Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with dementia: An Australian population‐based study

Objective To investigate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) using the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria in people with dementia compared with people without dementia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Pharmaceut...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of geriatric psychiatry 2019-10, Vol.34 (10), p.1498-1505
Hauptverfasser: Eshetie, Tesfahun C., Nguyen, Tuan A., Gillam, Marianne H., Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1505
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1498
container_title International journal of geriatric psychiatry
container_volume 34
creator Eshetie, Tesfahun C.
Nguyen, Tuan A.
Gillam, Marianne H.
Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.
description Objective To investigate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) using the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria in people with dementia compared with people without dementia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 10% sample of pharmacy claims. People with dementia were defined as those dispensed a medicine for dementia (cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, or risperidone for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia) between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015, aged 65 years or older at 1 January 2016 and alive at the end of 2016. An age‐ and gender‐matched comparison cohort of people not dispensed medicines for dementia was identified. PIP prevalence was determined between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016. Results In total, 8280 people dispensed medicines for dementia and 41 400 comparisons not dispensed medicines for dementia were included: 63% were female and the median age was 82 years. PIP prevalence was 79% among people with dementia compared with 70% among the comparison group (P 
doi_str_mv 10.1002/gps.5160
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2251697593</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2251697593</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3490-dccce7f9a22961004c01aec1467c313689a92a0cd1805d4c39c34a7d99ddc9a13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMotlbBL5ABN26m5jGvuCtFq1CwoK6HNLmtKZmHyQxldn6C3-iXmD5UEFxlcc895B6EzgkeEozp9bJ2w5gk-AD1CeY8JCRJDlEfZ1kcJpThHjpxboWxn5HsGPUYISljPO4jmFUNlI0WxnSBLkVd26q2WjQQ1BactHquy6WfBDVUtYFgrZvXQEGxXboJRmUwal1jhdHCM1XdGtHoqvx8_5gLBypwTau6U3S0EMbB2f4doJe72-fxfTh9nDyMR9NQsojjUEkpIV1wQSlP_GGRxESAJFGSSkZYknHBqcBSkQzHKpKM-z2RKs6VklwQNkBXO6-_4q0F1-SFdhKMESVUrcsp9ZV4GnPm0cs_6Kpqbel_5ynfjXqM_gqlrZyzsMh9nELYLic436TPffp8k96jF3thOy9A_YDfrT0Q7oC1NtD9K8ons6et8AvhHY7n</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2288529752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with dementia: An Australian population‐based study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Eshetie, Tesfahun C. ; Nguyen, Tuan A. ; Gillam, Marianne H. ; Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eshetie, Tesfahun C. ; Nguyen, Tuan A. ; Gillam, Marianne H. ; Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To investigate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) using the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria in people with dementia compared with people without dementia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 10% sample of pharmacy claims. People with dementia were defined as those dispensed a medicine for dementia (cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, or risperidone for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia) between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015, aged 65 years or older at 1 January 2016 and alive at the end of 2016. An age‐ and gender‐matched comparison cohort of people not dispensed medicines for dementia was identified. PIP prevalence was determined between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016. Results In total, 8280 people dispensed medicines for dementia and 41 400 comparisons not dispensed medicines for dementia were included: 63% were female and the median age was 82 years. PIP prevalence was 79% among people with dementia compared with 70% among the comparison group (P &lt; .0001). Use of anticholinergics, long‐term use of high‐dose proton pump inhibitors, and use of benzodiazepines were the most common instances of PIP in people with dementia. After adjustments for age, gender, comorbidity, and number of prescribers, people with dementia were more likely to be exposed to PIP than comparisons (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI, 1.35‐1.53, P &lt; .0001). Conclusions PIP was more common in people dispensed medicines for dementia than comparisons. These results highlight the need for effective interventions to optimize prescribing in people with dementia.