Endolysin treatment against Staphylococcus aureus in adults with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial
To the Editor: Staphylococcus aureus density is increased in many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and is thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis, interacting with an altered skin barrier and immunologic changes.1 S aureus might induce or aggravate inflammation through different mechanisms...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology 2019-09, Vol.144 (3), p.860-863 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 863 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 860 |
container_title | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology |
container_volume | 144 |
creator | de Wit, Jill Totté, Joan E.E. van Mierlo, Minke M.F. van Veldhuizen, Joyce van Doorn, Martijn B.A. Schuren, Frank H.J. Willemsen, Sten P. Pardo, Luba M. Pasmans, Suzanne G.M.A. |
description | To the Editor: Staphylococcus aureus density is increased in many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and is thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis, interacting with an altered skin barrier and immunologic changes.1 S aureus might induce or aggravate inflammation through different mechanisms, for example through excretion of virulence factors, even if the S aureus overgrowth is primarily caused by other factors.2 Current guidelines only recommend antimicrobial therapy directed against S aureus in patients with clinically infected AD based on a Cochrane review in which no clinical benefit of short-term antimicrobial treatment in patients with noninfected AD was found.3 Arguably, long-term antistaphylococcal treatment, such as antibiotics, might reduce symptoms in patients with AD.4 However, this is undesired because antibiotics can affect the commensal microbiota and could induce bacterial resistance.5 In contrast, long-term treatment of AD with an endolysin that targets only S aureus is feasible. Clinical efficacy was measured by using the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigators Global Assessment, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, and pruritus Numeric Rating Scale and by registration of the number of flares. [...]daily use of an emollient and good compliance with the treatment could have resulted in a reduction in triamcinolone use in both the endolysin and vehicle groups.7 Because AD is a heterogeneous disease, anti–S aureus treatment might not be suitable for all patients with AD, indicating the need for subphenotyping. Because only 56% of our study population had 2 consecutive positive S aureus skin cultures (indicating persistent colonization) before the start of the intervention, the target population that would probably benefit the most from endolysin treatment was small. [...]long-term targeted endolysin treatment against S aureus in this study was well tolerated but had no TCS-sparing effect in patients with AD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.020 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2233857324</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0091674919306918</els_id><sourcerecordid>2233857324</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b23d60c5792a68f82c08977f83bc6ee06fca0c8242c06dd42b2482495cfc6fdd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhy0EokvhBTggS1x6SfCfxLERl6pqAalSD4Wz5R071JETL7YDWp6mz8KT1astHDhwmhn5m59G_hB6TUlLCRXvpnYy4FtGqGpJ3xJGnqANJWpohGT9U7QhRNFGDJ06QS9ynkiduVTP0QmntOtrv0HpcrEx7LNfcEnOlNktBZtvxi-54Ntidnf7ECECrBmbNblaKmrsGkrGP325w6bEnQdsXZpN8cXn9_j8930yNXf2v5zFEJeSYgi1Lcmb8BI9G03I7tVjPUVfry6_XHxqrm8-fr44v26gY7I0W8atINAPihkhR8mASDUMo-RbEM4RMYIhIFlXH4S1Hduyrk6qhxHEaC0_RWfH3F2K31eXi559BheCWVxcs2aMc9kPnHUVffsPOsU1LfW6SkmuKOsprRQ7UpBizsmNepf8bNJeU6IPRvSkD0b0wYgmva5G6tKbx-h1Ozv7d-WPggp8OAKu_sUP75LO4N0CzvrkoGgb_f_yHwCOSZ8e</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2283912511</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endolysin treatment against Staphylococcus aureus in adults with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>de Wit, Jill ; Totté, Joan E.E. ; van Mierlo, Minke M.F. ; van Veldhuizen, Joyce ; van Doorn, Martijn B.A. ; Schuren, Frank H.J. ; Willemsen, Sten P. ; Pardo, Luba M. ; Pasmans, Suzanne G.M.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Jill ; Totté, Joan E.E. ; van Mierlo, Minke M.F. ; van Veldhuizen, Joyce ; van Doorn, Martijn B.A. ; Schuren, Frank H.J. ; Willemsen, Sten P. ; Pardo, Luba M. ; Pasmans, Suzanne G.M.A.</creatorcontrib><description>To the Editor: Staphylococcus aureus density is increased in many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and is thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis, interacting with an altered skin barrier and immunologic changes.1 S aureus might induce or aggravate inflammation through different mechanisms, for example through excretion of virulence factors, even if the S aureus overgrowth is primarily caused by other factors.2 Current guidelines only recommend antimicrobial therapy directed against S aureus in patients with clinically infected AD based on a Cochrane review in which no clinical benefit of short-term antimicrobial treatment in patients with noninfected AD was found.3 Arguably, long-term antistaphylococcal treatment, such as antibiotics, might reduce symptoms in patients with AD.4 However, this is undesired because antibiotics can affect the commensal microbiota and could induce bacterial resistance.5 In contrast, long-term treatment of AD with an endolysin that targets only S aureus is feasible. Clinical efficacy was measured by using the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigators Global Assessment, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, and pruritus Numeric Rating Scale and by registration of the number of flares. [...]daily use of an emollient and good compliance with the treatment could have resulted in a reduction in triamcinolone use in both the endolysin and vehicle groups.7 Because AD is a heterogeneous disease, anti–S aureus treatment might not be suitable for all patients with AD, indicating the need for subphenotyping. Because only 56% of our study population had 2 consecutive positive S aureus skin cultures (indicating persistent colonization) before the start of the intervention, the target population that would probably benefit the most from endolysin treatment was small. [...]long-term targeted endolysin treatment against S aureus in this study was well tolerated but had no TCS-sparing effect in patients with AD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-6749</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6825</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.020</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31145938</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Antibiotics ; Atopic dermatitis ; Colonization ; Dermatitis ; Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy ; Double-Blind Method ; Eczema ; Endopeptidases - therapeutic use ; Excretion ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical treatment ; Microbiota ; Middle Aged ; Patients ; Population studies ; Pruritus ; Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use ; Skin diseases ; Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy ; Staphylococcus aureus ; Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Virulence factors ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2019-09, Vol.144 (3), p.860-863</ispartof><rights>2019 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology</rights><rights>2019. American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b23d60c5792a68f82c08977f83bc6ee06fca0c8242c06dd42b2482495cfc6fdd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b23d60c5792a68f82c08977f83bc6ee06fca0c8242c06dd42b2482495cfc6fdd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091674919306918$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31145938$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totté, Joan E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Mierlo, Minke M.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Veldhuizen, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Doorn, Martijn B.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuren, Frank H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemsen, Sten P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Luba M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasmans, Suzanne G.M.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Endolysin treatment against Staphylococcus aureus in adults with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial</title><title>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</title><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><description>To the Editor: Staphylococcus aureus density is increased in many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and is thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis, interacting with an altered skin barrier and immunologic changes.1 S aureus might induce or aggravate inflammation through different mechanisms, for example through excretion of virulence factors, even if the S aureus overgrowth is primarily caused by other factors.2 Current guidelines only recommend antimicrobial therapy directed against S aureus in patients with clinically infected AD based on a Cochrane review in which no clinical benefit of short-term antimicrobial treatment in patients with noninfected AD was found.3 Arguably, long-term antistaphylococcal treatment, such as antibiotics, might reduce symptoms in patients with AD.4 However, this is undesired because antibiotics can affect the commensal microbiota and could induce bacterial resistance.5 In contrast, long-term treatment of AD with an endolysin that targets only S aureus is feasible. Clinical efficacy was measured by using the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigators Global Assessment, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, and pruritus Numeric Rating Scale and by registration of the number of flares. [...]daily use of an emollient and good compliance with the treatment could have resulted in a reduction in triamcinolone use in both the endolysin and vehicle groups.7 Because AD is a heterogeneous disease, anti–S aureus treatment might not be suitable for all patients with AD, indicating the need for subphenotyping. Because only 56% of our study population had 2 consecutive positive S aureus skin cultures (indicating persistent colonization) before the start of the intervention, the target population that would probably benefit the most from endolysin treatment was small. [...]long-term targeted endolysin treatment against S aureus in this study was well tolerated but had no TCS-sparing effect in patients with AD.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Antibiotics</subject><subject>Atopic dermatitis</subject><subject>Colonization</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Eczema</subject><subject>Endopeptidases - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Excretion</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Microbiota</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pruritus</subject><subject>Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Skin diseases</subject><subject>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</subject><subject>Staphylococcus aureus</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Virulence factors</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0091-6749</issn><issn>1097-6825</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9u1DAQhy0EokvhBTggS1x6SfCfxLERl6pqAalSD4Wz5R071JETL7YDWp6mz8KT1astHDhwmhn5m59G_hB6TUlLCRXvpnYy4FtGqGpJ3xJGnqANJWpohGT9U7QhRNFGDJ06QS9ynkiduVTP0QmntOtrv0HpcrEx7LNfcEnOlNktBZtvxi-54Ntidnf7ECECrBmbNblaKmrsGkrGP325w6bEnQdsXZpN8cXn9_j8930yNXf2v5zFEJeSYgi1Lcmb8BI9G03I7tVjPUVfry6_XHxqrm8-fr44v26gY7I0W8atINAPihkhR8mASDUMo-RbEM4RMYIhIFlXH4S1Hduyrk6qhxHEaC0_RWfH3F2K31eXi559BheCWVxcs2aMc9kPnHUVffsPOsU1LfW6SkmuKOsprRQ7UpBizsmNepf8bNJeU6IPRvSkD0b0wYgmva5G6tKbx-h1Ozv7d-WPggp8OAKu_sUP75LO4N0CzvrkoGgb_f_yHwCOSZ8e</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>de Wit, Jill</creator><creator>Totté, Joan E.E.</creator><creator>van Mierlo, Minke M.F.</creator><creator>van Veldhuizen, Joyce</creator><creator>van Doorn, Martijn B.A.</creator><creator>Schuren, Frank H.J.</creator><creator>Willemsen, Sten P.</creator><creator>Pardo, Luba M.</creator><creator>Pasmans, Suzanne G.M.