Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis
Aim The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐bas...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology 2019-10, Vol.15 (5), p.e197-e203 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e203 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e197 |
container_title | Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Li, Chia‐Chin Liang, Ji‐An Chen, William Tzu‐Liang Chien, Chun‐Ru |
description | Aim
The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐based propensity score (PS)‐matched analysis.
Methods
We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS‐matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account.
Results
Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings.
Conclusion
For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ajco.13196 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250638757</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2299624999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-4e851c86ecedda822c1e4196f010e60720af336f042a85341b6baf48cbe240633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EoqWw4QGQJTYIaYoviZOwG43KTZW6gXV04hx3PErsYDutsuMReBvehyfBYUqFWOCNj6XPn4_PT8hzzs55Xm_goP05l7xRD8gprwq5qUolH97XZXlCnsR4YEw2ouGPyYnkomRNxU7JjwtjUCd7gw5jpN5QO8I1_vz2_Xq2PfY0QG992mOAaaHGBxoyDgPV4DQGOkGy6FKkKSCkzN_atKcOPfSH-QZcoto7PYeAa7nH0f8tfEu3dPLTPGSLd_nRDmJ2TMFP6KJNC43ah7WbEVK-3VNwMCzRxqfkkYEh4rO7_Yx8eXfxefdhc3n1_uNue7nRsqzUpsC65LpWqLHvoRZCcyzyoAzjDBWrBAMjZT4WAupSFrxTHZii1h2Kgikpz8irozf39HXGmNrRRo3DAPmPc2xFHqSSdVVWGX35D3rwc8j9rlTTKFE0TZOp10dKBx9jQNNOIY88LC1n7Rpnu8bZ_o4zwy_ulHM3Yn-P_skvA_wI3NoBl_-o2u2n3dVR-gsnTrJz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2299624999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Li, Chia‐Chin ; Liang, Ji‐An ; Chen, William Tzu‐Liang ; Chien, Chun‐Ru</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Chia‐Chin ; Liang, Ji‐An ; Chen, William Tzu‐Liang ; Chien, Chun‐Ru</creatorcontrib><description>Aim
The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐based propensity score (PS)‐matched analysis.
Methods
We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS‐matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account.
Results
Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings.
Conclusion
For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-7555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-7563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ajco.13196</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31250970</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Cancer ; Cardiovascular diseases ; Chemoradiotherapy ; Chemoradiotherapy - mortality ; Cohort Studies ; Death ; effectiveness ; Female ; Humans ; image‐guided radiotherapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Mortality ; neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy ; Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology ; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy ; Population studies ; population‐based ; Propensity Score ; Radiation therapy ; Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - mortality ; rectal cancer ; Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology ; Rectal Neoplasms - mortality ; Rectal Neoplasms - pathology ; Rectal Neoplasms - therapy ; Rectum ; Survival Rate ; Taiwan - epidemiology ; Toxicity ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2019-10, Vol.15 (5), p.e197-e203</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-4e851c86ecedda822c1e4196f010e60720af336f042a85341b6baf48cbe240633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-4e851c86ecedda822c1e4196f010e60720af336f042a85341b6baf48cbe240633</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2365-7641</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fajco.13196$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fajco.13196$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31250970$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Chia‐Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ji‐An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, William Tzu‐Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chien, Chun‐Ru</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis</title><title>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</title><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><description>Aim
The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐based propensity score (PS)‐matched analysis.
Methods
We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS‐matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account.
Results
Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings.
