Effects of resistance‐associated variants in genotype 2 hepatitis C virus on viral replication and susceptibility to antihepatitis C virus drugs

Aims Development of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) has made antihepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment highly safe and effective. However, the emergence of resistant‐associated variants (RAVs) after failure of DAA therapy affects retreatment outcomes. In particular, genotype 1 HCV with P32 deletion has...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Hepatology research 2019-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1275-1285
Hauptverfasser: Suda, Goki, Kimura, Megumi, Shigesawa, Taku, Suzuki, Kazuharu, Nakamura, Akihisa, Ohara, Masatsugu, Kawagishi, Naoki, Nakai, Masato, Sho, Takuya, Maehara, Osamu, Shimazaki, Tomoe, Morikawa, Kenichi, Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru, Ogawa, Koji, Sakamoto, Naoya
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1285
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1275
container_title Hepatology research
container_volume 49
creator Suda, Goki
Kimura, Megumi
Shigesawa, Taku
Suzuki, Kazuharu
Nakamura, Akihisa
Ohara, Masatsugu
Kawagishi, Naoki
Nakai, Masato
Sho, Takuya
Maehara, Osamu
Shimazaki, Tomoe
Morikawa, Kenichi
Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru
Ogawa, Koji
Sakamoto, Naoya
description Aims Development of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) has made antihepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment highly safe and effective. However, the emergence of resistant‐associated variants (RAVs) after failure of DAA therapy affects retreatment outcomes. In particular, genotype 1 HCV with P32 deletion has been reported to be highly resistant to all approved non‐structural protein (NS)5A inhibitors. However, analysis of RAVs in genotype 2 HCV has been limited. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated the roles of genotype 2 HCV variants in antiviral drug efficacy. Methods We utilized HCV‐2b/2a (JFH‐1) chimeric virus (genotype 2a), which replicates more robustly than JFH‐1. We constructed various genotype 2a JFH‐1‐based HCV cell culture systems with NS3 (D168E), NS5A (F28S, F28S/M31I, P32 deletion, and Y93H), and NS5B (S282 T) RAVs and analyzed the replication ability and sensitivity to various anti‐HCV reagents. Results Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5A–P32 deletion could not replicate even in long‐term cultures. Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5A‐F28S/M31I showed significantly higher replication ability than the wild‐type strain, and replication could not be suppressed, even with high concentrations of NS5A inhibitors, including pibrentasvir and velpatasvir (
doi_str_mv 10.1111/hepr.13401
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2251101381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2251101381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-d5d7c8c04c48be46ca2d2327911e0ddefe878113e48037978f94de4be7e9da143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoMotlZvfAAJeCPC1JwkO5m5lGW1hYIiCt6FbHKmpszOjEmmZe98BMEX8Fl8lD5Jz3arFwrmJuHk4zsn-Rl7CuIYaL36glM6BqUF3GOH0BhZCaU_36ezauqqVro-YI9yvhACjJD6ITtQIGvQqj1kP1Zdh75kPnY8YY65uMHj9bfvLufRR1cw8EuXohuIiQM_x2Es2wm5_PWT-roSS8x8yS9jmkky7A6uJ9XUR0-3VHFD4HnOHqcS17GPZcvLSNUS_xWENJ_nx-xB5_qMT-72I_bpzerj8qQ6e_f2dPn6rPJaG6jCIhjfeKG9btaoa-9kkEqaFgBFCNhhYxoAhboRyrSm6VodUK_RYBscPf-Ivdh7pzR-nTEXu4k0Zt-7Acc5WykXAII-EQh9_hd6Mc5poOkstZRts2hFTdTLPeXTmHPCzk4pblzaWhB2F5XdRWVvoyL42Z1yXm8w_EF_Z0MA7IGr2OP2Pyp7snr_YS-9AeLZowE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2322985906</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of resistance‐associated variants in genotype 2 hepatitis C virus on viral replication and susceptibility to antihepatitis C virus drugs</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Suda, Goki ; Kimura, Megumi ; Shigesawa, Taku ; Suzuki, Kazuharu ; Nakamura, Akihisa ; Ohara, Masatsugu ; Kawagishi, Naoki ; Nakai, Masato ; Sho, Takuya ; Maehara, Osamu ; Shimazaki, Tomoe ; Morikawa, Kenichi ; Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru ; Ogawa, Koji ; Sakamoto, Naoya</creator><creatorcontrib>Suda, Goki ; Kimura, Megumi ; Shigesawa, Taku ; Suzuki, Kazuharu ; Nakamura, Akihisa ; Ohara, Masatsugu ; Kawagishi, Naoki ; Nakai, Masato ; Sho, Takuya ; Maehara, Osamu ; Shimazaki, Tomoe ; Morikawa, Kenichi ; Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru ; Ogawa, Koji ; Sakamoto, Naoya</creatorcontrib><description>Aims Development of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) has made antihepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment highly safe and effective. However, the emergence of resistant‐associated variants (RAVs) after failure of DAA therapy affects retreatment outcomes. In particular, genotype 1 HCV with P32 deletion has been reported to be highly resistant to all approved non‐structural protein (NS)5A inhibitors. However, analysis of RAVs in genotype 2 HCV has been limited. