2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty

We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) non-anterior (NA) surgical approaches on prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and examined the impact of new perioperative protocols on PJI rates following all surgical approaches at a single institution. A total of 6086 consecutive patients undergoing prim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The bone & joint journal 2019-06, Vol.101-B (6_Supple_B), p.2-8
Hauptverfasser: Aggarwal, V K, Weintraub, S, Klock, J, Stachel, A, Phillips, M, Schwarzkopf, R, Iorio, R, Bosco, J, Zuckerman, J D, Vigdorchik, J M, Long, W J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 8
container_issue 6_Supple_B
container_start_page 2
container_title The bone & joint journal
container_volume 101-B
creator Aggarwal, V K
Weintraub, S
Klock, J
Stachel, A
Phillips, M
Schwarzkopf, R
Iorio, R
Bosco, J
Zuckerman, J D
Vigdorchik, J M
Long, W J
description We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) non-anterior (NA) surgical approaches on prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and examined the impact of new perioperative protocols on PJI rates following all surgical approaches at a single institution. A total of 6086 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a single institution between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data obtained from electronic patient medical records included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical approach, and presence of deep PJI. There were 3053 male patients (50.1%) and 3033 female patients (49.9%). The mean age and BMI of the entire cohort was 62.7 years (18 to 102, sd 12.3) and 28.8 kg/m (13.3 to 57.6, sd 6.1), respectively. Infection rates were calculated yearly for the DA and NA approach groups. Covariates were assessed and used in multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for risk of development of PJI with DA compared with NA approaches. In order to determine the effect of adopting a set of infection prevention protocols on PJI, we calculated ORs for PJI comparing patients undergoing THA for two distinct time periods: 2013 to 2014 and 2015 to 2016. These periods corresponded to before and after we implemented a set of perioperative infection protocols. There were 1985 patients in the DA group and 4101 patients in the NA group. The overall rate of PJI at our institution during the study period was 0.82% (50/6086) and decreased from 0.96% (12/1245) in 2013 to 0.53% (10/1870) in 2016. There were 24 deep PJIs in the DA group (1.22%) and 26 deep PJIs in the NA group (0.63%; p = 0.023). After multivariate analysis, the DA approach was 2.2 times more likely to result in PJI than the NA approach (OR 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.9); p = 0.006) for the overall study period. We found a higher rate of PJI in DA NA approaches. Infection prevention protocols such as use of aspirin, dilute povidone-iodine lavage, vancomycin powder, and Gram-negative coverage may have been positively associated with diminished PJI rates observed for all approaches over time. Cite this article: 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):2-8.
doi_str_mv 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-0786.R1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2233859332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2233859332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c189t-e0a0931585b73c04670c9f15939550b7dbb20321b71b84f9d35e30682c230bbd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkNtKAzEQhoMgttS-guSyN1snyR6y3rXFeqAgeADvSpLNsqnbZE1SpE_i6xqw4tz8wz__fAyD0IzAnDCg18CAZCWF9zkBsizny8fHjALhGVS8nD-TMzSmkNdZngMfoWkIO0jFgZCcXKARS1oWJYzRd9qq8doL-4FforGqa43uG7z4Er65wQus3H4Q3gRnsWvx4F2InY5G4Z0zNmJjW62iSVMvog5Y6viltcWN8cnHwkbtjfOpabB1Nvs3hsQSqsPRRdHjzgxY-Nh5N_QixOMlOm9FH_T0pBP0tr59Xd1nm6e7h9VikynC65hpEFAzUvBCVkxBXlag6pYUNauLAmTVSEmBUSIrInne1g0rNIOSU0UZSNmwCZr9ctM1nwcd4nZvgtJ9L6x2h7CllDGecIym6NUpepB73WwHb_bCH7d_z2Q_rvp6JA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2233859332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Aggarwal, V K ; Weintraub, S ; Klock, J ; Stachel, A ; Phillips, M ; Schwarzkopf, R ; Iorio, R ; Bosco, J ; Zuckerman, J D ; Vigdorchik, J M ; Long, W J</creator><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, V K ; Weintraub, S ; Klock, J ; Stachel, A ; Phillips, M ; Schwarzkopf, R ; Iorio, R ; Bosco, J ; Zuckerman, J D ; Vigdorchik, J M ; Long, W J</creatorcontrib><description>We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) non-anterior (NA) surgical approaches on prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and examined the impact of new perioperative protocols on PJI rates following all surgical approaches at a single institution. A total of 6086 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a single institution between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data obtained from electronic patient medical records included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical approach, and presence of deep PJI. There were 3053 male patients (50.1%) and 3033 female patients (49.9%). The mean age and BMI of the entire cohort was 62.7 years (18 to 102, sd 12.3) and 28.8 kg/m (13.3 to 57.6, sd 6.1), respectively. Infection rates were calculated yearly for the DA and NA approach groups. Covariates were assessed and used in multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for risk of development of PJI with DA compared with NA approaches. In order to determine the effect of adopting a set of infection prevention protocols on PJI, we calculated ORs for PJI comparing patients undergoing THA for two distinct time periods: 2013 to 2014 and 2015 to 2016. These periods corresponded to before and after we implemented a set of perioperative infection protocols. There were 1985 patients in the DA group and 4101 patients in the NA group. The overall rate of PJI at our institution during the study period was 0.82% (50/6086) and decreased from 0.96% (12/1245) in 2013 to 0.53% (10/1870) in 2016. There were 24 deep PJIs in the DA group (1.22%) and 26 deep PJIs in the NA group (0.63%; p = 0.023). After multivariate analysis, the DA approach was 2.2 times more likely to result in PJI than the NA approach (OR 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.9); p = 0.006) for the overall study period. We found a higher rate of PJI in DA NA approaches. Infection prevention protocols such as use of aspirin, dilute povidone-iodine lavage, vancomycin powder, and Gram-negative coverage may have been positively associated with diminished PJI rates observed for all approaches over time. Cite this article: 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):2-8.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2049-4408</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-0786.R1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31146560</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><ispartof>The bone &amp; joint journal, 2019-06, Vol.101-B (6_Supple_B), p.2-8</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c189t-e0a0931585b73c04670c9f15939550b7dbb20321b71b84f9d35e30682c230bbd3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31146560$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, V K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weintraub, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klock, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stachel, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosco, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigdorchik, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, W J</creatorcontrib><title>2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty</title><title>The bone &amp; joint journal</title><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><description>We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) non-anterior (NA) surgical approaches on prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and examined the impact of new perioperative protocols on PJI rates following all surgical approaches at a single institution. A total of 6086 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a single institution between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data obtained from electronic patient medical records included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical approach, and presence of deep PJI. There were 3053 male patients (50.1%) and 3033 female patients (49.9%). The mean age and BMI of the entire cohort was 62.7 years (18 to 102, sd 12.3) and 28.8 kg/m (13.3 to 57.6, sd 6.1), respectively. Infection rates were calculated yearly for the DA and NA approach groups. Covariates were assessed and used in multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for risk of development of PJI with DA compared with NA approaches. In order to determine the effect of adopting a set of infection prevention protocols on PJI, we calculated ORs for PJI comparing patients undergoing THA for two distinct time periods: 2013 to 2014 and 2015 to 2016. These periods corresponded to before and after we implemented a set of perioperative infection protocols. There were 1985 patients in the DA group and 4101 patients in the NA group. The overall rate of PJI at our institution during the study period was 0.82% (50/6086) and decreased from 0.96% (12/1245) in 2013 to 0.53% (10/1870) in 2016. There were 24 deep PJIs in the DA group (1.22%) and 26 deep PJIs in the NA group (0.63%; p = 0.023). After multivariate analysis, the DA approach was 2.2 times more likely to result in PJI than the NA approach (OR 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.9); p = 0.006) for the overall study period. We found a higher rate of PJI in DA NA approaches. Infection prevention protocols such as use of aspirin, dilute povidone-iodine lavage, vancomycin powder, and Gram-negative coverage may have been positively associated with diminished PJI rates observed for all approaches over time. Cite this article: 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):2-8.