0urVmGlbO-LV0FwXXeQ92uhxkuDTNcK_YJlI6YmQ</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Peng, Yaoping</creator><creator>Tullis, Jonathan G.</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning</title><author>Peng, Yaoping ; Tullis, Jonathan G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a401t-621387875008790027af5db2574dc5b186a5f436c547a36188152664f29e7c1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Beliefs</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Independent Study</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Self-Regulated Learning</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Study Habits</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Peng, Yaoping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tullis, Jonathan G.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Peng, Yaoping</au><au>Tullis, Jonathan G.</au><au>Benjamin, Aaron S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1244853</ericid><atitle>Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn</addtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>487</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>487-496</pages><issn>0278-7393</issn><eissn>1939-1285</eissn><abstract>In student-regulated instruction, guiding one's study effectively and efficiently is crucial for successful learning. Yet, significant variability exists in how effectively learners regulate their own study. Here, we explored whether and how beliefs about the nature of intelligence affect learners' metacognitive control and ultimately the efficacy of their study choices. We manipulated learners' theories of intelligence across two experiments. Learners then studied a list of words for a later memory test, chose half of the words to restudy, and restudied their chosen items. Learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was malleable chose to restudy more poorly learned items and ultimately learned more than learners who were persuaded to believe intelligence was fixed. Learners' underlying beliefs about the nature of intelligence may affect learners' goals and ultimately their metacognitive control.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>31282727</pmid><doi>10.1037/xlm0000740</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-7393
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2020-03, Vol.46 (3), p.487-496
issn 0278-7393
1939-1285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253831826
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Beliefs
Human
Independent Study
Intelligence
Learning
Learning Processes
Metacognition
Monitoring
Self-Regulated Learning
Student Attitudes
Study Habits
Theories
Undergraduate Students
title Theories of Intelligence Influence Self-Regulated Study Choices and Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T23%3A24%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theories%20of%20Intelligence%20Influence%20Self-Regulated%20Study%20Choices%20and%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Learning,%20memory,%20and%20cognition&rft.au=Peng,%20Yaoping&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=487&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=487-496&rft.issn=0278-7393&rft.eissn=1939-1285&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xlm0000740&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253369846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253369846&rft_id=info:pmid/31282727&rft_ericid=EJ1244853&rfr_iscdi=true