Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”
The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics 2019-01, Vol.63 (1), p.116-141 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 141 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Grafton, Rupert Quentin |
description | The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1467-8489.12288 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2237512126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2167951962</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-d81d3b947d6a91dc9ede5f510ba9f8e25f0647f4d669426cbdb37eca05fbe9b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQhyMEEqUws1pigIG0seM4MVso_1UEQiCxWU7sUFdpXOyEKlvfgRVerk9C0lQMLNziu9P3O1mf4xxCbwCbGkJMQjfCER1AhKJoy-n9brab3ifYpVHwuuvsWTv1PA9hgnrO5FHnKq2BkR9KLoDOwIKX0jRzps0MqAKUEwnuK2N4vVp-XnCTq-INnHOrilMQV7Y0PFf8bI2tll9CH9vV8hvwQmzGQpftZt_ZyXhu5cHm7TsvV5fPoxt3_HB9O4rHboqRH7kigsJPKA4F4RSKlEohgyyAXsJpFkkUZB7BYYYFIRQjkiYi8UOZci_IEkkT3-87J93dudHvlbQlmymbyjznhdSVZQj5YQARRKRBj_6gU12ZovkdQ5CENICUoIYadlRqtLWNFzY3asZNzaDHWvOs9cxaz2xtvkmQLrFQuaz_w1l8Fz91wR--4In4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2167951962</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creator><creatorcontrib>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creatorcontrib><description>The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1364-985X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8489.12288</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Australia ; Basin Plan ; basins ; Economic impact ; Environmental objective ; Evaluation ; Infrastructure ; Insecurity ; Irrigation ; Irrigation water ; issues and policy ; Reforms ; regulatory capture ; Reviews ; risk factors ; stream flows ; Subsidies ; trade‐offs ; Water</subject><ispartof>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2019-01, Vol.63 (1), p.116-141</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australasian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2019 Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-d81d3b947d6a91dc9ede5f510ba9f8e25f0647f4d669426cbdb37eca05fbe9b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-d81d3b947d6a91dc9ede5f510ba9f8e25f0647f4d669426cbdb37eca05fbe9b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8489.12288$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8489.12288$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creatorcontrib><title>Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”</title><title>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</title><description>The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Basin Plan</subject><subject>basins</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Environmental objective</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Insecurity</subject><subject>Irrigation</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>issues and policy</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>regulatory capture</subject><subject>Reviews</subject><subject>risk factors</subject><subject>stream flows</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>trade‐offs</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>1364-985X</issn><issn>1467-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkL9OwzAQhyMEEqUws1pigIG0seM4MVso_1UEQiCxWU7sUFdpXOyEKlvfgRVerk9C0lQMLNziu9P3O1mf4xxCbwCbGkJMQjfCER1AhKJoy-n9brab3ifYpVHwuuvsWTv1PA9hgnrO5FHnKq2BkR9KLoDOwIKX0jRzps0MqAKUEwnuK2N4vVp-XnCTq-INnHOrilMQV7Y0PFf8bI2tll9CH9vV8hvwQmzGQpftZt_ZyXhu5cHm7TsvV5fPoxt3_HB9O4rHboqRH7kigsJPKA4F4RSKlEohgyyAXsJpFkkUZB7BYYYFIRQjkiYi8UOZci_IEkkT3-87J93dudHvlbQlmymbyjznhdSVZQj5YQARRKRBj_6gU12ZovkdQ5CENICUoIYadlRqtLWNFzY3asZNzaDHWvOs9cxaz2xtvkmQLrFQuaz_w1l8Fz91wR--4In4</recordid><startdate>201901</startdate><enddate>201901</enddate><creator>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201901</creationdate><title>Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”</title><author>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4238-d81d3b947d6a91dc9ede5f510ba9f8e25f0647f4d669426cbdb37eca05fbe9b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Basin Plan</topic><topic>basins</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Environmental objective</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Insecurity</topic><topic>Irrigation</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>issues and policy</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>regulatory capture</topic><topic>Reviews</topic><topic>risk factors</topic><topic>stream flows</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>trade‐offs</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grafton, Rupert Quentin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots”</atitle><jtitle>The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics</jtitle><date>2019-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>116-141</pages><issn>1364-985X</issn><eissn>1467-8489</eissn><abstract>The water reforms undertaken in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia since 2007 have been viewed as a model for other countries seeking to respond to water insecurity. Here, a policy review is provided of this water reform and whether it delivers on key environmental objectives in the 2007 Water Act (the Act). The evaluation includes a review of the 2012 Basin Plan, a key instrument of the Act, and complementary policies associated with the acquisition of water entitlements for the environment via direct (reverse tenders) and indirect (infrastructure subsidies) means. Using the objects of the Act as a benchmark, an evaluation is provided of the following: (i) planned reductions in irrigation water extractions in the 2012 Basin Plan; (ii) risks associated with the 2018 amendments to the Basin Plan that, collectively, allow for an increase in irrigation water extractions of some 22 per cent, relative to the sustainable diversion limits specified in the 2012 Basin Plan; (iii) Basin‐scale environmental outcomes achieved, as of the end of 2018; and (iv) economic effects of direct and indirect methods of acquiring water for the environment. Findings from the review generate the “Do's” and “Do Nots” of water reform for Australia, and possibly other countries, when managing the trade‐offs between water for irrigation and the environment.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8489.12288</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1364-985X |
ispartof | The Australian journal of agricultural and resource economics, 2019-01, Vol.63 (1), p.116-141 |
issn | 1364-985X 1467-8489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2237512126 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Australia Basin Plan basins Economic impact Environmental objective Evaluation Infrastructure Insecurity Irrigation Irrigation water issues and policy Reforms regulatory capture Reviews risk factors stream flows Subsidies trade‐offs Water |
title | Policy review of water reform in the Murray–Darling Basin, Australia: the “do's” and “do'nots” |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Policy%20review%20of%20water%20reform%20in%20the%20Murray%E2%80%93Darling%20Basin,%20Australia:%20the%20%E2%80%9Cdo's%E2%80%9D%20and%20%E2%80%9Cdo'nots%E2%80%9D&rft.jtitle=The%20Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20and%20resource%20economics&rft.au=Grafton,%20Rupert%20Quentin&rft.date=2019-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=116-141&rft.issn=1364-985X&rft.eissn=1467-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8489.12288&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2167951962%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2167951962&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |