Programmed death–ligand 1 expression on direct Pap‐stained cytology smears from non–small cell lung cancer: Comparison with cell blocks and surgical resection specimens

Background Programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression, as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), is used to select patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1)/PD‐L1 therapy. The current study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of PD‐L1 immu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer cytopathology 2019-07, Vol.127 (7), p.470-480
Hauptverfasser: Lozano, Maria D., Abengozar‐Muela, Marta, Echeveste, José I., Subtil, José Carlos, Bertó, Juan, Gúrpide, Alfonso, Calvo, Alfonso, Andrea, Carlos E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 480
container_issue 7
container_start_page 470
container_title Cancer cytopathology
container_volume 127
creator Lozano, Maria D.
Abengozar‐Muela, Marta
Echeveste, José I.
Subtil, José Carlos
Bertó, Juan
Gúrpide, Alfonso
Calvo, Alfonso
Andrea, Carlos E.
description Background Programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression, as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), is used to select patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1)/PD‐L1 therapy. The current study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of PD‐L1 immunostaining and quantitation on direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytological smears compared with formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples (cytological cell blocks and surgical resection specimens) in NSCLC cases using 2 commercially available assays: the PD‐L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent Technologies/Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and the Ventana SP263 Assay (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, Arizona). Methods PD‐L1 immunostaining using either both or one of the assays was tested in 117 sets of paired samples obtained from 62 NSCLC cases. The tumor proportion score was reported in every case following the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Results In 57 sets of samples, both PD‐L1 assays were used. Due to the availability of samples, only 1 assay was performed in 3 sets of samples and in 2 cases, only cytology smears were used and tested for both assays. A total of 113 sets of paired samples finally were evaluated; 4 cases could not be studied due to intense nonspecific background staining. A significant concordance between the 2 assays on cytological smears was found. Concordance between paired cytological smears and formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples was observed in 97.3% of the cases. Conclusions The quantification of PD‐L1 expression on direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytology smears is feasible and reliable for both PD‐L1 assays. The quantification of programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression on a direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytology smear is feasible. In the current study, PD‐L1 testing in cytology appears to be mostly concordant with corresponding histology samples.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncy.22155
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2248384021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2248384021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-20ce1708cb122e75025066f0b4b8c381a06fe703b2ba0c64851369c1399165273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1qFjEUhgdRbK1uvAAJuBHhq8lJMj_uZPAPinahoKshky8zTZ0k05wZ6ux6CYL34UX1Ssw4tQsXQkjO4snzHniz7DGjx4xSeKG9Xo4BmJR3skNWcbHLc17evZ3hy0H2APGcUlYWwO5nB5yBkBWIw-zXaQx9VM6ZPdkbNZ1dX_0cbK_8njBivo_RINrgSTp7G42eyKkar69-4KSsT3_0MoUh9AtBZ1RE0sXgiA8-adCpYSDapGuYfU-08trEl6QOblTRYlJe2ulsI9oh6G9I1lycY2-1GkjKToFrOo5GW2c8PszudWpA8-jmPco-v3n9qX63O_n49n396mSnecXlDqg2rKClbhmAKSQFSfO8o61oS81LpmjemYLyFlpFdS5KyXheacariuUSCn6UPdu8YwwXs8GpcRbXRZU3YcYGQJS8FBRYQp_-g56HOfq0XaKkkAAFiEQ93ygdA2I0XTNG61RcGkabtcVmbbH502KCn9wo5zYVc4v-rS0BbAMu7WCW_6ia-kP9dZP-BgOkrD4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2254522724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Programmed death–ligand 1 expression on direct Pap‐stained cytology smears from non–small cell lung cancer: Comparison with cell blocks and surgical resection specimens</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Lozano, Maria D. ; Abengozar‐Muela, Marta ; Echeveste, José I. ; Subtil, José Carlos ; Bertó, Juan ; Gúrpide, Alfonso ; Calvo, Alfonso ; Andrea, Carlos E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lozano, Maria D. ; Abengozar‐Muela, Marta ; Echeveste, José I. ; Subtil, José Carlos ; Bertó, Juan ; Gúrpide, Alfonso ; Calvo, Alfonso ; Andrea, Carlos E.