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Endolysin treatment against Staphylococcus aureus in adults with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial</title><author>de Wit, Jill ; Totté, Joan E.E. ; van Mierlo, Minke M.F. ; van Veldhuizen, Joyce ; van Doorn, Martijn B.A. ; Schuren, Frank H.J. ; Willemsen, Sten P. ; Pardo, Luba M. ; Pasmans, Suzanne G.M.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c428t-b23d60c5792a68f82c08977f83bc6ee06fca0c8242c06dd42b2482495cfc6fdd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Antibiotics</topic><topic>Atopic dermatitis</topic><topic>Colonization</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Eczema</topic><topic>Endopeptidases - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Excretion</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Microbiota</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pruritus</topic><topic>Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Skin diseases</topic><topic>Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy</topic><topic>Staphylococcus aureus</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Virulence factors</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Wit, Jill</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Totté, Joan E.E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Mierlo, Minke M.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Veldhuizen, Joyce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Doorn, Martijn B.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuren, Frank H.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willemsen, Sten P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pardo, Luba M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pasmans, Suzanne G.M.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Wit, Jill</au><au>Totté, Joan E.E.</au><au>van Mierlo, Minke M.F.</au><au>van Veldhuizen, Joyce</au><au>van Doorn, Martijn B.A.</au><au>Schuren, Frank H.J.</au><au>Willemsen, Sten P.</au><au>Pardo, Luba M.</au><au>Pasmans, Suzanne G.M.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endolysin treatment against Staphylococcus aureus in adults with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of allergy and clinical immunology</jtitle><addtitle>J Allergy Clin Immunol</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>144</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>860</spage><epage>863</epage><pages>860-863</pages><issn>0091-6749</issn><eissn>1097-6825</eissn><abstract>To the Editor: Staphylococcus aureus density is increased in many patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and is thought to contribute to disease pathogenesis, interacting with an altered skin barrier and immunologic changes.1 S aureus might induce or aggravate inflammation through different mechanisms, for example through excretion of virulence factors, even if the S aureus overgrowth is primarily caused by other factors.2 Current guidelines only recommend antimicrobial therapy directed against S aureus in patients with clinically infected AD based on a Cochrane review in which no clinical benefit of short-term antimicrobial treatment in patients with noninfected AD was found.3 Arguably, long-term antistaphylococcal treatment, such as antibiotics, might reduce symptoms in patients with AD.4 However, this is undesired because antibiotics can affect the commensal microbiota and could induce bacterial resistance.5 In contrast, long-term treatment of AD with an endolysin that targets only S aureus is feasible. Clinical efficacy was measured by using the Eczema Area and Severity Index, Investigators Global Assessment, Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure, and pruritus Numeric Rating Scale and by registration of the number of flares. [...]daily use of an emollient and good compliance with the treatment could have resulted in a reduction in triamcinolone use in both the endolysin and vehicle groups.7 Because AD is a heterogeneous disease, anti–S aureus treatment might not be suitable for all patients with AD, indicating the need for subphenotyping. Because only 56% of our study population had 2 consecutive positive S aureus skin cultures (indicating persistent colonization) before the start of the intervention, the target population that would probably benefit the most from endolysin treatment was small. [...]long-term targeted endolysin treatment against S aureus in this study was well tolerated but had no TCS-sparing effect in patients with AD.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>31145938</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.020</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-6749 |
ispartof | Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2019-09, Vol.144 (3), p.860-863 |
issn | 0091-6749 1097-6825 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2233857324 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Antibiotics Atopic dermatitis Colonization Dermatitis Dermatitis, Atopic - drug therapy Double-Blind Method Eczema Endopeptidases - therapeutic use Excretion Female Humans Male Medical treatment Microbiota Middle Aged Patients Population studies Pruritus Recombinant Proteins - therapeutic use Skin diseases Staphylococcal Infections - drug therapy Staphylococcus aureus Studies Treatment Outcome Virulence factors Young Adult |
title | Endolysin treatment against Staphylococcus aureus in adults with atopic dermatitis: A randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T04%3A43%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endolysin%20treatment%20against%20Staphylococcus%20aureus%20in%20adults%20with%20atopic%20dermatitis:%20A%C2%A0randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20allergy%20and%20clinical%20immunology&rft.au=de%20Wit,%20Jill&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=144&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=860&rft.epage=863&rft.pages=860-863&rft.issn=0091-6749&rft.eissn=1097-6825&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaci.2019.05.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2233857324%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2283912511&rft_id=info:pmid/31145938&rft_els_id=S0091674919306918&rfr_iscdi=true |