Assessment of adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by care providers working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil
To assess adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by doctors, nurses, obstetric nursing residents, and obstetric medical residents working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil. A cross-sectional study was conducted with care providers working in 11 public hospitals...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Ciência & saude coletiva 2019-06, Vol.24 (6), p.2135-2145 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 2145 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 2135 |
| container_title | Ciência & saude coletiva |
| container_volume | 24 |
| creator | Carvalho, Elisabete Mesquita Peres de Amorim, Fábio Ferreira Santana, Levy Aniceto Göttems, Leila Bernarda Donato |
| description | To assess adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by doctors, nurses, obstetric nursing residents, and obstetric medical residents working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with care providers working in 11 public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil between January and March 2015. A questionnaire containing 20 sociodemographic questions and 50 five-point Likert items was administered. The average scores of each group and each hospital were analyzed.
Nurses obtained the highest scores for the use of evidence-based practices (57.8 ± 12.9), while doctors achieved the highest scores for the work process dimension (72 ± 8.5). Medical residents obtained the highest scores for organization of labor and childbirth care (56.5 ± 8.5). No statistically significant differences were found between groups. Hospital scores ranged from 55 to 64. No statistically significant differences were found between hospitals. Most professionals encourage natural childbirth.
It is necessary to strengthen actions to promote greater adherence to best care practices, both in relation to organization of labor and childbirth care and to the attitudes and values of health professionals. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1590/1413-81232018246.08412019 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2252270487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A594429370</galeid><sourcerecordid>A594429370</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g340t-8ab09979073ef06d2713d76bbe1216f650a89db05ffa4a21e7120ae5fbc21b2e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1u1TAQhS0EoqXwCsiIDSxyscdOnCwvhUJFJVjAOrKdyY1LEgfbAcqD8Lz49kfoIjSLGVnfOTqeIeQZZxteNuwVl1wUNQcBjNcgqw2rJc9zc48c80rVhSwrfj_Pd9wReRTjJWOghISH5EhwqBqu4Jj83saIMU44J-p7qrsBA84WafLUYEx0CdomZzFSN9NRGx-onjtqBzd2xoU0UKsDUnN105fgv7sOQ6Q_fPjq5t1etqxmdJYOPi4u6fHaKg1IzzCTeqRvXEzB2esEr4P-5cbH5EGfQXxy20_Il7O3n0_fFxcf352fbi-KnZAsFbU2rGlUw5TAnlUdKC46VRmDHHjVVyXTddMZVva9lho4qrwmjWVvLHADKE7IixvfnPvbmv_bTi5aHEc9o19jC1ACKCZrldHn_6CXfg1zTteCYGUJFQD7S-30iK2be5_yAvem7bZspIRGqD21-Q-Vq8PJWT9j7_L7geDlgSAzCX-mnV5jbD98Oj9kn94GXc2EXbsEN-lw1d4dXfwBeT6utA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2305526220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by care providers working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）</source><creator>Carvalho, Elisabete Mesquita Peres de ; Amorim, Fábio Ferreira ; Santana, Levy Aniceto ; Göttems, Leila Bernarda Donato</creator><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Elisabete Mesquita Peres de ; Amorim, Fábio Ferreira ; Santana, Levy Aniceto ; Göttems, Leila Bernarda Donato</creatorcontrib><description>To assess adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by doctors, nurses, obstetric nursing residents, and obstetric medical residents working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with care providers working in 11 public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil between January and March 2015. A questionnaire containing 20 sociodemographic questions and 50 five-point Likert items was administered. The average scores of each group and each hospital were analyzed.
Nurses obtained the highest scores for the use of evidence-based practices (57.8 ± 12.9), while doctors achieved the highest scores for the work process dimension (72 ± 8.5). Medical residents obtained the highest scores for organization of labor and childbirth care (56.5 ± 8.5). No statistically significant differences were found between groups. Hospital scores ranged from 55 to 64. No statistically significant differences were found between hospitals. Most professionals encourage natural childbirth.