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression, as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), is used to select patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1)/PD‐L1 therapy. The current study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of PD‐L1 immunostaining and quantitation on direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytological smears compared with formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples (cytological cell blocks and surgical resection specimens) in NSCLC cases using 2 commercially available assays: the PD‐L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent Technologies/Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and the Ventana SP263 Assay (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, Arizona). Methods PD‐L1 immunostaining using either both or one of the assays was tested in 117 sets of paired samples obtained from 62 NSCLC cases. The tumor proportion score was reported in every case following the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Results In 57 sets of samples, both PD‐L1 assays were used. Due to the availability of samples, only 1 assay was performed in 3 sets of samples and in 2 cases, only cytology smears were used and tested for both assays. A total of 113 sets of paired samples finally were evaluated; 4 cases could not be studied due to intense nonspecific background staining. A significant concordance between the 2 assays on cytological smears was found. Concordance between paired cytological smears and formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples was observed in 97.3% of the cases. Conclusions The quantification of PD‐L1 expression on direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytology smears is feasible and reliable for both PD‐L1 assays. The quantification of programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression on a direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytology smear is feasible. In the current study, PD‐L1 testing in cytology appears to be mostly concordant with corresponding histology samples.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1934-662X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-6638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22155</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31245924</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use ; B7-H1 Antigen - analysis ; B7-H1 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; B7-H1 Antigen - metabolism ; biomarkers ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biomarkers, Tumor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - immunology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy ; cell blocks ; Cellular biology ; cytology ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; fine‐needle aspiration ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; immunoperoxidase stain ; immunostaining ; Ligands ; lung ; Lung - pathology ; Lung - surgery ; Lung cancer ; Lung Neoplasms - immunology ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) ; Papanicolaou Test ; Paraffin Embedding ; Patient Selection ; Pneumonectomy ; programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) ; smears ; Tissue Fixation ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Cancer cytopathology, 2019-07, Vol.127 (7), p.470-480</ispartof><rights>2019 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2019 American Cancer Society.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-20ce1708cb122e75025066f0b4b8c381a06fe703b2ba0c64851369c1399165273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-20ce1708cb122e75025066f0b4b8c381a06fe703b2ba0c64851369c1399165273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncy.22155$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncy.22155$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31245924$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lozano, Maria D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abengozar‐Muela, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echeveste, José I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subtil, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertó, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gúrpide, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea, Carlos E.</creatorcontrib><title>Programmed death–ligand 1 expression on direct Pap‐stained cytology smears from non–small cell lung cancer: Comparison with cell blocks and surgical resection specimens</title><title>Cancer cytopathology</title><addtitle>Cancer Cytopathol</addtitle><description>Background Programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression, as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), is used to select patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1)/PD‐L1 therapy. The current study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of PD‐L1 immunostaining and quantitation on direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytological smears compared with formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples (cytological cell blocks and surgical resection specimens) in NSCLC cases using 2 commercially available assays: the PD‐L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent Technologies/Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and the Ventana SP263 Assay (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, Arizona). Methods PD‐L1 immunostaining using either both or one of the assays was tested in 117 sets of paired samples obtained from 62 NSCLC cases. The tumor proportion score was reported in every case following the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Results In 57 sets of samples, both