</description><issn>2049-4408</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkNtKAzEQhoMgttS-guSyN1snyR6y3rXFeqAgeADvSpLNsqnbZE1SpE_i6xqw4tz8wz__fAyD0IzAnDCg18CAZCWF9zkBsizny8fHjALhGVS8nD-TMzSmkNdZngMfoWkIO0jFgZCcXKARS1oWJYzRd9qq8doL-4FforGqa43uG7z4Er65wQus3H4Q3gRnsWvx4F2InY5G4Z0zNmJjW62iSVMvog5Y6viltcWN8cnHwkbtjfOpabB1Nvs3hsQSqsPRRdHjzgxY-Nh5N_QixOMlOm9FH_T0pBP0tr59Xd1nm6e7h9VikynC65hpEFAzUvBCVkxBXlag6pYUNauLAmTVSEmBUSIrInne1g0rNIOSU0UZSNmwCZr9ctM1nwcd4nZvgtJ9L6x2h7CllDGecIym6NUpepB73WwHb_bCH7d_z2Q_rvp6JA</recordid><startdate>201906</startdate><enddate>201906</enddate><creator>Aggarwal, V K</creator><creator>Weintraub, S</creator><creator>Klock, J</creator><creator>Stachel, A</creator><creator>Phillips, M</creator><creator>Schwarzkopf, R</creator><creator>Iorio, R</creator><creator>Bosco, J</creator><creator>Zuckerman, J D</creator><creator>Vigdorchik, J M</creator><creator>Long, W J</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201906</creationdate><title>2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty</title><author>Aggarwal, V K ; Weintraub, S ; Klock, J ; Stachel, A ; Phillips, M ; Schwarzkopf, R ; Iorio, R ; Bosco, J ; Zuckerman, J D ; Vigdorchik, J M ; Long, W J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c189t-e0a0931585b73c04670c9f15939550b7dbb20321b71b84f9d35e30682c230bbd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aggarwal, V K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weintraub, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klock, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stachel, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Phillips, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarzkopf, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iorio, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosco, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zuckerman, J D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigdorchik, J M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, W J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The bone &amp; joint journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aggarwal, V K</au><au>Weintraub, S</au><au>Klock, J</au><au>Stachel, A</au><au>Phillips, M</au><au>Schwarzkopf, R</au><au>Iorio, R</au><au>Bosco, J</au><au>Zuckerman, J D</au><au>Vigdorchik, J M</au><au>Long, W J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>The bone &amp; joint journal</jtitle><addtitle>Bone Joint J</addtitle><date>2019-06</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>101-B</volume><issue>6_Supple_B</issue><spage>2</spage><epage>8</epage><pages>2-8</pages><eissn>2049-4408</eissn><abstract>We studied the impact of direct anterior (DA) non-anterior (NA) surgical approaches on prosthetic joint infection (PJI), and examined the impact of new perioperative protocols on PJI rates following all surgical approaches at a single institution. A total of 6086 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) at a single institution between 2013 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Data obtained from electronic patient medical records included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), medical comorbidities, surgical approach, and presence of deep PJI. There were 3053 male patients (50.1%) and 3033 female patients (49.9%). The mean age and BMI of the entire cohort was 62.7 years (18 to 102, sd 12.3) and 28.8 kg/m (13.3 to 57.6, sd 6.1), respectively. Infection rates were calculated yearly for the DA and NA approach groups. Covariates were assessed and used in multivariate analysis to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for risk of development of PJI with DA compared with NA approaches. In order to determine the effect of adopting a set of infection prevention protocols on PJI, we calculated ORs for PJI comparing patients undergoing THA for two distinct time periods: 2013 to 2014 and 2015 to 2016. These periods corresponded to before and after we implemented a set of perioperative infection protocols. There were 1985 patients in the DA group and 4101 patients in the NA group. The overall rate of PJI at our institution during the study period was 0.82% (50/6086) and decreased from 0.96% (12/1245) in 2013 to 0.53% (10/1870) in 2016. There were 24 deep PJIs in the DA group (1.22%) and 26 deep PJIs in the NA group (0.63%; p = 0.023). After multivariate analysis, the DA approach was 2.2 times more likely to result in PJI than the NA approach (OR 2.2 (95% confidence interval 1.1 to 3.9); p = 0.006) for the overall study period. We found a higher rate of PJI in DA NA approaches. Infection prevention protocols such as use of aspirin, dilute povidone-iodine lavage, vancomycin powder, and Gram-negative coverage may have been positively associated with diminished PJI rates observed for all approaches over time. Cite this article: 2019;101-B(6 Supple B):2-8.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>31146560</pmid><doi>10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-0786.R1</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2049-4408
ispartof The bone & joint journal, 2019-06, Vol.101-B (6_Supple_B), p.2-8
issn 2049-4408
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2233859332
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
title 2019 Frank Stinchfield Award: A comparison of prosthetic joint infection rates between direct anterior and non-anterior approach total hip arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A21%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=2019%20Frank%20Stinchfield%20Award:%20A%20comparison%20of%20prosthetic%20joint%20infection%20rates%20between%20direct%20anterior%20and%20non-anterior%20approach%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=The%20bone%20&%20joint%20journal&rft.au=Aggarwal,%20V%20K&rft.date=2019-06&rft.volume=101-B&rft.issue=6_Supple_B&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=8&rft.pages=2-8&rft.eissn=2049-4408&rft_id=info:doi/10.1302/0301-620X.101B6.BJJ-2018-0786.R1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2233859332%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2233859332&rft_id=info:pmid/31146560&rfr_iscdi=true