It is necessary to strengthen actions to promote greater adherence to best care practices, both in relation to organization of labor and childbirth care and to the attitudes and values of health professionals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1413-8123</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1678-4561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1590/1413-81232018246.08412019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31269172</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Brazil: Associacao Brasileira de Pos-Graduacao em Saude Coletiva - ABRASCO</publisher><subject>Adult ; Brazil ; Childbirth & labor ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Delivery, Obstetric - standards ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Female ; Guideline Adherence ; Health Personnel - standards ; Hospitals ; Hospitals, Public - standards ; Humans ; Labor ; Labor, Obstetric ; Male ; Maternal Health Services - standards ; Medical residencies ; Middle Aged ; Nurses ; Obstetric Nursing ; Obstetrics ; Physicians ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Pregnancy ; Quality of Health Care ; Statistical significance ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Ciência & saude coletiva, 2019-06, Vol.24 (6), p.2135-2145</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Associacao Brasileira de Pos-Graduacao em Saude Coletiva - ABRASCO</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-0929-5733 ; 0000-0002-2675-8085 ; 0000-0002-5140-0237 ; 0000-0001-7743-4892</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31269172$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Elisabete Mesquita Peres de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Fábio Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Levy Aniceto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göttems, Leila Bernarda Donato</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by care providers working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil</title><title>Ciência & saude coletiva</title><addtitle>Cien Saude Colet</addtitle><description>To assess adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by doctors, nurses, obstetric nursing residents, and obstetric medical residents working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with care providers working in 11 public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil between January and March 2015. A questionnaire containing 20 sociodemographic questions and 50 five-point Likert items was administered. The average scores of each group and each hospital were analyzed.
Nurses obtained the highest scores for the use of evidence-based practices (57.8 ± 12.9), while doctors achieved the highest scores for the work process dimension (72 ± 8.5). Medical residents obtained the highest scores for organization of labor and childbirth care (56.5 ± 8.5). No statistically significant differences were found between groups. Hospital scores ranged from 55 to 64. No statistically significant differences were found between hospitals. Most professionals encourage natural childbirth.
It is necessary to strengthen actions to promote greater adherence to best care practices, both in relation to organization of labor and childbirth care and to the attitudes and values of health professionals.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Childbirth & labor</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - standards</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Guideline Adherence</subject><subject>Health Personnel - standards</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Hospitals, Public - standards</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labor, Obstetric</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maternal Health Services - standards</subject><subject>Medical residencies</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Obstetric Nursing</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Quality of Health Care</subject><subject>Statistical significance</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1413-8123</issn><issn>1678-4561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>KPI</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkc1u1TAQhS0EoqXwCsiIDSxyscdOnCwvhUJFJVjAOrKdyY1LEgfbAcqD8Lz49kfoIjSLGVnfOTqeIeQZZxteNuwVl1wUNQcBjNcgqw2rJc9zc48c80rVhSwrfj_Pd9wReRTjJWOghISH5EhwqBqu4Jj83saIMU44J-p7qrsBA84WafLUYEx0CdomZzFSN9NRGx-onjtqBzd2xoU0UKsDUnN105fgv7sOQ6Q_fPjq5t1etqxmdJYOPi4u6fHaKg1IzzCTeqRvXEzB2esEr4P-5cbH5EGfQXxy20_Il7O3n0_fFxcf352fbi-KnZAsFbU2rGlUw5TAnlUdKC46VRmDHHjVVyXTddMZVva9lho4qrwmjWVvLHADKE7IixvfnPvbmv_bTi5aHEc9o19jC1ACKCZrldHn_6CXfg1zTteCYGUJFQD7S-30iK2be5_yAvem7bZspIRGqD21-Q-Vq8PJWT9j7_L7geDlgSAzCX-mnV5jbD98Oj9kn94GXc2EXbsEN-lw1d4dXfwBeT6utA</recordid><startdate>20190601</startdate><enddate>20190601</enddate><creator>Carvalho, Elisabete Mesquita Peres de</creator><creator>Amorim, Fábio Ferreira</creator><creator>Santana, Levy Aniceto</creator><creator>Göttems, Leila Bernarda Donato</creator><general>Associacao Brasileira de Pos-Graduacao em Saude Coletiva - ABRASCO</general><general>Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>KPI</scope><scope>INF</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-5733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2675-8085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-0237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7743-4892</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190601</creationdate><title>Assessment of adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by care providers