Corneal epithelial dendritic cell density in the healthy human cornea: A meta-analysis of in-vivo confocal microscopy data

Numerous studies have reported a wide range of corneal epithelial dendritic cells (CEDC) density using in-vivo confocal microscopy in healthy participants. It is necessary to establish normal CEDC values for healthy corneas to enable differentiation from pathological corneas. This meta-analysis aime...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The ocular surface 2019-10, Vol.17 (4), p.753-762
Hauptverfasser: Mobeen, Rabia, Stapleton, Fiona, Chao, Cecilia, Madigan, Michele C., Briggs, Nancy, Golebiowski, Blanka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 762
container_issue 4
container_start_page 753
container_title The ocular surface
container_volume 17
creator Mobeen, Rabia
Stapleton, Fiona
Chao, Cecilia
Madigan, Michele C.
Briggs, Nancy
Golebiowski, Blanka
description Numerous studies have reported a wide range of corneal epithelial dendritic cells (CEDC) density using in-vivo confocal microscopy in healthy participants. It is necessary to establish normal CEDC values for healthy corneas to enable differentiation from pathological corneas. This meta-analysis aimed to establish CEDC density and distribution and examine their relationship with age and sex. A systematic review of the literature of studies using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph with Rostock Corneal Module and reporting CEDC density in healthy subjects up to December 2018 was conducted via Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. A random effect modeling approach was used to obtain the results of meta-analysis and meta-regression was conducted to estimate the effect of age and sex. 38 studies reported central and 9 reported peripheral inferior CEDC density of 1203 participants (mean age 46.0 ± 12.2, range 18–81 years). CEDC density in the central and peripheral inferior cornea was 26.4 ± 13.6 cells/mm2 (95% CI:22.5–26.8) and 74.9 ± 22.7 cells/mm2 (95%CI:59.8–90.0), respectively. No effect of age was found on central CEDC density (p = 0.63); whereas peripheral CEDC density decreased with increasing age (p = 0.02). CEDC density was not influenced by sex at either location (p > 0.48). This study established that the density at the peripheral inferior cornea is three-fold higher than at the central cornea. Peripheral but not central CEDC density decreased with increasing age. There are limited studies in youth (
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.07.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253286179</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1542012419301193</els_id><sourcerecordid>2253286179</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5d8d7da0b3555d11fb203c9fefdaf791b32e6d7ea3e7cec82ad2553f10489de43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qGzEURkVoqBOnL5BF0bKbmepnNPKUboJpk4Khm2QtZOkKy8yMXEk2TJ8-Gjvpsitdwfk-7j0I3VNSU0Lbr_t6n0OqGaFdTWRNCL1CN7TjshId5R_KLBpWEcqaBbpNaU8Ib1vCPqIFp0x2pG1u0N91iCPoHsPB5x30vowWRht99gYb6M_f5POE_YgLgXeFzrsJ746DHrE5x7_hBzxA1pUedT8ln3Bwha9O_hQKMrpgSu_gTQzJhMOErc76Dl073Sf49PYu0cvPH8_rp2rz-_HX-mFTGS7aXAm7stJqsuVCCEup2zLCTefAWe1kR7ecQWslaA7SgFkxbZkQ3FHSrDoLDV-iL5feQwx_jpCyGnyaL9MjhGNSjAnOVi2VXUHZBZ0XTRGcOkQ_6DgpStTsXO3V7FzNzhWRqjgvoc9v_cftAPZf5F1yAb5fAChXnjxElYyH0YD1EUxWNvj_9b8CEQuVVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253286179</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corneal epithelial dendritic cell density in the healthy human cornea: A meta-analysis of in-vivo confocal microscopy data</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Mobeen, Rabia ; Stapleton, Fiona ; Chao, Cecilia ; Madigan, Michele C. ; Briggs, Nancy ; Golebiowski, Blanka</creator><creatorcontrib>Mobeen, Rabia ; Stapleton, Fiona ; Chao, Cecilia ; Madigan, Michele C. ; Briggs, Nancy ; Golebiowski, Blanka</creatorcontrib><description>Numerous studies have reported a wide range of corneal epithelial dendritic cells (CEDC) density using in-vivo confocal microscopy in healthy participants. It is necessary to establish normal CEDC values for healthy corneas to enable differentiation from pathological corneas. This meta-analysis aimed to establish CEDC density and distribution and examine their relationship with age and sex. A systematic review of the literature of studies using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph with Rostock Corneal Module and reporting CEDC density in healthy subjects up to December 2018 was conducted via Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. A random effect modeling approach was used to obtain the results of meta-analysis and meta-regression was conducted to estimate the effect of age and sex. 38 studies reported central and 9 reported peripheral inferior CEDC density of 1203 participants (mean age 46.0 ± 12.2, range 18–81 years). CEDC density in the central and peripheral inferior cornea was 26.4 ± 13.6 cells/mm2 (95% CI:22.5–26.8) and 74.9 ± 22.7 cells/mm2 (95%CI:59.8–90.0), respectively. No effect of age was found on central CEDC density (p = 0.63); whereas peripheral CEDC density decreased with increasing age (p = 0.02). CEDC density was not influenced by sex at either location (p &gt; 0.48). This study established that the density at the peripheral inferior cornea is three-fold higher than at the central cornea. Peripheral but not central CEDC density decreased with increasing age. There are limited studies in youth (&lt;18 years), precluding a more detailed analysis. Sex does not appear to be a significant factor in CEDC density.