Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”

The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics 2019-01, Vol.63 (1), p.116-141
1. Verfasser: Grafton, Rupert Quentin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 1
container_start_page 116
container_title The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics
container_volume 63
creator Grafton, Rupert Quentin
description The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8489.12288
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2237512126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2167951962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-d81d3b947d6a91dc9ede5f510ba9f8e25f0647f4d669426cbdb37eca05fbe9b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQhyMEEqUws1pigIG0seM4MVso_1UEQiCxWU7sUFdpXOyEKlvfgRVerk9C0lQMLNziu9P3O1mf4xxCbwCbGkJMQjfCER1AhKJoy-n9brab3ifYpVHwuuvsWTv1PA9hgnrO5FHnKq2BkR9KLoDOwIKX0jRzps0MqAKUEwnuK2N4vVp-XnCTq-INnHOrilMQV7Y0PFf8bI2tll9CH9vV8hvwQmzGQpftZt_ZyXhu5cHm7TsvV5fPoxt3_HB9O4rHboqRH7kigsJPKA4F4RSKlEohgyyAXsJpFkkUZB7BYYYFIRQjkiYi8UOZci_IEkkT3-87J93dudHvlbQlmymbyjznhdSVZQj5YQARRKRBj_6gU12ZovkdQ5CENICUoIYadlRqtLWNFzY3asZNzaDHWvOs9cxaz2xtvkmQLrFQuaz_w1l8Fz91wR--4In4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2167951962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creator><creatorcontrib>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creatorcontrib><description>The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-985X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Basin Plan ; basins ; Economic impact ; Environmental objective ; Evaluation ; Infrastructure ; Insecurity ; Irrigation ; Irrigation water ; issues and policy ; Reforms ; regulatory capture ; Reviews ; risk factors ; stream flows ; Subsidies ; trade‐offs ; Water</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2019-01, Vol.63 (1), p.116-141</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-d81d3b947d6a91dc9ede5f510ba9f8e25f0647f4d669426cbdb37eca05fbe9b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-d81d3b947d6a91dc9ede5f510ba9f8e25f0647f4d669426cbdb37eca05fbe9b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8489.12288$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8489.12288$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creatorcontrib><title>Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”</title><title>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Basin Plan</subject><subject>basins</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Environmental objective</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Insecurity</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>regulatory capture</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>risk factors</subject><subject>stream flows</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>trade‐offs</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>1364-985X</issn><issn>1467-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQhyMEEqUws1pigIG0seM4MVso_1UEQiCxWU7sUFdpXOyEKlvfgRVerk9C0lQMLNziu9P3O1mf4xxCbwCbGkJMQjfCER1AhKJoy-n9brab3ifYpVHwuuvsWTv1PA9hgnrO5FHnKq2BkR9KLoDOwIKX0jRzps0MqAKUEwnuK2N4vVp-XnCTq-INnHOrilMQV7Y0PFf8bI2tll9CH9vV8hvwQmzGQpftZt_ZyXhu5cHm7TsvV5fPoxt3_HB9O4rHboqRH7kigsJPKA4F4RSKlEohgyyAXsJpFkkUZB7BYYYFIRQjkiYi8UOZci_IEkkT3-87J93dudHvlbQlmymbyjznhdSVZQj5YQARRKRBj_6gU12ZovkdQ5CENICUoIYadlRqtLWNFzY3asZNzaDHWvOs9cxaz2xtvkmQLrFQuaz_w1l8Fz91wR--4In4</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”</title><author>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-d81d3b947d6a91dc9ede5f510ba9f8e25f0647f4d669426cbdb37eca05fbe9b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Basin Plan</topic><topic>basins</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Environmental objective</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Insecurity</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>regulatory capture</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><topic>stream flows</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>trade‐offs</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>116-141</pages><issn>1364-985X</issn><eissn>1467-8489</eissn><abstract>The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8489.12288</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1364-985X
ispartof The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2019-01, Vol.63 (1), p.116-141
issn 1364-985X
1467-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2237512126
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete
subjects Australia
Basin Plan
basins
Economic impact
Environmental objective
Evaluation
Infrastructure
Insecurity
Irrigation
Irrigation water
issues and policy
Reforms
regulatory capture
Reviews
risk factors
stream flows
Subsidies
trade‐offs
Water
title Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20review%20of%20water%20reform%20in%20the%20Murray%E2%80%93Darling%20Basin,%20Australia:%20the%20%E2%80%9Cdo's%E2%80%9D%20and%20%E2%80%9Cdo'nots%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Grafton,%20Rupert%20Quentin&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=116-141&rft.issn=1364-985X&rft.eissn=1467-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2167951962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2167951962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true