The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in early rheumatoid arthritis and its ability to predict subsequent failure of triple therapy

To assess whether the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can predict those who subsequently require escalation of disease modifying therapy because of continued disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with newly diagnosed RA were recruited from the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism 2019-12, Vol.49 (3), p.373-376
Hauptverfasser: Boulos, Daniel, Proudman, Susanna M., Metcalf, Robert G., McWilliams, Leah, Hall, Cindy, Wicks, Ian P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 376
container_issue 3
container_start_page 373
container_title Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism
container_volume 49
creator Boulos, Daniel
Proudman, Susanna M.
Metcalf, Robert G.
McWilliams, Leah
Hall, Cindy
Wicks, Ian P.
description To assess whether the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can predict those who subsequently require escalation of disease modifying therapy because of continued disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with newly diagnosed RA were recruited from the Early Arthritis Clinic at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. All patients commenced “triple-therapy” with a standardised protocol of methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, and were reviewed every three to six weeks. DMARD therapy was adjusted according to a pre-defined algorithm if not in low disease activity. The NLR, PLR and other markers of disease activity including ESR, CRP and DAS28 were collected, as well as current therapy. The primary outcome measure was failure of triple-therapy to maintain low-disease activity (DAS282.7 was an independent predictor of treatment failure (OR 2.65, CI 1.23–5.72, p = 0.01) whilst the PLR, ESR, CRP and DAS-28ESR were not. The NLR is significantly increased in those who subsequently fail triple-therapy for RA, and it outperformed conventional markers of disease activity. The NLR may offer an inexpensive, objective and reproducible prognostic marker in RA. Further studies are justified to confirm its potential role in guiding the management of RA.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.05.008
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250606966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S004901721930109X</els_id><sourcerecordid>2250606966</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-d68c03a1c3f7234ecc39d389c31219289c1a022f741f3ca35f382461b34061593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQha2Kqmxp_0LlYy9Jx3biJEdAtCAh9UIlbpbXmSheOXFqO0g58N8x2i0ce5o5vDdv3kcIZVAyYPLHoYw46ZDGYFPJgXUl1CVA-4HsWC140Ur5eEZ2AFVXAGv4Ofkc4wGAMQnNJ3IuGK_aum125PlhRDrjmoJfRusKt03L6M2WkAadrKd2pqiD22gYcZ108ranp2QbqZ57alOee-ts2mjydAnYW5NoXPcR_644Jzpo69aA1A80Bbs4pGnEoJftC_k4aBfx62lekD8_bx6ub4v737_uri_vCyOaKhW9bA0IzYwYGi4qNEZ0vWg7k3uwjueFaeB8aCo2CKNFPYiWV5LtRQWS1Z24IN-Pd5fg80sxqclGg87pGf0aFec1SJCdlFnaHqUm-BgDDmoJNrPeFAP1Cl8d1Dt89QpfQa0y_Gz9dkpZ9xP2b8Z_tLPg6ijA3PXJYlDRWJxNBhbQJNV7-_-UFzidnaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2250606966</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in early rheumatoid arthritis and its ability to predict subsequent failure of triple therapy</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Boulos, Daniel ; Proudman, Susanna M. ; Metcalf, Robert G. ; McWilliams, Leah ; Hall, Cindy ; Wicks, Ian P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boulos, Daniel ; Proudman, Susanna M. ; Metcalf, Robert G. ; McWilliams, Leah ; Hall, Cindy ; Wicks, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><description>To assess whether the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can predict those who subsequently require escalation of disease modifying therapy because of continued disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with newly diagnosed RA were recruited from the Early Arthritis Clinic at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. All patients commenced “triple-therapy” with a standardised protocol of methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, and were reviewed every three to six weeks. DMARD therapy was adjusted according to a pre-defined algorithm if not in low disease activity. The NLR, PLR and other markers of disease activity including ESR, CRP and DAS28 were collected, as well as current therapy. The primary outcome measure was failure of triple-therapy to maintain low-disease activity (DAS28&lt;3.2) at 12 months. Two-hundred and twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 54.2 ± 15.4 years, with a mean disease duration of 22.3 ± 25.0 weeks. Forty-five (20%) patients had failed triple