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6230</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1166</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/gps.5160</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31173395</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Anticholinergics ; Australia - epidemiology ; Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use ; Cholinergic Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Cholinesterase inhibitors ; Comorbidity ; Dementia ; Dementia - drug therapy ; Dementia disorders ; Female ; Geriatric psychiatry ; Humans ; Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Male ; Medicare ; medication‐related problems ; Memantine ; Population studies ; Population-based studies ; potentially inappropriate medications ; potentially inappropriate prescribing ; Proton pump inhibitors ; Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Retrospective Studies ; Risperidone</subject><ispartof>International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2019-10, Vol.34 (10), p.1498-1505</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3490-dccce7f9a22961004c01aec1467c313689a92a0cd1805d4c39c34a7d99ddc9a13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3490-dccce7f9a22961004c01aec1467c313689a92a0cd1805d4c39c34a7d99ddc9a13</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5063-6128 ; 0000-0001-7253-988X ; 0000-0002-9528-9278</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fgps.5160$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fgps.5160$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31173395$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eshetie, Tesfahun C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillam, Marianne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><title>Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with dementia: An Australian population‐based study</title><title>International journal of geriatric psychiatry</title><addtitle>Int J Geriatr Psychiatry</addtitle><description>Objective To investigate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) using the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria in people with dementia compared with people without dementia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 10% sample of pharmacy claims. People with dementia were defined as those dispensed a medicine for dementia (cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, or risperidone for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia) between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015, aged 65 years or older at 1 January 2016 and alive at the end of 2016. An age‐ and gender‐matched comparison cohort of people not dispensed medicines for dementia was identified. PIP prevalence was determined between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016. Results In total, 8280 people dispensed medicines for dementia and 41 400 comparisons not dispensed medicines for dementia were included: 63% were female and the median age was 82 years. PIP prevalence was 79% among people with dementia compared with 70% among the comparison group (P &lt; .0001). Use of anticholinergics, long‐term use of high‐dose proton pump inhibitors, and use of benzodiazepines were the most common instances of PIP in people with dementia. After adjustments for age, gender, comorbidity, and number of prescribers, people with dementia were more likely to be exposed to PIP than comparisons (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI, 1.35‐1.53, P &lt; .0001). Conclusions PIP was more common in people dispensed medicines for dementia than comparisons. These results highlight the need for effective interventions to optimize prescribing in people with dementia.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Anticholinergics</subject><subject>Australia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cholinergic Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cholinesterase inhibitors</subject><subject>Comorbidity</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatric psychiatry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>medication‐related problems</subject><subject>Memantine</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Population-based studies</subject><subject>potentially inappropriate medications</subject><subject>potentially inappropriate prescribing</subject><subject>Proton pump inhibitors</subject><subject>Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risperidone</subject><issn>0885-6230</issn><issn>1099-1166</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKAzEUQIMotlbBL5ABN26m5jGvuCtFq1CwoK6HNLmtKZmHyQxldn6C3-iXmD5UEFxlcc895B6EzgkeEozp9bJ2w5gk-AD1CeY8JCRJDlEfZ1kcJpThHjpxboWxn5HsGPUYISljPO4jmFUNlI0WxnSBLkVd26q2WjQQ1BactHquy6WfBDVUtYFgrZvXQEGxXboJRmUwal1jhdHCM1XdGtHoqvx8_5gLBypwTau6U3S0EMbB2f4doJe72-fxfTh9nDyMR9NQsojjUEkpIV1wQSlP_GGRxESAJFGSSkZYknHBqcBSkQzHKpKM-z2RKs6VklwQNkBXO6-_4q0F1-SFdhKMESVUrcsp9ZV4GnPm0cs_6Kpqbel_5ynfjXqM_gqlrZyzsMh9nELYLic436TPffp8k96jF3thOy9A_YDfrT0Q7oC1NtD9K8ons6et8AvhHY7n</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Eshetie, Tesfahun C.</creator><creator>Nguyen, Tuan A.</creator><creator>Gillam, Marianne H.