Virginia‐based periodontists’ perceptions: Current and future trends of the specialty
Background The aim of this survey was threefold: (1) describe the demographics of periodontists and their practices in Virginia; (2) explore periodontists’ perceptions of the impact that changes in the field of dentistry (i.e. increasing corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of periodontology (1970) 2019-11, Vol.90 (11), p.1287-1296 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1296 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1287 |
container_title | Journal of periodontology (1970) |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | White, John H. Carrico, Caroline K. Lanning, Sharon K. Waldrop, Thomas C. Sabatini, Robert Richardson, Christopher R. Golob Deeb, Janina |
description | Background
The aim of this survey was threefold: (1) describe the demographics of periodontists and their practices in Virginia; (2) explore periodontists’ perceptions of the impact that changes in the field of dentistry (i.e. increasing corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume of periodontal procedures done by general practitioners [GPs]) are having on the specialty; (3) explore how periodontists might adjust their practices to account for these trends.
Methods
An electronic survey was emailed to Virginia‐based American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) members assessing personal and practice demographics, trends in treatment modalities and practice models, and to survey how periodontists plan to adapt their practices for these trends. Virginia has large urban, suburban and rural municipalities, which renders the state a favorable representation of the United States as a whole.
Results
The response rate was 31% (n = 46). Most respondents (87%) were male and practiced full‐time (70%). Respondents reported practicing predominantly in urban (n = 19, 41%) and suburban (n = 24, 52%) and less in rural areas (n = 3, 7%). In current practice, respondents reported greater numbers of referrals from more experienced GPs. Student debt after periodontal residency was significantly associated with age (P value = 0.0002), with 56% of respondents aged $250,000 compared with 3% for those aged ≥40 years. Respondents ranked biologic advances, treatment of peri‐implantitis, advances in digital dentistry, development of corporate and group practice models, and integration of more periodontal services in GP practices as the most likely trends to impact periodontal practices. The most commonly reported practice adjustments included expansion of existing services, increasing the number of periodontists in the practice, and joining with other specialists or GPs to create group practices.
Conclusion
Periodontists perceive the need to expand services, increase the number of providers in their practices or create group practices to account for increased corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume of periodontal procedures performed by GPs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/JPER.18-0634 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250625924</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2250625924</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-6614585db220e700e3ca9722b3dfa969e7c6d409aeb1647b9ad70700f70070d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EouWyMSOPDKT4Esc1G6rKTZVACJCYIic-AaM0CbYj1K2PwMrr9UlIKDAyHB2d_3z6hw-hA0pGlBB2cn07vRvRcUQSHm-gIVUxj3giySYadm8W8VixAdrx_rU7aczJNhpwyoQUSgzR06N1z7ayerX8yLQHgxtwtjZ1FawPfrX87IMcmmDryp_iSescVAHryuCiDa0DHLrAeFwXOLwA9g3kVpdhsYe2Cl162P_Zu-jhfHo_uYxmNxdXk7NZlHMueJQkNBZjYTLGCEhCgOdaScYybgqtEgUyT0xMlIaMJrHMlDaSdFzRjSQm5rvoaN3buPqtBR_SufU5lKWuoG59ypggCROK9ejxGs1d7b2DIm2cnWu3SClJe5lpLzOl47SX2eGHP81tNgfzB__a6wC-Bt5tCYt_y74PSrjk_AtXn4DW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250625924</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virginia‐based periodontists’ perceptions: Current and future trends of the specialty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>White, John H. ; Carrico, Caroline K. ; Lanning, Sharon K. ; Waldrop, Thomas C. ; Sabatini, Robert ; Richardson, Christopher R. ; Golob Deeb, Janina</creator><creatorcontrib>White, John H. ; Carrico, Caroline K. ; Lanning, Sharon K. ; Waldrop, Thomas C. ; Sabatini, Robert ; Richardson, Christopher R. ; Golob Deeb, Janina</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The aim of this survey was threefold: (1) describe the demographics of periodontists and their practices in Virginia; (2) explore periodontists’ perceptions of the impact that changes in the field of dentistry (i.e. increasing corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume of periodontal procedures done by general practitioners [GPs]) are having on the specialty; (3) explore how periodontists might adjust their practices to account for these trends.
Methods
An electronic survey was emailed to Virginia‐based American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) members assessing personal and practice demographics, trends in treatment modalities and practice models, and to survey how periodontists plan to adapt their practices for these trends. Virginia has large urban, suburban and rural municipalities, which renders the state a favorable representation of the United States as a whole.
