Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Residents of Multisource Feedback: Different, Relevant, and Useful Information

Multisource feedback is a process through which different members of the care team assess and provide feedback on residents’ competencies, usually those that are less often addressed by traditional assessment methods (ie, communication, collaboration, and professionalism). Feasibility and reliabilit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of emergency medicine 2019-11, Vol.74 (5), p.660-669
Hauptverfasser: Castonguay, Véronique, Lavoie, Patrick, Karazivan, Philippe, Morris, Judy, Gagnon, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 669
container_issue 5
container_start_page 660
container_title Annals of emergency medicine
container_volume 74
creator Castonguay, Véronique
Lavoie, Patrick
Karazivan, Philippe
Morris, Judy
Gagnon, Robert
description Multisource feedback is a process through which different members of the care team assess and provide feedback on residents’ competencies, usually those that are less often addressed by traditional assessment methods (ie, communication, collaboration, and professionalism). Feasibility and reliability of multisource feedback have been addressed in previous research. The present study explores emergency residents’ perceptions of multisource feedback provided by teaching physicians, nurses, and patients they have worked with during a rotation in an emergency department (ED). A multisource feedback intervention was proposed to residents during 9 months in the ED of a tertiary care university hospital. Residents distributed feedback questionnaires to physicians, nurses, and patients that focused on competencies (collaboration, communication, and professionalism) from the CanMEDS framework. Responses were compiled and reported to participating residents. To assess residents’ perceptions of multisource feedback, semistructured group and individual interviews were held 3 months after the intervention. Transcripts were analyzed qualitatively, following Miles and Huberman’s method for intrasite case analysis. According to residents (n=10), each source (physicians, nurses, and patients) provided relevant comments that differed significantly in their content. Physicians focused primarily on medical expertise; nurses addressed competencies related to leadership, collaboration, and communication; and patients commented on the competencies of professionalism and communication. Residents concluded that obtaining feedback from nurses and patients was acceptable and useful. They reported modifying certain behaviors after receiving the multisource feedback. Residents perceived the multisource feedback to be acceptable and useful for the assessment of medical competencies such as communication, collaboration, professionalism, and leadership.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.019
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253829980</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0196064419304184</els_id><sourcerecordid>2253829980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c24e4f79bc7561c5b22299e5adacaebff0342450f90cf4c20888c15e6cf8c8183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0EotvSv4DCjQMJY8fJ2tzQ0kKlViDUni1nMkZeEmexk0r993XYVuLIaSzP-6F5GHvHoeLA24_7yoZAI8VfI_WVAK4raKo8XrANB70t220LL9km_7QltFKesNOU9gCgpeCv2UnNhQIt6g07_KCIdJj9FFIxueJiTaWAD8UN9R59oOInJd9TmP_ub5Zh9mlasqm4JOo7i78_FV-8cxSz5kNWD3Rv15cNfXGXyC1DcRXcFEe7trxhr5wdEp0_zTN2d3lxu_tWXn__erX7fF2iFGouUUiSbqs73DYtx6YTQmhNje0tWuqcg1oK2YDTgE6iAKUU8oZadAoVV_UZe3_MPcTpz0JpNqNPSMNgA01LMkI0tcqRCrJUH6UYp5QiOXOIfrTxwXAwK3CzN_8ANytwA43JI3vfPtUs3bp7dj4TzoLdUUD52HtP0ST0GXCmGwln00_-P2oeAaStmUo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253829980</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Residents of Multisource Feedback: Different, Relevant, and Useful Information</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Castonguay, Véronique ; Lavoie, Patrick ; Karazivan, Philippe ; Morris, Judy ; Gagnon, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>Castonguay, Véronique ; Lavoie, Patrick ; Karazivan, Philippe ; Morris, Judy ; Gagnon, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>Multisource feedback is a process through which different members of the care team assess and provide feedback on residents’ competencies, usually those that are less often addressed by traditional assessment methods (ie, communication, collaboration, and professionalism). Feasibility and reliability of multisource feedback have been addressed in previous research. The present study explores emergency residents’ perceptions of multisource feedback provided by teaching physicians, nurses, and patients they have worked with during a rotation in an emergency department (ED). A multisource feedback intervention was proposed to residents during 9 months in the ED of a tertiary care university hospital. Residents distributed feedback questionnaires to physicians, nurses, and patients that focused on competencies (collaboration, communication, and professionalism) from the CanMEDS framework. Responses