Genotoxicity evaluation of tobacco and nicotine delivery products: Part Two. In vitro micronucleus assay

In this study, a variety of test matrices from tobacco and nicotine delivery products were assessed against a 3R4F Kentucky reference cigarette using the in vitro micronucleus assay. Testing was conducted using two Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO and V79), and a human lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6),...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food and chemical toxicology 2019-10, Vol.132, p.110546-110546, Article 110546
Hauptverfasser: Thorne, David, Leverette, Robert, Breheny, Damien, Lloyd, Mel, McEnaney, Stephen, Whitwell, James, Clements, Julie, Bombick, Betsy, Gaça, Marianna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110546
container_issue
container_start_page 110546
container_title Food and chemical toxicology
container_volume 132
creator Thorne, David
Leverette, Robert
Breheny, Damien
Lloyd, Mel
McEnaney, Stephen
Whitwell, James
Clements, Julie
Bombick, Betsy
Gaça, Marianna
description In this study, a variety of test matrices from tobacco and nicotine delivery products were assessed against a 3R4F Kentucky reference cigarette using the in vitro micronucleus assay. Testing was conducted using two Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO and V79), and a human lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6), in accordance with established guidelines. Total particulate matter (TPM) from a 3R4F Reference cigarette was compared to an electronic cigarette e-liquid, electronic cigarette TPM and TPM from a commercial tobacco heating product using a standard and an extended treatment condition with recovery period. Cells were assessed with 3R4F TPM prior to assessment of the other tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. These cell lines gave varied responses to 3R4F TPM with the most robust response using V79 cells. The use of an extended exposure/recovery period was seen to increase assay sensitivity for CHO and V79 cell lines but was less clear for TK6 cells. Negative responses were observed for all products except 3R4F across all treatment conditions in V79 cells. The most potent response to cigarette smoke was following extended treatment with recovery, suggesting this may be a more appropriate treatment for the future assessment of tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. •Particulate matter from a cigarette was compared against a commercial e-liquid e-cigarette and commercial THP.•Data were contextualised against nicotine equivalents to enable comparisons between different test matrices and products.•An extended recovery period of 1.5–2 cell cycles was used to increase assay sensitivity.•All cells (CHO, V79 and TK6) showed an increase in IVMNBN cells following the extended recovery period.•None of the NGPs tested produced a positive response, whereas cigarette smoke was positive under all test conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fct.2019.05.054
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253272072</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0278691519303217</els_id><sourcerecordid>2253272072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-6fe8b50717f9558346fca28ce95c7bc8c75344deed7f05b48d4ca83f7181832a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9v1DAUxC0EapfSD8AF-cglwX_i2IETqtpSqRIcytly7GfhVdYutrNlvz1ebeFYaaR3mRnN-yH0npKeEjp-2vbe1p4ROvVENA2v0IYqybuRC_oabQiTqhsnKs7R21K2hBBJ5XiGzjmlI2d02qBftxBTTX-CDfWAYW-W1dSQIk4e1zQbaxM20eEYbKohAnawhD3kA37Mya22ls_4h8kVPzylHt9FvA81J7wLNqe42gXWgk0p5vAOvfFmKXD5fC_Qz5vrh6tv3f3327urr_ed5dNYu9GDmsVxp5-EUHwYvTVMWZiElbNVVgo-DA7ASU_EPCg3WKO4l1RRxZnhF-jjqbft-71CqXoXioVlMRHSWjRjgjPJiGTNSk_WtrWUDF4_5rAz-aAp0UfAeqsbYH0ErIloGlrmw3P9Ou_A_U_8I9oMX04GaE_uA2RdbIBowYUMrcyl8EL9X3ODjP0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2253272072</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Genotoxicity evaluation of tobacco and nicotine delivery products: Part Two. In vitro micronucleus assay</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Thorne, David ; Leverette, Robert ; Breheny, Damien ; Lloyd, Mel ; McEnaney, Stephen ; Whitwell, James ; Clements, Julie ; Bombick, Betsy ; Gaça, Marianna</creator><creatorcontrib>Thorne, David ; Leverette, Robert ; Breheny, Damien ; Lloyd, Mel ; McEnaney, Stephen ; Whitwell, James ; Clements, Julie ; Bombick, Betsy ; Gaça, Marianna</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, a variety of test matrices from tobacco and nicotine delivery products were assessed against a 3R4F Kentucky reference cigarette using the in vitro micronucleus assay. Testing was conducted using two Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO and V79), and a human lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6), in accordance with established guidelines. Total particulate matter (TPM) from a 3R4F Reference cigarette was compared to an electronic cigarette e-liquid, electronic cigarette TPM and TPM from a commercial tobacco heating product using a standard and an extended treatment condition with recovery period. Cells were assessed with 3R4F TPM prior to assessment of the other tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. These cell lines gave varied responses to 3R4F TPM with the most robust response using V79 cells. The use of an extended exposure/recovery period was seen to increase assay sensitivity for CHO and V79 cell lines but was less clear for TK6 cells. Negative responses were observed for all products except 3R4F across all treatment conditions in V79 cells. The most potent response to cigarette smoke was following extended treatment with recovery, suggesting this may be a more appropriate treatment for the future assessment of tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. •Particulate matter from a cigarette was compared against a commercial e-liquid e-cigarette and commercial THP.•Data were contextualised against nicotine equivalents to enable comparisons between different test matrices and products.•An extended recovery period of 1.5–2 cell cycles was used to increase assay sensitivity.•All cells (CHO, V79 and TK6) showed an increase in IVMNBN cells following the extended recovery period.•None of the NGPs tested produced a positive response, whereas cigarette smoke was positive under all test conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0278-6915</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6351</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2019.05.054</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31163219</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>E-cigarette ; E-liquid ; In vitro ; IVMN ; NGP ; Nicotine equivalents ; THP ; TPM</subject><ispartof>Food and chemical toxicology, 2019-10, Vol.132, p.110546-110546, Article 110546</ispartof><rights>2019 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-6fe8b50717f9558346fca28ce95c7bc8c75344deed7f05b48d4ca83f7181832a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-6fe8b50717f9558346fca28ce95c7bc8c75344deed7f05b48d4ca83f7181832a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6002-6507 ; 0000-0001-5786-4369</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691519303217$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31163219$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Thorne, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leverette, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breheny, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Mel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEnaney, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitwell, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clements, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombick, Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaça, Marianna</creatorcontrib><title>Genotoxicity evaluation of tobacco and nicotine delivery products: Part Two. In vitro micronucleus assay</title><title>Food and chemical toxicology</title><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><description>In this study, a variety of test matrices from tobacco and nicotine delivery products were assessed against a 3R4F Kentucky reference cigarette using the in vitro micronucleus assay. Testing was conducted using two Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO and V79), and a human lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6), in accordance with established guidelines. Total particulate matter (TPM) from a 3R4F Reference cigarette was compared to an electronic cigarette e-liquid, electronic cigarette TPM and TPM from a commercial tobacco heating product using a standard and an extended treatment condition with recovery period. Cells were assessed with 3R4F TPM prior to assessment of the other tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. These cell lines gave varied responses to 3R4F TPM with the most robust response using V79 cells. The use of an extended exposure/recovery period was seen to increase assay sensitivity for CHO and V79 cell lines but was less clear for TK6 cells. Negative responses were observed for all products except 3R4F across all treatment conditions in V79 cells. The most potent response to cigarette smoke was following extended treatment with recovery, suggesting this may be a more appropriate treatment for the future assessment of tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. •Particulate matter from a cigarette was compared against a commercial e-liquid e-cigarette and commercial THP.•Data were contextualised against nicotine equivalents to enable comparisons between different test matrices and products.•An extended recovery period of 1.5–2 cell cycles was used to increase assay sensitivity.•All cells (CHO, V79 and TK6) showed an increase in IVMNBN cells following the extended recovery period.•None of the NGPs tested produced a positive response, whereas cigarette smoke was positive under all test conditions.</description><subject>E-cigarette</subject><subject>E-liquid</subject><subject>In vitro</subject><subject>IVMN</subject><subject>NGP</subject><subject>Nicotine equivalents</subject><subject>THP</subject><subject>TPM</subject><issn>0278-6915</issn><issn>1873-6351</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9v1DAUxC0EapfSD8AF-cglwX_i2IETqtpSqRIcytly7GfhVdYutrNlvz1ebeFYaaR3mRnN-yH0npKeEjp-2vbe1p4ROvVENA2v0IYqybuRC_oabQiTqhsnKs7R21K2hBBJ5XiGzjmlI2d02qBftxBTTX-CDfWAYW-W1dSQIk4e1zQbaxM20eEYbKohAnawhD3kA37Mya22ls_4h8kVPzylHt9FvA81J7wLNqe42gXWgk0p5vAOvfFmKXD5fC_Qz5vrh6tv3f3327urr_ed5dNYu9GDmsVxp5-EUHwYvTVMWZiElbNVVgo-DA7ASU_EPCg3WKO4l1RRxZnhF-jjqbft-71CqXoXioVlMRHSWjRjgjPJiGTNSk_WtrWUDF4_5rAz-aAp0UfAeqsbYH0ErIloGlrmw3P9Ou_A_U_8I9oMX04GaE_uA2RdbIBowYUMrcyl8EL9X3ODjP0</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Thorne, David</creator><creator>Leverette, Robert</creator><creator>Breheny, Damien</creator><creator>Lloyd, Mel</creator><creator>McEnaney, Stephen</creator><creator>Whitwell, James</creator><creator>Clements, Julie</creator><creator>Bombick, Betsy</creator><creator>Gaça, Marianna</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6002-6507</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5786-4369</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>Genotoxicity