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-0124</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-5913</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2019.07.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31279064</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Cell Count ; Cell Differentiation ; Corneal epithelial dendritic cells ; Dendritic cells ; Dendritic Cells - cytology ; Dendritiform ; Epithelium, Corneal - cytology ; Humans ; IVCM ; meta-Analysis ; Microscopy, Confocal - methods ; Reference Values ; Sex</subject><ispartof>The ocular surface, 2019-10, Vol.17 (4), p.753-762</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5d8d7da0b3555d11fb203c9fefdaf791b32e6d7ea3e7cec82ad2553f10489de43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5d8d7da0b3555d11fb203c9fefdaf791b32e6d7ea3e7cec82ad2553f10489de43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31279064$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mobeen, Rabia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stapleton, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madigan, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golebiowski, Blanka</creatorcontrib><title>Corneal epithelial dendritic cell density in the healthy human cornea: A meta-analysis of in-vivo confocal microscopy data</title><title>The ocular surface</title><addtitle>Ocul Surf</addtitle><description>Numerous studies have reported a wide range of corneal epithelial dendritic cells (CEDC) density using in-vivo confocal microscopy in healthy participants. It is necessary to establish normal CEDC values for healthy corneas to enable differentiation from pathological corneas. This meta-analysis aimed to establish CEDC density and distribution and examine their relationship with age and sex. A systematic review of the literature of studies using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph with Rostock Corneal Module and reporting CEDC density in healthy subjects up to December 2018 was conducted via Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. A random effect modeling approach was used to obtain the results of meta-analysis and meta-regression was conducted to estimate the effect of age and sex. 38 studies reported central and 9 reported peripheral inferior CEDC density of 1203 participants (mean age 46.0 ± 12.2, range 18–81 years). CEDC density in the central and peripheral inferior cornea was 26.4 ± 13.6 cells/mm2 (95% CI:22.5–26.8) and 74.9 ± 22.7 cells/mm2 (95%CI:59.8–90.0), respectively. No effect of age was found on central CEDC density (p = 0.63); whereas peripheral CEDC density decreased with increasing age (p = 0.02). CEDC density was not influenced by sex at either location (p &gt; 0.48). This study established that the density at the peripheral inferior cornea is three-fold higher than at the central cornea. Peripheral but not central CEDC density decreased with increasing age. There are limited studies in youth (&lt;18 years), precluding a more detailed analysis. Sex does not appear to be a significant factor in CEDC density.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Cell Count</subject><subject>Cell Differentiation</subject><subject>Corneal epithelial dendritic cells</subject><subject>Dendritic cells</subject><subject>Dendritic Cells - cytology</subject><subject>Dendritiform</subject><subject>Epithelium, Corneal - cytology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IVCM</subject><subject>meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Microscopy, Confocal - methods</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>Sex</subject><issn>1542-0124</issn><issn>1937-5913</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1qGzEURkVoqBOnL5BF0bKbmepnNPKUboJpk4Khm2QtZOkKy8yMXEk2TJ8-Gjvpsitdwfk-7j0I3VNSU0Lbr_t6n0OqGaFdTWRNCL1CN7TjshId5R_KLBpWEcqaBbpNaU8Ib1vCPqIFp0x2pG1u0N91iCPoHsPB5x30vowWRht99gYb6M_f5POE_YgLgXeFzrsJ746DHrE5x7_hBzxA1pUedT8ln3Bwha9O_hQKMrpgSu_gTQzJhMOErc76Dl073Sf49PYu0cvPH8_rp2rz-_HX-mFTGS7aXAm7stJqsuVCCEup2zLCTefAWe1kR7ecQWslaA7SgFkxbZkQ3FHSrDoLDV-iL5feQwx_jpCyGnyaL9MjhGNSjAnOVi2VXUHZBZ0XTRGcOkQ_6DgpStTsXO3V7FzNzhWRqjgvoc9v_cftAPZf5F1yAb5fAChXnjxElYyH0YD1EUxWNvj_9b8CEQuVVA</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Mobeen, Rabia</creator><creator>Stapleton, Fiona</creator><creator>Chao, Cecilia</creator><creator>Madigan, Michele C.