PD‐L1 assays were used. Due to the availability of samples, only 1 assay was performed in 3 sets of samples and in 2 cases, only cytology smears were used and tested for both assays. A total of 113 sets of paired samples finally were evaluated; 4 cases could not be studied due to intense nonspecific background staining. A significant concordance between the 2 assays on cytological smears was found. Concordance between paired cytological smears and formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples was observed in 97.3% of the cases. Conclusions The quantification of PD‐L1 expression on direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytology smears is feasible and reliable for both PD‐L1 assays. The quantification of programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression on a direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytology smear is feasible. In the current study, PD‐L1 testing in cytology appears to be mostly concordant with corresponding histology samples.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use</subject><subject>B7-H1 Antigen - analysis</subject><subject>B7-H1 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>B7-H1 Antigen - metabolism</subject><subject>biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - immunology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy</subject><subject>cell blocks</subject><subject>Cellular biology</subject><subject>cytology</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>fine‐needle aspiration</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>immunoperoxidase stain</subject><subject>immunostaining</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>lung</subject><subject>Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Lung - surgery</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - immunology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)</subject><subject>Papanicolaou Test</subject><subject>Paraffin Embedding</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Pneumonectomy</subject><subject>programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1)</subject><subject>smears</subject><subject>Tissue Fixation</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1934-662X</issn><issn>1934-6638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1qFjEUhgdRbK1uvAAJuBHhq8lJMj_uZPAPinahoKshky8zTZ0k05wZ6ux6CYL34UX1Ssw4tQsXQkjO4snzHniz7DGjx4xSeKG9Xo4BmJR3skNWcbHLc17evZ3hy0H2APGcUlYWwO5nB5yBkBWIw-zXaQx9VM6ZPdkbNZ1dX_0cbK_8njBivo_RINrgSTp7G42eyKkar69-4KSsT3_0MoUh9AtBZ1RE0sXgiA8-adCpYSDapGuYfU-08trEl6QOblTRYlJe2ulsI9oh6G9I1lycY2-1GkjKToFrOo5GW2c8PszudWpA8-jmPco-v3n9qX63O_n49n396mSnecXlDqg2rKClbhmAKSQFSfO8o61oS81LpmjemYLyFlpFdS5KyXheacariuUSCn6UPdu8YwwXs8GpcRbXRZU3YcYGQJS8FBRYQp_-g56HOfq0XaKkkAAFiEQ93ygdA2I0XTNG61RcGkabtcVmbbH502KCn9wo5zYVc4v-rS0BbAMu7WCW_6ia-kP9dZP-BgOkrD4</recordid><startdate>201907</startdate><enddate>201907</enddate><creator>Lozano, Maria D.</creator><creator>Abengozar‐Muela, Marta</creator><creator>Echeveste, José I.</creator><creator>Subtil, José Carlos</creator><creator>Bertó, Juan</creator><creator>Gúrpide, Alfonso</creator><creator>Calvo, Alfonso</creator><creator>Andrea, Carlos E.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201907</creationdate><title>Programmed death–ligand 1 expression on direct Pap‐stained cytology smears from non–small cell lung cancer: Comparison with cell blocks and surgical resection specimens</title><author>Lozano, Maria D. ; Abengozar‐Muela, Marta ; Echeveste, José I. ; Subtil, José Carlos ; Bertó, Juan ; Gúrpide, Alfonso ; Calvo, Alfonso ; Andrea, Carlos E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3935-20ce1708cb122e75025066f0b4b8c381a06fe703b2ba0c64851369c1399165273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use</topic><topic>B7-H1 Antigen - analysis</topic><topic>B7-H1 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>B7-H1 Antigen - metabolism</topic><topic>biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - immunology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy</topic><topic>cell blocks</topic><topic>Cellular biology</topic><topic>cytology</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>fine‐needle aspiration</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>immunoperoxidase stain</topic><topic>immunostaining</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>lung</topic><topic>Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Lung - surgery</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - immunology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)</topic><topic>Papanicolaou Test</topic><topic>Paraffin Embedding</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Pneumonectomy</topic><topic>programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1)</topic><topic>smears</topic><topic>Tissue Fixation</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lozano, Maria D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abengozar‐Muela, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Echeveste, José I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Subtil, José Carlos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertó, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gúrpide, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, Alfonso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrea, Carlos E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer cytopathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lozano, Maria D.