therapy by one year. The mean baseline NLR was significantly higher in those who failed triple therapy compared with those who did not (3.7 ± 2.8 vs. 2.9 ± 1.5; p = 0.02), however, the PLR was not significantly different. A baseline NLR&gt;2.7 was an independent predictor of treatment failure (OR 2.65, CI 1.23–5.72, p = 0.01) whilst the PLR, ESR, CRP and DAS-28ESR were not. The NLR is significantly increased in those who subsequently fail triple-therapy for RA, and it outperformed conventional markers of disease activity. The NLR may offer an inexpensive, objective and reproducible prognostic marker in RA. Further studies are justified to confirm its potential role in guiding the management of RA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-0172</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-866X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.05.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31248587</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Arthritis ; Lymphocytes ; Neutrophils ; Prognosis ; Rheumatoid ; Severity of Illness Index</subject><ispartof>Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2019-12, Vol.49 (3), p.373-376</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-d68c03a1c3f7234ecc39d389c31219289c1a022f741f3ca35f382461b34061593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-d68c03a1c3f7234ecc39d389c31219289c1a022f741f3ca35f382461b34061593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.05.008$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31248587$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boulos, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proudman, Susanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalf, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wicks, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><title>The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in early rheumatoid arthritis and its ability to predict subsequent failure of triple therapy</title><title>Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism</title><addtitle>Semin Arthritis Rheum</addtitle><description>To assess whether the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can predict those who subsequently require escalation of disease modifying therapy because of continued disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with newly diagnosed RA were recruited from the Early Arthritis Clinic at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. All patients commenced “triple-therapy” with a standardised protocol of methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, and were reviewed every three to six weeks. DMARD therapy was adjusted according to a pre-defined algorithm if not in low disease activity. The NLR, PLR and other markers of disease activity including ESR, CRP and DAS28 were collected, as well as current therapy. The primary outcome measure was failure of triple-therapy to maintain low-disease activity (DAS28&lt;3.2) at 12 months. Two-hundred and twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 54.2 ± 15.4 years, with a mean disease duration of 22.3 ± 25.0 weeks. Forty-five (20%) patients had failed triple therapy by one year. The mean baseline NLR was significantly higher in those who failed triple therapy compared with those who did not (3.7 ± 2.8 vs. 2.9 ± 1.5; p = 0.02), however, the PLR was not significantly different. A baseline NLR&gt;2.7 was an independent predictor of treatment failure (OR 2.65, CI 1.23–5.72, p = 0.01) whilst the PLR, ESR, CRP and DAS-28ESR were not. The NLR is significantly increased in those who subsequently fail triple-therapy for RA, and it outperformed conventional markers of disease activity. The NLR may offer an inexpensive, objective and reproducible prognostic marker in RA. Further studies are justified to confirm its potential role in guiding the management of RA.</description><subject>Arthritis</subject><subject>Lymphocytes</subject><subject>Neutrophils</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Rheumatoid</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><issn>0049-0172</issn><issn>1532-866X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQha2Kqmxp_0LlYy9Jx3biJEdAtCAh9UIlbpbXmSheOXFqO0g58N8x2i0ce5o5vDdv3kcIZVAyYPLHoYw46ZDGYFPJgXUl1CVA-4HsWC140Ur5eEZ2AFVXAGv4Ofkc4wGAMQnNJ3IuGK_aum125PlhRDrjmoJfRusKt03L6M2WkAadrKd2pqiD22gYcZ108ranp2QbqZ57alOee-ts2mjydAnYW5NoXPcR_644Jzpo69aA1A80Bbs4pGnEoJftC_k4aBfx62lekD8_bx6ub4v737_uri_vCyOaKhW9bA0IzYwYGi4qNEZ0vWg7k3uwjueFaeB8aCo2CKNFPYiWV5LtRQWS1Z24IN-Pd5fg80sxqclGg87pGf0aFec1SJCdlFnaHqUm-BgDDmoJNrPeFAP1Cl8d1Dt89QpfQa0y_Gz9dkpZ9xP2b8Z_tLPg6ijA3PXJYlDRWJxNBhbQJNV7-_-UFzidnaI</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Boulos, Daniel</creator><creator>Proudman, Susanna M.