Accuracy of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction Measurements by Contemporary Three-Dimensional Echocardiography with Semi- and Fully Automated Software: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,881 Subjects
BackgroundAlthough left ventricular (LV) quantification software for transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) have been steadily advancing, the measurement accuracy of semiautomated and fully automated software has not been systematically investigated. MethodsWe performed a systematic...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2019-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1105-1115.e5 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1115.e5 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1105 |
| container_title | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Kitano, Tetsuji, MD Nabeshima, Yosuke, MD Otsuji, Yutaka, MD, PhD Negishi, Kazuaki, MD, PhD Takeuchi, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FASE, FESC, FJCC |
| description | BackgroundAlthough left ventricular (LV) quantification software for transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) have been steadily advancing, the measurement accuracy of semiautomated and fully automated software has not been systematically investigated. MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following a search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies that directly compared LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using 3DE with ultrasound machines manufactured by one of the four manufacturers with either semiautomated ( n = 4) or fully automated software ( n = 2) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) during the period from January 1, 2011, to July 23, 2018. A random effects model was used to determine the bias and 95% CI of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF. A metaregression and subgroup analysis were performed to investigate intersoftware variabilities. ResultsOf a total of 38 studies (1,881 subjects), the pooled bias and 95% CI for EDV, ESV, and EF of semiautomated software were –39.3 mL (–49.2 to –29.5 mL, P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.417 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2246243595</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0894731719306182</els_id><sourcerecordid>2246243595</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-24de5f8dbbf6204829ac08ddfa991c5cfa0f2e2599ecf34dfd3eae5e014827f83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAC7BAXrIgwXaSJkYIqSotIHWERIfZWq59TV2SuPiHKo_K2-C0AwsWrGzJ3zm-PsdZ9pzggmAyf30oQO5tQTFhBa6KijQPshnBrMnnDasfZjPcsipvStJcZU-8P2CM6xbjx9lVSWiJmxbPsl8LKaMTckRWow3ogO5gCM7I2AmH7mwXe_BIDAqtDiCDsQNaJ_y8uQHho4M-CTzajWhphwD90TrhRnS7dwD5e5NOfYJFh1ZpWCmcMvabE8f9iE4m7NEWepOfL1jHrhvRIgbbiwAKba0OJ-HgDdqOPhmLYCT6Aj8NnM78DQSRL5Lz6I2fxiev2pagbdxNk_qn2SMtOg_P7tfr7Ot6dbv8mG8-f_i0XGxyWRESclopqHWrdjs9p7hqKRMSt0ppwRiRtdQCawq0ZgykLiulVQkCasAksY1uy-vs5cX36OyPCD7w3ngJXScGsNFzSqs5rcqa1QmlF1Q6670DzY_O9CktTjCfKuUHPlXKp0o5rniqNIle3PvHXQ_qr-RPhwl4ewEgvTKl47iXBgYJyrgUBFfW_N__3T9y2ZnBSNF9hxH8wUaXMvaccE855tvpU01_irASz0lLy9-tb8xz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2246243595</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction Measurements by Contemporary Three-Dimensional Echocardiography with Semi- and Fully Automated Software: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,881 Subjects</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kitano, Tetsuji, MD ; Nabeshima, Yosuke, MD ; Otsuji, Yutaka, MD, PhD ; Negishi, Kazuaki, MD, PhD ; Takeuchi, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FASE, FESC, FJCC</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Tetsuji, MD ; Nabeshima, Yosuke, MD ; Otsuji, Yutaka, MD, PhD ; Negishi, Kazuaki, MD, PhD ; Takeuchi, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FASE, FESC, FJCC</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundAlthough left ventricular (LV) quantification software for transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) have been steadily advancing, the measurement accuracy of semiautomated and fully automated software has not been systematically investigated. MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following a search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies that directly compared LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using 3DE with ultrasound machines manufactured by one of the four manufacturers with either semiautomated ( n = 4) or fully automated software ( n = 2) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) during the period from January 1, 2011, to July 23, 2018. A random effects model was used to determine the bias and 95% CI of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF. A metaregression and subgroup analysis were performed to investigate intersoftware variabilities. ResultsOf a total of 38 studies (1,881 subjects), the pooled bias and 95% CI for EDV, ESV, and EF of semiautomated software were –39.3 mL (–49.2 to –29.5 mL, P < .001), –19.6 mL (–25.9 to –13.3 mL, P < .001), and –0.6% (–2.0% to 0.7%, P = .360), respectively. The corresponding values for fully automated software were –14.5 mL (–25.7 to –3.3 mL, P = .011), –6.3 mL (–11.4 to –1.2 mL, P = .016), and –1.1% (–3.5% to 1.3%, P = .356) compared with CMR. The EDV and ESV biases for 3DE and CMR became significantly smaller and less heterogeneous when