Toward Standardized Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: An Analysis of Practice Guidelines

Standardized care may improve outcomes in many diseases including congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Our study assesses the variability of CDH clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among North American centers. North American member institutions of the CDH Study Group and the Pediatric Surgical Res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2019-11, Vol.243, p.229-235
Hauptverfasser: Jancelewicz, Tim, Brindle, Mary E., Guner, Yigit S., Lally, Pamela A., Lally, Kevin P., Harting, Matthew T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 235
container_issue
container_start_page 229
container_title The Journal of surgical research
container_volume 243
creator Jancelewicz, Tim
Brindle, Mary E.
Guner, Yigit S.
Lally, Pamela A.
Lally, Kevin P.
Harting, Matthew T.
description Standardized care may improve outcomes in many diseases including congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Our study assesses the variability of CDH clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among North American centers. North American member institutions of the CDH Study Group and the Pediatric Surgical Research Collaborative were solicited to submit their CDH CPG. Elements from each CPG were collected and classified according to therapeutic purpose. Elements were assigned to umbrella topics of prenatal assessment, delivery plus initial resuscitation, ventilatory and cardiovascular management, therapeutic targets, analgesia, and criteria for transitions in care. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the scope and variability of CPGs. Sixty-eight centers provided 40 responses (59%). Of these, 29 (73%) had a CDH CPG, of which 27 were obtained for review. All CPGs had a primary focus of preoperative care. Conventional ventilation was the first-line strategy in all CPGs. Ninety-three percent reported a peak inspiratory pressure limit (mean: 25.2 ± 2 cm H2O). Target oxygenation and ventilatory variables had low coefficients of variation. Two-thirds of CPGs discussed echocardiography, with indications for inhaled nitric oxide, sildenafil, and prostaglandins detailed in 81%, 30%, and 22% of CPGs, respectively. Extracorporeal life support and operative indications were specified in 93% and 59%, respectively, although specific targets for each were highly variable. This synthesis of North American CDH CPGs identifies areas of both alignment and variability and provides objective data about individual institutional guidelines in CDH care. These data may inform the development of a consensus-based, multi-institutional approach to standardized CDH management in North America.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2245608921</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0022480419302987</els_id><sourcerecordid>2245608921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-7807070fda54460a00a7f5d6054c4fde82d494a046029599cc577df308f6287d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhq2qqCy0D8ClyrGXpGPHjhM4oW2BSiCQSs_WYE-2XiXOYmeL4Onr1UKPlUeyR_PNL_lj7IRDxYE3X9fVOqVKAO8qUBWAfscWHDpVto2u37MFgBClbEEesqOU1pD7Ttcf2GHNhWhkIxaM7qcnjK74OWNw-eFfyBU3GHBFI4W5mPpiOYUVBT_jUHzzuPkdcTXi7G1xRTF4PC3OQy4cnpNPO_4uos1jKi633tHgA6WP7KDHIdGn1_uY_br4fr-8Kq9vL38sz69LW6t6LnULOp_eoZKyAQRA3SvXgJJW9o5a4WQnEfJMdKrrrFVau76Gtm9Eq119zL7sczdxetxSms3ok6VhwEDTNhkhpGqg7QTPKN-jNk4pRerNJvoR47PhYHZ2zdpku2Zn14Ay2W7e-fwav30Yyf3beNOZgbM9QPmTfzxFk6ynYMn5SHY2bvL_if8LYT2KDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2245608921</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward Standardized Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: An Analysis of Practice Guidelines</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jancelewicz, Tim ; Brindle, Mary E. ; Guner, Yigit S. ; Lally, Pamela A. ; Lally, Kevin P. ; Harting, Matthew T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jancelewicz, Tim ; Brindle, Mary E. ; Guner, Yigit S. ; Lally, Pamela A. ; Lally, Kevin P. ; Harting, Matthew T. ; Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (CDHSG) ; Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative (PedSRC)</creatorcontrib><description>Standardized care may improve outcomes in many diseases including congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Our study assesses the variability of CDH clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among North American centers. North American member institutions of the CDH Study Group and the Pediatric Surgical Research Collaborative were solicited to submit their CDH CPG. Elements from each CPG were collected and classified according to therapeutic purpose. Elements were assigned to umbrella topics of prenatal assessment, delivery plus initial resuscitation, ventilatory and cardiovascular management, therapeutic targets, analgesia, and criteria for transitions in care. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the scope and variability of CPGs. Sixty-eight centers provided 40 responses (59%). Of these, 29 (73%) had a CDH CPG, of which 27 were obtained for review. All CPGs had a primary focus of preoperative care. Conventional ventilation was the first-line strategy in all CPGs. Ninety-three percent reported a peak inspiratory pressure limit (mean: 25.2 ± 2 cm H2O). Target oxygenation and ventilatory variables had low coefficients of variation. Two-thirds of CPGs discussed echocardiography, with indications for inhaled nitric oxide, sildenafil, and prostaglandins detailed in 81%, 30%, and 22% of CPGs, respectively. Extracorporeal life support and operative indications were specified in 93% and 59%, respectively, although specific targets for each were highly variable. This synthesis of North American CDH CPGs identifies areas of both alignment and variability and provides objective data about individual institutional guidelines in CDH care. These data may inform the development of a consensus-based, multi-institutional approach to standardized CDH management in North America.