Effects of amount and recurrence of leaf herbivory on the induction of direct and indirect defences in wild cotton
The induction of defences in response to herbivory is a key mechanism of plant resistance. While a number of studies have investigated the time course and magnitude of plant induction in response to a single event of herbivory, few have looked at the effects of recurrent herbivory. Furthermore, stud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) Germany), 2019-11, Vol.21 (6), p.1063-1071 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1071 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1063 |
container_title | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany) |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Abdala‐Roberts, L. Reyes‐Hernández, M. Quijano‐Medina, T. Moreira, X. Francisco, M. Angulo, D. F. Parra‐Tabla, V. Virgen, A. Rojas, J. C. Pineda, A. |
description | The induction of defences in response to herbivory is a key mechanism of plant resistance. While a number of studies have investigated the time course and magnitude of plant induction in response to a single event of herbivory, few have looked at the effects of recurrent herbivory. Furthermore, studies measuring the effects of the total amount and recurrence of herbivory on both direct and indirect plant defences are lacking. To address this gap, here we asked whether insect leaf herbivory induced changes in the amount and concentration of extrafloral nectar (an indirect defence) and concentration of leaf phenolic compounds (a direct defence) in wild cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).
We conducted a greenhouse experiment where we tested single event or recurrent herbivory effects on defence induction by applying mechanical leaf damage and caterpillar (Spodoptera frugiperda) regurgitant.
Single events of 25% and 50% leaf damage did not significantly influence extrafloral nectar production or concentration. Extrafloral nectar traits did, however, increase significantly relative to controls when plants were exposed to recurrent herbivory (two episodes of 25% damage). In contrast, phenolic compounds increased significantly in response to single events of leaf damage but not to recurrent damage. In addition, we found. that local induction of extrafloral nectar production was stronger than systemic induction, whereas the reverse pattern was observed for phenolics.
Together, these results reveal seemingly inverse patterns of induction of direct and indirect defences in response to herbivory in wild cotton.
Wild cotton differentially induces direct and indirect defences in response to the amount and recurrence of herbivory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/plb.13022 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2246910912</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2305457029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-dd6d1fcf518f6ec45b68f048c509fef407df8ee01a7d5c7fabf67b2c02b020c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMotlYP_gEJeNFD20myn0ct9QMKetBz2E0mdMt2U5Ndpf_etFs9COaSmckzL-F9CblkMGHhTDd1OWECOD8iQxaJbJwlaXq8r-NQgxiQM-9XACzKgZ2SgWBcpCJnQ-LmxqBqPbWGFmvbNS0tGk0dqs45bBTuHmosDF2iK6tP67bUNrRdIq0a3am2Cl1AdBVW-t0w7xuNZqfgw4R-VbWmyratbc7JiSlqjxeHe0TeH-Zvs6fx4uXxeXa3GCsRCz7WOtHMKBOzzCSoorhMMgNRpmLIDZoIUm0yRGBFqmOVmqI0SVpyBbwEDioTI3LT626c_ejQt3JdeYV1XTRoOy85j5KcQR68GJHrP-jKdq4Jv5NcQBzFKfA8ULc9pZz13qGRG1etC7eVDOQuCBmCkPsgAnt1UOzKNepf8sf5AEx7IDiD2_-V5Ovivpf8BupvksU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2305457029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of amount and recurrence of leaf herbivory on the induction of direct and indirect defences in wild cotton</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Abdala‐Roberts, L. ; Reyes‐Hernández, M. ; Quijano‐Medina, T. ; Moreira, X. ; Francisco, M. ; Angulo, D. F. ; Parra‐Tabla, V. ; Virgen, A. ; Rojas, J. C. ; Pineda, A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdala‐Roberts, L. ; Reyes‐Hernández, M. ; Quijano‐Medina, T. ; Moreira, X. ; Francisco, M. ; Angulo, D. F. ; Parra‐Tabla, V. ; Virgen, A. ; Rojas, J. C. ; Pineda, A.</creatorcontrib><description>The induction of defences in response to herbivory is a key mechanism of plant resistance. While a number of studies have investigated the time course and magnitude of plant induction in response to a single event of herbivory, few have looked at the effects of recurrent herbivory. Furthermore, studies measuring the effects of the total amount and recurrence of herbivory on both direct and indirect plant defences are lacking. To address this gap, here we asked whether insect leaf herbivory induced changes in the amount and concentration of extrafloral nectar (an indirect defence) and concentration of leaf phenolic compounds (a direct defence) in wild cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).
We conducted a greenhouse experiment where we tested single event or recurrent herbivory effects on defence induction by applying mechanical leaf damage and caterpillar (Spodoptera frugiperda) regurgitant.
Single events of 25% and 50% leaf damage did not significantly influence extrafloral nectar production or concentration. Extrafloral nectar traits did, however, increase significantly relative to controls when plants were exposed to recurrent herbivory (two episodes of 25% damage). In contrast, phenolic compounds increased significantly in response to single events of leaf damage but not to recurrent damage. In addition, we found. that local induction of extrafloral nectar production was stronger than systemic induction, whereas the reverse pattern was observed for phenolics.