fully automated software was used. A metaregression analysis revealed that EDV bias became larger with an increase in EDV when semiautomated software was used but not when fully automated software was used. ConclusionsAlthough 3DE still underestimates LV volumes, EF showed similar values to CMR for both types of software. The adoption of fully automated software could further improve measurement accuracy with fewer observer variabilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0894-7317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.417</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31230780</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cardiovascular ; Ejection fraction ; Left ventricle ; Meta-analysis ; Three-dimensional echocardiography</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2019-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1105-1115.e5</ispartof><rights>American Society of Echocardiography</rights><rights>2019 American Society of Echocardiography</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-24de5f8dbbf6204829ac08ddfa991c5cfa0f2e2599ecf34dfd3eae5e014827f83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-24de5f8dbbf6204829ac08ddfa991c5cfa0f2e2599ecf34dfd3eae5e014827f83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894731719306182$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31230780$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Tetsuji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabeshima, Yosuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otsuji, Yutaka, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negishi, Kazuaki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FASE, FESC, FJCC</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction Measurements by Contemporary Three-Dimensional Echocardiography with Semi- and Fully Automated Software: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,881 Subjects</title><title>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</title><addtitle>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</addtitle><description>BackgroundAlthough left ventricular (LV) quantification software for transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) have been steadily advancing, the measurement accuracy of semiautomated and fully automated software has not been systematically investigated. MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following a search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies that directly compared LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using 3DE with ultrasound machines manufactured by one of the four manufacturers with either semiautomated ( n = 4) or fully automated software ( n = 2) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) during the period from January 1, 2011, to July 23, 2018. A random effects model was used to determine the bias and 95% CI of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF. A metaregression and subgroup analysis were performed to investigate intersoftware variabilities. ResultsOf a total of 38 studies (1,881 subjects), the pooled bias and 95% CI for EDV, ESV, and EF of semiautomated software were –39.3 mL (–49.2 to –29.5 mL, P < .001), –19.6 mL (–25.9 to –13.3 mL, P < .001), and –0.6% (–2.0% to 0.7%, P = .360), respectively. The corresponding values for fully automated software were –14.5 mL (–25.7 to –3.3 mL, P = .011), –6.3 mL (–11.4 to –1.2 mL, P = .016), and –1.1% (–3.5% to 1.3%, P = .356) compared with CMR. The EDV and ESV biases for 3DE and CMR became significantly smaller and less heterogeneous when fully automated software was used. A metaregression analysis revealed that EDV bias became larger with an increase in EDV when semiautomated software was used but not when fully automated software was used. ConclusionsAlthough 3DE still underestimates LV volumes, EF showed similar values to CMR for both types of software. The adoption of fully automated software could further improve measurement accuracy with fewer observer variabilities.</description><subject>Cardiovascular</subject><subject>Ejection fraction</subject><subject>Left ventricle</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Three-dimensional echocardiography</subject><issn>0894-7317</issn><issn>1097-6795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks2O0zAUhSMEYsrAC7BAXrIgwXaSJkYIqSotIHWERIfZWq59TV2SuPiHKo_K2-C0AwsWrGzJ3zm-PsdZ9pzggmAyf30oQO5tQTFhBa6KijQPshnBrMnnDasfZjPcsipvStJcZU-8P2CM6xbjx9lVSWiJmxbPsl8LKaMTckRWow3ogO5gCM7I2AmH7mwXe_BIDAqtDiCDsQNaJ_y8uQHho4M-CTzajWhphwD90TrhRnS7dwD5e5NOfYJFh1ZpWCmcMvabE8f9iE4m7NEWepOfL1jHrhvRIgbbiwAKba0OJ-HgDdqOPhmLYCT6Aj8NnM78DQSRL5Lz6I2fxiev2pagbdxNk_qn2SMtOg_P7tfr7Ot6dbv8mG8-f_i0XGxyWRESclopqHWrdjs9p7hqKRMSt0ppwRiRtdQCawq0ZgykLiulVQkCasAksY1uy-vs5cX36OyPCD7w3ngJXScGsNFzSqs5rcqa1QmlF1Q6670DzY_O9CktTjCfKuUHPlXKp0o5rniqNIle3PvHXQ_qr-RPhwl4ewEgvTKl47iXBgYJyrgUBFfW_N__3T9y2ZnBSNF9hxH8wUaXMvaccE855tvpU01_irASz0lLy9-tb8xz</recordid><startdate>20190901</startdate><enddate>20190901</enddate><creator>Kitano, Tetsuji, MD</creator><creator>Nabeshima, Yosuke, MD</creator><creator>Otsuji, Yutaka, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Negishi, Kazuaki, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Takeuchi, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FASE, FESC, FJCC</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190901</creationdate><title>Accuracy of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction Measurements by Contemporary Three-Dimensional Echocardiography with Semi- and Fully Automated Software: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,881 Subjects</title><author>Kitano, Tetsuji, MD ; Nabeshima, Yosuke, MD ; Otsuji, Yutaka, MD, PhD ; Negishi, Kazuaki, MD, PhD ; Takeuchi, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FASE, FESC, FJCC</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-24de5f8dbbf6204829ac08ddfa991c5cfa0f2e2599ecf34dfd3eae5e014827f83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Cardiovascular</topic><topic>Ejection fraction</topic><topic>Left ventricle</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Three-dimensional echocardiography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Tetsuji, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nabeshima, Yosuke, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Otsuji, Yutaka, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Negishi, Kazuaki, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeuchi, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FASE, FESC, FJCC</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitano, Tetsuji, MD</au><au>Nabeshima, Yosuke, MD</au><au>Otsuji, Yutaka, MD, PhD</au><au>Negishi, Kazuaki, MD, PhD</au><au>Takeuchi, Masaaki, MD, PhD, FASE, FESC, FJCC</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction Measurements by Contemporary Three-Dimensional Echocardiography with Semi- and Fully Automated Software: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,881 Subjects</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Soc Echocardiogr</addtitle><date>2019-09-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1105</spage><epage>1115.e5</epage><pages>1105-1115.e5</pages><issn>0894-7317</issn><eissn>1097-6795</eissn><abstract>BackgroundAlthough left ventricular (LV) quantification software for transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) have been steadily advancing, the measurement accuracy of semiautomated and fully automated software has not been systematically investigated. MethodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following a search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies that directly compared LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using 3DE with ultrasound machines manufactured by one of the four manufacturers with either semiautomated ( n = 4) or fully automated software ( n = 2) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) during the period from January 1, 2011, to July 23, 2018. A random effects model was used to determine the bias and 95% CI of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF. A metaregression and subgroup analysis were performed to investigate intersoftware variabilities. ResultsOf a total of 38 studies (1,881 subjects), the pooled bias and 95% CI for EDV, ESV, and EF of semiautomated software were –39.3 mL (–49.2 to –29.5 mL, P < .001), –19.6 mL (–25.9 to –13.3 mL, P < .001), and –0.6% (–2.0% to 0.7%, P = .360), respectively. The corresponding values for fully automated software were –14.5 mL (–25.7 to –3.3 mL, P = .011), –6.3 mL (–11.4 to –1.2 mL, P = .016), and –1.1% (–3.5% to 1.3%, P = .356) compared with CMR. The EDV and ESV biases for 3DE and CMR became significantly smaller and less heterogeneous when fully automated software was used. A metaregression analysis revealed that EDV bias became larger with an increase in EDV when semiautomated software was used but not when fully automated software was used. ConclusionsAlthough 3DE still underestimates LV volumes, EF showed similar values to CMR for both types of software. The adoption of fully automated software could further improve measurement accuracy with fewer observer variabilities.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31230780</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.417</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0894-7317 |
| ispartof | Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2019-09, Vol.32 (9), p.1105-1115.e5 |
| issn | 0894-7317 1097-6795 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2246243595 |
| source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Cardiovascular Ejection fraction Left ventricle Meta-analysis Three-dimensional echocardiography |
| title | Accuracy of Left Ventricular Volumes and Ejection Fraction Measurements by Contemporary Three-Dimensional Echocardiography with Semi- and Fully Automated Software: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 1,881 Subjects |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T09%3A28%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20Left%20Ventricular%20Volumes%20and%20Ejection%20Fraction%20Measurements%20by%20Contemporary%20Three-Dimensional%20Echocardiography%20with%20Semi-%20and%20Fully%20Automated%20Software:%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis%20of%201,881%20Subjects&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Society%20of%20Echocardiography&rft.au=Kitano,%20Tetsuji,%20MD&rft.date=2019-09-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1105&rft.epage=1115.e5&rft.pages=1105-1115.e5&rft.issn=0894-7317&rft.eissn=1097-6795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.417&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2246243595%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2246243595&rft_id=info:pmid/31230780&rft_els_id=S0894731719306182&rfr_iscdi=true |