</creator><creator>Briggs, Nancy</creator><creator>Golebiowski, Blanka</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Corneal epithelial dendritic cell density in the healthy human cornea: A meta-analysis of in-vivo confocal microscopy data</title><author>Mobeen, Rabia ; Stapleton, Fiona ; Chao, Cecilia ; Madigan, Michele C. ; Briggs, Nancy ; Golebiowski, Blanka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-5d8d7da0b3555d11fb203c9fefdaf791b32e6d7ea3e7cec82ad2553f10489de43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Cell Count</topic><topic>Cell Differentiation</topic><topic>Corneal epithelial dendritic cells</topic><topic>Dendritic cells</topic><topic>Dendritic Cells - cytology</topic><topic>Dendritiform</topic><topic>Epithelium, Corneal - cytology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IVCM</topic><topic>meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Microscopy, Confocal - methods</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>Sex</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mobeen, Rabia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stapleton, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chao, Cecilia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madigan, Michele C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Briggs, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golebiowski, Blanka</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The ocular surface</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mobeen, Rabia</au><au>Stapleton, Fiona</au><au>Chao, Cecilia</au><au>Madigan, Michele C.</au><au>Briggs, Nancy</au><au>Golebiowski, Blanka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corneal epithelial dendritic cell density in the healthy human cornea: A meta-analysis of in-vivo confocal microscopy data</atitle><jtitle>The ocular surface</jtitle><addtitle>Ocul Surf</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>753</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>753-762</pages><issn>1542-0124</issn><eissn>1937-5913</eissn><abstract>Numerous studies have reported a wide range of corneal epithelial dendritic cells (CEDC) density using in-vivo confocal microscopy in healthy participants. It is necessary to establish normal CEDC values for healthy corneas to enable differentiation from pathological corneas. This meta-analysis aimed to establish CEDC density and distribution and examine their relationship with age and sex. A systematic review of the literature of studies using the Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph with Rostock Corneal Module and reporting CEDC density in healthy subjects up to December 2018 was conducted via Medline, Google Scholar, Scopus, PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library. A random effect modeling approach was used to obtain the results of meta-analysis and meta-regression was conducted to estimate the effect of age and sex. 38 studies reported central and 9 reported peripheral inferior CEDC density of 1203 participants (mean age 46.0 ± 12.2, range 18–81 years). CEDC density in the central and peripheral inferior cornea was 26.4 ± 13.6 cells/mm2 (95% CI:22.5–26.8) and 74.9 ± 22.7 cells/mm2 (95%CI:59.8–90.0), respectively. No effect of age was found on central CEDC density (p = 0.63); whereas peripheral CEDC density decreased with increasing age (p = 0.02). CEDC density was not influenced by sex at either location (p &gt; 0.48). This study established that the density at the peripheral inferior cornea is three-fold higher than at the central cornea. Peripheral but not central CEDC density decreased with increasing age. There are limited studies in youth (&lt;18 years), precluding a more detailed analysis. Sex does not appear to be a significant factor in CEDC density.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31279064</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jtos.2019.07.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1542-0124
ispartof The ocular surface, 2019-10, Vol.17 (4), p.753-762
issn 1542-0124
1937-5913
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253286179
source MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Age
Cell Count
Cell Differentiation
Corneal epithelial dendritic cells
Dendritic cells
Dendritic Cells - cytology
Dendritiform
Epithelium, Corneal - cytology
Humans
IVCM
meta-Analysis
Microscopy, Confocal - methods
Reference Values
Sex
title Corneal epithelial dendritic cell density in the healthy human cornea: A meta-analysis of in-vivo confocal microscopy data
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T14%3A22%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corneal%20epithelial%20dendritic%20cell%20density%20in%20the%20healthy%20human%20cornea:%20A%20meta-analysis%20of%20in-vivo%20confocal%20microscopy%20data&rft.jtitle=The%20ocular%20surface&rft.au=Mobeen,%20Rabia&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=753&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=753-762&rft.issn=1542-0124&rft.eissn=1937-5913&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtos.2019.07.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253286179%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253286179&rft_id=info:pmid/31279064&rft_els_id=S1542012419301193&rfr_iscdi=true