Results
The response rate was 31% (n = 46). Most respondents (87%) were male and practiced full‐time (70%). Respondents reported practicing predominantly in urban (n = 19, 41%) and suburban (n = 24, 52%) and less in rural areas (n = 3, 7%). In current practice, respondents reported greater numbers of referrals from more experienced GPs. Student debt after periodontal residency was significantly associated with age (P value = 0.0002), with 56% of respondents aged <40 years reporting student loans >$250,000 compared with 3% for those aged ≥40 years. Respondents ranked biologic advances, treatment of peri‐implantitis, advances in digital dentistry, development of corporate and group practice models, and integration of more periodontal services in GP practices as the most likely trends to impact periodontal practices. The most commonly reported practice adjustments included expansion of existing services, increasing the number of periodontists in the practice, and joining with other specialists or GPs to create group practices.
Conclusion
Periodontists perceive the need to expand services, increase the number of providers in their practices or create group practices to account for increased corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume of periodontal procedures performed by GPs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3492</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3670</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/JPER.18-0634</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31257595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Adult ; Dental Care ; Dentistry ; Dentists ; future trends ; Humans ; Male ; perceptions ; Periodontics ; periodontists ; practice trends ; Referral and Consultation ; survey ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Virginia</subject><ispartof>Journal of periodontology (1970), 2019-11, Vol.90 (11), p.1287-1296</ispartof><rights>2019 American Academy of Periodontology</rights><rights>2019 American Academy of Periodontology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-6614585db220e700e3ca9722b3dfa969e7c6d409aeb1647b9ad70700f70070d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-6614585db220e700e3ca9722b3dfa969e7c6d409aeb1647b9ad70700f70070d43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3189-0136</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2FJPER.18-0634$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2FJPER.18-0634$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31257595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>White, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrico, Caroline K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanning, Sharon K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldrop, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabatini, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golob Deeb, Janina</creatorcontrib><title>Virginia‐based periodontists’ perceptions: Current and future trends of the specialty</title><title>Journal of periodontology (1970)</title><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><description>Background
The aim of this survey was threefold: (1) describe the demographics of periodontists and their practices in Virginia; (2) explore periodontists’ perceptions of the impact that changes in the field of dentistry (i.e. increasing corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume of periodontal procedures done by general practitioners [GPs]) are having on the specialty; (3) explore how periodontists might adjust their practices to account for these trends.
Methods
An electronic survey was emailed to Virginia‐based American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) members assessing personal and practice demographics, trends in treatment modalities and practice models, and to survey how periodontists plan to adapt their practices for these trends. Virginia has large urban, suburban and rural municipalities, which renders the state a favorable representation of the United States as a whole.
Results
The response rate was 31% (n = 46). Most respondents (87%) were male and practiced full‐time (70%). Respondents reported practicing predominantly in urban (n = 19, 41%) and suburban (n = 24, 52%) and less in rural areas (n = 3, 7%). In current practice, respondents reported greater numbers of referrals from more experienced GPs. Student debt after periodontal residency was significantly associated with age (P value = 0.0002), with 56% of respondents aged <40 years reporting student loans >$250,000 compared with 3% for those aged ≥40 years. Respondents ranked biologic advances, treatment of peri‐implantitis, advances in digital dentistry, development of corporate and group practice models, and integration of more periodontal services in GP practices as the most likely trends to impact periodontal practices. The most commonly reported practice adjustments included expansion of existing services, increasing the number of periodontists in the practice, and joining with other specialists or GPs to create group practices.