</au><au>Abengozar‐Muela, Marta</au><au>Echeveste, José I.</au><au>Subtil, José Carlos</au><au>Bertó, Juan</au><au>Gúrpide, Alfonso</au><au>Calvo, Alfonso</au><au>Andrea, Carlos E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Programmed death–ligand 1 expression on direct Pap‐stained cytology smears from non–small cell lung cancer: Comparison with cell blocks and surgical resection specimens</atitle><jtitle>Cancer cytopathology</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer Cytopathol</addtitle><date>2019-07</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>470</spage><epage>480</epage><pages>470-480</pages><issn>1934-662X</issn><eissn>1934-6638</eissn><abstract>Background Programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression, as assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), is used to select patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1)/PD‐L1 therapy. The current study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of PD‐L1 immunostaining and quantitation on direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytological smears compared with formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples (cytological cell blocks and surgical resection specimens) in NSCLC cases using 2 commercially available assays: the PD‐L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent Technologies/Dako, Carpinteria, CA, USA) and the Ventana SP263 Assay (Ventana Medical Systems Inc, Tucson, Arizona). Methods PD‐L1 immunostaining using either both or one of the assays was tested in 117 sets of paired samples obtained from 62 NSCLC cases. The tumor proportion score was reported in every case following the recommendations of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Results In 57 sets of samples, both PD‐L1 assays were used. Due to the availability of samples, only 1 assay was performed in 3 sets of samples and in 2 cases, only cytology smears were used and tested for both assays. A total of 113 sets of paired samples finally were evaluated; 4 cases could not be studied due to intense nonspecific background staining. A significant concordance between the 2 assays on cytological smears was found. Concordance between paired cytological smears and formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded samples was observed in 97.3% of the cases. Conclusions The quantification of PD‐L1 expression on direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytology smears is feasible and reliable for both PD‐L1 assays. The quantification of programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression on a direct Papanicolaou‐stained cytology smear is feasible. In the current study, PD‐L1 testing in cytology appears to be mostly concordant with corresponding histology samples.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31245924</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncy.22155</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1934-662X
ispartof Cancer cytopathology, 2019-07, Vol.127 (7), p.470-480
issn 1934-662X
1934-6638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2248384021
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological - therapeutic use
B7-H1 Antigen - analysis
B7-H1 Antigen - antagonists & inhibitors
B7-H1 Antigen - metabolism
biomarkers
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Biomarkers, Tumor - antagonists & inhibitors
Biomarkers, Tumor - metabolism
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - immunology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy
cell blocks
Cellular biology
cytology
Feasibility Studies
Female
fine‐needle aspiration
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
immunoperoxidase stain
immunostaining
Ligands
lung
Lung - pathology
Lung - surgery
Lung cancer
Lung Neoplasms - immunology
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
non–small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)
Papanicolaou Test
Paraffin Embedding
Patient Selection
Pneumonectomy
programmed death–ligand 1 (PD‐L1)
smears
Tissue Fixation
Young Adult
title Programmed death–ligand 1 expression on direct Pap‐stained cytology smears from non–small cell lung cancer: Comparison with cell blocks and surgical resection specimens
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T18%3A10%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Programmed%20death%E2%80%93ligand%201%20expression%20on%20direct%20Pap%E2%80%90stained%20cytology%20smears%20from%20non%E2%80%93small%20cell%20lung%20cancer:%20Comparison%20with%20cell%20blocks%20and%20surgical%20resection%20specimens&rft.jtitle=Cancer%20cytopathology&rft.au=Lozano,%20Maria%20D.&rft.date=2019-07&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=470&rft.epage=480&rft.pages=470-480&rft.issn=1934-662X&rft.eissn=1934-6638&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncy.22155&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2248384021%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2254522724&rft_id=info:pmid/31245924&rfr_iscdi=true