were compiled and reported to participating residents. To assess residents’ perceptions of multisource feedback, semistructured group and individual interviews were held 3 months after the intervention. Transcripts were analyzed qualitatively, following Miles and Huberman’s method for intrasite case analysis. According to residents (n=10), each source (physicians, nurses, and patients) provided relevant comments that differed significantly in their content. Physicians focused primarily on medical expertise; nurses addressed competencies related to leadership, collaboration, and communication; and patients commented on the competencies of professionalism and communication. Residents concluded that obtaining feedback from nurses and patients was acceptable and useful. They reported modifying certain behaviors after receiving the multisource feedback. Residents perceived the multisource feedback to be acceptable and useful for the assessment of medical competencies such as communication, collaboration, professionalism, and leadership.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-0644</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6760</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31280923</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic Dissertations as Topic ; Clinical Competence - standards ; Emergency Medicine - education ; Feedback ; Humans ; Internship and Residency ; Physicians - psychology ; Physicians - standards</subject><ispartof>Annals of emergency medicine, 2019-11, Vol.74 (5), p.660-669</ispartof><rights>2019 American College of Emergency Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c24e4f79bc7561c5b22299e5adacaebff0342450f90cf4c20888c15e6cf8c8183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c24e4f79bc7561c5b22299e5adacaebff0342450f90cf4c20888c15e6cf8c8183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196064419304184$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31280923$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castonguay, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavoie, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karazivan, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagnon, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Residents of Multisource Feedback: Different, Relevant, and Useful Information</title><title>Annals of emergency medicine</title><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><description>Multisource feedback is a process through which different members of the care team assess and provide feedback on residents’ competencies, usually those that are less often addressed by traditional assessment methods (ie, communication, collaboration, and professionalism). Feasibility and reliability of multisource feedback have been addressed in previous research. The present study explores emergency residents’ perceptions of multisource feedback provided by teaching physicians, nurses, and patients they have worked with during a rotation in an emergency department (ED). A multisource feedback intervention was proposed to residents during 9 months in the ED of a tertiary care university hospital. Residents distributed feedback questionnaires to physicians, nurses, and patients that focused on competencies (collaboration, communication, and professionalism) from the CanMEDS framework. Responses were compiled and reported to participating residents. To assess residents’ perceptions of multisource feedback, semistructured group and individual interviews were held 3 months after the intervention. Transcripts were analyzed qualitatively, following Miles and Huberman’s method for intrasite case analysis. According to residents (n=10), each source (physicians, nurses, and patients) provided relevant comments that differed significantly in their content. Physicians focused primarily on medical expertise; nurses addressed competencies related to leadership, collaboration, and communication; and patients commented on the competencies of professionalism and communication. Residents concluded that obtaining feedback from nurses and patients was acceptable and useful. They reported modifying certain behaviors after receiving the multisource feedback. Residents perceived the multisource feedback to be acceptable and useful for the assessment of medical competencies such as communication, collaboration, professionalism, and leadership.