Together, these results reveal seemingly inverse patterns of induction of direct and indirect defences in response to herbivory in wild cotton.
Wild cotton differentially induces direct and indirect defences in response to the amount and recurrence of herbivory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1435-8603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8677</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/plb.13022</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31237391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Animals ; Cotton ; Extrafloral nectar ; Gossypium - metabolism ; Gossypium - parasitology ; Gossypium thurberi ; Greenhouse effect ; Greenhouses ; Herbivores ; Herbivory ; induced defences ; Insects ; Leaves ; Nectar ; Pest resistance ; Phenolic compounds ; Phenols ; Phenols - metabolism ; Plant Leaves - metabolism ; Plant Leaves - parasitology ; Plant Nectar - metabolism ; Plant resistance ; recurrent herbivory ; Spodoptera - pathogenicity ; wild cotton</subject><ispartof>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2019-11, Vol.21 (6), p.1063-1071</ispartof><rights>2019 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands</rights><rights>2019 German Society for Plant Sciences and The Royal Botanical Society of the Netherlands.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-dd6d1fcf518f6ec45b68f048c509fef407df8ee01a7d5c7fabf67b2c02b020c83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-dd6d1fcf518f6ec45b68f048c509fef407df8ee01a7d5c7fabf67b2c02b020c83</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1394-3043</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fplb.13022$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fplb.13022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31237391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdala‐Roberts, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes‐Hernández, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quijano‐Medina, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francisco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angulo, D. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra‐Tabla, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virgen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pineda, A.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of amount and recurrence of leaf herbivory on the induction of direct and indirect defences in wild cotton</title><title>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</title><addtitle>Plant Biol (Stuttg)</addtitle><description>The induction of defences in response to herbivory is a key mechanism of plant resistance. While a number of studies have investigated the time course and magnitude of plant induction in response to a single event of herbivory, few have looked at the effects of recurrent herbivory. Furthermore, studies measuring the effects of the total amount and recurrence of herbivory on both direct and indirect plant defences are lacking. To address this gap, here we asked whether insect leaf herbivory induced changes in the amount and concentration of extrafloral nectar (an indirect defence) and concentration of leaf phenolic compounds (a direct defence) in wild cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).
We conducted a greenhouse experiment where we tested single event or recurrent herbivory effects on defence induction by applying mechanical leaf damage and caterpillar (Spodoptera frugiperda) regurgitant.
Single events of 25% and 50% leaf damage did not significantly influence extrafloral nectar production or concentration. Extrafloral nectar traits did, however, increase significantly relative to controls when plants were exposed to recurrent herbivory (two episodes of 25% damage). In contrast, phenolic compounds increased significantly in response to single events of leaf damage but not to recurrent damage. In addition, we found. that local induction of extrafloral nectar production was stronger than systemic induction, whereas the reverse pattern was observed for phenolics.
Together, these results reveal seemingly inverse patterns of induction of direct and indirect defences in response to herbivory in wild cotton.
Wild cotton differentially induces direct and indirect defences in response to the amount and recurrence of herbivory.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cotton</subject><subject>Extrafloral nectar</subject><subject>Gossypium - metabolism</subject><subject>Gossypium - parasitology</subject><subject>Gossypium thurberi</subject><subject>Greenhouse effect</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Herbivory</subject><subject>induced defences</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Nectar</subject><subject>Pest resistance</subject><subject>Phenolic compounds</subject><subject>Phenols</subject><subject>Phenols - metabolism</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - metabolism</subject><subject>Plant Leaves - parasitology</subject><subject>Plant Nectar - metabolism</subject><subject>Plant resistance</subject><subject>recurrent herbivory</subject><subject>Spodoptera - pathogenicity</subject><subject>wild cotton</subject><issn>1435-8603</issn><issn>1438-8677</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1LAzEQhoMotlYP_gEJeNFD20myn0ct9QMKetBz2E0mdMt2U5Ndpf_etFs9COaSmckzL-F9CblkMGHhTDd1OWECOD8iQxaJbJwlaXq8r-NQgxiQM-9XACzKgZ2SgWBcpCJnQ-LmxqBqPbWGFmvbNS0tGk0dqs45bBTuHmosDF2iK6tP67bUNrRdIq0a3am2Cl1AdBVW-t0w7xuNZqfgw4R-VbWmyratbc7JiSlqjxeHe0TeH-Zvs6fx4uXxeXa3GCsRCz7WOtHMKBOzzCSoorhMMgNRpmLIDZoIUm0yRGBFqmOVmqI0SVpyBbwEDioTI3LT626c_ejQt3JdeYV1XTRoOy85j5KcQR68GJHrP-jKdq4Jv5NcQBzFKfA8ULc9pZz13qGRG1etC7eVDOQuCBmCkPsgAnt1UOzKNepf8sf5AEx7IDiD2_-V5Ovivpf8BupvksU</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Abdala‐Roberts, L.</creator><creator>Reyes‐Hernández, M.</creator><creator>Quijano‐Medina, T.</creator><creator>Moreira, X.</creator><creator>Francisco, M.</creator><creator>Angulo, D. F.</creator><creator>Parra‐Tabla, V.</creator><creator>Virgen, A.</creator><creator>Rojas, J. C.