</creator><creator>Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5063-6128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-988X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-9278</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with dementia: An Australian population‐based study</title><author>Eshetie, Tesfahun C. ; Nguyen, Tuan A. ; Gillam, Marianne H. ; Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3490-dccce7f9a22961004c01aec1467c313689a92a0cd1805d4c39c34a7d99ddc9a13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Anticholinergics</topic><topic>Australia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cholinergic Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cholinesterase inhibitors</topic><topic>Comorbidity</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatric psychiatry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>medication‐related problems</topic><topic>Memantine</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Population-based studies</topic><topic>potentially inappropriate medications</topic><topic>potentially inappropriate prescribing</topic><topic>Proton pump inhibitors</topic><topic>Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risperidone</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eshetie, Tesfahun C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, Tuan A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gillam, Marianne H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International journal of geriatric psychiatry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eshetie, Tesfahun C.</au><au>Nguyen, Tuan A.</au><au>Gillam, Marianne H.</au><au>Kalisch Ellett, Lisa M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with dementia: An Australian population‐based study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of geriatric psychiatry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Geriatr Psychiatry</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1498</spage><epage>1505</epage><pages>1498-1505</pages><issn>0885-6230</issn><eissn>1099-1166</eissn><abstract>Objective To investigate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) using the Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria in people with dementia compared with people without dementia. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 10% sample of pharmacy claims. People with dementia were defined as those dispensed a medicine for dementia (cholinesterase inhibitors, memantine, or risperidone for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia) between 1 January 2005 and 31 December 2015, aged 65 years or older at 1 January 2016 and alive at the end of 2016. An age‐ and gender‐matched comparison cohort of people not dispensed medicines for dementia was identified. PIP prevalence was determined between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2016. Results In total, 8280 people dispensed medicines for dementia and 41 400 comparisons not dispensed medicines for dementia were included: 63% were female and the median age was 82 years. PIP prevalence was 79% among people with dementia compared with 70% among the comparison group (P &lt; .0001). Use of anticholinergics, long‐term use of high‐dose proton pump inhibitors, and use of benzodiazepines were the most common instances of PIP in people with dementia. After adjustments for age, gender, comorbidity, and number of prescribers, people with dementia were more likely to be exposed to PIP than comparisons (adjusted OR 1.44, 95% CI, 1.35‐1.53, P &lt; .0001). Conclusions PIP was more common in people dispensed medicines for dementia than comparisons. These results highlight the need for effective interventions to optimize prescribing in people with dementia.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31173395</pmid><doi>10.1002/gps.5160</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5063-6128</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7253-988X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9528-9278</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6230
ispartof International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2019-10, Vol.34 (10), p.1498-1505
issn 0885-6230
1099-1166
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2251697593
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anticholinergics
Australia - epidemiology
Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use
Cholinergic Antagonists - therapeutic use
Cholinesterase inhibitors
Comorbidity
Dementia
Dementia - drug therapy
Dementia disorders
Female
Geriatric psychiatry
Humans
Inappropriate Prescribing - statistics & numerical data
Male
Medicare
medication‐related problems
Memantine
Population studies
Population-based studies
potentially inappropriate medications
potentially inappropriate prescribing
Proton pump inhibitors
Proton Pump Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Risperidone
title Potentially inappropriate prescribing in people with dementia: An Australian population‐based study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T05%3A51%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Potentially%20inappropriate%20prescribing%20in%20people%20with%20dementia:%20An%20Australian%20population%E2%80%90based%20study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20geriatric%20psychiatry&rft.au=Eshetie,%20Tesfahun%20C.&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1498&rft.epage=1505&rft.pages=1498-1505&rft.issn=0885-6230&rft.eissn=1099-1166&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/gps.5160&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2251697593%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2288529752&rft_id=info:pmid/31173395&rfr_iscdi=true