</description><subject>Academic Dissertations as Topic</subject><subject>Clinical Competence - standards</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine - education</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Physicians - psychology</subject><subject>Physicians - standards</subject><issn>0196-0644</issn><issn>1097-6760</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE1v1DAQhi0EotvSv4DCjQMJY8fJ2tzQ0kKlViDUni1nMkZeEmexk0r993XYVuLIaSzP-6F5GHvHoeLA24_7yoZAI8VfI_WVAK4raKo8XrANB70t220LL9km_7QltFKesNOU9gCgpeCv2UnNhQIt6g07_KCIdJj9FFIxueJiTaWAD8UN9R59oOInJd9TmP_ub5Zh9mlasqm4JOo7i78_FV-8cxSz5kNWD3Rv15cNfXGXyC1DcRXcFEe7trxhr5wdEp0_zTN2d3lxu_tWXn__erX7fF2iFGouUUiSbqs73DYtx6YTQmhNje0tWuqcg1oK2YDTgE6iAKUU8oZadAoVV_UZe3_MPcTpz0JpNqNPSMNgA01LMkI0tcqRCrJUH6UYp5QiOXOIfrTxwXAwK3CzN_8ANytwA43JI3vfPtUs3bp7dj4TzoLdUUD52HtP0ST0GXCmGwln00_-P2oeAaStmUo</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Castonguay, Véronique</creator><creator>Lavoie, Patrick</creator><creator>Karazivan, Philippe</creator><creator>Morris, Judy</creator><creator>Gagnon, Robert</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Residents of Multisource Feedback: Different, Relevant, and Useful Information</title><author>Castonguay, Véronique ; Lavoie, Patrick ; Karazivan, Philippe ; Morris, Judy ; Gagnon, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-c24e4f79bc7561c5b22299e5adacaebff0342450f90cf4c20888c15e6cf8c8183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic Dissertations as Topic</topic><topic>Clinical Competence - standards</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine - education</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Physicians - psychology</topic><topic>Physicians - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castonguay, Véronique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lavoie, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karazivan, Philippe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Judy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gagnon, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castonguay, Véronique</au><au>Lavoie, Patrick</au><au>Karazivan, Philippe</au><au>Morris, Judy</au><au>Gagnon, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Residents of Multisource Feedback: Different, Relevant, and Useful Information</atitle><jtitle>Annals of emergency medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Ann Emerg Med</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>660</spage><epage>669</epage><pages>660-669</pages><issn>0196-0644</issn><eissn>1097-6760</eissn><abstract>Multisource feedback is a process through which different members of the care team assess and provide feedback on residents’ competencies, usually those that are less often addressed by traditional assessment methods (ie, communication, collaboration, and professionalism). Feasibility and reliability of multisource feedback have been addressed in previous research. The present study explores emergency residents’ perceptions of multisource feedback provided by teaching physicians, nurses, and patients they have worked with during a rotation in an emergency department (ED). A multisource feedback intervention was proposed to residents during 9 months in the ED of a tertiary care university hospital. Residents distributed feedback questionnaires to physicians, nurses, and patients that focused on competencies (collaboration, communication, and professionalism) from the CanMEDS framework. Responses were compiled and reported to participating residents. To assess residents’ perceptions of multisource feedback, semistructured group and individual interviews were held 3 months after the intervention. Transcripts were analyzed qualitatively, following Miles and Huberman’s method for intrasite case analysis. According to residents (n=10), each source (physicians, nurses, and patients) provided relevant comments that differed significantly in their content. Physicians focused primarily on medical expertise; nurses addressed competencies related to leadership, collaboration, and communication; and patients commented on the competencies of professionalism and communication. Residents concluded that obtaining feedback from nurses and patients was acceptable and useful. They reported modifying certain behaviors after receiving the multisource feedback. Residents perceived the multisource feedback to be acceptable and useful for the assessment of medical competencies such as communication, collaboration, professionalism, and leadership.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31280923</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.019</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-0644
ispartof Annals of emergency medicine, 2019-11, Vol.74 (5), p.660-669
issn 0196-0644
1097-6760
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253829980
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Academic Dissertations as Topic
Clinical Competence - standards
Emergency Medicine - education
Feedback
Humans
Internship and Residency
Physicians - psychology
Physicians - standards
title Perceptions of Emergency Medicine Residents of Multisource Feedback: Different, Relevant, and Useful Information
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20Emergency%20Medicine%20Residents%20of%20Multisource%20Feedback:%20Different,%20Relevant,%20and%20Useful%20Information&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20emergency%20medicine&rft.au=Castonguay,%20V%C3%A9ronique&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=660&rft.epage=669&rft.pages=660-669&rft.issn=0196-0644&rft.eissn=1097-6760&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253829980%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253829980&rft_id=info:pmid/31280923&rft_els_id=S0196064419304184&rfr_iscdi=true