Making markets work for disability services: The question of price setting
Personalisation schemes and associated markets for social care have been a growing trend in industrialised countries over recent decades. While there is no single approach to marketisation of social care and personalisation, often funds are devolved to clients of care services to be used to purchase...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health & social care in the community 2019-09, Vol.27 (5), p.e716-e723 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e723 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | e716 |
container_title | Health & social care in the community |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Carey, Gemma Malbon, Eleanor R. Weier, Megan Dickinson, Helen Duff, Gordon |
description | Personalisation schemes and associated markets for social care have been a growing trend in industrialised countries over recent decades. While there is no single approach to marketisation of social care and personalisation, often funds are devolved to clients of care services to be used to purchase services directly from market. Such arrangements are vulnerable to market failures and ‘thin’ markets, causing the need for stewardship of the social care markets. We present findings from a 2018 survey of 626 care service providers in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme market on their experience of market conditions. Over 46% of respondents listed ‘addressing pricing’ as their top action for addressing market problems. Qualitative findings show that central price setting is detached from service delivery realities, affecting service quality and capability building potential. We argue that devolution of price setting to, or at least flexibility and discretion at, the local level is likely to be a key to solving pricing dilemmas in personalisation schemes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/hsc.12780 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2243493448</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2243493448</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-b2434f3f1ca19b5f76d8e362b166cc3582e6219346ec53d3014ec63ae29daf6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AeQJRYY0vojcRI2VAEFgRgos5U4Z5o2jYudUPXf4zaFAQkvlnyPn7t7ETqnZEj9Gc2cGlIWJ-QA9SkXUcAiFh6iPkmFCEhISQ-dODcnhHJG4mPU45TRiBLeR08v2aKsP_AyswtoHF4bu8DaWFyULsvLqmw22IH9KhW4GzydAf5swTWlqbHReGX9u683jXecoiOdVQ7O9vcAvd_fTceT4Pn14XF8-xwoniQkyFnIQ801VRlN80jHokiAC5ZTIZTiUcJAMJryUICKeMEJDUEJngFLi0wL4AN01XlX1uyGkcvSKaiqrAbTOsm2Dfz_MPHo5R90blpb--k8Fccx5WRHXXeUssY5C1r6vXwgG0mJ3AYsfcByF7BnL_bGNl9C8Uv-JOqBUQesywo2_5vk5G3cKb8BrlaDNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2277713048</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Making markets work for disability services: The question of price setting</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Carey, Gemma ; Malbon, Eleanor R. ; Weier, Megan ; Dickinson, Helen ; Duff, Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Carey, Gemma ; Malbon, Eleanor R. ; Weier, Megan ; Dickinson, Helen ; Duff, Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>Personalisation schemes and associated markets for social care have been a growing trend in industrialised countries over recent decades. While there is no single approach to marketisation of social care and personalisation, often funds are devolved to clients of care services to be used to purchase services directly from market. Such arrangements are vulnerable to market failures and ‘thin’ markets, causing the need for stewardship of the social care markets. We present findings from a 2018 survey of 626 care service providers in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme market on their experience of market conditions. Over 46% of respondents listed ‘addressing pricing’ as their top action for addressing market problems. Qualitative findings show that central price setting is detached from service delivery realities, affecting service quality and capability building potential. We argue that devolution of price setting to, or at least flexibility and discretion at, the local level is likely to be a key to solving pricing dilemmas in personalisation schemes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0410</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2524</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12780</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31215103</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Customization ; Decentralization ; Disability ; Disability insurance ; Flexibility ; health and social policy implementation ; Industrialized nations ; Insurance ; Management ; Markets ; personalisation ; Policy implementation ; Prices ; Quality of service ; quasi‐markets ; Respondents ; Services ; Social services ; Vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Health & social care in the community, 2019-09, Vol.27 (5), p.e716-e723</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-b2434f3f1ca19b5f76d8e362b166cc3582e6219346ec53d3014ec63ae29daf6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-b2434f3f1ca19b5f76d8e362b166cc3582e6219346ec53d3014ec63ae29daf6e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7698-9044 ; 0000-0002-6840-498X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhsc.12780$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhsc.12780$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27843,27901,27902,30976,33751,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31215103$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carey, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malbon, Eleanor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weier, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duff, Gordon</creatorcontrib><title>Making markets work for disability services: The question of price setting</title><title>Health & social care in the community</title><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><description>Personalisation schemes and associated markets for social care have been a growing trend in industrialised countries over recent decades. While there is no single approach to marketisation of social care and personalisation, often funds are devolved to clients of care services to be used to purchase services directly from market. Such arrangements are vulnerable to market failures and ‘thin’ markets, causing the need for stewardship of the social care markets. We present findings from a 2018 survey of 626 care service providers in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme market on their experience of market conditions. Over 46% of respondents listed ‘addressing pricing’ as their top action for addressing market problems. Qualitative findings show that central price setting is detached from service delivery realities, affecting service quality and capability building potential. We argue that devolution of price setting to, or at least flexibility and discretion at, the local level is likely to be a key to solving pricing dilemmas in personalisation schemes.