Conclusion
Periodontists perceive the need to expand services, increase the number of providers in their practices or create group practices to account for increased corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume of periodontal procedures performed by GPs.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Dental Care</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Dentists</subject><subject>future trends</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>perceptions</subject><subject>Periodontics</subject><subject>periodontists</subject><subject>practice trends</subject><subject>Referral and Consultation</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><issn>0022-3492</issn><issn>1943-3670</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kLtOwzAUhi0EouWyMSOPDKT4Esc1G6rKTZVACJCYIic-AaM0CbYj1K2PwMrr9UlIKDAyHB2d_3z6hw-hA0pGlBB2cn07vRvRcUQSHm-gIVUxj3giySYadm8W8VixAdrx_rU7aczJNhpwyoQUSgzR06N1z7ayerX8yLQHgxtwtjZ1FawPfrX87IMcmmDryp_iSescVAHryuCiDa0DHLrAeFwXOLwA9g3kVpdhsYe2Cl162P_Zu-jhfHo_uYxmNxdXk7NZlHMueJQkNBZjYTLGCEhCgOdaScYybgqtEgUyT0xMlIaMJrHMlDaSdFzRjSQm5rvoaN3buPqtBR_SufU5lKWuoG59ypggCROK9ejxGs1d7b2DIm2cnWu3SClJe5lpLzOl47SX2eGHP81tNgfzB__a6wC-Bt5tCYt_y74PSrjk_AtXn4DW</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>White, John H.</creator><creator>Carrico, Caroline K.</creator><creator>Lanning, Sharon K.</creator><creator>Waldrop, Thomas C.</creator><creator>Sabatini, Robert</creator><creator>Richardson, Christopher R.</creator><creator>Golob Deeb, Janina</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3189-0136</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Virginia‐based periodontists’ perceptions: Current and future trends of the specialty</title><author>White, John H. ; Carrico, Caroline K. ; Lanning, Sharon K. ; Waldrop, Thomas C. ; Sabatini, Robert ; Richardson, Christopher R. ; Golob Deeb, Janina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3353-6614585db220e700e3ca9722b3dfa969e7c6d409aeb1647b9ad70700f70070d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Dental Care</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Dentists</topic><topic>future trends</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>perceptions</topic><topic>Periodontics</topic><topic>periodontists</topic><topic>practice trends</topic><topic>Referral and Consultation</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>White, John H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carrico, Caroline K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lanning, Sharon K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waldrop, Thomas C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabatini, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Golob Deeb, Janina</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>White, John H.</au><au>Carrico, Caroline K.</au><au>Lanning, Sharon K.</au><au>Waldrop, Thomas C.</au><au>Sabatini, Robert</au><au>Richardson, Christopher R.</au><au>Golob Deeb, Janina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virginia‐based periodontists’ perceptions: Current and future trends of the specialty</atitle><jtitle>Journal of periodontology (1970)</jtitle><addtitle>J Periodontol</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1287</spage><epage>1296</epage><pages>1287-1296</pages><issn>0022-3492</issn><eissn>1943-3670</eissn><abstract>Background
The aim of this survey was threefold: (1) describe the demographics of periodontists and their practices in Virginia; (2) explore periodontists’ perceptions of the impact that changes in the field of dentistry (i.e. increasing corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume of periodontal procedures done by general practitioners [GPs]) are having on the specialty; (3) explore how periodontists might adjust their practices to account for these trends.
Methods
An electronic survey was emailed to Virginia‐based American Academy of Periodontology (AAP) members assessing personal and practice demographics, trends in treatment modalities and practice models, and to survey how periodontists plan to adapt their practices for these trends. Virginia has large urban, suburban and rural municipalities, which renders the state a favorable representation of the United States as a whole.
Results
The response rate was 31% (n = 46). Most respondents (87%) were male and practiced full‐time (70%). Respondents reported practicing predominantly in urban (n = 19, 41%) and suburban (n = 24, 52%) and less in rural areas (n = 3, 7%). In current practice, respondents reported greater numbers of referrals from more experienced GPs. Student debt after periodontal residency was significantly associated with age (P value = 0.0002), with 56% of respondents aged <40 years reporting student loans >$250,000 compared with 3% for those aged ≥40 years. Respondents ranked biologic advances, treatment of peri‐implantitis, advances in digital dentistry, development of corporate and group practice models, and integration of more periodontal services in GP practices as the most likely trends to impact periodontal practices. The most commonly reported practice adjustments included expansion of existing services, increasing the number of periodontists in the practice, and joining with other specialists or GPs to create group practices.
Conclusion
Periodontists perceive the need to expand services, increase the number of providers in their practices or create group practices to account for increased corporate dentistry, graduate debt, digitalization, and volume of periodontal procedures performed by GPs.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>31257595</pmid><doi>10.1002/JPER.18-0634</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3189-0136</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3492 |
ispartof | Journal of periodontology (1970), 2019-11, Vol.90 (11), p.1287-1296 |
issn | 0022-3492 1943-3670 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250625924 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Dental Care Dentistry Dentists future trends Humans Male perceptions Periodontics periodontists practice trends Referral and Consultation survey Surveys and Questionnaires United States Virginia |
title | Virginia‐based periodontists’ perceptions: Current and future trends of the specialty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T20%3A34%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virginia%E2%80%90based%20periodontists%E2%80%99%20perceptions:%20Current%20and%20future%20trends%20of%20the%20specialty&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20periodontology%20(1970)&rft.au=White,%20John%20H.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1287&rft.epage=1296&rft.pages=1287-1296&rft.issn=0022-3492&rft.eissn=1943-3670&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/JPER.18-0634&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2250625924%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250625924&rft_id=info:pmid/31257595&rfr_iscdi=true |