</creator><creator>Pineda, A.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1394-3043</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Effects of amount and recurrence of leaf herbivory on the induction of direct and indirect defences in wild cotton</title><author>Abdala‐Roberts, L. ; Reyes‐Hernández, M. ; Quijano‐Medina, T. ; Moreira, X. ; Francisco, M. ; Angulo, D. F. ; Parra‐Tabla, V. ; Virgen, A. ; Rojas, J. C. ; Pineda, A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3532-dd6d1fcf518f6ec45b68f048c509fef407df8ee01a7d5c7fabf67b2c02b020c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cotton</topic><topic>Extrafloral nectar</topic><topic>Gossypium - metabolism</topic><topic>Gossypium - parasitology</topic><topic>Gossypium thurberi</topic><topic>Greenhouse effect</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Herbivory</topic><topic>induced defences</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Nectar</topic><topic>Pest resistance</topic><topic>Phenolic compounds</topic><topic>Phenols</topic><topic>Phenols - metabolism</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - metabolism</topic><topic>Plant Leaves - parasitology</topic><topic>Plant Nectar - metabolism</topic><topic>Plant resistance</topic><topic>recurrent herbivory</topic><topic>Spodoptera - pathogenicity</topic><topic>wild cotton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdala‐Roberts, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reyes‐Hernández, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quijano‐Medina, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira, X.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Francisco, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Angulo, D. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parra‐Tabla, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Virgen, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojas, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pineda, A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdala‐Roberts, L.</au><au>Reyes‐Hernández, M.</au><au>Quijano‐Medina, T.</au><au>Moreira, X.</au><au>Francisco, M.</au><au>Angulo, D. F.</au><au>Parra‐Tabla, V.</au><au>Virgen, A.</au><au>Rojas, J. C.</au><au>Pineda, A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of amount and recurrence of leaf herbivory on the induction of direct and indirect defences in wild cotton</atitle><jtitle>Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)</jtitle><addtitle>Plant Biol (Stuttg)</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1063</spage><epage>1071</epage><pages>1063-1071</pages><issn>1435-8603</issn><eissn>1438-8677</eissn><abstract>The induction of defences in response to herbivory is a key mechanism of plant resistance. While a number of studies have investigated the time course and magnitude of plant induction in response to a single event of herbivory, few have looked at the effects of recurrent herbivory. Furthermore, studies measuring the effects of the total amount and recurrence of herbivory on both direct and indirect plant defences are lacking. To address this gap, here we asked whether insect leaf herbivory induced changes in the amount and concentration of extrafloral nectar (an indirect defence) and concentration of leaf phenolic compounds (a direct defence) in wild cotton (Gossypium hirsutum).
We conducted a greenhouse experiment where we tested single event or recurrent herbivory effects on defence induction by applying mechanical leaf damage and caterpillar (Spodoptera frugiperda) regurgitant.
Single events of 25% and 50% leaf damage did not significantly influence extrafloral nectar production or concentration. Extrafloral nectar traits did, however, increase significantly relative to controls when plants were exposed to recurrent herbivory (two episodes of 25% damage). In contrast, phenolic compounds increased significantly in response to single events of leaf damage but not to recurrent damage. In addition, we found. that local induction of extrafloral nectar production was stronger than systemic induction, whereas the reverse pattern was observed for phenolics.
Together, these results reveal seemingly inverse patterns of induction of direct and indirect defences in response to herbivory in wild cotton.
Wild cotton differentially induces direct and indirect defences in response to the amount and recurrence of herbivory.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31237391</pmid><doi>10.1111/plb.13022</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1394-3043</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1435-8603 |
ispartof | Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany), 2019-11, Vol.21 (6), p.1063-1071 |
issn | 1435-8603 1438-8677 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2246910912 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Animals Cotton Extrafloral nectar Gossypium - metabolism Gossypium - parasitology Gossypium thurberi Greenhouse effect Greenhouses Herbivores Herbivory induced defences Insects Leaves Nectar Pest resistance Phenolic compounds Phenols Phenols - metabolism Plant Leaves - metabolism Plant Leaves - parasitology Plant Nectar - metabolism Plant resistance recurrent herbivory Spodoptera - pathogenicity wild cotton |
title | Effects of amount and recurrence of leaf herbivory on the induction of direct and indirect defences in wild cotton |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T11%3A49%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20amount%20and%20recurrence%20of%20leaf%20herbivory%20on%20the%20induction%20of%20direct%20and%20indirect%20defences%20in%20wild%20cotton&rft.jtitle=Plant%20biology%20(Stuttgart,%20Germany)&rft.au=Abdala%E2%80%90Roberts,%20L.&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1063&rft.epage=1071&rft.pages=1063-1071&rft.issn=1435-8603&rft.eissn=1438-8677&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/plb.13022&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2305457029%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2305457029&rft_id=info:pmid/31237391&rfr_iscdi=true |