</description><subject>Customization</subject><subject>Decentralization</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability insurance</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>health and social policy implementation</subject><subject>Industrialized nations</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>personalisation</subject><subject>Policy implementation</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>quasi‐markets</subject><subject>Respondents</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Social services</subject><subject>Vulnerability</subject><issn>0966-0410</issn><issn>1365-2524</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EoqUw8AeQJRYY0vojcRI2VAEFgRgos5U4Z5o2jYudUPXf4zaFAQkvlnyPn7t7ETqnZEj9Gc2cGlIWJ-QA9SkXUcAiFh6iPkmFCEhISQ-dODcnhHJG4mPU45TRiBLeR08v2aKsP_AyswtoHF4bu8DaWFyULsvLqmw22IH9KhW4GzydAf5swTWlqbHReGX9u683jXecoiOdVQ7O9vcAvd_fTceT4Pn14XF8-xwoniQkyFnIQ801VRlN80jHokiAC5ZTIZTiUcJAMJryUICKeMEJDUEJngFLi0wL4AN01XlX1uyGkcvSKaiqrAbTOsm2Dfz_MPHo5R90blpb--k8Fccx5WRHXXeUssY5C1r6vXwgG0mJ3AYsfcByF7BnL_bGNl9C8Uv-JOqBUQesywo2_5vk5G3cKb8BrlaDNw</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Carey, Gemma</creator><creator>Malbon, Eleanor R.</creator><creator>Weier, Megan</creator><creator>Dickinson, Helen</creator><creator>Duff, Gordon</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-9044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-498X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Making markets work for disability services: The question of price setting</title><author>Carey, Gemma ; Malbon, Eleanor R. ; Weier, Megan ; Dickinson, Helen ; Duff, Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3880-b2434f3f1ca19b5f76d8e362b166cc3582e6219346ec53d3014ec63ae29daf6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Customization</topic><topic>Decentralization</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability insurance</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>health and social policy implementation</topic><topic>Industrialized nations</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>personalisation</topic><topic>Policy implementation</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>quasi‐markets</topic><topic>Respondents</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Social services</topic><topic>Vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carey, Gemma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malbon, Eleanor R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weier, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickinson, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duff, Gordon</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carey, Gemma</au><au>Malbon, Eleanor R.</au><au>Weier, Megan</au><au>Dickinson, Helen</au><au>Duff, Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Making markets work for disability services: The question of price setting</atitle><jtitle>Health & social care in the community</jtitle><addtitle>Health Soc Care Community</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>e716</spage><epage>e723</epage><pages>e716-e723</pages><issn>0966-0410</issn><eissn>1365-2524</eissn><abstract>Personalisation schemes and associated markets for social care have been a growing trend in industrialised countries over recent decades. While there is no single approach to marketisation of social care and personalisation, often funds are devolved to clients of care services to be used to purchase services directly from market. Such arrangements are vulnerable to market failures and ‘thin’ markets, causing the need for stewardship of the social care markets. We present findings from a 2018 survey of 626 care service providers in the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme market on their experience of market conditions. Over 46% of respondents listed ‘addressing pricing’ as their top action for addressing market problems. Qualitative findings show that central price setting is detached from service delivery realities, affecting service quality and capability building potential. We argue that devolution of price setting to, or at least flexibility and discretion at, the local level is likely to be a key to solving pricing dilemmas in personalisation schemes.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><pmid>31215103</pmid><doi>10.1111/hsc.12780</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-9044</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6840-498X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0966-0410 |
ispartof | Health & social care in the community, 2019-09, Vol.27 (5), p.e716-e723 |
issn | 0966-0410 1365-2524 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2243493448 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Customization Decentralization Disability Disability insurance Flexibility health and social policy implementation Industrialized nations Insurance Management Markets personalisation Policy implementation Prices Quality of service quasi‐markets Respondents Services Social services Vulnerability |
title | Making markets work for disability services: The question of price setting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T16%3A59%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Making%20markets%20work%20for%20disability%20services:%20The%20question%20of%20price%20setting&rft.jtitle=Health%20&%20social%20care%20in%20the%20community&rft.au=Carey,%20Gemma&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=e716&rft.epage=e723&rft.pages=e716-e723&rft.issn=0966-0410&rft.eissn=1365-2524&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/hsc.12780&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2243493448%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2277713048&rft_id=info:pmid/31215103&rfr_iscdi=true |