</creator><creator>Metcalf, Robert G.</creator><creator>McWilliams, Leah</creator><creator>Hall, Cindy</creator><creator>Wicks, Ian P.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in early rheumatoid arthritis and its ability to predict subsequent failure of triple therapy</title><author>Boulos, Daniel ; Proudman, Susanna M. ; Metcalf, Robert G. ; McWilliams, Leah ; Hall, Cindy ; Wicks, Ian P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c374t-d68c03a1c3f7234ecc39d389c31219289c1a022f741f3ca35f382461b34061593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Arthritis</topic><topic>Lymphocytes</topic><topic>Neutrophils</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Rheumatoid</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boulos, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Proudman, Susanna M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metcalf, Robert G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McWilliams, Leah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wicks, Ian P.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boulos, Daniel</au><au>Proudman, Susanna M.</au><au>Metcalf, Robert G.</au><au>McWilliams, Leah</au><au>Hall, Cindy</au><au>Wicks, Ian P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in early rheumatoid arthritis and its ability to predict subsequent failure of triple therapy</atitle><jtitle>Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism</jtitle><addtitle>Semin Arthritis Rheum</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>373</spage><epage>376</epage><pages>373-376</pages><issn>0049-0172</issn><eissn>1532-866X</eissn><abstract>To assess whether the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can predict those who subsequently require escalation of disease modifying therapy because of continued disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Patients with newly diagnosed RA were recruited from the Early Arthritis Clinic at the Royal Adelaide Hospital. All patients commenced “triple-therapy” with a standardised protocol of methotrexate, sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine, and were reviewed every three to six weeks. DMARD therapy was adjusted according to a pre-defined algorithm if not in low disease activity. The NLR, PLR and other markers of disease activity including ESR, CRP and DAS28 were collected, as well as current therapy. The primary outcome measure was failure of triple-therapy to maintain low-disease activity (DAS28&lt;3.2) at 12 months. Two-hundred and twenty-two patients met inclusion criteria. The mean age was 54.2 ± 15.4 years, with a mean disease duration of 22.3 ± 25.0 weeks. Forty-five (20%) patients had failed triple therapy by one year. The mean baseline NLR was significantly higher in those who failed triple therapy compared with those who did not (3.7 ± 2.8 vs. 2.9 ± 1.5; p = 0.02), however, the PLR was not significantly different. A baseline NLR&gt;2.7 was an independent predictor of treatment failure (OR 2.65, CI 1.23–5.72, p = 0.01) whilst the PLR, ESR, CRP and DAS-28ESR were not. The NLR is significantly increased in those who subsequently fail triple-therapy for RA, and it outperformed conventional markers of disease activity. The NLR may offer an inexpensive, objective and reproducible prognostic marker in RA. Further studies are justified to confirm its potential role in guiding the management of RA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31248587</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.05.008</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-0172
ispartof Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism, 2019-12, Vol.49 (3), p.373-376
issn 0049-0172
1532-866X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2250606966
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Arthritis
Lymphocytes
Neutrophils
Prognosis
Rheumatoid
Severity of Illness Index
title The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in early rheumatoid arthritis and its ability to predict subsequent failure of triple therapy
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T23%3A26%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20neutrophil-lymphocyte%20ratio%20in%20early%20rheumatoid%20arthritis%20and%20its%20ability%20to%20predict%20subsequent%20failure%20of%20triple%20therapy&rft.jtitle=Seminars%20in%20arthritis%20and%20rheumatism&rft.au=Boulos,%20Daniel&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=373&rft.epage=376&rft.pages=373-376&rft.issn=0049-0172&rft.eissn=1532-866X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.05.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2250606966%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2250606966&rft_id=info:pmid/31248587&rft_els_id=S004901721930109X&rfr_iscdi=true