Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis

Aim The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐bas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology 2019-10, Vol.15 (5), p.e197-e203
Hauptverfasser: Li, Chia‐Chin, Liang, Ji‐An, Chen, William Tzu‐Liang, Chien, Chun‐Ru
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e203
container_issue 5
container_start_page e197
container_title Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology
container_volume 15
creator Li, Chia‐Chin
Liang, Ji‐An
Chen, William Tzu‐Liang
Chien, Chun‐Ru
description Aim The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐based propensity score (PS)‐matched analysis. Methods We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS‐matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account. Results Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings. Conclusion For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ajco.13196
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250638757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299624999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-4e851c86ecedda822c1e4196f010e60720af336f042a85341b6baf48cbe240633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EoqWw4QGQJTYIaYoviZOwG43KTZW6gXV04hx3PErsYDutsuMReBvehyfBYUqFWOCNj6XPn4_PT8hzzs55Xm_goP05l7xRD8gprwq5qUolH97XZXlCnsR4YEw2ouGPyYnkomRNxU7JjwtjUCd7gw5jpN5QO8I1_vz2_Xq2PfY0QG992mOAaaHGBxoyDgPV4DQGOkGy6FKkKSCkzN_atKcOPfSH-QZcoto7PYeAa7nH0f8tfEu3dPLTPGSLd_nRDmJ2TMFP6KJNC43ah7WbEVK-3VNwMCzRxqfkkYEh4rO7_Yx8eXfxefdhc3n1_uNue7nRsqzUpsC65LpWqLHvoRZCcyzyoAzjDBWrBAMjZT4WAupSFrxTHZii1h2Kgikpz8irozf39HXGmNrRRo3DAPmPc2xFHqSSdVVWGX35D3rwc8j9rlTTKFE0TZOp10dKBx9jQNNOIY88LC1n7Rpnu8bZ_o4zwy_ulHM3Yn-P_skvA_wI3NoBl_-o2u2n3dVR-gsnTrJz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299624999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Li, Chia‐Chin ; Liang, Ji‐An ; Chen, William Tzu‐Liang ; Chien, Chun‐Ru</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Chia‐Chin ; Liang, Ji‐An ; Chen, William Tzu‐Liang ; Chien, Chun‐Ru</creatorcontrib><description>Aim The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐based propensity score (PS)‐matched analysis. Methods We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS‐matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account. Results Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings. Conclusion For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-7555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-7563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31250970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Cancer ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemoradiotherapy - mortality ; Cohort Studies ; Death ; effectiveness ; Female ; Humans ; image‐guided radiotherapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy ; Population studies ; population‐based ; Propensity Score ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - mortality ; rectal cancer ; Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Rectum ; Survival Rate ; Taiwan - epidemiology ; Toxicity ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2019-10, Vol.15 (5), p.e197-e203</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-4e851c86ecedda822c1e4196f010e60720af336f042a85341b6baf48cbe240633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-4e851c86ecedda822c1e4196f010e60720af336f042a85341b6baf48cbe240633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2365-7641</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajco.13196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajco.13196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31250970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Chia‐Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ji‐An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, William Tzu‐Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chien, Chun‐Ru</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis</title><title>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Aim The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐based propensity score (PS)‐matched analysis. Methods We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS‐matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account. Results Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings. Conclusion For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy - mortality</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>image‐guided radiotherapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>population‐based</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - mortality</subject><subject>rectal cancer</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Taiwan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1743-7555</issn><issn>1743-7563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EoqWw4QGQJTYIaYoviZOwG43KTZW6gXV04hx3PErsYDutsuMReBvehyfBYUqFWOCNj6XPn4_PT8hzzs55Xm_goP05l7xRD8gprwq5qUolH97XZXlCnsR4YEw2ouGPyYnkomRNxU7JjwtjUCd7gw5jpN5QO8I1_vz2_Xq2PfY0QG992mOAaaHGBxoyDgPV4DQGOkGy6FKkKSCkzN_atKcOPfSH-QZcoto7PYeAa7nH0f8tfEu3dPLTPGSLd_nRDmJ2TMFP6KJNC43ah7WbEVK-3VNwMCzRxqfkkYEh4rO7_Yx8eXfxefdhc3n1_uNue7nRsqzUpsC65LpWqLHvoRZCcyzyoAzjDBWrBAMjZT4WAupSFrxTHZii1h2Kgikpz8irozf39HXGmNrRRo3DAPmPc2xFHqSSdVVWGX35D3rwc8j9rlTTKFE0TZOp10dKBx9jQNNOIY88LC1n7Rpnu8bZ_o4zwy_ulHM3Yn-P_skvA_wI3NoBl_-o2u2n3dVR-gsnTrJz</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Li, Chia‐Chin</creator><creator>Liang, Ji‐An</creator><creator>Chen, William Tzu‐Liang</creator><creator>Chien, Chun‐Ru</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-7641</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis</title><author>Li, Chia‐Chin ; Liang, Ji‐An ; Chen, William Tzu‐Liang ; Chien, Chun‐Ru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-4e851c86ecedda822c1e4196f010e60720af336f042a85341b6baf48cbe240633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy - mortality</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>image‐guided radiotherapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>population‐based</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - mortality</topic><topic>rectal cancer</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Taiwan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Chia‐Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ji‐An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, William Tzu‐Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chien, Chun‐Ru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Chia‐Chin</au><au>Liang, Ji‐An</au><au>Chen, William Tzu‐Liang</au><au>Chien, Chun‐Ru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e197</spage><epage>e203</epage><pages>e197-e203</pages><issn>1743-7555</issn><eissn>1743-7563</eissn><abstract>Aim The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐based propensity score (PS)‐matched analysis. Methods We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS‐matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account. Results Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings. Conclusion For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31250970</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajco.13196</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-7641</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-7555
ispartof Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2019-10, Vol.15 (5), p.e197-e203
issn 1743-7555
1743-7563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250638757
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Cancer
Cardiovascular diseases
Chemoradiotherapy
Chemoradiotherapy - mortality
Cohort Studies
Death
effectiveness
Female
Humans
image‐guided radiotherapy
Male
Middle Aged
Mortality
neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy
Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy
Population studies
population‐based
Propensity Score
Radiation therapy
Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - mortality
rectal cancer
Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology
Rectal Neoplasms - mortality
Rectal Neoplasms - pathology
Rectal Neoplasms - therapy
Rectum
Survival Rate
Taiwan - epidemiology
Toxicity
Treatment Outcome
Young Adult
title Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A01%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20image%E2%80%90guided%20radiotherapy%20for%20rectal%20cancer%20patients%20treated%20with%20neoadjuvant%20concurrent%20chemoradiotherapy:%20A%20population%E2%80%90based%20propensity%20score%E2%80%90matched%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Li,%20Chia%E2%80%90Chin&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e197&rft.epage=e203&rft.pages=e197-e203&rft.issn=1743-7555&rft.eissn=1743-7563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajco.13196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299624999%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299624999&rft_id=info:pmid/31250970&rfr_iscdi=true