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-4804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8673</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.007</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31226462</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>CDH ; Congenital diaphragmatic hernia ; CPG ; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ; Guidelines ; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - diagnosis ; Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - therapy ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Practice Guidelines as Topic ; Prenatal Diagnosis ; Respiration, Artificial ; Standardization ; Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><ispartof>The Journal of surgical research, 2019-11, Vol.243, p.229-235</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-7807070fda54460a00a7f5d6054c4fde82d494a046029599cc577df308f6287d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-7807070fda54460a00a7f5d6054c4fde82d494a046029599cc577df308f6287d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8929-8311 ; 0000-0001-6014-8259</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480419302987$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31226462$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jancelewicz, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guner, Yigit S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lally, Pamela A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lally, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harting, Matthew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (CDHSG)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative (PedSRC)</creatorcontrib><title>Toward Standardized Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: An Analysis of Practice Guidelines</title><title>The Journal of surgical research</title><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><description>Standardized care may improve outcomes in many diseases including congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Our study assesses the variability of CDH clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among North American centers. North American member institutions of the CDH Study Group and the Pediatric Surgical Research Collaborative were solicited to submit their CDH CPG. Elements from each CPG were collected and classified according to therapeutic purpose. Elements were assigned to umbrella topics of prenatal assessment, delivery plus initial resuscitation, ventilatory and cardiovascular management, therapeutic targets, analgesia, and criteria for transitions in care. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the scope and variability of CPGs. Sixty-eight centers provided 40 responses (59%). Of these, 29 (73%) had a CDH CPG, of which 27 were obtained for review. All CPGs had a primary focus of preoperative care. Conventional ventilation was the first-line strategy in all CPGs. Ninety-three percent reported a peak inspiratory pressure limit (mean: 25.2 ± 2 cm H2O). Target oxygenation and ventilatory variables had low coefficients of variation. Two-thirds of CPGs discussed echocardiography, with indications for inhaled nitric oxide, sildenafil, and prostaglandins detailed in 81%, 30%, and 22% of CPGs, respectively. Extracorporeal life support and operative indications were specified in 93% and 59%, respectively, although specific targets for each were highly variable. This synthesis of North American CDH CPGs identifies areas of both alignment and variability and provides objective data about individual institutional guidelines in CDH care. These data may inform the development of a consensus-based, multi-institutional approach to standardized CDH management in North America.</description><subject>CDH</subject><subject>Congenital diaphragmatic hernia</subject><subject>CPG</subject><subject>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - diagnosis</subject><subject>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Practice Guidelines as Topic</subject><subject>Prenatal Diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiration, Artificial</subject><subject>Standardization</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><issn>0022-4804</issn><issn>1095-8673</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhq2qqCy0D8ClyrGXpGPHjhM4oW2BSiCQSs_WYE-2XiXOYmeL4Onr1UKPlUeyR_PNL_lj7IRDxYE3X9fVOqVKAO8qUBWAfscWHDpVto2u37MFgBClbEEesqOU1pD7Ttcf2GHNhWhkIxaM7qcnjK74OWNw-eFfyBU3GHBFI4W5mPpiOYUVBT_jUHzzuPkdcTXi7G1xRTF4PC3OQy4cnpNPO_4uos1jKi633tHgA6WP7KDHIdGn1_uY_br4fr-8Kq9vL38sz69LW6t6LnULOp_eoZKyAQRA3SvXgJJW9o5a4WQnEfJMdKrrrFVau76Gtm9Eq119zL7sczdxetxSms3ok6VhwEDTNhkhpGqg7QTPKN-jNk4pRerNJvoR47PhYHZ2zdpku2Zn14Ay2W7e-fwav30Yyf3beNOZgbM9QPmTfzxFk6ynYMn5SHY2bvL_if8LYT2KDA</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Jancelewicz, Tim</creator><creator>Brindle, Mary E.</creator><creator>Guner, Yigit S.</creator><creator>Lally, Pamela A.</creator><creator>Lally, Kevin P.