The incidence of wound infection and dehiscence following childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review of the evidence

Approximately 85% of vaginal births are affected by childbirth related perineal trauma, either spontaneously or as a result of an episiotomy. Perineal infection in the postnatal period is associated with wound dehiscence, granulation tissue formation, dyspareunia and pelvic floor dysfunction. Despit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 2019-09, Vol.240, p.1-8
Hauptverfasser: Jones, Kathy, Webb, Sara, Manresa, Margarita, Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria, Morris, R.Katie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology
container_volume 240
creator Jones, Kathy
Webb, Sara
Manresa, Margarita
Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria
Morris, R.Katie
description Approximately 85% of vaginal births are affected by childbirth related perineal trauma, either spontaneously or as a result of an episiotomy. Perineal infection in the postnatal period is associated with wound dehiscence, granulation tissue formation, dyspareunia and pelvic floor dysfunction. Despite leading to long-term physical and psychological problems, the incidence of infection continues to remain unclear. This review is designed to determine the incidence of childbirth related perineal wound infection and dehiscence. A systematic review to determine the incidence of wound infection and dehiscence associated with childbirth-related perineal trauma. Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched from inception to September 2018 using MeSH, textwords and appropriate word variants to ensure capturing all relevant studies. No restrictions were placed on birth mode, degree of trauma, parity, country or language. 23 studies were included (11 cohort, 2 case control and 10 reporting incidence). Reported incidence of childbirth-related perineal trauma wound infection ranged from 0.1%–23.6% and wound dehiscence from 0.21%–24.6%. Quality assessment of included studies exposed inadequacies in several methodological areas. There was great clinical heterogeneity amongst the studies, particularly regarding perineal wound infection definition and confirmation, making effective synthesis of the data almost impossible. Despite the known high occurrence of perineal trauma during childbirth and associated long-term morbidities, this review clearly demonstrates the true incidence of infection remains largely unknown. This can be attributed to multiple factors including lack of high level evidence around understanding ‘normal’ perineal wound healing, absence of a core outcome set for childbirth-related perineal trauma and that women present to a variety of healthcare settings for treatment. It is vital that a validated childbirth-related perineal trauma diagnostic tool and core outcome set are developed for use in future studies to facilitate improved diagnosis and treatment and reduce long term morbidities of women affected by childbirth-related perineal trauma wound infection and dehiscence.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2242112123</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301211519302593</els_id><sourcerecordid>2242112123</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4bec68552e07e264cb83fe535d2303084cd308e94b446373e4074ebe5b00f8443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD9v2zAQxYmgQe2m_QZBwLGLFP6V5A4FDKNtAgTIks4ERZ5iGpLokFQNj_nmoey0YzkccYd39_B-CF1TUlJCq9tdCTv_HNqSEboqiSwJby7QkjY1K-pKig9oSTihBaNULtCnGHckP85XH9GCU0bYquZL9Pq0BexG4yyMBrDv8MFPo82jDkxyfsQ6dxa2LpqTovN97w9ufMZm63rbupC2RYBeJ7B4D8GNoHucgp4G_Q2vcTzGBINOzuAAfxwcZo-UTXNz8vyMLjvdR_jy_l-h3z9_PG3uiofHX_eb9UNheMVSIVowVSMlA1IDq4RpG96B5NIynnM2wthcYSVaISpecxCkFtCCbAnpGiH4Ffp6vrsP_mWCmNQwZ-p7PYKfomJMZFSMMp6l4iw1wccYoFP74AYdjooSNcNXO3WGr2b4ikiV4ee1m3eHqR3A_lv6SzsLvp8FkHNmFkFF42YG1oVMW1nv_u_wBp8EmMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2242112123</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The incidence of wound infection and dehiscence following childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review of the evidence</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jones, Kathy ; Webb, Sara ; Manresa, Margarita ; Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria ; Morris, R.Katie</creator><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kathy ; Webb, Sara ; Manresa, Margarita ; Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria ; Morris, R.Katie</creatorcontrib><description>Approximately 85% of vaginal births are affected by childbirth related perineal trauma, either spontaneously or as a result of an episiotomy. Perineal infection in the postnatal period is associated with wound dehiscence, granulation tissue formation, dyspareunia and pelvic floor dysfunction. Despite leading to long-term physical and psychological problems, the incidence of infection continues to remain unclear. This review is designed to determine the incidence of childbirth related perineal wound infection and dehiscence. A systematic review to determine the incidence of wound infection and dehiscence associated with childbirth-related perineal trauma. Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched from inception to September 2018 using MeSH, textwords and appropriate word variants to ensure capturing all relevant studies. No restrictions were placed on birth mode, degree of trauma, parity, country or language. 