working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil</title><author>Carvalho, Elisabete Mesquita Peres de ; Amorim, Fábio Ferreira ; Santana, Levy Aniceto ; Göttems, Leila Bernarda Donato</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g340t-8ab09979073ef06d2713d76bbe1216f650a89db05ffa4a21e7120ae5fbc21b2e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Childbirth & labor</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - standards</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Guideline Adherence</topic><topic>Health Personnel - standards</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Hospitals, Public - standards</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labor, Obstetric</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maternal Health Services - standards</topic><topic>Medical residencies</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Obstetric Nursing</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Quality of Health Care</topic><topic>Statistical significance</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Elisabete Mesquita Peres de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amorim, Fábio Ferreira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santana, Levy Aniceto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Göttems, Leila Bernarda Donato</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Global Issues database</collection><collection>¡Informe!</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Health and Medical</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ciência & saude coletiva</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carvalho, Elisabete Mesquita Peres de</au><au>Amorim, Fábio Ferreira</au><au>Santana, Levy Aniceto</au><au>Göttems, Leila Bernarda Donato</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by care providers working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Ciência & saude coletiva</jtitle><addtitle>Cien Saude Colet</addtitle><date>2019-06-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2135</spage><epage>2145</epage><pages>2135-2145</pages><issn>1413-8123</issn><eissn>1678-4561</eissn><abstract>To assess adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by doctors, nurses, obstetric nursing residents, and obstetric medical residents working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil.
A cross-sectional study was conducted with care providers working in 11 public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil between January and March 2015. A questionnaire containing 20 sociodemographic questions and 50 five-point Likert items was administered. The average scores of each group and each hospital were analyzed.
Nurses obtained the highest scores for the use of evidence-based practices (57.8 ± 12.9), while doctors achieved the highest scores for the work process dimension (72 ± 8.5). Medical residents obtained the highest scores for organization of labor and childbirth care (56.5 ± 8.5). No statistically significant differences were found between groups. Hospital scores ranged from 55 to 64. No statistically significant differences were found between hospitals. Most professionals encourage natural childbirth.
It is necessary to strengthen actions to promote greater adherence to best care practices, both in relation to organization of labor and childbirth care and to the attitudes and values of health professionals.</abstract><cop>Brazil</cop><pub>Associacao Brasileira de Pos-Graduacao em Saude Coletiva - ABRASCO</pub><pmid>31269172</pmid><doi>10.1590/1413-81232018246.08412019</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0929-5733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2675-8085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5140-0237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7743-4892</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1413-8123 |
| ispartof | Ciência & saude coletiva, 2019-06, Vol.24 (6), p.2135-2145 |
| issn | 1413-8123 1678-4561 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2252270487 |
| source | MEDLINE; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ） |
| subjects | Adult Brazil Childbirth & labor Cross-Sectional Studies Delivery, Obstetric - standards Evidence-Based Practice Female Guideline Adherence Health Personnel - standards Hospitals Hospitals, Public - standards Humans Labor Labor, Obstetric Male Maternal Health Services - standards Medical residencies Middle Aged Nurses Obstetric Nursing Obstetrics Physicians Practice Guidelines as Topic Pregnancy Quality of Health Care Statistical significance Surveys and Questionnaires Young Adult |
| title | Assessment of adherence to best practices in labor and childbirth care by care providers working in public hospitals in the Federal District of Brazil |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T07%3A49%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20adherence%20to%20best%20practices%20in%20labor%20and%20childbirth%20care%20by%20care%20providers%20working%20in%20public%20hospitals%20in%20the%20Federal%20District%20of%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Ci%C3%AAncia%20&%20saude%20coletiva&rft.au=Carvalho,%20Elisabete%20Mesquita%20Peres%20de&rft.date=2019-06-01&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2135&rft.epage=2145&rft.pages=2135-2145&rft.issn=1413-8123&rft.eissn=1678-4561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1590/1413-81232018246.08412019&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA594429370%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2305526220&rft_id=info:pmid/31269172&rft_galeid=A594429370&rfr_iscdi=true |