Forensic Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Nasal Prediction Techniques

Prediction facial features from the skull are recurring theme on the forensic literature. The nose has been investigated since it has a significant role in facial recognition and the literature shows that there is not an universal method for nasal prediction. This study aimed to conduct a systematic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of forensic sciences 2019-11, Vol.64 (6), p.1633-1639
Hauptverfasser: Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda, Stocco Baccarin, Leandro, Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1639
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1633
container_title Journal of forensic sciences
container_volume 64
creator Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda
Stocco Baccarin, Leandro
Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco
description Prediction facial features from the skull are recurring theme on the forensic literature. The nose has been investigated since it has a significant role in facial recognition and the literature shows that there is not an universal method for nasal prediction. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to analyze what are the most consistent techniques of nasal reconstruction. Primary studies describing or validating nasal reconstruction techniques in adults and published in journals of Forensic Sciences were included in this review. Tedeschi‐Oliveira's method positioned nasal tip with acceptable accuracy as Gerasimov's method. The Krogman's and Iscan's technique underestimated nasal projection in North Americans. The Prokopec's and Ubelaker's method obtained accuracy in Caucasoid. George's method presented results similar to reference standard in Caucasoid. In a supplementary way, studies are needed to accurately estimate the nasal width.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1556-4029.14111
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2243499506</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2310957074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3711-c83f2c2073dabe8aadbeec45fcd5e8ec085b638a0194fbf0127dfc1461167f923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0DtPwzAUBWALgWgpzGwoEgtLWl_nzVZVlIcqikqZLce5Fq7SpNgJVf897oMOLHixbH0-1zqEXAPtg1sDiKLYDynL-hC68wnpHm9OSZdSxnyALO2QC2sXlNIYYjgnnQAYQJqkXTIb1wYrq6U3FlKL0puhrCvbmFY2uq7uvaH3vrENLkXjzAy_Na69Wnmvwjr8ZrDQO-jNUX5W-qtFe0nOlCgtXh32HvkYP8xHT_5k-vg8Gk58GSQAvkwDxSSjSVCIHFMhihxRhpGSRYQpSppGeRykgkIWqlxRYEmhJIQxQJyojAU9crfPXZl6O7fhS20llqWosG4tZywMwiyLaOzo7R-6qFtTud9xFgDNooQmoVODvZKmttag4iujl8JsOFC-rZtvy-Xbcvmubvfi5pDb5kssjv63XweiPVjrEjf_5fGX8XQf_AMymojW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2310957074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Forensic Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Nasal Prediction Techniques</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda ; Stocco Baccarin, Leandro ; Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco</creator><creatorcontrib>Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda ; Stocco Baccarin, Leandro ; Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco</creatorcontrib><description>Prediction facial features from the skull are recurring theme on the forensic literature. The nose has been investigated since it has a significant role in facial recognition and the literature shows that there is not an universal method for nasal prediction. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to analyze what are the most consistent techniques of nasal reconstruction. Primary studies describing or validating nasal reconstruction techniques in adults and published in journals of Forensic Sciences were included in this review. Tedeschi‐Oliveira's method positioned nasal tip with acceptable accuracy as Gerasimov's method. The Krogman's and Iscan's technique underestimated nasal projection in North Americans. The Prokopec's and Ubelaker's method obtained accuracy in Caucasoid. George's method presented results similar to reference standard in Caucasoid. In a supplementary way, studies are needed to accurately estimate the nasal width.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1198</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1556-4029</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.14111</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31211878</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Continental Population Groups ; Face (anatomy) ; Face - anatomy &amp; histology ; Face recognition ; facial reconstruction ; Forecasting ; Forensic anthropology ; Forensic Anthropology - methods ; Forensic science ; forensic sciences ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; meta‐analysis as topic ; nose ; Nose - anatomy &amp; histology ; Reference Values ; review ; Sex Characteristics ; Systematic review</subject><ispartof>Journal of forensic sciences, 2019-11, Vol.64 (6), p.1633-1639</ispartof><rights>2019 American Academy of Forensic Sciences</rights><rights>2019 American Academy of Forensic Sciences.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3711-c83f2c2073dabe8aadbeec45fcd5e8ec085b638a0194fbf0127dfc1461167f923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3711-c83f2c2073dabe8aadbeec45fcd5e8ec085b638a0194fbf0127dfc1461167f923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4488-5632</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1556-4029.14111$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1556-4029.14111$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31211878$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stocco Baccarin, Leandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco</creatorcontrib><title>Forensic Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Nasal Prediction Techniques</title><title>Journal of forensic sciences</title><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><description>Prediction facial features from the skull are recurring theme on the forensic literature. The nose has been investigated since it has a significant role in facial recognition and the literature shows that there is not an universal method for nasal prediction. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to analyze what are the most consistent techniques of nasal reconstruction. Primary studies describing or validating nasal reconstruction techniques in adults and published in journals of Forensic Sciences were included in this review. Tedeschi‐Oliveira's method positioned nasal tip with acceptable accuracy as Gerasimov's method. The Krogman's and Iscan's technique underestimated nasal projection in North Americans. The Prokopec's and Ubelaker's method obtained accuracy in Caucasoid. George's method presented results similar to reference standard in Caucasoid. In a supplementary way, studies are needed to accurately estimate the nasal width.</description><subject>Continental Population Groups</subject><subject>Face (anatomy)</subject><subject>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Face recognition</subject><subject>facial reconstruction</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Forensic anthropology</subject><subject>Forensic Anthropology - methods</subject><subject>Forensic science</subject><subject>forensic sciences</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>meta‐analysis as topic</subject><subject>nose</subject><subject>Nose - anatomy &amp; histology</subject><subject>Reference Values</subject><subject>review</subject><subject>Sex Characteristics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><issn>0022-1198</issn><issn>1556-4029</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0DtPwzAUBWALgWgpzGwoEgtLWl_nzVZVlIcqikqZLce5Fq7SpNgJVf897oMOLHixbH0-1zqEXAPtg1sDiKLYDynL-hC68wnpHm9OSZdSxnyALO2QC2sXlNIYYjgnnQAYQJqkXTIb1wYrq6U3FlKL0puhrCvbmFY2uq7uvaH3vrENLkXjzAy_Na69Wnmvwjr8ZrDQO-jNUX5W-qtFe0nOlCgtXh32HvkYP8xHT_5k-vg8Gk58GSQAvkwDxSSjSVCIHFMhihxRhpGSRYQpSppGeRykgkIWqlxRYEmhJIQxQJyojAU9crfPXZl6O7fhS20llqWosG4tZywMwiyLaOzo7R-6qFtTud9xFgDNooQmoVODvZKmttag4iujl8JsOFC-rZtvy-Xbcvmubvfi5pDb5kssjv63XweiPVjrEjf_5fGX8XQf_AMymojW</recordid><startdate>201911</startdate><enddate>201911</enddate><creator>Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda</creator><creator>Stocco Baccarin, Leandro</creator><creator>Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4488-5632</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201911</creationdate><title>Forensic Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Nasal Prediction Techniques</title><author>Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda ; Stocco Baccarin, Leandro ; Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3711-c83f2c2073dabe8aadbeec45fcd5e8ec085b638a0194fbf0127dfc1461167f923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Continental Population Groups</topic><topic>Face (anatomy)</topic><topic>Face - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Face recognition</topic><topic>facial reconstruction</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Forensic anthropology</topic><topic>Forensic Anthropology - methods</topic><topic>Forensic science</topic><topic>forensic sciences</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>meta‐analysis as topic</topic><topic>nose</topic><topic>Nose - anatomy &amp; histology</topic><topic>Reference Values</topic><topic>review</topic><topic>Sex Characteristics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stocco Baccarin, Leandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paim Strapasson, Raíssa Ananda</au><au>Stocco Baccarin, Leandro</au><au>Haltenhoff Melani, Rodolfo Francisco</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Forensic Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Nasal Prediction Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of forensic sciences</jtitle><addtitle>J Forensic Sci</addtitle><date>2019-11</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>64</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1633</spage><epage>1639</epage><pages>1633-1639</pages><issn>0022-1198</issn><eissn>1556-4029</eissn><abstract>Prediction facial features from the skull are recurring theme on the forensic literature. The nose has been investigated since it has a significant role in facial recognition and the literature shows that there is not an universal method for nasal prediction. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to analyze what are the most consistent techniques of nasal reconstruction. Primary studies describing or validating nasal reconstruction techniques in adults and published in journals of Forensic Sciences were included in this review. Tedeschi‐Oliveira's method positioned nasal tip with acceptable accuracy as Gerasimov's method. The Krogman's and Iscan's technique underestimated nasal projection in North Americans. The Prokopec's and Ubelaker's method obtained accuracy in Caucasoid. George's method presented results similar to reference standard in Caucasoid. In a supplementary way, studies are needed to accurately estimate the nasal width.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31211878</pmid><doi>10.1111/1556-4029.14111</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4488-5632</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-1198
ispartof Journal of forensic sciences, 2019-11, Vol.64 (6), p.1633-1639
issn 0022-1198
1556-4029
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2243499506
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Continental Population Groups
Face (anatomy)
Face - anatomy & histology
Face recognition
facial reconstruction
Forecasting
Forensic anthropology
Forensic Anthropology - methods
Forensic science
forensic sciences
Humans
Meta-analysis
meta‐analysis as topic
nose
Nose - anatomy & histology
Reference Values
review
Sex Characteristics
Systematic review
title Forensic Facial Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Nasal Prediction Techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T09%3A30%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Forensic%20Facial%20Reconstruction:%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20of%20Nasal%20Prediction%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20forensic%20sciences&rft.au=Paim%20Strapasson,%20Ra%C3%ADssa%20Ananda&rft.date=2019-11&rft.volume=64&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1633&rft.epage=1639&rft.pages=1633-1639&rft.issn=0022-1198&rft.eissn=1556-4029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1556-4029.14111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2310957074%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2310957074&rft_id=info:pmid/31211878&rfr_iscdi=true