Conclusion
For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cardiovascular diseases</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Chemoradiotherapy - mortality</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>image‐guided radiotherapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>population‐based</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - mortality</subject><subject>rectal cancer</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Rectum</subject><subject>Survival Rate</subject><subject>Taiwan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Toxicity</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1743-7555</issn><issn>1743-7563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctu1DAUhi0EoqWw4QGQJTYIaYoviZOwG43KTZW6gXV04hx3PErsYDutsuMReBvehyfBYUqFWOCNj6XPn4_PT8hzzs55Xm_goP05l7xRD8gprwq5qUolH97XZXlCnsR4YEw2ouGPyYnkomRNxU7JjwtjUCd7gw5jpN5QO8I1_vz2_Xq2PfY0QG992mOAaaHGBxoyDgPV4DQGOkGy6FKkKSCkzN_atKcOPfSH-QZcoto7PYeAa7nH0f8tfEu3dPLTPGSLd_nRDmJ2TMFP6KJNC43ah7WbEVK-3VNwMCzRxqfkkYEh4rO7_Yx8eXfxefdhc3n1_uNue7nRsqzUpsC65LpWqLHvoRZCcyzyoAzjDBWrBAMjZT4WAupSFrxTHZii1h2Kgikpz8irozf39HXGmNrRRo3DAPmPc2xFHqSSdVVWGX35D3rwc8j9rlTTKFE0TZOp10dKBx9jQNNOIY88LC1n7Rpnu8bZ_o4zwy_ulHM3Yn-P_skvA_wI3NoBl_-o2u2n3dVR-gsnTrJz</recordid><startdate>201910</startdate><enddate>201910</enddate><creator>Li, Chia‐Chin</creator><creator>Liang, Ji‐An</creator><creator>Chen, William Tzu‐Liang</creator><creator>Chien, Chun‐Ru</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-7641</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201910</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis</title><author>Li, Chia‐Chin ; Liang, Ji‐An ; Chen, William Tzu‐Liang ; Chien, Chun‐Ru</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3576-4e851c86ecedda822c1e4196f010e60720af336f042a85341b6baf48cbe240633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cardiovascular diseases</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Chemoradiotherapy - mortality</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>image‐guided radiotherapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>population‐based</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - mortality</topic><topic>rectal cancer</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - mortality</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Rectal Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Rectum</topic><topic>Survival Rate</topic><topic>Taiwan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Toxicity</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Chia‐Chin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Ji‐An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, William Tzu‐Liang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chien, Chun‐Ru</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Chia‐Chin</au><au>Liang, Ji‐An</au><au>Chen, William Tzu‐Liang</au><au>Chien, Chun‐Ru</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis</atitle><jtitle>Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology</jtitle><addtitle>Asia Pac J Clin Oncol</addtitle><date>2019-10</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e197</spage><epage>e203</epage><pages>e197-e203</pages><issn>1743-7555</issn><eissn>1743-7563</eissn><abstract>Aim
The effects of image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT, an advanced RT technology) have been debated in the literature. We compared the outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (NCCRT; with vs without IGRT) in a large population‐based propensity score (PS)‐matched analysis.
Methods
We identified LARC patients diagnosed between 2007 and 2015 via the Taiwan cancer registry (TCR) and constructed a PS‐matched cohort to balance observable potential confounders. Outcomes (R0 resection, overall survival, incidence of local regional recurrence [ILRR], rectal cancer mortality [IRCM], other cancer mortality [IOCM] and cardiovascular mortality [ICVM]) were obtained from TCR and the national death registry. We compared the hazard ratio (HR) of death and other endpoints between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. We performed supplementary analysis (SA) to evaluate the robustness of these results in a subgroup, taking an additional potential confounder into account.
Results
Our study population comprised of 586 patients that were balanced with regard to observed covariables. There was no significant difference in HR for death (0.99; 95% confidence interval 0.70–1.39; P = 0.94) between IGRT and non‐IGRT groups. There were also no significant differences in R0 resection, ILRR, IRCM, IOCM or ICVM. The results of our SA were consistent with these findings.
Conclusion
For LARC patients treated with NCCRT, the treatment outcome was not significantly different among patients treated with and without IGRT. Further study is needed to clarify these results with consideration to additional potential confounding factors and toxicity profiles at endpoints.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31250970</pmid><doi>10.1111/ajco.13196</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2365-7641</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1743-7555 |
ispartof | Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology, 2019-10, Vol.15 (5), p.e197-e203 |
issn | 1743-7555 1743-7563 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250638757 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Cancer Cardiovascular diseases Chemoradiotherapy Chemoradiotherapy - mortality Cohort Studies Death effectiveness Female Humans image‐guided radiotherapy Male Middle Aged Mortality neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy Neoadjuvant Therapy - mortality Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - pathology Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - therapy Population studies population‐based Propensity Score Radiation therapy Radiotherapy, Image-Guided - mortality rectal cancer Rectal Neoplasms - epidemiology Rectal Neoplasms - mortality Rectal Neoplasms - pathology Rectal Neoplasms - therapy Rectum Survival Rate Taiwan - epidemiology Toxicity Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Effectiveness of image‐guided radiotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy: A population‐based propensity score‐matched analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T15%3A01%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20image%E2%80%90guided%20radiotherapy%20for%20rectal%20cancer%20patients%20treated%20with%20neoadjuvant%20concurrent%20chemoradiotherapy:%20A%20population%E2%80%90based%20propensity%20score%E2%80%90matched%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Asia-Pacific%20journal%20of%20clinical%20oncology&rft.au=Li,%20Chia%E2%80%90Chin&rft.date=2019-10&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e197&rft.epage=e203&rft.pages=e197-e203&rft.issn=1743-7555&rft.eissn=1743-7563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ajco.13196&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2299624999%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2299624999&rft_id=info:pmid/31250970&rfr_iscdi=true |