23 studies were included (11 cohort, 2 case control and 10 reporting incidence). Reported incidence of childbirth-related perineal trauma wound infection ranged from 0.1%–23.6% and wound dehiscence from 0.21%–24.6%. Quality assessment of included studies exposed inadequacies in several methodological areas. There was great clinical heterogeneity amongst the studies, particularly regarding perineal wound infection definition and confirmation, making effective synthesis of the data almost impossible. Despite the known high occurrence of perineal trauma during childbirth and associated long-term morbidities, this review clearly demonstrates the true incidence of infection remains largely unknown. This can be attributed to multiple factors including lack of high level evidence around understanding ‘normal’ perineal wound healing, absence of a core outcome set for childbirth-related perineal trauma and that women present to a variety of healthcare settings for treatment. It is vital that a validated childbirth-related perineal trauma diagnostic tool and core outcome set are developed for use in future studies to facilitate improved diagnosis and treatment and reduce long term morbidities of women affected by childbirth-related perineal trauma wound infection and dehiscence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-2115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7654</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.038</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31202973</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Childbirth related perineal trauma ; Delivery, Obstetric - adverse effects ; Episiotomy - adverse effects ; Female ; Humans ; Incidence ; Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology ; Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology ; Perineum - injuries ; Pregnancy ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology ; Surgical Wound Dehiscence - etiology ; Systematic review ; Wound dehiscence ; Wound infection</subject><ispartof>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology, 2019-09, Vol.240, p.1-8</ispartof><rights>2019 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4bec68552e07e264cb83fe535d2303084cd308e94b446373e4074ebe5b00f8443</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4bec68552e07e264cb83fe535d2303084cd308e94b446373e4074ebe5b00f8443</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1247-429X ; 0000-0001-9631-5370</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3538,27906,27907,45977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31202973$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manresa, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, R.Katie</creatorcontrib><title>The incidence of wound infection and dehiscence following childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review of the evidence</title><title>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</title><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><description>Approximately 85% of vaginal births are affected by childbirth related perineal trauma, either spontaneously or as a result of an episiotomy. Perineal infection in the postnatal period is associated with wound dehiscence, granulation tissue formation, dyspareunia and pelvic floor dysfunction. Despite leading to long-term physical and psychological problems, the incidence of infection continues to remain unclear. This review is designed to determine the incidence of childbirth related perineal wound infection and dehiscence. A systematic review to determine the incidence of wound infection and dehiscence associated with childbirth-related perineal trauma. Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched from inception to September 2018 using MeSH, textwords and appropriate word variants to ensure capturing all relevant studies. No restrictions were placed on birth mode, degree of trauma, parity, country or language. 23 studies were included (11 cohort, 2 case control and 10 reporting incidence). Reported incidence of childbirth-related perineal trauma wound infection ranged from 0.1%–23.6% and wound dehiscence from 0.21%–24.6%. Quality assessment of included studies exposed inadequacies in several methodological areas. There was great clinical heterogeneity amongst the studies, particularly regarding perineal wound infection definition and confirmation, making effective synthesis of the data almost impossible. Despite the known high occurrence of perineal trauma during childbirth and associated long-term morbidities, this review clearly demonstrates the true incidence of infection remains largely unknown. This can be attributed to multiple factors including lack of high level evidence around understanding ‘normal’ perineal wound healing, absence of a core outcome set for childbirth-related perineal trauma and that women present to a variety of healthcare settings for treatment. It is vital that a validated childbirth-related perineal trauma diagnostic tool and core outcome set are developed for use in future studies to facilitate improved diagnosis and treatment and reduce long term morbidities of women affected by childbirth-related perineal trauma wound infection and dehiscence.</description><subject>Childbirth related perineal trauma</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - adverse effects</subject><subject>Episiotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Perineum - injuries</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology</subject><subject>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - etiology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Wound dehiscence</subject><subject>Wound infection</subject><issn>0301-2115</issn><issn>1872-7654</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD9v2zAQxYmgQe2m_QZBwLGLFP6V5A4FDKNtAgTIks4ERZ5iGpLokFQNj_nmoey0YzkccYd39_B-CF1TUlJCq9tdCTv_HNqSEboqiSwJby7QkjY1K-pKig9oSTihBaNULtCnGHckP85XH9GCU0bYquZL9Pq0BexG4yyMBrDv8MFPo82jDkxyfsQ6dxa2LpqTovN97w9ufMZm63rbupC2RYBeJ7B4D8GNoHucgp4G_Q2vcTzGBINOzuAAfxwcZo-UTXNz8vyMLjvdR_jy_l-h3z9_PG3uiofHX_eb9UNheMVSIVowVSMlA1IDq4RpG96B5NIynnM2wthcYSVaISpecxCkFtCCbAnpGiH4Ffp6vrsP_mWCmNQwZ-p7PYKfomJMZFSMMp6l4iw1wccYoFP74AYdjooSNcNXO3WGr2b4ikiV4ee1m3eHqR3A_lv6SzsLvp8FkHNmFkFF42YG1oVMW1nv_u_wBp8EmMA</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Jones, Kathy</creator><creator>Webb, Sara</creator><creator>Manresa, Margarita</creator><creator>Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria</creator><creator>Morris, R.Katie</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-429X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-5370</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>The