</creator><creator>Harting, Matthew T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-8311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6014-8259</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Toward Standardized Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: An Analysis of Practice Guidelines</title><author>Jancelewicz, Tim ; Brindle, Mary E. ; Guner, Yigit S. ; Lally, Pamela A. ; Lally, Kevin P. ; Harting, Matthew T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c353t-7807070fda54460a00a7f5d6054c4fde82d494a046029599cc577df308f6287d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>CDH</topic><topic>Congenital diaphragmatic hernia</topic><topic>CPG</topic><topic>Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - diagnosis</topic><topic>Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Practice Guidelines as Topic</topic><topic>Prenatal Diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiration, Artificial</topic><topic>Standardization</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jancelewicz, Tim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brindle, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guner, Yigit S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lally, Pamela A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lally, Kevin P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harting, Matthew T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (CDHSG)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative (PedSRC)</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jancelewicz, Tim</au><au>Brindle, Mary E.</au><au>Guner, Yigit S.</au><au>Lally, Pamela A.</au><au>Lally, Kevin P.</au><au>Harting, Matthew T.</au><aucorp>Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group (CDHSG)</aucorp><aucorp>Pediatric Surgery Research Collaborative (PedSRC)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward Standardized Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: An Analysis of Practice Guidelines</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of surgical research</jtitle><addtitle>J Surg Res</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>243</volume><spage>229</spage><epage>235</epage><pages>229-235</pages><issn>0022-4804</issn><eissn>1095-8673</eissn><abstract>Standardized care may improve outcomes in many diseases including congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). Our study assesses the variability of CDH clinical practice guidelines (CPG) among North American centers. North American member institutions of the CDH Study Group and the Pediatric Surgical Research Collaborative were solicited to submit their CDH CPG. Elements from each CPG were collected and classified according to therapeutic purpose. Elements were assigned to umbrella topics of prenatal assessment, delivery plus initial resuscitation, ventilatory and cardiovascular management, therapeutic targets, analgesia, and criteria for transitions in care. Descriptive analyses were performed to characterize the scope and variability of CPGs. Sixty-eight centers provided 40 responses (59%). Of these, 29 (73%) had a CDH CPG, of which 27 were obtained for review. All CPGs had a primary focus of preoperative care. Conventional ventilation was the first-line strategy in all CPGs. Ninety-three percent reported a peak inspiratory pressure limit (mean: 25.2 ± 2 cm H2O). Target oxygenation and ventilatory variables had low coefficients of variation. Two-thirds of CPGs discussed echocardiography, with indications for inhaled nitric oxide, sildenafil, and prostaglandins detailed in 81%, 30%, and 22% of CPGs, respectively. Extracorporeal life support and operative indications were specified in 93% and 59%, respectively, although specific targets for each were highly variable. This synthesis of North American CDH CPGs identifies areas of both alignment and variability and provides objective data about individual institutional guidelines in CDH care. These data may inform the development of a consensus-based, multi-institutional approach to standardized CDH management in North America.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31226462</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.007</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8929-8311</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6014-8259</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-4804
ispartof The Journal of surgical research, 2019-11, Vol.243, p.229-235
issn 0022-4804
1095-8673
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2245608921
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects CDH
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia
CPG
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation
Guidelines
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - diagnosis
Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital - therapy
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Prenatal Diagnosis
Respiration, Artificial
Standardization
Surveys and Questionnaires
title Toward Standardized Management of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: An Analysis of Practice Guidelines
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T11%3A23%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20Standardized%20Management%20of%20Congenital%20Diaphragmatic%20Hernia:%20An%20Analysis%20of%20Practice%20Guidelines&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20surgical%20research&rft.au=Jancelewicz,%20Tim&rft.aucorp=Congenital%20Diaphragmatic%20Hernia%20Study%20Group%20(CDHSG)&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=243&rft.spage=229&rft.epage=235&rft.pages=229-235&rft.issn=0022-4804&rft.eissn=1095-8673&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jss.2019.05.007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2245608921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2245608921&rft_id=info:pmid/31226462&rft_els_id=S0022480419302987&rfr_iscdi=true