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated the roles of genotype 2 HCV variants in antiviral drug efficacy. Methods We utilized HCV‐2b/2a (JFH‐1) chimeric virus (genotype 2a), which replicates more robustly than JFH‐1. We constructed various genotype 2a JFH‐1‐based HCV cell culture systems with NS3 (D168E), NS5A (F28S, F28S/M31I, P32 deletion, and Y93H), and NS5B (S282 T) RAVs and analyzed the replication ability and sensitivity to various anti‐HCV reagents. Results Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5A–P32 deletion could not replicate even in long‐term cultures. Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5A‐F28S/M31I showed significantly higher replication ability than the wild‐type strain, and replication could not be suppressed, even with high concentrations of NS5A inhibitors, including pibrentasvir and velpatasvir (&lt;1000–10 000 fold‐resistance compared with the wild‐type strain). However, genotype 2a‐based HCV with NA5A‐F28S/M31I was sensitive to HCV protease inhibitor, NS5B inhibitor, interferon‐α, and ribavirin. Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5B‐S282 T was resistant to sofosbuvir, but was highly sensitive to ribavirin compared with the control. Conclusions When undertaking retreatment for genotype 2a HCV‐infected patients who fail to respond to DAAs, the optimized retreatment should be chosen according to the sensitivity of the emerging RAVs to anti‐HCV drugs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6346</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-034X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13401</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31261439</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Antiviral agents ; Cell culture ; Clonal deletion ; Disease resistance ; Drug development ; Gene deletion ; Genotype &amp; phenotype ; genotype 2 ; Genotypes ; Hepatitis C ; hepatitis C virus ; Interferon ; NS5A F28S/M31I ; NS5B S282 T ; Proteinase inhibitors ; Replication ; resistant‐associated variant ; Ribavirin</subject><ispartof>Hepatology research, 2019-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1275-1285</ispartof><rights>2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology</rights><rights>2019 The Japan Society of Hepatology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-d5d7c8c04c48be46ca2d2327911e0ddefe878113e48037978f94de4be7e9da143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-d5d7c8c04c48be46ca2d2327911e0ddefe878113e48037978f94de4be7e9da143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3891-5113 ; 0000-0003-0098-9106 ; 0000-0002-2953-6242</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhepr.13401$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhepr.13401$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31261439$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Suda, Goki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Megumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shigesawa, Taku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kazuharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Akihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohara, Masatsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawagishi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sho, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maehara, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimazaki, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morikawa, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Naoya</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of resistance‐associated variants in genotype 2 hepatitis C virus on viral replication and susceptibility to antihepatitis C virus drugs</title><title>Hepatology research</title><addtitle>Hepatol Res</addtitle><description>Aims Development of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) has made antihepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment highly safe and effective. However, the emergence of resistant‐associated variants (RAVs) after failure of DAA therapy affects retreatment outcomes. In particular, genotype 1 HCV with P32 deletion has been reported to be highly resistant to all approved non‐structural protein (NS)5A inhibitors. However, analysis of RAVs in genotype 2 HCV has been limited. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated the roles of genotype 2 HCV variants in antiviral drug efficacy. Methods We utilized HCV‐2b/2a (JFH‐1) chimeric virus (genotype 2a), which replicates more robustly than JFH‐1. We constructed various genotype 2a JFH‐1‐based HCV cell culture systems with NS3 (D168E), NS5A (F28S, F28S/M31I, P32 deletion, and Y93H), and NS5B (S282 T) RAVs and analyzed the replication ability and sensitivity to various anti‐HCV reagents. Results Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5A–P32 deletion could not replicate even in long‐term cultures. Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5A‐F28S/M31I showed significantly higher replication ability than the wild‐type strain, and replication could not be suppressed, even with high concentrations of NS5A inhibitors, including pibrentasvir and velpatasvir (&lt;1000–10 000 fold‐resistance compared with the wild‐type strain). However, genotype 2a‐based HCV with NA5A‐F28S/M31I was sensitive to HCV protease inhibitor, NS5B inhibitor, interferon‐α, and ribavirin. Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5B‐S282 T was resistant to sofosbuvir, but was highly sensitive to ribavirin compared with the control. Conclusions When undertaking retreatment for genotype 2a HCV‐infected patients who fail to respond to DAAs, the optimized retreatment should be chosen according to the sensitivity of the emerging RAVs to anti‐HCV drugs.</description><subject>Antiviral agents</subject><subject>Cell culture</subject><subject>Clonal deletion</subject><subject>Disease resistance</subject><subject>Drug development</subject><subject>Gene deletion</subject><subject>Genotype &amp; phenotype</subject><subject>genotype 2</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Hepatitis C</subject><subject>hepatitis C virus</subject><subject>Interferon</subject><subject>NS5A F28S/M31I</subject><subject>NS5B S282 T</subject><subject>Proteinase inhibitors</subject><subject>Replication</subject><subject>resistant‐associated variant</subject><subject>Ribavirin</subject><issn>1386-6346</issn><issn>1872-034X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdFqFDEUhoMotlZvfAAJeCPC1JwkO5m5lGW1hYIiCt6FbHKmpszOjEmmZe98BMEX8Fl8lD5Jz3arFwrmJuHk4zsn-Rl7CuIYaL36glM6BqUF3GOH0BhZCaU_36ezauqqVro-YI9yvhACjJD6ITtQIGvQqj1kP1Zdh75kPnY8YY65uMHj9bfvLufRR1cw8EuXohuIiQM_x2Es2wm5_PWT-roSS8x8yS9jmkky7A6uJ9XUR0-3VHFD4HnOHqcS17GPZcvLSNUS_xWENJ_nx-xB5_qMT-72I_bpzerj8qQ6e_f2dPn6rPJaG6jCIhjfeKG9btaoa-9kkEqaFgBFCNhhYxoAhboRyrSm6VodUK_RYBscPf-Ivdh7pzR-nTEXu4k0Zt-7Acc5WykXAII-EQh9_hd6Mc5poOkstZRts2hFTdTLPeXTmHPCzk4pblzaWhB2F5XdRWVvoyL42Z1yXm8w_EF_Z0MA7IGr2OP2Pyp7snr_YS-9AeLZowE</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Suda, Goki</creator><creator>Kimura, Megumi</creator><creator>Shigesawa, Taku</creator><creator>Suzuki, Kazuharu</creator><creator>Nakamura, Akihisa</creator><creator>Ohara, Masatsugu</creator><creator>Kawagishi, Naoki</creator><creator>Nakai, Masato</creator><creator>Sho, Takuya</creator><creator>Maehara, Osamu</creator><creator>Shimazaki, Tomoe</creator><creator>Morikawa, Kenichi</creator><creator>Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru</creator><creator>Ogawa, Koji</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Naoya</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3891-5113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-9106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-6242</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Effects of resistance‐associated variants in genotype 2 hepatitis C virus on viral replication and susceptibility to antihepatitis C virus drugs</title><author>Suda, Goki ; Kimura, Megumi ; Shigesawa, Taku ; Suzuki, Kazuharu ; Nakamura, Akihisa ; Ohara, Masatsugu ; Kawagishi, Naoki ; Nakai, Masato ; Sho, Takuya ; Maehara, Osamu ; Shimazaki, Tomoe ; Morikawa, Kenichi ; Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru ; Ogawa, Koji ; Sakamoto, Naoya</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4471-d5d7c8c04c48be46ca2d2327911e0ddefe878113e48037978f94de4be7e9da143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Antiviral agents</topic><topic>Cell culture</topic><topic>Clonal deletion</topic><topic>Disease resistance</topic><topic>Drug development</topic><topic>Gene deletion</topic><topic>Genotype &amp; phenotype</topic><topic>genotype 2</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Hepatitis C</topic><topic>hepatitis C virus</topic><topic>Interferon</topic><topic>NS5A F28S/M31I</topic><topic>NS5B S282 T</topic><topic>Proteinase inhibitors</topic><topic>Replication</topic><topic>resistant‐associated variant</topic><topic>Ribavirin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Suda, Goki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kimura, Megumi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shigesawa, Taku</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Kazuharu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Akihisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ohara, Masatsugu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawagishi, Naoki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakai, Masato</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sho, Takuya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maehara, Osamu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shimazaki, Tomoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morikawa, Kenichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ogawa, Koji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Naoya</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Hepatology