incidence of wound infection and dehiscence following childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review of the evidence</title><author>Jones, Kathy ; Webb, Sara ; Manresa, Margarita ; Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria ; Morris, R.Katie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4bec68552e07e264cb83fe535d2303084cd308e94b446373e4074ebe5b00f8443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Childbirth related perineal trauma</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - adverse effects</topic><topic>Episiotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Perineum - injuries</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology</topic><topic>Surgical Wound Dehiscence - etiology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Wound dehiscence</topic><topic>Wound infection</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jones, Kathy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webb, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manresa, Margarita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, R.Katie</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jones, Kathy</au><au>Webb, Sara</au><au>Manresa, Margarita</au><au>Hodgetts-Morton, Victoria</au><au>Morris, R.Katie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The incidence of wound infection and dehiscence following childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review of the evidence</atitle><jtitle>European journal of obstetrics &amp; gynecology and reproductive biology</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>240</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>1-8</pages><issn>0301-2115</issn><eissn>1872-7654</eissn><abstract>Approximately 85% of vaginal births are affected by childbirth related perineal trauma, either spontaneously or as a result of an episiotomy. Perineal infection in the postnatal period is associated with wound dehiscence, granulation tissue formation, dyspareunia and pelvic floor dysfunction. Despite leading to long-term physical and psychological problems, the incidence of infection continues to remain unclear. This review is designed to determine the incidence of childbirth related perineal wound infection and dehiscence. A systematic review to determine the incidence of wound infection and dehiscence associated with childbirth-related perineal trauma. Medline, Embase and Cinahl databases were searched from inception to September 2018 using MeSH, textwords and appropriate word variants to ensure capturing all relevant studies. No restrictions were placed on birth mode, degree of trauma, parity, country or language. 23 studies were included (11 cohort, 2 case control and 10 reporting incidence). Reported incidence of childbirth-related perineal trauma wound infection ranged from 0.1%–23.6% and wound dehiscence from 0.21%–24.6%. Quality assessment of included studies exposed inadequacies in several methodological areas. There was great clinical heterogeneity amongst the studies, particularly regarding perineal wound infection definition and confirmation, making effective synthesis of the data almost impossible. Despite the known high occurrence of perineal trauma during childbirth and associated long-term morbidities, this review clearly demonstrates the true incidence of infection remains largely unknown. This can be attributed to multiple factors including lack of high level evidence around understanding ‘normal’ perineal wound healing, absence of a core outcome set for childbirth-related perineal trauma and that women present to a variety of healthcare settings for treatment. It is vital that a validated childbirth-related perineal trauma diagnostic tool and core outcome set are developed for use in future studies to facilitate improved diagnosis and treatment and reduce long term morbidities of women affected by childbirth-related perineal trauma wound infection and dehiscence.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>31202973</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.038</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1247-429X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9631-5370</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-2115
ispartof European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology, 2019-09, Vol.240, p.1-8
issn 0301-2115
1872-7654
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2242112123
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Childbirth related perineal trauma
Delivery, Obstetric - adverse effects
Episiotomy - adverse effects
Female
Humans
Incidence
Obstetric Labor Complications - epidemiology
Obstetric Labor Complications - etiology
Perineum - injuries
Pregnancy
Surgical Wound Dehiscence - epidemiology
Surgical Wound Dehiscence - etiology
Systematic review
Wound dehiscence
Wound infection
title The incidence of wound infection and dehiscence following childbirth-related perineal trauma: A systematic review of the evidence
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A05%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20incidence%20of%20wound%20infection%20and%20dehiscence%20following%20childbirth-related%20perineal%20trauma:%20A%20systematic%20review%20of%20the%20evidence&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20&%20gynecology%20and%20reproductive%20biology&rft.au=Jones,%20Kathy&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=240&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=1-8&rft.issn=0301-2115&rft.eissn=1872-7654&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.05.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2242112123%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2242112123&rft_id=info:pmid/31202973&rft_els_id=S0301211519302593&rfr_iscdi=true