evaluation of tobacco and nicotine delivery products: Part Two. In vitro micronucleus assay</title><author>Thorne, David ; Leverette, Robert ; Breheny, Damien ; Lloyd, Mel ; McEnaney, Stephen ; Whitwell, James ; Clements, Julie ; Bombick, Betsy ; Gaça, Marianna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-6fe8b50717f9558346fca28ce95c7bc8c75344deed7f05b48d4ca83f7181832a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>E-cigarette</topic><topic>E-liquid</topic><topic>In vitro</topic><topic>IVMN</topic><topic>NGP</topic><topic>Nicotine equivalents</topic><topic>THP</topic><topic>TPM</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Thorne, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leverette, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breheny, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Mel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McEnaney, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitwell, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clements, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bombick, Betsy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaça, Marianna</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Thorne, David</au><au>Leverette, Robert</au><au>Breheny, Damien</au><au>Lloyd, Mel</au><au>McEnaney, Stephen</au><au>Whitwell, James</au><au>Clements, Julie</au><au>Bombick, Betsy</au><au>Gaça, Marianna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Genotoxicity evaluation of tobacco and nicotine delivery products: Part Two. In vitro micronucleus assay</atitle><jtitle>Food and chemical toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Food Chem Toxicol</addtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>132</volume><spage>110546</spage><epage>110546</epage><pages>110546-110546</pages><artnum>110546</artnum><issn>0278-6915</issn><eissn>1873-6351</eissn><abstract>In this study, a variety of test matrices from tobacco and nicotine delivery products were assessed against a 3R4F Kentucky reference cigarette using the in vitro micronucleus assay. Testing was conducted using two Chinese hamster cell lines (CHO and V79), and a human lymphoblastoid cell line (TK6), in accordance with established guidelines. Total particulate matter (TPM) from a 3R4F Reference cigarette was compared to an electronic cigarette e-liquid, electronic cigarette TPM and TPM from a commercial tobacco heating product using a standard and an extended treatment condition with recovery period. Cells were assessed with 3R4F TPM prior to assessment of the other tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. These cell lines gave varied responses to 3R4F TPM with the most robust response using V79 cells. The use of an extended exposure/recovery period was seen to increase assay sensitivity for CHO and V79 cell lines but was less clear for TK6 cells. Negative responses were observed for all products except 3R4F across all treatment conditions in V79 cells. The most potent response to cigarette smoke was following extended treatment with recovery, suggesting this may be a more appropriate treatment for the future assessment of tobacco and nicotine product test matrices. •Particulate matter from a cigarette was compared against a commercial e-liquid e-cigarette and commercial THP.•Data were contextualised against nicotine equivalents to enable comparisons between different test matrices and products.•An extended recovery period of 1.5–2 cell cycles was used to increase assay sensitivity.•All cells (CHO, V79 and TK6) showed an increase in IVMNBN cells following the extended recovery period.•None of the NGPs tested produced a positive response, whereas cigarette smoke was positive under all test conditions.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>31163219</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.fct.2019.05.054</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6002-6507</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5786-4369</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0278-6915
ispartof Food and chemical toxicology, 2019-10, Vol.132, p.110546-110546, Article 110546
issn 0278-6915
1873-6351
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2253272072
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects E-cigarette
E-liquid
In vitro
IVMN
NGP
Nicotine equivalents
THP
TPM
title Genotoxicity evaluation of tobacco and nicotine delivery products: Part Two. In vitro micronucleus assay
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T10%3A50%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Genotoxicity%20evaluation%20of%20tobacco%20and%20nicotine%20delivery%20products:%20Part%20Two.%20In%20vitro%20micronucleus%20assay&rft.jtitle=Food%20and%20chemical%20toxicology&rft.au=Thorne,%20David&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=132&rft.spage=110546&rft.epage=110546&rft.pages=110546-110546&rft.artnum=110546&rft.issn=0278-6915&rft.eissn=1873-6351&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fct.2019.05.054&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2253272072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2253272072&rft_id=info:pmid/31163219&rft_els_id=S0278691519303217&rfr_iscdi=true