research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Suda, Goki</au><au>Kimura, Megumi</au><au>Shigesawa, Taku</au><au>Suzuki, Kazuharu</au><au>Nakamura, Akihisa</au><au>Ohara, Masatsugu</au><au>Kawagishi, Naoki</au><au>Nakai, Masato</au><au>Sho, Takuya</au><au>Maehara, Osamu</au><au>Shimazaki, Tomoe</au><au>Morikawa, Kenichi</au><au>Natsuizaka, Mitsuteru</au><au>Ogawa, Koji</au><au>Sakamoto, Naoya</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of resistance‐associated variants in genotype 2 hepatitis C virus on viral replication and susceptibility to antihepatitis C virus drugs</atitle><jtitle>Hepatology research</jtitle><addtitle>Hepatol Res</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1275</spage><epage>1285</epage><pages>1275-1285</pages><issn>1386-6346</issn><eissn>1872-034X</eissn><abstract>Aims Development of direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) has made antihepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment highly safe and effective. However, the emergence of resistant‐associated variants (RAVs) after failure of DAA therapy affects retreatment outcomes. In particular, genotype 1 HCV with P32 deletion has been reported to be highly resistant to all approved non‐structural protein (NS)5A inhibitors. However, analysis of RAVs in genotype 2 HCV has been limited. Accordingly, in this study, we evaluated the roles of genotype 2 HCV variants in antiviral drug efficacy. Methods We utilized HCV‐2b/2a (JFH‐1) chimeric virus (genotype 2a), which replicates more robustly than JFH‐1. We constructed various genotype 2a JFH‐1‐based HCV cell culture systems with NS3 (D168E), NS5A (F28S, F28S/M31I, P32 deletion, and Y93H), and NS5B (S282 T) RAVs and analyzed the replication ability and sensitivity to various anti‐HCV reagents. Results Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5A–P32 deletion could not replicate even in long‐term cultures. Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5A‐F28S/M31I showed significantly higher replication ability than the wild‐type strain, and replication could not be suppressed, even with high concentrations of NS5A inhibitors, including pibrentasvir and velpatasvir (&lt;1000–10 000 fold‐resistance compared with the wild‐type strain). However, genotype 2a‐based HCV with NA5A‐F28S/M31I was sensitive to HCV protease inhibitor, NS5B inhibitor, interferon‐α, and ribavirin. Genotype 2a‐based HCV with NS5B‐S282 T was resistant to sofosbuvir, but was highly sensitive to ribavirin compared with the control. Conclusions When undertaking retreatment for genotype 2a HCV‐infected patients who fail to respond to DAAs, the optimized retreatment should be chosen according to the sensitivity of the emerging RAVs to anti‐HCV drugs.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31261439</pmid><doi>10.1111/hepr.13401</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3891-5113</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0098-9106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2953-6242</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-6346
ispartof Hepatology research, 2019-11, Vol.49 (11), p.1275-1285
issn 1386-6346
1872-034X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2251101381
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Antiviral agents
Cell culture
Clonal deletion
Disease resistance
Drug development
Gene deletion
Genotype & phenotype
genotype 2
Genotypes
Hepatitis C
hepatitis C virus
Interferon
NS5A F28S/M31I
NS5B S282 T
Proteinase inhibitors
Replication
resistant‐associated variant
Ribavirin
title Effects of resistance‐associated variants in genotype 2 hepatitis C virus on viral replication and susceptibility to antihepatitis C virus drugs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T01%3A41%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20resistance%E2%80%90associated%20variants%20in%20genotype%202%C2%A0hepatitis%20C%20virus%20on%20viral%20replication%20and%20susceptibility%20to%20antihepatitis%20C%20virus%20drugs&rft.jtitle=Hepatology%20research&rft.au=Suda,%20Goki&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1275&rft.epage=1285&rft.pages=1275-1285&rft.issn=1386-6346&rft.eissn=1872-034X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hepr.13401&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2251101381%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2322985906&rft_id=info:pmid/31261439&rfr_iscdi=true